The subject of this work is Lithuanian historical novel transformation. (P. Dirgela‘s „Kingdom“) In this work Lithuanian paradigm transformation of Lithianian historical novel is analyzed. Basic attention is commited to P. Dirgela‘s novels cycle „Kingdom“, which was written in 20 century. This influental work hardly ever investigated in Lithuanian literature and criticism. Reviewing Lithuanian historical novel evolution, innovation of „Kingdom“ in Lithuanian prose context is emphasized. „Kingdom“ deconstructs traditional Lithuanian historical paradigm, promoted historical distantion clearness. P. Dirgela‘s work introduces historical implications of Lithuanian past, though author`s and reader`s close time is determined. It is the first decade of independent Lithuania. Historical plane there assumes new literary expression forms. P.Dirgela‘s novel is the complicated „postmodern“ structure work, in which each part is developing new statehood process and it`s present poetic expression aspects. Historical dimension is raised as structure of work, author`s and reader`s found stories and nowadays connection , analogues, phenomenological time providence. „Kingdom“ is the unique piece both in Lithuanian and in the whole historical prose. The work reveals such new prose position, represents open retrospective providence, join modern and postmodern literary expression means. Task of master`s work contains introduction and three sections: „Lithuanian historical novel in... [to full text]

P. Dirgėlos ,,Karalystė“ atspindi istorinio romano virsmus. Procesų cikliškumas (praeities sugrįžimas į dabartį) valstybės istorijoje, vieno proceso ar reiškinio priklausomybė nuo kito – tai P. Dirgėlos literatūrinių vaizdų ir mąstymo esmė. „Karalystę“ galima suvokti kaip dialoginę mito ir istorijos struktūrą, o steigiamą Karalystės erdvę – kaip mitoistorinę realybę. ,,Karalystėje“ pristatyta simbolinės realybės struktūra iš esmės sutampa su mitinės, istorinės, socialinės ar kitokios realybės struktūromis. Pasirinktas tik vienas iš daugelio šiam veikalui reikšmingų jo simbolinės tvarkos epicentrų: mitinė jūra ir iš jos kylantis mitinis jūrinės Lietuvos valstybės vaizdas. Darbo tikslas yra įvardyti mitinę jūrinės (Lietuvos) valstybės realybę ir aptarti jos santykį su kitomis simbolinėmis struktūromis Petro Dirgėlos romane ,,Karalystė“. Rašant darbą buvo remiamasi šiuolaikinėmis mito teorijomis, hermeneutiniu ir psichoanalitiniu mito realybės interpretavimu, istoriniu kultūriniu literatūros aiškinimu, istorijos ir literatūros subjekto struktūros samprata J. Lacano ir kitų autorių veikaluose. / P. Dirgėla’s „Kingdom” reflects the conversions of a historical novel. P. Dirgėla’s literary images and basis of thinking is related with cyclical processes in the history of the state (when the past returns to the present) as well as the interdependence of processes or phenomenon’s. „The Kingdom”can be understood as the interactive structure of myth and history and the set up of the Kingdom’s space as mitohistorical reality. The symbolic structure of reality presented in the „Kingdom” largely coherent with the mythical, historical, social or other structures of reality. There was selected only one of the most significant works of the symbolic epicenter of the procedure: a mythical marine and the rising image of Lithuania as mythical marine state. The aim of this paper is to identify the reality of Lithuania as the mythical marine state and discuss its relationship with other symbolic structures in P. Dirgėla’s novel „The Kingdom”. The writing of the work is based on modern theories of myth, hermeneutical and psychoanalytical interpretation of myth reality, historical and cultural interpretation of literature as well as on the concept of history and literature body structure which is found in J. Lacan and other author’s works.