The effects of polymer concentration and solvents on cocrystal morphology of low solubility drugs were investigated, both of which had an impact. The melting temperatures also decreased with increasing polymer concentration. Placing the binding agent, benzene, at different interfaces induced morphological changes, such as formation of porous cocrystals. Previously liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS) has been reported as a hindrance in the crystallisation process impeding further development. A phase diagram was constructed, and different phases were categorised into 4 types. After separation of the highly concentrated amorphous Oil Phase II, it was prone to gradual crystallisation. Crystallisation took place over 30-60 minutes; this allowed the in-situ monitoring. A novel cocrystallisation technique was developed; from (LLPS). Cocrystals of indomethacin with saccharin and nicotinamide were obtained by mixing Oil Phase II with the coformers. In-situ monitoring by spectroscopic had gradual changes in spectra; characteristic peaks increased in height and area with the formation of crystals until the reaction was complete. With crystal formation, the XRD spectra gradually had a sharper baseline due to a decrease in the amorphous indomethacin. The photoluminescence (PL) spectra displayed several peaks coupling into one large hump together with increasing intensity as the sample crystallised. There was a shift in the peak absorbance of the pure drug crystals obtained from LLPS and the indomethacin:saccharin cocrystal obtained from LLPS. Amorphous stabilisation was achieved by mixing polymer (PVP) with Oil Phase II. There were no changes to the XRD diffractogram as the sample did not undergo crystallisation.

Yes / Cocrystals consist of two molecules bonded together in a single crystal lattice giving rise to wide applications including improving solubility of poorly soluble pharmaceuticals. Cocrystallization reaction occurs in the oily phase of liquid–liquid phase separation (LLPS) after it is mixed with coformers. Indomethacin–saccharin cocrystal formation was monitored in situ, and the kinetics of crystallization were determined. The crystallization rates show that the process can be proposed to prevent unwanted oily phase formation during LLPS. / Research Development Fund Publication Prize Award winner, Sep 2022.

No description available.

Le système ubiquitine-protéasome représente une plateforme de signalisation cellulaire chez les eucaryotes et joue un rôle majeur dans la coordination des processus cellulaires. Des progrès récents suggèrent que l’ubiquitination joue un rôle important dans les phénomènes de séparation de phase liquide-liquide (LLPS), un processus permettant la localisation d’une quantité accrue de protéines dans un compartiment subcellulaire, afin de réaliser une fonction biologique. En effet, il a été démontré que l’ubiquitination joue un rôle central dans les mécanismes qui gouvernent la LLPS durant la formation des granules de stress dans le cytoplasme ou les foci de réparation de l’ADN dans le noyau. D’autre part, chez la levure, des travaux ont montré que le protéasome est capable de s’assembler sous forme de granules dans le cytoplasme suite à un stress métabolique. Toutefois, les mécanismes par lesquels le système ubiquitine-protéasome ainsi que ses régulateurs contrôlent les processus de LLPS restent à déterminer. Dans la première étude de cette thèse, nous avons investigué le mécanisme d’action de la déubiquitinase USP16, qui a été suggérée comme un régulateur négatif de la LLPS, empêchant la formation des foci de réparations de dommages à l’ADN. Cependant, nos résultats démontrent que USP16 est majoritairement cytoplasmique et que seulement une entrée forcée de USP16 dans le noyau empêche la formation des foci de réparation des cassures double brin induites par des radiations ionisagntes et ce en favorisant la déubiquitination de l’histone H2A. De plus, aucune translocation nucléaire de USP16 n’a été observée durant le cycle cellulaire ou suite à des dommages à l’ADN. Nos travaux montrent que USP16 est activement exclue du noyau via son signal d’export nucléaire et régulerait indirectement la LLPS menant à la formation des foci de réparation de l’ADN. Dans la deuxième étude, nous décrivons le comportement dynamique des protéines du protéasome lors d’une LLPS induite par un stress métabolique. Nos résultats indiquent que le protéasome forme des foci distincts dans le noyau des cellules humaines en réponse à une privation de nutriments. Nous avons constaté que ces foci sont enrichis en ubiquitine conjuguée et nous avons démontré que le récepteur d’ubiquitine Rad23B ainsi que l’absence des acides aminés non essentiels sont des éléments clés nécessaires à l’assemblage de ces foci du iv protéasome. De plus, des expériences de survie cellulaire montrent que la présence de ces foci est associée à la mort des cellules par apoptose. En conclusion, nos travaux mettent en lumière l’importance du système ubiquitine-protéasome dans la formation et la régulation des foci cellulaires suite à une LLPS. De même, cette étude aidera également à approfondir notre compréhension sur les mécanismes qui gouvernent l’homéostasie des protéines, la survie cellulaire et le développement du cancer. / The ubiquitin-proteasome system represents a major cell-signaling platform in eukaryotes and plays a pivotal role in the coordination of cellular processes. Recent studies provided evidence that ubiquitination plays a role in liquid-liquid phase separation (LLPS), a process that results in the localization of highly increased levels of a protein in a defined subcellular compartment, in order to achieve a biological function. Indeed, ubiquitination has been shown to play a central role in the mechanisms that govern LLPS and subsequent formation of stress granules in the cytoplasm or the DNA repair foci in the nucleus. On the other hand, several studies have shown that the proteasome itself is able to form granules in the cytoplasm following metabolic stress in yeasts. However, the mechanisms by which the ubiquitin-proteasome system and its regulators control LLPS processes remain to be determined. In the first study of this thesis, we investigated the mechanism of action of USP16 deubiquitinase, which has been suggested as a negative regulator of LLPS preventing the formation of DNA damage repair foci. However, our results demonstrate that USP16 is predominantly cytoplasmic and that only enforced nuclear entry of USP16 prevents the formation of repair foci after double strand breaks induced by ionizing radiation, and this by promoting the deubiquitination of histone H2A. In addition, no nuclear translocation of USP16 was observed during cell cycle or following DNA damage. Our study shows that USP16 is actively excluded from the nucleus via its nuclear export signal and would indirectly regulate LLPS that lead to DNA repair foci. In the second study, we describe the dynamic behavior of proteasome proteins during metabolic stress, a process that involves LLPS. Our results indicate that the proteasome forms distinct foci in the nucleus of human cells in response to nutrients deprivation. We found that these foci are enriched with conjugated ubiquitin and demonstrated that the ubiquitin receptor Rad23B as well as the absence of nonessential amino acids are the key elements necessary for the assembly of these proteasome foci. In addition, cell survival experiments show that the presence of these foci is associated with cell death by apoptosis. In conclusion, our work has shed new light on the importance of the ubiquitin-proteasome system in the formation and regulation of cell foci following LLPS. Likewise, this vi study will also help deepen our understanding of the mechanisms leading to protein homeostasis, cell survival and cancer development.