鄭漢文. / 手稿本, 複本據原稿影印. / Thesis (M.A.)--香港中文大學硏究院哲學學部. / Shou gao ben, fu ben ju yuan gao ying yin. / Includes bibliographical references: leaves 239-244. / Zheng Hanwen. / Thesis (M.A.)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue yan jiu yuan zhe xue xue bu. / 前言（代序） --- p.1 / 體例說明 --- p.3 / Chapter 第一章 --- 導言 --- p.5 / Chapter 1 --- 本文之目的，進路及綱要 --- p.6 / Chapter 2 --- 生命形式八段引文之摘錄及中譯 --- p.9 / Chapter 3 --- 關於生命形式的三項要點 --- p.21 / Chapter 第二章 --- 透過語言看成遊戲的類比，展示生命形式的一般用法及意義 --- p.33 / Chapter 4 --- 語言看成遊戲的類比：語言遊戲 --- p.34 / Chapter 5 --- 說話（語言）是生命形式的一部份 --- p.45 / Chapter 6 --- 想像一種語言意即想像一種生命形式 --- p.60 / Chapter 7 --- 人們在語言中互相一致；這是在生命形式上的一致 --- p.83 / Chapter 8 --- 那定要接受的及被給與的是種種生命形式 --- p.109 / Chapter 第三章 --- 透過「語言用作交通」的現象展示「生命形式」的特殊用法及意義 --- p.136 / Chapter 9 --- 「語言用作交通」的現象：言說三為 --- p.137 / Chapter 10 --- 「希望」是掌握語言運用後的生命形式的樣態 --- p.153 / Chapter 11 --- 一種生命形式積聚於一句「信念的述辭」 --- p.170 / Chapter 12 --- 把「確定性」看作一種生命形式 --- p.182 / Chapter 13 --- 通過夜談（對話）作出生命形式的夜徑 --- p.200 / Chapter 第四章 --- 總結 --- p.211 / Chapter 14 --- 維根斯坦之生命形式 --- p.212 / Chapter 15 --- 全文撮要 --- p.222 / 後語（附錄） --- p.224 / 註釋 --- p.227 / 參考書目 --- p.232

呂子德. / 手稿本, 複本據稿本印影. / Thesis (M.A.)--香港中文大學, 1989. / Shou gao ben, fu ben ju gao ben yin ying. / Includes bibliographical references: leaves 84-89. / Lü Zide. / Thesis (M.A.)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue, 1989. / Chapter 第一章 --- 引言 --- p.1 / Chapter 第二章 --- 總論篇 --- p.11 / Chapter 第三章 --- 空之多重涵義及語言的應用限域 --- p.39 / Chapter 第四章 --- 語言陷阱及破解之道 --- p.62 / Chapter 第五章 --- 總結 --- p.79

傅昌權. / 稿本複印本. / Thesis (M.A.)--香港中文大學. / Gao ben fu yin ben. / Includes bibliographical references: leaves 138-143. / Fu Changquan. / Thesis (M.A.)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue.

Thesis. 1977. Ph.D.--Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy. / MICROFICHE COPY AVAILABLE IN ARCHIVES AND HUMANITIES. / Vita. / Bibliography : leaves 231-236. / Ph.D.

No description available.

哲學家多認為日常關于語意的陳述 (如:「單身漢」意即未婚男性)乃事實陳述，陳述語義事實。這些哲學家大都還認為語義事實有物理基礎。對此本文提出兩重反駁。首先，語義事實並無物理基礎，因此 (物理主義認為)根本不存在語義事實。其次，日常語義話語既不陳述語義事實，也不要求語義事實存在，而應理解為一種虛構。第一章論證第一點 (基于Kripke的論證，但据本文目的作了適當裁剪):任何具備表徵能力的物理系統皆等價於擁有某一獨特、確定功能的機器;若語義事實有物理基礎，則功能事實當有物理基礎，但功能事實並無物理基礎。第二章首先論證日常語義話語不要求語義事實存在 (因我們對其存在與否實無所謂)，其次論證虛構話語 (如「Crotone在意大利的足弓上」)乃理解日常語義話語的最佳模型。將語義話語理解為虛構，非但合理可信，且多有啟發。本文結論認為，自然主義本身雖毋庸置疑，尋求自然主義的意義/表徵理論卻是緣木求魚。 / Many philosophers believe that the folk talk of meaning (e.g. “ ‘Bachelor’ means unmarried man“) states facts about meaning, or semantic facts. Most of them further believe that these facts are grounded in the physical reality. I argue against both views: (1) there are no semantic facts, insofar as they must be physically grounded; (2) meaning-talk does not state semantic facts, is not committed to them, and should instead be understood as a kind of make-believe. Chapter 1 presents an argument for (1), rst expounded (I think) by Kripke and here modied for my purpose. The argument is that any physical system with any representational capacity at all can be regarded as having a unique, determinate function; thus if representation--hence meaning--is physically grounded, so must be the function; but no such function can be physically grounded. Chapter 2 argues, rst, that meaning-talk does not commit us to semantic facts because we are indifferent to their existence. Second, that make-believe utterances (e.g. “Crotone is on the arch of the Italian boot“) more than any other discourse provide a good model for meaning-talk. Construing meaning-talk as make-believe is plausible and illuminating. I conclude that, while naturalism (I believe) is true, the attempt to naturalise meaning and representation is misguided. / Detailed summary in vernacular field only. / Shen, Jian. / Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2012. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 83-85). / Abstracts also in Chinese. / Abstract --- p.i / Acknowledgements --- p.iii / Table of Contents --- p.iv / Introduction --- p.1 / The First Thesis --- p.1 / The Second Thesis --- p.6 / Chapter 1 --- To Repudiate an Ontology --- p.9 / Chapter 1.1 --- Argument for Semantic Anti-Realism --- p.9 / Chapter 1.1.1 --- Premise One --- p.12 / Chapter 1.1.2 --- Premise Two --- p.14 / Chapter 1.2 --- Naturalisers’ Program --- p.19 / Chapter 1.2.1 --- Against Dretske --- p.24 / Chapter 1.2.2 --- Against Millikan --- p.28 / Chapter 1.2.3 --- Against Fodor --- p.35 / Chapter 1.3 --- An Exegetical Appendix --- p.39 / Chapter 2 --- While Enjoying Its Benefit --- p.43 / Chapter 2.1 --- Argument for Non-Commitment --- p.43 / Chapter 2.2 --- Another Argument for Non-Commitment --- p.44 / Chapter 2.2.1 --- Objections and Replies --- p.46 / Chapter 2.3 --- The Fictionalist Hypothesis --- p.60 / Chapter 2.3.1 --- Searching for a Model --- p.60 / Chapter 2.3.2 --- Why the Model Is Good --- p.65 / Chapter 2.3.3 --- Other Models --- p.71 / Chapter 2.3.4 --- Objections and Replies --- p.73 / Conclusion --- p.82 / Bibliography --- p.83

by Li, Chi Ho. / Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 1997. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 39-40). / Abstract --- p.i / Introduction --- p.1 / Mathematical Linguistics in a Nutshell --- p.4 / Two Classical Arguments --- p.8 / The Arguments from Sluicing and Doubling Relative Constructions --- p.11 / The Argument from the English such that constructions --- p.15 / The Argument from German constructions --- p.20 / The Argument from Feature Agreement --- p.23 / The Argument from Unbounded Dependency --- p.28 / Conclusion --- p.35 / Glossary --- p.37 / Bibliography --- p.39

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.