Spelling suggestions: "subject:"deader performance"" "subject:"1eader performance""
1 |
Exploring school district supports and the strength of leader efficacy: a case studyBaldwin, Caroline Michele 29 April 2010 (has links)
This study explores school district supports for leader efficacy. Enhancing
leadership self and collective efficacy (LSE & LCE) positively impacts leader
performance, which advances student learning and supports school improvement. I
conducted a bounded case study of an urban school district. Evidence of district
conditions and supports came from district documents, a survey and interview data. LSE
and LCE were measured for 32 principals and vice-principals. This study supports the
findings of an earlier study that identified ways in which district leaders, through district conditions, have the greatest impact on LSE and LCE. Evidence revealed that the district under study satisfied these conditions and also showed strong measurements of both LSE and LCE. The results show this district is finding effective ways to support and enhance
LSE and LCE. District conditions are described and recommendations for continued
improvement made.
|
2 |
Implicit personality and leadership in stressful and dangerous situations: a first stepSmith, Daniel R. 05 April 2012 (has links)
Leadership in stressful and dangerous situations is vitally important in terms of lives, property, and national strategic objectives. But our understanding of effective leadership in these and other contexts is limited. Part of the problem is that interactionist theoretical perspectives are not reflected in contemporary leadership thinking. In addition, the impact of individual differences on leadership is often misrepresented or hidden by linear correlations and regressions conducted on continuous scores. This study employed new, innovative, indirect conditional reasoning measures to assess the personalities of 627 leaders entering the militaryâ s most challenging and stressful combat leader development course (the US Army Ranger School). These innovative measures predicted compelling differences in leadership, attrition, and in the peer evaluations made during the training. Analyses conducted on the continuous personality scores demonstrate that these findings are misrepresented or hidden by linear correlations and regressions. As an alternative, I present a configural scoring scheme, couched in a poker analogy, to explain how these individual differences combine to predict the odds of success for each of the 18 personality types studied.
|
Page generated in 0.078 seconds