Spelling suggestions: "subject:"likerttype scale"" "subject:"likentype scale""
1 |
Employee perceptions on managing diversity in the workplace / S.G. RalepeliRalepeli, Selebeli Gideon January 2008 (has links)
Thesis (M.B.A.)--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2009.
|
2 |
Employee perceptions on managing diversity in the workplace / S.G. RalepeliRalepeli, Selebeli Gideon January 2008 (has links)
Thesis (M.B.A.)--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2009.
|
3 |
Employee perceptions on managing diversity in the workplace / S.G. RalepeliRalepeli, Selebeli Gideon January 2008 (has links)
Thesis (M.B.A.)--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2009.
|
4 |
[en] BARRA DA TIJUCA: AN ERGONOMIC APPROACH TO PEDESTRIANS CONDITIONS / [pt] ABORDAGEM ERGONÔMICA DA SITUAÇÃO DO PEDESTRE NA BARRA DA TIJUCAGIUSEPPE AMADO DE OLIVEIRA 17 August 2004 (has links)
[pt] Esta pesquisa é uma abordagem ergonômica sobre a situação
do pedestre nas vias da Barra da Tijuca, localizado na zona
oeste da cidade do Rio de Janeiro. O usuário que necessita
utilizar as calçadas do bairro sofre constrangimentos ao
interagir com o espaço urbano bairro. Realizaram-se estudos
exploratórios com observações assistemáticas e entrevistas
semi-estruturadas para, posteriormente, elaborar e aplica
questionário e a escala de avaliação tipo Likert.
Pesquisaram-se os problemas ergonômicos do pedestre no
ambiente construído e avaliou-se o seu grau de satisfação
com a região. / [en] This research is about an ergonomic approach of pedestrian
situation in Barra da Tijuca borough, in Rio de Janeiro.
The pedestrian who needs use the Barra`s sidewalks has
constraints when interacts with the urban space. The
initial study was assistematic observation and semi-
structured interview. Later, questionnaire forms were
applied with Likert-type Scale. The ergonomics problems of
the pedestrian in built environment were studied and user`s
satisfaction degree related to Barra was evaluated.
|
5 |
[pt] AVALIAÇÃO DO NÍVEL DE UTILIZAÇÃO DE CONCEITOS BÁSICOS E DE INICIATIVAS E PRÁTICAS DE GERENCIAMENTO DA CADEIA DE SUPRIMENTOS: UM SURVEY NO SETOR DE PRESTAÇÃO DE SERVIÇOS LOGÍSTICOS NO ESTADO DO PARÁ / [en] EVALUATION USAGE LEVEL OF BASIC CONCEPTS AND INITIATIVES AND PRACTICES OF SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT: A SURVEY ON PROVIDE LOGISTICS SERVICES SECTOR IN THE STATE OF PARÁ28 February 2013 (has links)
[pt] A prática de terceirização das atividades logísticas pelas empresas é
bastante comum no cenário atual de mercado, onde as empresas buscam, cada vez
mais, novas estratégias de auxílio no gerenciamento de seus negócios, bem como
redução de custos, agilidade na solução de seus problemas, aumento do nível de
serviço prestado a seus clientes e melhorias no desempenho. Através desta
estratégia de terceirização, entram em cena os chamados Prestadores de Serviços
Logísticos (PSL). Sendo assim, este estudo tem como objetivo avaliar o nível de
utilização de conceitos básicos e de iniciativas e práticas relacionadas ao tema
Gerenciamento da Cadeia de Suprimentos (SCM), pelos Prestadores de Serviços
Logísticos atuantes no estado do Pará. Para isso, desenvolveu-se uma pesquisa
survey de cunho quantitativo junto aos PSL, utilizando como instrumento de
coleta de dados um questionário dotado de uma escala Likert de quatro pontos,
onde, através de suas respostas, os entrevistados foram responsáveis por expressar
qual o nível de uso dos conceitos básicos e das iniciativas e práticas, abordadas
neste estudo, nos seus processos logísticos. Visto que a pesquisa se enquadra
como quantitativa, para o tratamento e avaliação dos dados, foi utilizado um
software estatístico e realizada uma análise estatística descritiva. Com os
resultados, concluiu-se que, no que se refere ao uso tanto de conceitos básicos
quanto de iniciativas e práticas de SCM, os PSL considerados na amostra
estudada não possuem um nível de utilização muito bem definido, dada a grande
variação observada entre as respostas. / [en] The practice of outsourcing logistics activities by companies is quite
common in the current market, where companies seek increasingly new support
strategies to manage their business, as well as cost savings, agility in solving their
problems, increasing level service and improving performance. Through this
outsourcing strategy, Logistics Services Providers (LSP) come into play. Thus,
the objective of this study is evaluate the usage level of basic concepts and
initiatives and practices related to the theme Supply Chain Management (SCM)
by the logistics services providers operating in the state of Pará. For this, a survey
research of quantitative nature was developed with these LSP, using a four-point
scale Likert questionnaire, where the respondents were responsible for expressing
what is the usage level of the basic concepts and of the initiatives and practices,
exposed on this study, on their logistics processes. As the research is quantitative,
a statistic software were used and a descriptive statistical analysis were made to
evaluate the collected data. From the results, it was concluded that the LSP
considered in the study sample don’t have a well- defined usage level, due to the
large variations observed among the answers.
|
6 |
Development and validation of an instrument to measure epistemic beliefs and attitudes / Développement et validation d'un instrument qui mesure les croyances et attitudes épistémiquesDang, Thi Quynh Huong 27 November 2013 (has links)
Cette recherche a consisté en le développement et la validation d'outils psychométriques servant à mesurer chez les étudiants une évolution dans les croyances épistémiques (c.-à-d. les croyances concernant les sciences, l'enseignement et l'apprentissage) et les attitudes épistémiques (c.-à-d. les conceptions, affects et valeurs envers des objets épistémiques comme la connaissance ou le savoir scientifique). Les valeurs et affects sont d'une importance primordiale dans l'éducation épistémologique, comme le sont les croyances ou les valeurs. Toutefois, ils semblent souvent négligés dans les approches pédagogiques ou dans la recherche. De plus, avant la présente recherche, il n'y avait pas d'instrument quantitatif fiable adapté au contexte français pour mesurer les croyances envers les sciences, l'enseignement et l'apprentissage. Pour ces raisons, nous avons développé dans la langue française un Questionnaire sur les Attitudes et les Croyances Epistémiques (QACE ou EBAI en anglais pour Epistemic Beliefs and Attitudes Inventory), qui est composé d'échelles de Likert et de différentiateurs sémantiques. Nous avons mené trois études. La première (Study 1) a été menée en France auprès de 283 étudiants pour explorer la structure de la première version du QACE (QACE1). Ensuite, cette version été utilisée pour évaluer l'impact de deux modules d'épistémologie sur les populations d'étudiants concernées. Les résultats ont indiqué une bonne consistance interne des échelles et leur capacité à mesurer des changements significatifs dans les attitudes et croyances épistémiques des étudiants. Dans une deuxième étude menée au Vietnam, nous avons examiné les propriétés psychométriques d'une traduction vietnamienne du QACE1 auprès de 228 étudiants ou professeurs (Study 2). Un résultat marquant est que les différentiateurs sémantiques se sont révélé être des outils novateurs simples et prometteurs pour mesurer les attitudes et croyances épistémiques. Cela peut être expliqué par leur robustesse psychométrique, leur forte sensibilité pour discriminer entre les groupes et la facilité avec laquelle on peut les adapter dans une autre culture. Troisièmement, la version préliminaire de l'instrument a été améliorée. Nous avons ensuite conduit en France une étude de validation de cette nouvelle version (QACE2) après de 729 étudiants (Study 3). Plusieurs construits théoriquement apparentés (comme le Epistemological Beliefs Inventory de Schraw et al., 2002; le Cognitive Complexity Indicator indiquant les position de Perry à partir du questionnaire Learning Environment Preferences de Moore, 1989; et l'échelle de dogmatisme de Shearman & Levine, 2006) ont été utilisés pour établir la validité du QACE2. Les résultats de la validation croisée sur les moitiés d'échantillons et de la fiabilité test-retest ont mis en évidence que le QACE2 est un outil fiable, stable et valide pour mesurer les croyances et attitudes épistémiques. Cette recherche a ouvert de nombreuses perspectives concernant, notamment, la vérification de la capacité du QACE2 à mesurer l'impact de modules d'épistémologie, la vérification de son adaptation à d'autres contextes francophones ou encore l'utilisation potentielle des différentiateurs sémantiques pour les recherches interculturelles sur l'épistémologie personnelle. / This research has focused on developing and validating psychometric tools to measure changes in university students' epistemic beliefs (i.e., beliefs about science, teaching, and learning) and epistemic attitudes (i.e., conceptions, affects, and values towards epistemic objects e.g., knowledge, scientific knowledge). Epistemic affects and values are of primary importance in epistemological education, as epistemic beliefs or conceptions do. However they seem to be often neglected in the pedagogical and research approaches. Moreover, before the present research, there was no reliable quantitative instrument to measure beliefs about science, learning and teaching specifically adapted to the French context. For these reasons, we developed the Epistemic Beliefs and Attitudes Inventory (EBAI), a set of Likert-type and semantic differential scales. We conducted three studies. The first study (Study 1) was conducted in France on 283 university students to explore the structure of the first version of the EBAI (EBAI1). The EBAI1 has then been used to evaluate the impact of two scientific epistemology related modules on the corresponding two students' populations. Results indicated robust internal consistencies of the scales and their ability to measure changes in students' epistemic beliefs and attitudes. In a second study, we preliminarily examined the psychometric properties of a Vietnamese translation of the EBAI1 in Vietnam with 228 participants, university students and teachers (Study 2). The results unravelled inadequacies of some scales to the Vietnamese context. One striking result is that the semantic differential scales appeared to be promising innovative and simple tools to measure epidemic attitudes and epistemic beliefs. We explain that by their strong psychometric properties, their high sensitivity in group discrimination, and the easiness to adapt them to another culture. Thirdly, the preliminary version of the instrument was revised for improvement and strengthening. We then conducted, in France, a validation study of this new version (EBAI2) among 729 students (Study 3). Several theoretically related constructs (e.g., general epistemological beliefs measured by the Epistemological Beliefs Inventory, Schraw et al., 2002; Cognitive Complexity Indicator indicating Perry's positions measured by the Learning Environment Preferences, Moore, 1989; and dogmatism measured by the Dogmatism Scale, Shearman & Levine, 2006) were used to establish the construct validity of the updated instrument (EBAI2). Results of double-split cross-validation and test-retest reliability showed a high reliability and temporal stability of the EBAI2. In summary, the findings supported that the EBAI2 is a reliable, stable and valid tool to measure epistemic beliefs and attitudes. This research opened many perspectives such as, for instance, checking for the EBAI2 ability to measure the impact of scientific epistemology related modules, checking for its adaptation to other francophone contexts, or using semantic differentials for cross-cultural researches in personal epistemology.
|
7 |
Leadership at public hospitals: a case study of the Matlala District HospitalMafora, Puni Peter 13 July 2020 (has links)
The purpose of the study was to explore and describe leadership at Matlala District
Hospital in Limpopo, a province of South Africa. The study was critical for a better
understanding of leadership styles adopted in different situations (hospital, district or
province) at Matlala District Hospital in the Sekhukhune district.
The main objectives of the study were described in chapter 1 on leadership styles
(transformational and transactional), to determine how best to investigate leadership
styles at Matlala District Hospital, to determine what the current leadership style at
Matlala District Hospital is and to propose the most appropriate leadership style for
Matlala District Hospital.
A mixed-methods approach was used with an exploratory and descriptive design. In
terms of the qualitative methodology, purposive sampling was used as the managers
were selected on their knowledge of the issues under investigation. Firstly, an
interview schedule was developed and used to collect data at Matlala District Hospital.
The sample size was 82. Interviews were conducted with 12 members of the executive
committee who were regarded as senior managers of the hospital. Secondly, the
researcher distributed the questionnaires to participants of the hospital that met the
inclusion criteria. Seventy participants completed questionnaires, which were
collected upon completion. A 100% response rate was reached.
Thematic analysis was used to assess the qualitative data. With regard to quantitative
data analysis, descriptive, frequency tables and charts and inferential statistics were
used. According to the results, those managers who felt that resources had be
provided felt strongly that leadership at the hospital should be improved. Accordingly,
guidelines for improving leadership at Matlala District Hospital have to be developed
to ensure that mitigating factors are in place for the improvement of the situation at
the hospital. / Public Administration and Management / M. P. A. (Public Administration)
|
Page generated in 0.054 seconds