Spelling suggestions: "subject:"9amediated communication"" "subject:"ctmediated communication""
181 |
"Get out of my Face(book)!" Using Facebook to examine Verbal Aggressiveness and ArgumentativenessGunnerson, Stephanie January 2017 (has links)
No description available.
|
182 |
Exploring female perceptions of relational norms in text messaging and their implications for developing romantic relationshipsGuest, Chelsea 30 October 2018 (has links)
No description available.
|
183 |
Online Dating and the Function of Anticipating Comparisons between Self-Presentation Report Veridicality and Potential Face-to-Face Interaction on Impression ManagementQin, Jiashuo 22 July 2016 (has links)
No description available.
|
184 |
Diffusion of responsibility or diffusion of social risk: Social impact of hyperpersonal cues in cyberbystander intervention in a cyberbullying contextDillon, Kelly Patricia 11 August 2016 (has links)
No description available.
|
185 |
The Discourse of Relationship Building in an Intercultural Virtual Learning CommunityBikowski, Dawn M. 22 April 2008 (has links)
No description available.
|
186 |
The Online Presentation of Self: Re-examining Goffman's Presentation of Self Across Contemporary CMC ContextsKuznekoff, Jeffrey H. 25 July 2012 (has links)
No description available.
|
187 |
Insider at border: interactions of technology, language, culture, and gender in computer-mediated communication by Korean female learners of EnglishBaek, Mi-Kyung 09 March 2005 (has links)
No description available.
|
188 |
An Inefficient Choice: An Empirical Test of Media Richness and Electronic PropinquityDickinson, Ted Michael 27 June 2012 (has links)
No description available.
|
189 |
Do you kiss when you text? Cross-cultu Do you kiss when you text? Cross-cultural differences in the use of the kissing emojis in three WhatsApp corporaSampietro, Agnese, Felder, Samuel, Siebenhaar, Beat 05 June 2024 (has links)
Emojis are pictographs added to messages on social media and websites. Researchers have observed that emojis representing kissing faces are often
used to close instant messaging conversations. This has been interpreted as an
imitation of cheek kissing, a common behavior in some cultural contexts. We
analyze the use of seven types of kissing emojis in three corpora of WhatsApp
chats, one from Spain (where cheek kisses in face-to-face interaction are
commonplace in many situations), the other from Germany (where kisses are
occasionally given), and the third from the German-speaking part of Switzerland
(where cheek kisses are a common greeting between relatives and friends). To do
so, we systematically categorize and compare the use of a sample of these emojis
on WhatsApp. The analysis suggests that there are differences between the three
corpora in the use of the kissing emojis. The emoji “face throwing a kiss” is often
included in closing messages in the Spanish and Swiss-German data, while in the
Federal German corpus kisses do not appear at the end of a conversation; using these
emojis in openings is uncommon in all three corpora. This suggests that these emojis
can exhibit cultural variation, but they do not clearly mirror face-to-face behavior.
|
190 |
Communication of Emotion in Mediated and Technology-Mediated Contexts: Face-to-Face, Telephone, and Instant MessagingBurge, Jamika D. 24 July 2007 (has links)
This dissertation work considers communication between people. I look at coordinating dyads (couples in relationships) and people in working relationships to develop an understanding of how people engage in high-stakes, or emotional communication via various communicative media. The approach for this research is to observe and measure people's behavior during interaction and subsequent reporting of that behavior and associated internal experiences. Qualitative and quantitative methods are employed. Quantitative data are analyzed using a range of statistical analyses, including correlations matrices, ANOVAs, and multivariate statistics.
Two controlled laboratory experiments were conducted for this research. These experiments involved couples in relationships. Couples were brought into the lab and argued with each other across one of three technological media: face-to-face, telephone, and instant messaging (IM). In one set of couples' experiments, the couples argued for twenty minutes; in the subsequent couples' experiment, couples were encouraged to take as much time as they needed for their arguments. One of the main results from the first experiment is that couples did, indeed, argue when brought into a laboratory setting. One of the important findings for the second experiment is that time did not affect couples' tendency to reach closure during their arguments.
This research is a contribution in that it examines how people engage in highly emotional communication using various technological media. In a society with ever-increasing communication needs that require technology, it becomes necessary to study its communicative affordances. Understanding the context of highly emotional interactions between members of couples gives insight into how technology meets (or fails to meet) these communication needs. / Ph. D.
|
Page generated in 0.092 seconds