Most eukaryotes harbor a diverse community of parasitic, mutualistic, and commensal microbial symbionts. Although the diversity of these microbial symbiotic communities has recently drawn considerable attention, theory regarding the evolution of interactions among symbionts and with the host is still in its nascent stages. Here we evaluate the role of interactions among coinfecting symbionts in the evolution of symbiont virulence toward the host. To do so, we place the virulence-transmission trade-off into a community context and model the evolution of symbiont trophic modes along the continuum from parasitism (virulence) to mutualism (negative virulence). We establish a framework for studying multiple infections of a host by the same symbiont species and coinfection by multiple species, using a concept of shared costs, wherein the negative consequences of virulence (or harm) toward the host are shared among symbionts. Our results show that mutualism can be maintained under infection by multiple symbionts when shared costs are sufficiently low, while greater virulence and parasitism toward the host are more likely when shared costs are high. Last, for coinfection by more than one species, we show that if the presence of a mutualist ameliorates some of the costs of pathogen virulence, then the symbiotic community may more often evolve to a more commensal state and maintain mutualisms.

Humans have always interacted with plants for thousands of years ago. The origin of plant domestication is a clear example of human-plant mutualism. This mutual relationship has gradually developed into a co-entangled relationship where both symbionts benefit each other in an environment. The evidence of this relationship is confirmed by the use of plants across the globe, which constitutes a critical component in the livelihoods of people. It is likely to have been the case during the Iron Age period in Southern Africa, particularly in southwestern Zimbabwe where diversity of plant resources and other economic activities supported the Early farming communities in a variety of ways. Unfortunately, the available information about plant use, the role of crops and wild plants beyond diet and subsistence is widely dispersed. Studies that adequately analyse plant remains from Early Iron Age sites to understand the purpose of plants especially wild in the daily livelihoods of early farming communities is lagging. The labour and decision making invested in the selection, management, gathering, processing and consumption of these plants is not known. This research explored an analysis of archaeobotanical remains at Mtanye site, one of the early farming communities in Gwanda, southwestern Zimbabwe. Ethnobotanical and archaeobotanical techniques, as well as further microscopic analysis of seeds in the laboratory, were performed. The assessment of ethnobotanical examinations and archaeobotanical remains concluded that plants were vital to Mtanye community’s daily livelihoods, by offering an essential contribution to social, religious and economic development in the face of environmental challenges. The people at Mtanye treated crop cultivation and gathering of wild plants with more considerable ingenuity just like other sectors of their economies. Considering that the environment was not conducive for adequate crop farming, the intensive use of wild plant resources likely underpinned their ability to survive in a semi-arid environment for a prolonged time.

A fundamental question of evolutionary ecology is, what determines body size? In general, the body size of vertebrates is thought to be relatively inflexible, a product of their genes, food, environment, and stress. However, vertebrate growth can be plastic in response to population interactions such as predator-prey and competition. While these relationships can elicit plasticity of vertebrate growth, mutualistic relationships have yet to be investigated. An iconic example of mutualism involving a vertebrate is the relationship between anemone and anemonefish. In this interaction anemonefish size is often positively correlated with anemone size. Here, I test the hypothesis that anemonefish growth is a plastic response to variation in anemone size. Juvenile clownfish (Amphiprion percula) of relatively uniform size were paired with sea anemones (Entacmaea quadricolor) of variable size and monitored over three months. The average anemone size over the course of the month was then used to predict the fish growth each month. Mixed model analyses verified that anemone area is significantly associated with both change in fish standard length and change in fish body depth. Fish in larger anemones grew more than did fish in small anemones. Remarkably, individuals in large anemones achieved this despite receiving the same amount of food as individuals in small anemones. This clownfish growth plasticity in response to anemone size might be adaptive if anemone area is a good indicator of resource availability in the wild, because it would enable the fish to maximize their reproduction without compromising survival. This study extends the understanding of how plasticity of vertebrate species can be influenced by a wide variety of population interactions.

This paper examines two contrasting ethical approaches to waste within the context of modern day western food poverty and attempts to examine the justifications that these ethical definitions of waste might lend to impoverished people in re-appropriating the wasted food for themselves. Towards the end of the paper there is also a brief discussion regarding the political implications that can be found in competing ethical definitions of waste.

Leafflower plant/leafflower moth brood pollination mutualisms are widespread in the Paleotropics. Leafflower moths pollinate leafflower plants, but their larvae consume a subset of the hosts' seeds. These interactions are highly phylogenetically constrained: six clades of leafflower plants are each associated with a unique clade of leafflower moths (Epicephala). Here, we report a previously unrecognized basal seventh pollinating Epicephala lineageassociated with the highly derived leafflower clade Glochidionin Asia. Epicephala lanceolaria is a pollinator and seed predator of Glochidion lanceolarium. Phylogenetic inference indicates that the ancestor of E. lanceolaria most likely shifted onto the ancestor of G. lanceolarium and displaced the ancestral allospecific Epicephala pollinator in at least some host populations. The unusual and apparently coadapted aspects of the G. lanceolarium/E. lanceolaria reproductive cycles suggest that plant-pollinator coevolution may have played a role in this displacement and provide insights into the dynamics of host shifts and trait coevolution in this specialized mutualism.

Mutualismos entre plantas e polinizadores estão organizados em redes de interação que envolvem muitas espécies. Em última instância, o que determina a ocorrência das interações entre plantas e polinizadores são as características dos dois grupos de espécies. O comportamento social pode ser uma das caraterísticas chave na organização das interações em sistemas de polinização. Investigamos se a presença de polinizadores com comportamento social em redes de polinização está associada a diferentes padrões estruturais, e se polinizadores com níveis crescentes de complexidade no comportamento social são mais importantes pra estrutura dessas redes. Encontramos que a variação na proporção de espécies sociais não altera a estrutura de redes de polinização. Encontramos também que espécies com comportamento social são, em média, mais importantes para a estrutura de redes de polinização do que espécies solitárias. Nossos resultados corroboram resultados anteriores que sugerem que redes mutualísticas tem estruturas invariantes. Nossos resultados sugerem ainda que o papel estrutural mais proeminente das espécies sociais está associado à sua maior abundância. Incluir aspectos da história natural das espécies e das interações em estudos de redes ecológicas, nos permitirá fazer inferências cada vez mais assertivas sobre a importância funcional das espécies em comunidades / Mutualisms between plants and pollinators are organized in interaction networks that involve many species. Ultimately, what determines the occurrence of interactions among plants and pollinators are the traits of both groups of species. Social behavior can be a key trait on the organization of interactions between plants and pollinators. Here, we investigated if the presence of pollinators with social behavior in pollination networks is associated to different structural patterns, and if pollinators with increasing levels of complexity in social behavior are more important for network structure. We found that the presence of social pollinator species does not affect the structure of pollination networks. We also found that species with social behavior are, on average, more important for network structure than solitary species. Our results reinforce past studies that suggested that the structure of mutualistic networks has invariant structural properties. Our results also suggest that the more prominent role occupied by pollinators with social behavior is associated to these species\' large abundances. Including natural history information about species and about species interactions on the study of ecological networks will allow us to make more assertive inferences on the functional roles species occupy in ecological communities

No amplo domínio da discussão historiográfica que cobre o tema da população livre de cor ou dos pobres livres, o trabalho se propõe a discutir a inserção social de indivíduos oriundos de setores populares na primeira metade do século XIX na Bahia, debruçando-se especialmente sobre a experiência de homens e mulheres de cor preta, livres ou libertos, nascidos na América, responsáveis por fundar e transformar experiências de mutualismo popular na Bahia do século XIX. A investigação se concentra nas conexões entre as tradições religiosa e secular da ajuda mútua popular promovida por negros no Brasil, por meio da ênfase no estudo das decisões e dos modelos institucionais adotados por integrantes de uma irmandade de pretos fundada em 1832 e de uma sociedade mutual de cor (1851). Saída de uma dissidência entre os irmãos, a Sociedade Protetora dos Desvalidos foi, até onde se sabe, a única mutual autorizada a funcionar oficialmente como uma sociedade de cor, num período de não reconhecimento, e de repressão, da identidade racial de pretos pelo Estado brasileiro. / This thesis aims to discuss the experience of free colour people in Bahia nineteenth century, on the vast theme of popular social mobility that recent historians have been facing in Brazilian historiography. These individuals were black, american born, free or freed men and women, and they helped to create and to change patterns of popular mutual aid in Bahia nineteenth century. This research focuses on connexions between religious and secular traditions of mutual aid of black individual associations by analysing institutional models and strategic decisions made by the members of a black lay sodality founded in 1832 and of a black mutual society, created in 1851. The Sociedade Protetora dos Desvalidos (1851) resulted from a dissidence within the sodality and it was the sole mutual black association officially authorized by the government within an age when black racial identity was not likely to be recognized by Brazilian state.

Espécies em comunidades ecológicas estão ligadas por meio de interações. Perturbações tais como flutuações em abundância, podem se propagar de uma espécie para outra espécie, por meio de interações ecológicas. Em consequência, perturbações podem percolar por toda comunidade e afetar todas as espécies, resultando em efeitos em cascata. Comunidades ecológicas diferem tanto em termos de composição de espécies quanto na maneira pela qual as interações estão organizadas dentro das comunidades. Como resultado, diferentes comunidades ecológicas são formadas por redes de interações com estruturas diversas, nas quais as espécies estão ligadas através de forças de interação que variam. Dado que espécies e interações estão sendo perdidas a ritmos alarmantes, é imprescindível compreender a robustez das diferentes comunidades frente a diferentes agentes promotores de extinção. Ademais, para que possamos prevenir o colapso das comunidades e restaurar interações perdidas, é necessário compreender como as comunidades são formadas, e como a robustez dessas comunidades muda com o passar do tempo. Entretanto, ainda não é claro como a estrutura da comunidade está relacionada com efeitos em cascata, e se as diferentes forças de interação entre as espécies afeta a robustez da rede, acelerando ou freiando os efeitos de diferentes promotores de extinção. Nesta tese, eu combinei simulações numéricas, redes teóricas e redes empíricas de interações mutualísticas para as quais existe informação sobre a força de interação entre espécies, para explorar a relação que estrutura e robustez têm com diferentes promotores de extinção e como a robustez dessas redes muda após a restauração de uma comunidade. Primeiramente eu investiguei como a estrutura da rede afeta o tempo até que uma perturbação atinja todas as espécies. O tempo de espalhamento foi usado como um indicador de robustez. Encontrei que as redes são mais robustas a efeitos em cascata quando incorporamos a força de interação das espécies, já que nestas simulações uma perturbação demorou mais tempo para atingir todas as espécies da rede. A riqueza de espécies, modularidade e aninhamento tiveram um forte efeito positivo no tempo de espalhamento da perturbação, independentemente da força de interação. Em seguida, criei redes teóricas com um número fixo de espécies e de interações, o que permitiu que eu isolasse os efeitos que o aninhamento e a modularidade têm na robustez. Explorei como a robustez a diferentes promotores de extinção está relacionada com o aninhamento e com a modularidade. Redes com valores maiores de aninhamento e modularidade apresentaram uma maior robustez a efeitos em cascata, enquanto que redes com valores intermediários de aninhamento foram mais robustas à remoção de espécies. Não encontrei nenhuma relação entre modularidade e remoção de espécies. Mostrei que a robustez depende não só do tipo de promotor de extinção que está sendo avaliado, como da medida de interesse. Por fim, usando uma série temporal de oito anos de redes de planta a polinizadores após a restauração de um habitat na Califórnia (EUA) explorei como a montagem e robustez de comunidades muda com o passar do tempo. Encontrei que as posições que as espécies ocupam na rede são altamente dinâmicas com o passar do tempo, fazendo com que o processo de montagem de comunidades seja pontuado por grandes reorganizações da rede. Não encontrei uma relação entre robustez da rede tempo após a restauração. O conjunto de resultados apresentado e discutido nesta tese contribuí para o entendimento dos mecanismos subjacentes à manutenção da biodiversidade. Para compreendermos como a robustez de diferentes comunidades varia, é necessário considerar não só a espécie per se, mas também as espécies que dependem direta e indiretamente da espécie em questão, a estrutura da comunidade na qual aquela espécie está inserida e também da natureza da perturbação que atinge a comunidade / Species in ecological communities are linked through interactions. Perturbations, such as fluctuations in abundance, can flow from a species to another through ecological interactions. As a consequence, perturbations can ripple across species assemblages resulting in cascading effects that can potentially affect all species in the community. Ecological assemblages differ both in terms of species composition and in the way in which interactions are organized. As a result, different ecological communities form interaction networks that differ both in their structures as well in the interaction strengths connecting pairs of species within networks. Given that species and interactions are being lost at alarming rates, it is imperative to comprehend how robust communities are to extinction drivers. Moreover, if we are to prevent communities\' collapse and restore lost interactions, we have to understand how communities are assembled, as well as if and how robustness change through time. Despite continued effort by ecologists, it remains unclear how community structure is related to cascading effects and whether interaction strength affects network robustness by enhancing or dampening cascading effects due to multiple extinction drivers. In this thesis, I combine empirical data on weighted mutualistic networks, numerical simulations, and theoretical networks to explore how robust different network structures are to different extinction drivers, and how robustness change as networks assemble. First, I investigate how the structure of mutualistic networks affects perturbation spreading time--a proxy of network robustness to cascading effects. I found that networks are more robust to cascading effects when I incorporate interaction strengths, since simulations in which interaction strength was included had higher perturbation spreading times. Species richness, modularity, and nestedness had a strong, positive effect in perturbation spreading time regardless of the interaction strengths. Then, using theoretical networks with a fixed number of species and number of interactions, I was able to disentangle the effects nestedness and modularity have on robustness. I explore how robustness to different extinction drivers, in addition to cascading effects, is related to nestedness and modularity. Networks with greater nestedness and modularity were more robust to cascading effects, whereas networks with intermediate nestedness levels were the most robust to species removal. Modularity had no effect on robustness to species removal. Most importantly, I show that robustness depends not only on the type of extinction driver assessed, but also on the measure being used to quantify robustness. Finally, I use an eight-year dataset of plant-pollination networks following habitat restoration to explore how the assembly of plant-pollinator communities, and their robustness, changes as community assembles. I found that species occupy highly dynamic network positions through time, causing the assembly process to be punctuated by major network reorganizations. There was no relationship between years since restoration and robustness to perturbation spreading and to species removal. Altogether, these results contribute to broaden our understanding of the mechanisms behind biodiversity maintenance. If we are to protect and restore ecological communities, it is essential to consider not only the species per se, but also all species that depend directly and indirectly of that particular species, to unravel the relationship between network structure and community robustness to extinction drivers, and to understand how network structure and robustness changes as communities assemble

Thesis (M.S.)--Oregon State University, 2010. / Printout. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 84-89). Also available on the World Wide Web.

No description available.