Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Centro de Ciências Biológicas. Programa de Pós-Graduação em Farmacologia. / Made available in DSpace on 2012-10-22T15:02:55Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 225418.pdf: 2520051 bytes, checksum: b59986e81eda2d965b91443a5dedb96d (MD5) / Estudos têm demonstrado que o odor do predador é um potente estímulo ansiogênico, fornecendo elementos para a avaliação do comportamento defensivo natural em roedores. Durante situações de estresse ou perigo potencial, a liberação de adrenalina ocasiona ativação de receptores beta-adrenérgicos nas vias ascendentes do vago para estruturas do SNC envolvidas na expressão e consolidação do medo e de suas respostas defensivas. O objetivo principal do presente estudo foi avaliar a participação do sistema beta-adrenérgico no comportamento defensivo de ratos expostos ao modelo do odor de gato. Para este propósito, realizamos inicialmente uma validação biológica e farmacológica do modelo dentro das condições experimentais de nosso laboratório. Em seguida, avaliamos o papel da neurotransmissão beta-adrenérgica central e periférica na resposta defensiva de ratos submetidos a este modelo. Nesta etapa, utilizamos em nossos estudos antagonistas beta-adrenérgicos como o propranolol, com ações farmacológicas centrais e periféricas, e o nadolol, com ações restritas à periferia. Por fim, avaliamos o envolvimento da neurotransmissão noradrenérgica do núcleo PMd - uma estrutura hipotalâmica amplamente relacionada ao comportamento defensivo inato - sobre a resposta defensiva de ratos expostos ao odor de gato, através da microinjeção de atenolol, um bloqueador beta1 seletivo, diretamente nesta estrutura. Nossos resultados demonstraram que a injeção sistêmica de propranolol, bem como as microinjeções de atenolol no PMd, foram eficazes na redução da resposta defensiva. Estes achados sugerem uma participação do sistema beta-adrenérgico central, além de reforçar o papel chave do PMd no comportamento de defesa inato frente ao odor de gato. Substantial evidences have been showing that predator odor is a powerful anxiogenic stimulus, providing insights into natural defensive behavior evaluation in rodents. During situations of stress or potential danger, epinephrine release actives beta-adrenoreceptors on the ascending vagus, projecting to central nervous system structures, which are believed to be important in the expression and consolidation of the fear and its defensive responses. The main aim of this study was to verify the beta-adrenergic system participation, in the behavior response of rats toward cat odor model. For this purpose, firstly we have realized the biological and pharmacological validation of the cat odor model in accordance to the experimental conditions of our laboratory. Next, the role of central and peripheral beta-adrenergic neurotransmission in rats submitted to this model was evaluated. Whereas propranolol was used to block beta-adrenoceptor at central and peripheral sites of action, nadolol, did it predominantly at the peripheral system. Finally, we have checked the noradrenergic involvement of the PMd - a hypothalamic structure that takes part in the innate defensive behavior - in the defensive response of rats exposed to cat odor, using atenolol, a selective beta1-blocker, microinjected directly into this structure. Our results demonstrate that either propranolol systemic injection or atenolol microinjections into PMd, were able to reduce the defensive behavior of rats exposed to cat odor. These findings suggest a central beta-adrenergic system participation in the innate defensive behavior toward cat odor strengthening the key role of the PMd on this behavior.

O nadolol é um agente bloqueador de receptores β-adrenérgicos empregado principalmente, na \"angina pectoris\", hipertensão, certas arritmias cardíacas e no tratamento do glaucoma (SING, 2006). A ivermectina e a abamectina são fármacos que apresentam ação antiparasitária (SHOOP, 1995). Na presente pesquisa, a cromatografia em fase líquida de alta eficiência foi uma das técnicas estudadas para a quantificação dos enantiômeros do nadolol e dos homólogos presentes na abamectina e ivermectina. A versatilidade desta técnica reside no grande número de fases estacionárias existentes, as quais possibilitam análises, separações e determinações quantitativas de uma ampla gama de compostos com alta eficiência (Aquino Neto e Nunes, 2003). Para identificação dos enantiômeros do nadolol foi utilizado o dicroísmo circular que permite a determinação da configuração absoluta de enantiômeros (LIMA, 1997). Para os enantiômeros do nadolol e dos homólogos presentes na abamectina e na ivermectina também foram realizados testes para desenvolvimento de uma metodologia de quantificação por meio de uma técnica relativamente recente chamada de eletroforese capilar (EC), a qual tem alcançado desde sua introdução um rápido desenvolvimento e ampla aplicação na análise de fármacos em medicamentos (SANTORO, 2000). Para a comprovação da qualidade e segurança dos sistemas computadorizados dos equipamentos de cromatografia em fase líquida de alta eficiência (CLAE) e de eletroforese capilar (EC) foram efetuadas, neste trabalho, as respectivas validações. Após esta validação, pode-se confirmar o correto funcionamento de um software, e suas interações com o hardware, onde devem ser levados em consideração, dentre outros, os aspectos relacionados à infra-estrutura, segurança e manutenção de dados (AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE VIGILÂNIA SANITÁRIA, 2010). As metodologias analíticas desenvolvidas a para quantificação do nadolol, abamectina e ivermectina por cromatografia em fase líquida de alta eficiência foram validadas. A validação analítica deve garantir, por meio de estudos experimentais, que o método atenda às exigências das aplicações analíticas, assegurando a confiabilidade dos resultados. Para tanto, o método deve apresentar especificidade, linearidade, intervalo, precisão, sensibilidade, limite de quantificação e detecção, exatidão, adequados à análise (AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE VIGILÂNIA SANITÁRIA, 2003). Portanto, o objetivo proposto nesta pesquisa é primeiramente a validação dos sistemas computadorizados dos equipamentos de cromatografia em fase líquida de alta eficiência (CLAE) e de eletroforese capilar (EC). Para isto, serão desenvolvidos e validados os métodos analíticos de separação, identificação e quantificação dos enantiômeros do nadolol e dos homólogos presentes na abamectina e na ivermectina, em medicamentos, empregando as técnicas analíticas selecionadas. / Nadolol is a blocking agent with activity in the β -adrenergic receptors. It is mainly used in angina, hypertension, certain heart arrhythmias and in the treatment of glaucoma (SING, 2006). Ivermectin and abamectin are drugs with antiparasitic activity (SHOOP, 1995). In the present research, high performance liquid chromatography is one of the techniques used in the quantification of the enantiomers of nadolol and homologues present in abamectin and ivermectin. The versatility of this technique and the large number of existing stationary phases, enables the separation and quantitative determination of a wide range of compounds with high efficiency (Aquino Neto e Nunes, 2003). For identification of the nadolol enantiomers, circular dichroism was used which allows the determination of the absolute configuration of the enantiomers (LIMA, 1997). Nadolol enantiomers and the homologues present in abamectin and ivermectin will be also quantified by capillary zone electrophoresis (CE), a separation technique relatively recent, which has achieved, since its introduction, a wide application in the analysis of drugs in pharmaceutical preparations (SANTORO, 2000). In order to assure the quality of the analytical results, the computer systems of the liquid chromatograph and capillary electrophoresis equipments, must be validated prior to the analytical methods validation. Computer systems validation is used to verify and confirm the proper operation of softwares, and their interactions with the hardwares, besides the infrastructure, safety and storage of data (AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE VIGILÂNIA SANITÁRIA, 2010). The analytical methodologies developed for quantification of nadolol, abamectin, ivermectin by using high efficiency liquid chromatography and capillary electrophoresis were validated. The analytical methods validation should ensure, through experimental studies, that the method meets the requirements for analytical applications, ensuring the reliability of the results. Parameters like, specificity, linearity, range, accuracy, sensitivity, limits of detection and quantification and accuracy, must be determined (AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE VIGILÂNIA SANITÁRIA, 2003). The objective of this study is to validate the computer systems of the high performance liquid chromatograph and capillary electrophoresis equipments and then to develop and validate analytical methods for separation, identification and quantification of nadolol enantiomers and the homologues of abamectin and ivermectin.

O nadolol é um agente bloqueador de receptores β-adrenérgicos empregado principalmente, na \"angina pectoris\", hipertensão, certas arritmias cardíacas e no tratamento do glaucoma (SING, 2006). A ivermectina e a abamectina são fármacos que apresentam ação antiparasitária (SHOOP, 1995). Na presente pesquisa, a cromatografia em fase líquida de alta eficiência foi uma das técnicas estudadas para a quantificação dos enantiômeros do nadolol e dos homólogos presentes na abamectina e ivermectina. A versatilidade desta técnica reside no grande número de fases estacionárias existentes, as quais possibilitam análises, separações e determinações quantitativas de uma ampla gama de compostos com alta eficiência (Aquino Neto e Nunes, 2003). Para identificação dos enantiômeros do nadolol foi utilizado o dicroísmo circular que permite a determinação da configuração absoluta de enantiômeros (LIMA, 1997). Para os enantiômeros do nadolol e dos homólogos presentes na abamectina e na ivermectina também foram realizados testes para desenvolvimento de uma metodologia de quantificação por meio de uma técnica relativamente recente chamada de eletroforese capilar (EC), a qual tem alcançado desde sua introdução um rápido desenvolvimento e ampla aplicação na análise de fármacos em medicamentos (SANTORO, 2000). Para a comprovação da qualidade e segurança dos sistemas computadorizados dos equipamentos de cromatografia em fase líquida de alta eficiência (CLAE) e de eletroforese capilar (EC) foram efetuadas, neste trabalho, as respectivas validações. Após esta validação, pode-se confirmar o correto funcionamento de um software, e suas interações com o hardware, onde devem ser levados em consideração, dentre outros, os aspectos relacionados à infra-estrutura, segurança e manutenção de dados (AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE VIGILÂNIA SANITÁRIA, 2010). As metodologias analíticas desenvolvidas a para quantificação do nadolol, abamectina e ivermectina por cromatografia em fase líquida de alta eficiência foram validadas. A validação analítica deve garantir, por meio de estudos experimentais, que o método atenda às exigências das aplicações analíticas, assegurando a confiabilidade dos resultados. Para tanto, o método deve apresentar especificidade, linearidade, intervalo, precisão, sensibilidade, limite de quantificação e detecção, exatidão, adequados à análise (AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE VIGILÂNIA SANITÁRIA, 2003). Portanto, o objetivo proposto nesta pesquisa é primeiramente a validação dos sistemas computadorizados dos equipamentos de cromatografia em fase líquida de alta eficiência (CLAE) e de eletroforese capilar (EC). Para isto, serão desenvolvidos e validados os métodos analíticos de separação, identificação e quantificação dos enantiômeros do nadolol e dos homólogos presentes na abamectina e na ivermectina, em medicamentos, empregando as técnicas analíticas selecionadas. / Nadolol is a blocking agent with activity in the β -adrenergic receptors. It is mainly used in angina, hypertension, certain heart arrhythmias and in the treatment of glaucoma (SING, 2006). Ivermectin and abamectin are drugs with antiparasitic activity (SHOOP, 1995). In the present research, high performance liquid chromatography is one of the techniques used in the quantification of the enantiomers of nadolol and homologues present in abamectin and ivermectin. The versatility of this technique and the large number of existing stationary phases, enables the separation and quantitative determination of a wide range of compounds with high efficiency (Aquino Neto e Nunes, 2003). For identification of the nadolol enantiomers, circular dichroism was used which allows the determination of the absolute configuration of the enantiomers (LIMA, 1997). Nadolol enantiomers and the homologues present in abamectin and ivermectin will be also quantified by capillary zone electrophoresis (CE), a separation technique relatively recent, which has achieved, since its introduction, a wide application in the analysis of drugs in pharmaceutical preparations (SANTORO, 2000). In order to assure the quality of the analytical results, the computer systems of the liquid chromatograph and capillary electrophoresis equipments, must be validated prior to the analytical methods validation. Computer systems validation is used to verify and confirm the proper operation of softwares, and their interactions with the hardwares, besides the infrastructure, safety and storage of data (AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE VIGILÂNIA SANITÁRIA, 2010). The analytical methodologies developed for quantification of nadolol, abamectin, ivermectin by using high efficiency liquid chromatography and capillary electrophoresis were validated. The analytical methods validation should ensure, through experimental studies, that the method meets the requirements for analytical applications, ensuring the reliability of the results. Parameters like, specificity, linearity, range, accuracy, sensitivity, limits of detection and quantification and accuracy, must be determined (AGÊNCIA NACIONAL DE VIGILÂNIA SANITÁRIA, 2003). The objective of this study is to validate the computer systems of the high performance liquid chromatograph and capillary electrophoresis equipments and then to develop and validate analytical methods for separation, identification and quantification of nadolol enantiomers and the homologues of abamectin and ivermectin.

Posttraumatic stress disorder is a debilitating anxiety disorder that can develop in the aftermath of a traumatic or life–threatening event involving extreme horror, intense fear or bodily harm. The disorder is typified by a symptom triad consisting of re–experiencing, hyperarousal and avoidance symptoms. Approximately 15–25% of trauma–exposed individuals go on to develop PTSD, depending on the nature and severity of the trauma. Although dysfunctional adaptive responses exist in multiple neurobiological pathways in the disorder, e.g. glutamate, GABA, glucocortocoids and serotonin, the noradrenergic system is particularly prominent and represents an important pharmacological target in attempts at preventing the development of PTSD posttrauma. However, current literature shows opposing and conflicting results regarding the effect of selective noradrenergic agents in memory processing, and the effect of modulation of selective noradrenergic receptors are spread over diverse protocols and paradigms of learning and fear also employing different strains of animals. Fear conditioning is a behavioural paradigm that uses associative learning to study the neural mechanisms underlying learning, memory and fear. It is useful in investigating the underpinnings of disorders associated with maladaptive fear responses. Performing fear conditioning experiments with the aim of applying it to an animal model of PTSD, and relating these behavioural responses to a defined neural mechanism, will assist both in the elucidation of the underlying pathology of the disease, as well as the development of more effective treatment. This project has set about to re–examine the diverse and complex role of noradrenergic receptors in the conditioned fear response with relevance to PTSD. To the best of my knowledge, this study represents the first attempt at studying a range of noradrenergic compounds with diverse actions and their ability to modify conditioned fear in a single animal model. This work thus introduces greater consistency and comparative relevance not currently available in the literature, and will also provide much needed pre–clinical evidence in support of treatment strategies targeting the noradrenergic system in the prevention of PTSD posttrauma. The first objective of this study was to set up and validate a passive avoidance fear conditioning protocol under our laboratory conditions using the Gemini Avoidance System. The noradrenergic system plays a prominent role in memory consolidation and fear conditioning, while administration of –adrenergic blockers, such as propranolol, have been shown to abolish learning and fear conditioning in both humans and animals. Propranolol has also demonstrated clinical value in preventing the progression of acute traumatic stress syndrome immediately posttrauma to full–blown PTSD. To confer predictive validity to our model, the centrally active –adrenergic antagonist, propranolol, and the non–centrally acting –adrenergic antagonist, nadolol, were administered to Wistar rats after passive avoidance fear conditioning training in the Gemini Avoidance System. Wistar rats were used because of their recognised enhanced sensitivity to stress. Evidence from this pilot study confirmed that propranolol 10 mg/kg significantly inhibits the consolidation of learned fear in rats, whereas nadolol is ineffective. This effectively validated our protocol and the apparatus for further application in this study and also confirmed the importance of a central mechanism of action for –adrenoceptor blockade in the possible application of these drugs in preventing the development of PTSD posttrauma. The second objective of this study was to investigate the role of 1–, 2–, 1–, and 2–receptors in a conditioned fear passive avoidance paradigm. This was done in order to investigate how selective pharmacological modulation of these receptors may modify the conditioned fear response, and whether any of these receptor systems might exert opposing effects in passive fear conditioning. Various centrally active noradrenergic agents were employed over a 3–tiered dose response design, including the 1–antagonist, prazosin, the 2–agonist, guanfacine, the 2–antagonist, yohimbine, the 1–antagonist, betaxolol and the 2–antagonist ICI 118551. The effect of post–exposure administration of these drugs on conditioned fear was compared to that of propranolol 10 mg/kg. Selected doses of betaxolol (10 mg/kg) and ICI 118551 (1 mg/kg) attenuated fear conditioning to an extent comparable to propranolol, as did prazosin (0.1 mg/kg). Yohimbine tended to boster fear learning at all doses tested, albeit not significantly, while guanfacine did not produce any significant effect on memory retention at any of the doses studied. This latter observation was surprising since yohimbine tended to bolster fear conditioning while earlier studies indicate that 2–agonism impairs conditioned fear. Concluding, this study has conferred validity to our passive avoidance model and has provided greater insight into the separate roles of noradrenergic receptors in contextual conditioned fear learning. The study has provided supportive evidence for a key role for both 1– and 2–antagonism, as well as 1–antagonism, in inhibiting fear memory consolidation and hence as viable secondary treatment options to prevent the development of PTSD posttrauma. However, further study is required to delineate the precise role of the 2–receptor in this regard. / Thesis (M.Sc. (Pharmacology))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2012.

Posttraumatic stress disorder is a debilitating anxiety disorder that can develop in the aftermath of a traumatic or life–threatening event involving extreme horror, intense fear or bodily harm. The disorder is typified by a symptom triad consisting of re–experiencing, hyperarousal and avoidance symptoms. Approximately 15–25% of trauma–exposed individuals go on to develop PTSD, depending on the nature and severity of the trauma. Although dysfunctional adaptive responses exist in multiple neurobiological pathways in the disorder, e.g. glutamate, GABA, glucocortocoids and serotonin, the noradrenergic system is particularly prominent and represents an important pharmacological target in attempts at preventing the development of PTSD posttrauma. However, current literature shows opposing and conflicting results regarding the effect of selective noradrenergic agents in memory processing, and the effect of modulation of selective noradrenergic receptors are spread over diverse protocols and paradigms of learning and fear also employing different strains of animals. Fear conditioning is a behavioural paradigm that uses associative learning to study the neural mechanisms underlying learning, memory and fear. It is useful in investigating the underpinnings of disorders associated with maladaptive fear responses. Performing fear conditioning experiments with the aim of applying it to an animal model of PTSD, and relating these behavioural responses to a defined neural mechanism, will assist both in the elucidation of the underlying pathology of the disease, as well as the development of more effective treatment. This project has set about to re–examine the diverse and complex role of noradrenergic receptors in the conditioned fear response with relevance to PTSD. To the best of my knowledge, this study represents the first attempt at studying a range of noradrenergic compounds with diverse actions and their ability to modify conditioned fear in a single animal model. This work thus introduces greater consistency and comparative relevance not currently available in the literature, and will also provide much needed pre–clinical evidence in support of treatment strategies targeting the noradrenergic system in the prevention of PTSD posttrauma. The first objective of this study was to set up and validate a passive avoidance fear conditioning protocol under our laboratory conditions using the Gemini Avoidance System. The noradrenergic system plays a prominent role in memory consolidation and fear conditioning, while administration of –adrenergic blockers, such as propranolol, have been shown to abolish learning and fear conditioning in both humans and animals. Propranolol has also demonstrated clinical value in preventing the progression of acute traumatic stress syndrome immediately posttrauma to full–blown PTSD. To confer predictive validity to our model, the centrally active –adrenergic antagonist, propranolol, and the non–centrally acting –adrenergic antagonist, nadolol, were administered to Wistar rats after passive avoidance fear conditioning training in the Gemini Avoidance System. Wistar rats were used because of their recognised enhanced sensitivity to stress. Evidence from this pilot study confirmed that propranolol 10 mg/kg significantly inhibits the consolidation of learned fear in rats, whereas nadolol is ineffective. This effectively validated our protocol and the apparatus for further application in this study and also confirmed the importance of a central mechanism of action for –adrenoceptor blockade in the possible application of these drugs in preventing the development of PTSD posttrauma. The second objective of this study was to investigate the role of 1–, 2–, 1–, and 2–receptors in a conditioned fear passive avoidance paradigm. This was done in order to investigate how selective pharmacological modulation of these receptors may modify the conditioned fear response, and whether any of these receptor systems might exert opposing effects in passive fear conditioning. Various centrally active noradrenergic agents were employed over a 3–tiered dose response design, including the 1–antagonist, prazosin, the 2–agonist, guanfacine, the 2–antagonist, yohimbine, the 1–antagonist, betaxolol and the 2–antagonist ICI 118551. The effect of post–exposure administration of these drugs on conditioned fear was compared to that of propranolol 10 mg/kg. Selected doses of betaxolol (10 mg/kg) and ICI 118551 (1 mg/kg) attenuated fear conditioning to an extent comparable to propranolol, as did prazosin (0.1 mg/kg). Yohimbine tended to boster fear learning at all doses tested, albeit not significantly, while guanfacine did not produce any significant effect on memory retention at any of the doses studied. This latter observation was surprising since yohimbine tended to bolster fear conditioning while earlier studies indicate that 2–agonism impairs conditioned fear. Concluding, this study has conferred validity to our passive avoidance model and has provided greater insight into the separate roles of noradrenergic receptors in contextual conditioned fear learning. The study has provided supportive evidence for a key role for both 1– and 2–antagonism, as well as 1–antagonism, in inhibiting fear memory consolidation and hence as viable secondary treatment options to prevent the development of PTSD posttrauma. However, further study is required to delineate the precise role of the 2–receptor in this regard. / Thesis (M.Sc. (Pharmacology))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2012.

The efficacy and safety of oral nadolol in supraventricular tachycardia were evaluated prospectively in 27 children (median age 5.5 years). Fifteen patients had an unsuccessful trial of digoxin therapy. Intravenous nadolol was given to seven patients during electrophysiologic study; five of these had an excellent response and two had a partial response (25% decrease in tachycardia rate). Six of these patients had a similar response to oral nadolol. Twelve patients received both propranolol and nadolol. Among six patients, intravenous propranolol was successful in four and unsuccessful in two; all six had a similar response to oral nadolol. With oral propranolol, tachycardia was well controlled in four patients and persistent in two; five of five patients had a similar response to oral nadolol. Twenty-six patients were treated with oral nadolol; the arrhythmia was well controlled in 23, 2 had recurrent tachycardia and 1 patient had tachycardia at a 25% slower rate. The effective dose of nadolol ranged between 0.5 and 2.5 mg/kg body weight once daily (median dose 1 mg/kg per day). During follow-up (3 to 36 months), compliance and tolerance were excellent; excluding 2 patients with reactive airway disease who developed wheezing, only 3 (12%) of 24 had side effects necessitating a change in drug therapy. Once a day nadolol is a safe and effective agent in the management of supraventricular tachycardia in children. Its long-term efficacy can be predicted by the short-term response to intravenous nadolol or propranolol during programmed electrophysiologic study.