Syftet med denna studie är att undersöka huruvida den tyska ubåtskrigföringen under andra världskriget använde sig av sjökrigsmetoder som beskrevs av Sir Julian Corbett i början av 1900-talet. För att testa Corbetts teorier studeras slaget om Atlanten 1939 – 1945 som ett empiriskt fall. Frågeställningen i denna rapport är: Vilka likheter och/eller skillnader finns mellan Sir Julian Corbetts sjökrigsmetoder och det tyska ubåtsvapens agerande under slaget om Atlanten? Metoden som används för denna undersökning är en komparativ metod där slaget om Atlanten studeras som ett fall. Resultatet visar att det finns en del likheter men också skillnader mellan tyskarnas ubåtskrigföring och Corbetts teorier. Corbett menar att syftet med all sjökrigföring är att alltid direkt eller indirekt säkra ett sjöherravälde eller att hindra motståndaren från att säkra den. Det tyska ubåtsvapnet försökte aldrig att etablera ett sjöherravälde utan valde att bestrida och neka britterna ett sådant. Detta gjorde de genom Corbetts metoder fleet in being, nålsticksoperationer och sjöfartskrig. Resultatet visar på en skillnad i metod gällande sjöfartskrig då Corbett menar att den effektivaste metoden är att anfalla fiendens hamninlopp och terminaler medan det tyska ubåtsvapnet bedrev sjöfartskrig ute på öppet hav med goda resultat. / The purpose of this study is to examine whether the German submarine warfare during the World War II used the principles of maritime strategy described by Sir Julian Corbett during the early 1900s. The Battle of the Atlantic will be used as an empirical case to test Corbett’s theories. The issue addressed in this report: What similarities and/or differences exist between Sir Julian Corbett’s maritime strategy and the German submarine actions during the Battle of the Atlantic? The method used for this study is a comparative method and the Battle of the Atlantic is studied as a case. The result shows that there are some similarities but also differences between the German submarine warfare and Corbett's theories. Corbett believes that the purpose of all naval warfare is to always directly or indirectly secure a sea command or to prevent the opponent from securing it. The German submarine force never tried to establish a sea command but chose to deny the British Navy and establishment of one. They did this by Corbett methods fleet in being, minor counter attacks and attack of trade. The results show a difference in the approach regarding maritime war. Corbett believes that the most effective approach is to attack the enemy's harbour and terminals while the German submarine force conducted maritime war on the high seas with good results.

The final voyages of H.M.S Erebus and H.M.S Terror marked a pivotal chapter in the tapestry of international relations with the Arctic frontier. The aim of this study is to analyze how these wrecks impact territorial disputes and the geopolitical dynamics between coastal states and international actors. By adopting an interdisciplinary perspective, where archaeology is supplemented by law and geopolitical theory, it has been possible to gain increased knowledge of how actors such as Canada, the United Kingdom, the United States, and the Inuit of Nunavut perceive and utilize the wrecks for their respective territorial interests. With the intention of further deepening the understanding of the complex conditions that shape the wreckages legal status and management in the modern world, an analysis of the legal frameworks regulating the Northwest Passage is also conducted. The study exposes contemporary jurisdictional gaps and emphasizes the necessity of including Inuit perspectives into Arctic Management. / Den sista expeditionen med H.M.S Erebus och H.M.S Terror har kommit att få central betydelse för de komplexa internationella relationerna med Arktis. Syftet med den här studien är att analysera hur dessa vrak påverkar de territoriella tvisterna och det geopolitiska samspelet mellan kuststater och internationella aktörer. Genom att anlägga ett tvärvetenskapligt perspektiv, där arkeologi kompletteras med juridik och geopolitisk teori har det varit möjligt att nå ökad kunskap om hur aktörer som Kanada, Storbritannien, USA och Inuiterna i Nunavut uppfattar och använder vraken för sina respektive territoriella intressen. Med avsikt att ytterligare fördjupa förståelsen av de komplexa förhållanden som formar vrakens juridiska status och hantering i den moderna världen, genomförs också en analys av de rättsliga ramverk som reglerar Nordvästpassagen. Studien avslöjar bristerna i nuvarande lagstiftning och framhäver vikten av att inkludera Inuiternas perspektiv i diskussioner om förvaltning.

An international maritime labour market study, the thesis focuses on the Dutch naval labour market, analysing wartime Zeeland admiralty crews. The research is based primarily on unique naval pay sources. Analysis of crew compositions has not been made on this scale in the period before. The 1667 Dutch Medway Raid is the starting point, where a few British played a leading role – amongst many others reported on the Dutch side. Pepys and Marvell primarily blamed their joining the enemy on the lure of superior Dutch payment. The thesis asks how many British there were really, how they came to be in Dutch service, and whether this involvement occurred, as indicated, at other times too. Part One is thematic and explores the background mechanisms of the maritime environment in detail, determining causation. First, the two naval recruitment systems are compared and completely reassessed in the light of state intervention in the trade sphere. Two new sets of ‘control’ data – naval wages and foreign shipping – are amongst the incentives and routes determined. British expatriate communities are examined as conduits for the supply of naval labour and civilian support. British personnel are compared and contrasted with other foreigners, against the background of Anglo-Dutch interlinkage and political transition from neutrality through conflict to alliance. Part Two is chronological, covering four major wars in three chapters. Micro-case studies assembled from the scattered record streams enable analysis of the crews of particular officers and ships. Seamen were an occupation that made them a very little known group: the thesis examines the different career types of British personnel of many different ranks, shedding light on their everyday lives. The thesis shows that British personnel were an integral part of Dutch crews throughout the period, even when the two nations were fighting each other. The basic need of subsistence labour for employment took precedence over allegiance to nation/ideology, demonstrating limitations in state power and the continual interdependence forced on the maritime powers through the realities of the labour market.