In this paper, my purpose is to test whether the government education policy and R&D expenditure policy can lead to development of patents or not. I use an idea-based growth model as the framework while treating patents as outputs to analyze patent development. I use the data of R&D intensity, patent and human capital of 30 countries in OECD from 1997 to 2006 based on panel data model to analyze their relationships. Research shows that R&D intensity and human capital produce some effects on patent development. Finally, I give some advice for government policy about improving patents.

Abstract People are racing with time in the era of knowledge economics. Those who are faster will be the winners. Those who are with original ideas will catch more chances to meet the customer¡¦s needs. Business speed and originality pop out of the performance of R&D. The performance of R&D depends on its member¡¦s personal knowledge and the knowledge prevailing in the origination. The pile of knowledge quantity and speed bases on how fast knowledge is shared. The factors of knowledge sharing situation are related to the characters of the organization and the sharing culture of its departments. This study will discuss the factors of the knowledge sharing situation. Furthermore, what are the performances of R&D? And what is the relationship between the character of the organization and knowledge sharing situation? And will the character of the organization and the R&D¡¦s knowledge sharing affect the performance of R&D? The conclusions of this study are proposed as followings: 1. Factors of the relationship between the character of the organization and knowledge sharing situation: 2. Factors of the relationship between knowledge sharing situation and the performance of the R&D: 3. The impact of the interaction with the organization character and the knowledge sharing situation on the performance of the R&D. Keywords: knowledge sharing R&D performance

In 2001 the IT industries in the world were in a recession and world top companies were in a deficit storm, but Samsung Electronics(SEC) still could make huge income. The success factors of SEC includes leadership, company culture, recruiting, huge investment, e-business, and sports marketing, etc. This thesis tries to do case study about Samsung Group, one of the representative Jaebol(Korean big companies) of Korea, and the main objects of study are SEC and electronic-related subsidiary companies like SDI, SEM etc., to study Samsung Group¡¦s innovation strategy and R&D management. Firstly, this thesis divided the contents of SEC¡¦s Digital Convergence goal and strategy into B to B and B to C, and named as up-stream innovation and down-stream innovation respectively. As one of the main success factors of electronic industries is R&D, I empathize SEC¡¦s unusual technology learning or R&D strategy in the first part, that is R&D history of semiconductor, mobile phone, and TFT-LCD, and its R&D organization. Secondly is the so-called innovation strategy, and this thesis define it to be consisted of four main factors, that is domestic up-stream innovation, international down-stream innovation, domestic down-stream innovation, and international up-stream innovation, which is its innovation process. Finally, I analyzed SEC¡¦s financial ratio, to prove the above non-financial factors more specifically. As a result, Samsung invested huge money to R&D, which is needed for Digital Convergence product, like semiconductor, TFT-LCD, mobile phone etc, based on the vertical integration of group organization, growing to multinational company throughout the innovation strategy.

none

This thesis examines firm innovation in China from firm-level human capital per- spective since resource-based theory and upper echelon theory reveal that the reason why firms vary in performance is that they differ in human capital. Two types of human capital are examined: general human capital measured by number of highly educated workers, and managerial human capital measured by characteristics (edu- cation and age) of general manager and management team. Besides human capital indicators, we also take R&D, firm size, market structure, firm age, ownership, city fixed effects, and industry fixed effects into account. Given the fact that innovations are made up of multifarious elements and hard to measure and define, this thesis examines firm innovation from three different aspects, patent applications, product innovation and total factor productivity.

Canada has long been a proponent of free trade while at the same time defending the current supply management system that protects the dairy industry from import competition. In the most recent Doha Development Round of talks amongst nations belonging to the World Trade Organization, the validity of Canada's protectionist position has been questioned and it is conceivable that Canada may have to make significant changes in the dairy industry to allow more liberal trade policies to be enacted. The key purpose of this study is to find out how free trade will affect the research and development (R&D) incentives of Canadian dairy farmers. On one hand they may be induced to perform more R&D due to competition effects in order to lower costs and achieve a competitive advantage over the main competitor, the United States. On the other hand they may be induced to perform less R&D due to the spillover effect, which allows the Canadian R&D efforts to be used by the United States at no additional cost. It is found that the outcome of these two opposing forces depends on the market scale effect. If Canada is a net importer when the border opens the spillover effect may dominate and Canadian dairy producers may invest less into R&D than under the current protectionist policies. These results however will switch if Canada is found to be the net exporters. The results also depend on the level of the quota currently in place. If the current quota is chosen at a quantity relatively close to the amount supplied at the monopolistic level, a free trade regime may promote R&D efforts more so than supply management. On the other hand, if the current quota level in Canada is closer to the quantity that would be supplied in a competitive industry, Canadian dairy producers may invest less heavily in R&D efforts under a free trade regime than a supply management system.

Chapter 1: Tradable Permits under Environmental and Cost-reducing R&D: This chapter models simultaneous investments in both environmental and cost-reducing R&D by asymmetric Cournot duopolist. Pollution rights (emission permits) are allocated by the regulator and can be traded between firms. Both R&D competition and cooperation are considered. In a three-stage game, firms first invest in R&D, then trade permits, and then compete in output. The strategic interaction between different types of R&D investments is analyzed. It is found that giving more permits to one firm induces it to conduct more cost-reducing but less environmental R&D. The second-best optimal allocation of pollution rights is also analyzed. This allocation matters for social welfare under R&D competition, but is irrelevant under R&D cooperation. Moreover, the optimal allocation depends on R&D spillovers. This paper also studies the grandfathering of permits based on historical output. Compared with the second-best optimal allocation, the higher the emissions reduction level, the more likely that grandfathering allocates too few permits to the large firm and too many permits to the small firm. Adding an R&D budget constraint leads firms to under-invest in cost-reducing R&D relative to environmental R&D. Chapter 2: Tradable Permits under Environmental R&D between Upstream and Downstream Industries: This chapter models the simultaneous investments in environmental R&D by both downstream and upstream industries, with two symmetric firms within each industry competing à la Cournot. Pollution rights are allocated by the regulator, and firms can trade permits. R&D competition, intra-industry (horizontal), inter-industry (vertical) and both intra- and inter-industry (generalized) R&D cooperations are considered. In a four-stage game, firms first invest in R&D, then trade permits, then upstream firms compete in intermediate good production, and finally downstream firms compete in final food production. The strategic interactions between R&D investments are analyzed. It is found that an increase in either vertical or horizontal R&D spillovers reduce the permit price but increase production, but the spillover effects on R&D investments are ambiguous and they depend on the number of permits that a firm receives from the government. However, firms undertake more R&D under generalized cooperation than vertical cooperation, irrespective of spillovers and the allocation of permits, and this results in higher social welfare under generalized cooperation than vertical cooperation. The optimal allocation of pollution rights by the regulator is also considered. This allocation matters for social welfare under R&D competition and horizontal cooperation, but is irrelevant under vertical and generalized cooperations. Chapter 3: Is There a Principle of Targeting in Environmental Taxation?: This chapter studies whether the "principle of targeting", which is referred to by Dixit (1985) as the tax formulae for dirty goods have "additivity property" (Sandmo 1975) and externality-generating sources should be directly targeted (Bhagwati and Johnson 1960), can be applicable in the presence of a uniform commodity tax with an additional emissions tax. We consider three perfectly competitive markets, one of them produces a non-polluting good and the other two produce polluting goods. The regulator chooses optimal taxes on all three markets to maximize social welfare and finances an exogenous public expenditure. First all, it is found that the additivity property does not hold under differentiated taxes, and is even further weakened with a uniform commodity tax. It is also shown that the Pigouvian tax is unlikely to apply on the top of the uniform commodity tax. Furthermore, if there is only tax instrument available -- i.e. either the uniform commodity tax or the emissions tax -- then the uniform commodity tax (emissions tax) induces higher social welfare when marginal social damage is low (high).

Canada has long been a proponent of free trade while at the same time defending the current supply management system that protects the dairy industry from import competition. In the most recent Doha Development Round of talks amongst nations belonging to the World Trade Organization, the validity of Canada's protectionist position has been questioned and it is conceivable that Canada may have to make significant changes in the dairy industry to allow more liberal trade policies to be enacted. The key purpose of this study is to find out how free trade will affect the research and development (R&D) incentives of Canadian dairy farmers. On one hand they may be induced to perform more R&D due to competition effects in order to lower costs and achieve a competitive advantage over the main competitor, the United States. On the other hand they may be induced to perform less R&D due to the spillover effect, which allows the Canadian R&D efforts to be used by the United States at no additional cost. It is found that the outcome of these two opposing forces depends on the market scale effect. If Canada is a net importer when the border opens the spillover effect may dominate and Canadian dairy producers may invest less into R&D than under the current protectionist policies. These results however will switch if Canada is found to be the net exporters. The results also depend on the level of the quota currently in place. If the current quota is chosen at a quantity relatively close to the amount supplied at the monopolistic level, a free trade regime may promote R&D efforts more so than supply management. On the other hand, if the current quota level in Canada is closer to the quantity that would be supplied in a competitive industry, Canadian dairy producers may invest less heavily in R&D efforts under a free trade regime than a supply management system.

Stegia AB har sedan ett antal år tillbaka använt sig av outsourcing i olika former. Initialt med ganska liten egen involvering för att sedan involveras allt mer på senare åt genom en egen fabrik först placerad i Taiwan och nu i Shanghai Kina. Verksamheter med global spridda enheter utsätts löpande för utmaningar och svårigheter internt vilka kan kopplas till språk, geografisk läge och kultur utöver de tekniska och organisatoriska utmaningar som finns inom verksamheten. Inom ramen för detta bedriver Stegia AB R&D och försäljning i Sverige samt produktion i Shanghai, Kina. Detta för med sig många svårigheter som detta examensarbete undersöker närmare. Genom en fallstudie har samtliga personer som utbyter information inom företagets enheter involveras i projektet där R&D och produktion i globalt spridda verksamheter undersökts hur det påverkar verksamheten genom olika svårigheter. För att genomföra detta har intervjuer skett såväl i Sverige och i Shanghai för att förstå den miljö som arbetet löpande sker i. Data har samlats in från företagets processer kopplade till produktion av egenutvecklade produkter där cykeltider, materialflöden, ledtider och studier i produktionen genomförts för att kartlägga olika faktorer som påverkar det dagliga arbetet. Det har visat sig att förtroende mellan de olika enheterna, tid som åtgår för att invänta återkoppling på olika uppgifter samt olika synsätt på arbetet är faktorer med stor inverkan på det dagliga arbetet. För att hantera dessa problem föreslås förflyttningar enheterna emellan för att skapa förståelse för respektive enhet internt såväl om externt. Vidare finns flertalet utmaningar kopplat till kvalitetssäkring och flöden som påverkas av kommunikationen internt i företaget där brist på data och i flera fall felaktig data ger följd fel inom organisationen. Sammantaget blir kommunikationsutmaningarna påtagliga inom dessa typer av verksamheter där många mindre problem snabbt påverkar verksamheten. / Stegia AB have during recent years been using outsourcing in different configurations. Initially with a small involvement in the supply chain, but today with a greater involvement though their fully owned off shore production unit; first located in Taiwan and now located in Shanghai, China. Organizations that are utilizing globally distributed units are facing a number of challenges on top of the daliy technical and organizational aspects. Those extra challenges could be cultural differences and language barriers, but the geographical positioning brings additional obstacles to the company. In this environment Stegia AB runs sales and R&D from Västerås with their production unit in Shanghai. This setup brings a lot of difficulties that this thesis will look deeper into. A case study have been conducted to investigate how the decision of a globally distributed organization brings difficulties. In this thesis, interviews have been conducted in Västerås and Shanghai. The aim is to involve all employees in R&D and the production units, as well as to gain understanding of their daily work. Data have been collected from the company’s manufacturing processes where cycle times, material flow, lead time and general production studies have been conducted in order to map and understand how different factors affect their organization. Through this study some factors have been found to critically affect the daily operation of the company, such as: trust, time to reply messages within the organization and employees’ opinions about the given tasks. In order to tackle those challenges, rotations between the units is suggested. This is to increase the employees' understanding of the units both internally and externally. On top of those challenges, quality control and logistics have been negatively affected by the lack of communication and insufficiency of relevant data within the organization. All together, the communication challenges very soon become crucial in globally distributed units; where small problems affect the daily operations.

This dissertation examines the relationship between productivity growth and research activities of heterogeneous firms, and the contribution of firm heterogeneity to business cycle fluctuations. The first chapter uses a dynamic model to study firms' decisions on whether to conduct research in house, with external units or via both modes. Productivity is modeled to evolve endogenously according to Research and Development (R&D) modes, and the costs of starting and continuing research are random and mode specific. Model estimates from a panel of Chinese manufacturing firms show that in-house R&D is more effective and costs less to maintain, but smaller firms choose external R&D because of its lower startup cost. These estimates are consistent with the observed cross-sectional differences in firm size by research status, and can match the persistence and transition dynamics in R&D modes. Simulation exercises show that continuation cost reduction induces more changes in R&D decisions, but start up cost reduction leads to most of the aggregate productivity gain. The second chapter investigates the impact of innovation on firm level prices. This impact depends on how innovation affects quality and efficiency and how the firm passes these changes onto prices. Estimation results of the empirical model with a panel of Spanish firms show that firms take advantage of process innovations to enlarge markups by not completely passing onto prices the decrease in cost. Product innovations could increase or decrease cost but they do not affect markups, thus we do not find prices to change systematically with them. The third chapter examines the contribution of firm level shocks to output fluctuations for four OECD countries (US, Germany, Canada and the UK). Recent studies stemming from Gabaix (2011) show that when few firms account for a disproportionately large share of production, shocks to these firms can propagate to generate business cycle fluctuations. However, we find that while firm size distribution is highly skewed in these four economies, the ability of the largest firms to transmit shocks is not universal and thus should not be taken for granted.