Double taxation could arise in a situation where resident- resident conflicts occur. Resident–resident conflicts occur in the situation where both countries regard such a person as a “resident” for tax purposes under their domestic legislation. For that reason, all income that is earned by that person, irrespective of the jurisdiction it is earned in, will be subject to tax in both countries. In order to resolve these conflicts, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development’s (“OECD’s”) Model Tax Convention contains a tie breaker clause which states that a non-individual shall be deemed to be a resident only of the State in which the ‘place of effective management’ is situated. It was found that although there were conflicting views, the expression ‘place of effective management’ was mainly determined with reference to the place where real management actually makes decisions on key business affairs of the company. Based on the following reasons it was concluded that using ‘place of effective management’ as a tie breaker rule was ineffective. • With improved communication technology and increased mobility of top level management, it makes it very difficult to pinpoint a single location where the ‘place of effective management’ is positioned; • Changes to the generic managerial structures seen in the past, makes it increasingly complex to determine where the ‘place of effective management’ is situated; and • There is no universal interpretation of the term ‘place of effective management’ within the international arena. Against the backdrop that each option for determining the ‘place of effective management, analysed in Chapter 4 had its own flaws, it is almost impossible to determine a company’s residency based on a single test. It was therefore, recommended that the tie breaker rule consist of a hierarchy of the following tests. 1. Deemed to be resident of the country in which place of effective management is situated, as defined by SARS’ interpretation. 2. Deemed to be a resident of the country in which its economic nexus is the strongest. 3. Conflict to be resolved by mutual agreement between the two Contracting States. / Thesis (M.Com. (Tax))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2011.

Begreppet beneficial owner finns i artiklarna 10, 11 och 12 i OECD:s modellavtal och är viktigt då det krävs att en part utgör beneficial owner för att denne ska ha rätt till den skattelättnad som erbjuds i de relevanta artiklarna. Då begreppet är oklart har OECD gett ut förslag på nya kommentarer till det i avsikt att klargöra dess innebörd. Uppsatsens syfte är att utreda innebörden av beneficial owner i artiklarna 10, 11 och 12 i OECD:s modellavtal från ett tolknings och tillämpnings perspektiv. Av utredningen framkom att begreppet enbart bör tolkas enligt modellavtalet och att det ska tillämpas i situationer, i vilket en mottagare av en inkomst har en skyldighet relaterad till att vidarebefordra inkomsten till en annan part och därför agerar som en mellanhandel. Om en part har en sådan skyldighet kan denne inte utgöra beneficial owner. I nuläget är dock termen relaterad oklar och författaren anser att den bör klargöras av OECD snarast. Vid utredningen om en part utgör beneficial owner bör först ett legalt tillvägagångsätt användas för att undersöka om det finns en skyldighet relaterad till att vidarebefordra inkomsten i partens legala dokument. Om detta inte hittas bör därefter både ett legalt och faktabaserat tillvägagångsätt användas, vid utredningen av fakta och omständigheter för att se om det finns substans som visar på att parten i praktiken är bunden (som om att parten hade en kontraktuell eller legal skyldighet) att vidarebefordra inkomsten.   Författarens slutsats blev att en part för att utgöra beneficial owner måste vara den som har rätten att använda den mottagna inkomsten efter vilja och även vara den som faktiskt åtnjuter de ekonomiska fördelarna av denna. Vidare måste parten också behandlas som ägaren till inkomsten i skattehänseende i hemviststaten, då en skattelättnad inte bör ges om det inte föreligger en risk för dubbelbeskattning. / The term beneficial owner is contained in articles 10, 11 and 12 in the OECD Model Tax Convention and is of importance since it is required that a party is the beneficial owner in order to be entitled to the tax relief offered in the relevant articles. Since the term is unclear, OECD has published proposals for new comments to clarify its meaning. The purpose of this study is to investigate the meaning of the term beneficial owner in articles 10, 11 and 12 in the OECD Model Tax Convention from an interpretation and application perspective. The investigation revealed that the term should only be interpreted in accordance with the OECD Model Tax Convention and that it aims at a recipient who has an obligation related to forwarding an income to another party and who is therefore acting as an intermediary. If a party has such an obligation, then he cannot be the beneficial owner. At present the term related is unclear and the author thinks that it should be clarified by the OECD as soon as possible. When investigating whether a party is the beneficial owner a legal approach should be used first to examine whether there is an obligation related to forwarding the income in the party's legal documents. If this is not found, then both a legal and factual approach should be used when examining the facts and circumstances in order to see if there is substance to show that the party is in practice bound (as if that party had a contractual or legal obligation) to forward the income. The author's conclusion is that a part to be the beneficial owner must be the one who has the right to use the received income as they wish and also be the one who actually enjoys the economic benefits of it. Furthermore, the party must also be treated as the owner of the income for tax purposes in the State of residence, since tax relief should not be given unless there is a risk of double taxation.

Double taxation could arise in a situation where resident- resident conflicts occur. Resident–resident conflicts occur in the situation where both countries regard such a person as a “resident” for tax purposes under their domestic legislation. For that reason, all income that is earned by that person, irrespective of the jurisdiction it is earned in, will be subject to tax in both countries. In order to resolve these conflicts, the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development’s (“OECD’s”) Model Tax Convention contains a tie breaker clause which states that a non-individual shall be deemed to be a resident only of the State in which the ‘place of effective management’ is situated. It was found that although there were conflicting views, the expression ‘place of effective management’ was mainly determined with reference to the place where real management actually makes decisions on key business affairs of the company. Based on the following reasons it was concluded that using ‘place of effective management’ as a tie breaker rule was ineffective. • With improved communication technology and increased mobility of top level management, it makes it very difficult to pinpoint a single location where the ‘place of effective management’ is positioned; • Changes to the generic managerial structures seen in the past, makes it increasingly complex to determine where the ‘place of effective management’ is situated; and • There is no universal interpretation of the term ‘place of effective management’ within the international arena. Against the backdrop that each option for determining the ‘place of effective management, analysed in Chapter 4 had its own flaws, it is almost impossible to determine a company’s residency based on a single test. It was therefore, recommended that the tie breaker rule consist of a hierarchy of the following tests. 1. Deemed to be resident of the country in which place of effective management is situated, as defined by SARS’ interpretation. 2. Deemed to be a resident of the country in which its economic nexus is the strongest. 3. Conflict to be resolved by mutual agreement between the two Contracting States. / Thesis (M.Com. (Tax))--North-West University, Potchefstroom Campus, 2011.

Föreliggande uppsats undersöker effekten av ojämlikhet i inkomstfördelning på ekonomisk tillväxt med hjälp av sekundär data på nationell nivå i de 34 OECD-länderna under tidsperioden 2000-2010. Effekten studeras i en multipel regressionsanalys där ojämlikhet i inkomstfördelning är en av de inkluderade förklarings-/kontrollvariablerna i en korrekt specificerad tvärsnitts-tillväxtmodell. Gini koefficienten är studiens huvudsakliga mått på ojämlikhet i inkomstfördelning; därtill analyseras även mått på ojämlikhet i botten- och toppändan av inkomstfördelningen. Resultatet från vår studie indikerar ett negativt och mestadels av tiden signifikant samband mellan ojämlikhet i inkomstfördelning och ekonomisk tillväxt mätt med Gini koefficienten. Vid en gemensam analys av samtliga ojämlikhetsmått kvarstår det negativa och signifikanta sambandet mätt med Gini koefficienten; vi finner dock att ojämlikhet i toppändan av inkomstfördelningen är positivt och signifikant associerad med den genomsnittliga tillväxttakten i real BNP per capita, medan ojämlikhet i bottenändan av inkomstfördelningen – om än positivt relaterad till följande års tillväxttakt per capita - tappar all sin signifikans.

隨著經濟活動全球化及資本移動自由化，跨國企業及個人之資產與所得分佈全世界，且因稅捐稽徵機關與納稅人間資訊不對稱，使得稅務資訊蒐集異常困難，稅捐稽徵機關在查核跨國案件時面臨極大挑戰，國際租稅合作與資訊交換成為各國稅捐稽徵機關用以處理國際租稅規避案件之重要工具。 本文就稅務資訊交換介紹國際稅約協定範本及其發展，並與我國經濟體相當之香港、新加坡及先進國家美國、瑞士等國家及OECD、UN及EU等國際機構所公布之國際租稅最新發展進行比較。本文研究歸納，資訊交換為影響我國洽簽租稅協定成敗之關鍵因素，進行銀行資訊交換應不影響我國發展為國際金融中心，支持財政部推動洽簽包括資訊交換之租稅協定。本文建議因應國際資訊交換之趨勢，我國應加強稽徵人員訓練、進行稅捐稽徵法第5條修法、確認租稅協定之法律位階、擴大租稅協定網絡之修法及加強宣導租稅資訊交換保密性等面向，強化我國資訊交換效能。 / Due to the globalization of economic activities, the labialization of capital transactions, individual worldwide assets and income and the asymmetric information of taxpayers and tax authorities, it is difficult for tax authorities to collect information. International cooperation in tax matters is crucial to ensuring the administration and enforcement of countries’ tax laws as cross border tax evasion becomes easier with the liberalization of financial markets. This thesis first introduces the development of the models of tax convention with special reference to EOI, it then makes a comparison of the measurements of EOI in the economies such as Hong Kong, Singapore, Switzerland, and the United States, and also looks at recent publications on EOI by OECD, UN and EU. It is concluded that EOI is the key to conclude tax treaties, that EOI of bank information will not adversely affect Taiwan government policy to become an international financial center, and that Ministry of Finance is supported to conclude tax treaties including EOI. It is suggested that strengthening the efficiency and capability of EOI in the aspects of strengthening the training of the tax collectors, amendment of Article 5 of the Tax Collection Act, confirmation of the legal status of tax treaties, broadening of the net work of tax treaties and promotion of the importance of the confidentiality of the EOI, so as to follow the international trend of EOI.

The aim of this thesis is to describe and understand the introduction of entrepreneurship and enterprise projects in primary and secondary schools in the North of Sweden and to identify and analyse the driving forces and actors behind this process. In particular the influence and significance of education policy at supranational, national and subnational level for the introduction of entrepreneurship and enterprise in education are analysed. The main questions of the study have been: • How and why have entrepreneurship and enterprise education come to the schools in the northern region of Sweden, in particular within the framework of the PRIO1 project? • How were important stakeholders involved at the subnational level and how did they reason and act in relation to the introduction of entrepreneurship and enterprise in the schools? • How are the concepts of entrepreneurship and enterprise education presented in policy documents at different policy levels? The study wants to report on changes in education policy during recent years. Especially the emergence of international policy convergence and new forms of governance are among the factors that are considered. Drawing on a conceptual framework of structure and agency, the analyses in the empirical studies are informed by a combination of theoretical fields. Important contributions are rendered from the education policy literature. The first method consists of a policy study of documents produced by organisations at different levels (supranational, national and subnational). The purpose of this analysis is to capture the ideas and arguments that have been used but also to understand the context and driving forces for the introduction of entrepreneurship and enterprise in education. Starting from the supranational level, the analysis focuses mainly on two organisations, OECD and EU. These organisations were chosen because they are widely regarded as leading organisations in setting the supranational policy agenda for education. The document study consists of a selection of OECD documents that have been released during the period 1970 - 2006, as well as a selection of EU documents. The EU documents cover the last 15 years. Attention is paid to several documents at the national and subnational level as well. The second method is an interview study. The interview study aims to focus on some of the key stakeholders (agents/actors) that have been participating in the formation (initiation, financing and realisation) of a county wide project “PRIO1”, Priority Enterprise in Västerbotten, in the North of Sweden. In order to understand why and how these actors at the subnational level have become involved in the process, there exists a need to hear their arguments. The document study shows that there is interplay between the different levels, but intertextual aspects have also become visible. The policy drive and policy scope show the concatenation but also the complexity of the policy development. Education is increasingly related to economic policies, in particular through labour market policies. Although the concepts of Entrepreneurship and Enterprise have developed within the economic sector, they are penetrating the education and training systems of many countries. From the results presented in this study, it seems that lifelong learning has become the guiding principle for the amalgamation of education and the world of work, while learning is no longer equated with just schooling. The opening of the school towards the surrounding world is a characteristic development in all this, but it is also a process that certainly is stipulated by agencies and actors at different levels, as is shown in this study. The interviews with some stakeholders at the subnational level show that the promotion of entrepreneurship and enterprise in education is related to arguments for economic and societal development. The interviews also reveal some of the “bottom-up” aspects of the policy process. One of the important results of this study is that the education policy studies have to include the level beyond the national borders. The interplay between the different policy-levels (supranational, national and subnational) needs more attention in order to understand the transformation of the education system.

Md., Johns Hopkins Univ., Diss.--Baltimore, 2004. / Kopie, ersch. im Verl. UMI, Ann Arbor, Mich. - Enth. 3 Beitr.

Mass., Harvard Univ., Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, Diss.--Cambridge, 2004. / Kopie, ersch. im Verl. UMI, Ann Arbor, Mich. - Enth. 3 Beitr.

Mass., Harvard Univ., Dep. of Economics, Diss.--Cambridge, 2003. / Kopie, ersch. im Verl. UMI, Ann Arbor, Mich. - Enth.

Colo., Univ. of Colorado, Dep. of Economics, Diss.--Boulder, 2003. / Kopie, ersch. im Verl. UMI, Ann Arbor, Mich.