Dissertation submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the Degree of Master of Technology: Emergency Medical Care, Durban University of Technology, 2012. / Background In the emergency setting, the onus is on the individual practitioner’s ability to make critical decisions at critical moments in order to provide the best level of care to their patient. In order to ensure that these decisions fall in line with the best interests of the patient, the South African paramedic requires a better understanding of how to arrive at such a decision; they need to understand the clinical decision making process. This study focused on South African paramedic clinical decision making with specific reference to acute traumatic pain management, with the aim of determining the factors which influence South African paramedic clinical decision making by revealing the current method of pain management employed by South African paramedics, how they view the priority of pain management in the continuum of care and if there were any context specific factors influencing their clinical decision making. Methods A mixed method design was used to determine the factors contributing to the clinical decision making process of South African paramedics in the acute pain management of patients with acute traumatic pain. A mixture of qualitative and quantitative approaches was utilized by means of a research questionnaire as well as in-depth interviews. The questionnaires were targeted at all South African paramedics while the in-depth interviews were conducted with five participants who had been purposefully selected from the questionnaire respondents. The data analysis was conducted in a descriptive manner in order to inform the explanatory nature of the answers to the research questions and objective. Results The results provided insight into the current methods and clinical decision making processes employed by South African paramedics in the management of patients’ experiencing acute traumatic pain. The study determined that the South African paramedic’s clinical decision making process involves three key phases in the acute traumatic pain management setting, the assessment phase, the initiation/pain management phase and the conclusion/re-evaluation phase, with each phase utilizing different decision making models, the intuitive/humanist model, the hypothetico- deductive model and a model which combined both of the aforementioned models. In addition to this, numerous factors such as the provision of care in order to facilitate further management and transportation to an appropriate facility, which influenced clinical decision making, were identified. Amongst South African paramedics, pain management was identified as coming second only to the interventions required to manage immediately life threatening conditions in terms of the prioritization of treatment. Recommendations A variety of recommendations which included the need to further the development of clinical decision making and pain management through research and education as well as considerations for investigation into the potential expansion of South African paramedic scope of practice in the pain management environment were made.

Submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master’s Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Durban University of Technology, 2014. / BACKGROUND Mechanical neck pain (MNP) has been described as any condition which changes joint mechanics and muscle structure / function. A review of the current literature shows that Muscle Energy Technique (MET) is an effective manual therapy for patients with acute or chronic MNP. The most useful contraction of MET however remains unknown. Some authors advocate the use of a two to seven second MET (Brous, 2005; Greenman, 2003 Mitchell, Moran, and Pruzzo, 1979) whilst other authors have recommended contraction durations of 30 to 60 seconds (Chaitow, 2006; Feland et al., 2001; Bandy and Irion, 1994). This study aimed to establish the most suitable contraction duration of MET in the treatment of chronic MNP by comparing a short duration MET to a long duration MET. OBJECTIVES Objectives included the comparison of a five-second (short duration) MET and a 45-second (long duration) MET in terms of subjective and objective findings in the treatment of chronic MNP. METHOD This randomized clinical trial, with 53 participants utilised a randomization table for group allocation. For the purpose of this study an average of the short contraction durations reported in the literature i.e. five seconds, was used for the short duration MET treatment and an average of the long contraction durations reported in the literature i.e. 45 seconds, was used for the long duration MET. Group A (n=26) received the five-second MET contraction and Group B (n=27) received the 45-second MET contraction treatment. Objective measures included the cervical range of motion (CROM Goniometer) and tenderness levels (algometer). The subjective measures were pain (Numerical Rating Scale-101) and MNP related disability (CMCC Neck Disability Index). Each participant received four treatments over a two week period, with all data collected prior to the first and third consultations and at the final follow up. Data were analysed using the SPSS version 20 (IBM), with a statistically significant p value set at <0.05. Repeated measures ANOVA testing determined the intergroup effects. To assess intergroup effects and effects of the intervention a time x treatment group interaction analysis was conducted. Profile plots assessed direction and trend of the effect of the treatment. RESULTS Intra-group analysis of both groups showed significant improvement in all of the range of motion measures (over time) except for Flexion, Right Lateral Flexion and Left Rotation in Group A and Flexion, Extension, Right Lateral Flexion and Left Lateral Flexion in Group B. The intra-group analysis also showed a significant improvement in the neck disability index scores and the tenderness measurements in both groups. The results of the inter-group analysis revealed that only Left Lateral Flexion showed a significant treatment effect (p=0.011) where increased scores were shown in Group A and not in Group B. There was no treatment effect for the neck disability index scores or the tenderness measurements. CONCLUSION It may be concluded that both treatment protocols were equally effective for all outcomes except for Left Lateral Flexion where the five-second MET seemed to show greater degree of improvement than the 45-second MET. The neck disability index scores and the pain levels of participants in both groups showed an improvement. No treatment was better than the other in terms of these two variables. This therefore seems to support the use of the shorter duration MET in clinical practice.

Thesis (MBA)--Stellenbosch University, 2012. / Analgesics are the medication most-generally used by modern society. The pain management market has therefore experienced substantial growth over the last few years. This research report aims to provide a critical review of pain management in the pharmaceutical market in South Africa, in order to establish and evaluate the most significant growth factors. This research report provides an overview of the history of pain, the basic physiology of pain and pain classification systems. There are three categories of analgesics - opioid analgesics, non-opioid analgesics and adjuvant analgesics. These categories of analgesics have been analysed according to the most generally-used MIMS pharmacological classification system referring to the analgesic therapeutic classes. These are narcotic analgesics, analgesics and antipyretics, combination analgesics, others such as tramadol and musculo-skeletal agents which consist of NSAIDs and COX inhibitors. Growth over the last four years (from August 2009 to July 2012) will be determined by analysing data per molecule, per product and per manufacturer. Splits between branded and generic drugs will also be analysed. Top prescribers by healthcare professionals will be examined, analysing scripting data from ImpactRx, which covers 85% of the private market data nationally. There are currently approximately 41 analgesic molecules in the assessed pain market which has produced 738 analgesic products. The analgesic market (worldwide and in South Africa) has seen the launch of only a few new drugs. New molecules of the same drug class or family have been launched, but in effect they can be viewed as mere line extensions with claimed reduction in side effects, advanced delivery times or improved efficacy. Two new molecules have been launched in the South African market in the narcotic analgesic class, (oxycodone and hydromorphone), however these molecules have been available internationally for years. Accelerated growth of the pain management market has mainly been met by combination analgesics, which in essence are not new, but rather a combination of different active ingredients or new drug delivery systems. The impact of product withdrawals on market share is also evaluated. The development and acceptance of generics are highlighted as key contributing factors in the growth of the analgesic market. Important to note is that generics often compete in their own generic market share. This may be the reason why the generic market does not show a significant increase over branded products. Another significant trend evident in the increased acceptance of generics, is that manufacturers, in order to keep market share, may choose to produce their own generic medication after their branded products patent has expired. Pain is one of the main reasons why patients seek medical attention and it is the physician’s ethical responsibility to treat patients and provide them with effective pain relief medication. The WHO analgesic ladder as a guideline for treating pain has proven to be effective after 25 years in practice. It is forecasted that an increase in the narcotic analgesic class will be noted. Pain is heavily undertreated worldwide and in South Africa, Increased awareness, education, new advanced research and knowledge may help to address this dilemma.

Aim of the study is to explore the role caring practices within the nurse-patient relationship, in facilitating effective chronic pain management in the primary health care context. Objectives are to analyse the current caring practices within the nurse-patient relationship during the management of patients with chronic pain within primary health care services; explore the challenges experienced by nurses in primary health care services when managing patients with chronic pain; observe the caring practices within the nurse patient interaction for the patients suffering from chronic pain within the Primary health care setting and explain the nurses‟ caring practices when managing their chronic pain in the primary health care setting. Method The research design for this study is sequential, explanatory and mixed method, which is more appropriate due to the complexity of the phenomenon under study. Findings: Although the survey measured the caring practices subjectively which other studies had done consistently, generally nurses associated caring as their core function within the health profession. Nurses do not actively involve the patients in the development of a treatment plan and as a result the caring behaviours that are intended to benefit the patients are not realised and, thus patients report nurses as not being caring. The results indicated that lack of an inclusive treatment plan, which can only be discovered through the development of the therapeutic NPR, is not given priority in the management of patients with chronic pain Conclusions: Caring should not be seen as concrete execution of the set of activities towards the patient but rather as a joint venture between the nurse and the patient. The strength of the model developed in this study is the identification of the nurses‟ internal readiness to create a caring environment by experiencing the love, faith and hope before engaging with the patient. / Health Studies

Submitted in partial compliance with the requirements for the Master’s Degree in Technology: Chiropractic, Durban University of Technology, 2014. / Background: Myofascial Pain and Dysfunction (MPD) is a diagnosis commonly encountered by practitioners, hence, there are several treatment approaches employed by various practicing physicians. Practitioners are required to perform evidence-based protocols on patients; however, such intervention becomes increasingly difficult with the increasing volume of evidence available with regards to treatment of MPD. A systematic review provides a well-structured, critical analysis of the available protocols, and as such, provides practitioners with an evidence-based summary of the available modalities and the effectiveness of these modalities. Thus, the aim of the study was to systematically review and evaluate the literature to determine the effects of various non-invasive modalities on MPD. Objectives: Studies investigating various non-invasive modalities were identified, evaluated against the inclusion criteria and then reviewed against PEDro criteria to present current available evidence regarding their effectiveness as a source of treatment for MPD. Methods: A literature search was conducted, based on key terms including: active and latent myofascial trigger points, manual therapy, manipulation, acupressure, massage, muscle stretching, ultrasound, transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation, electric stimulation therapy, magnetic field therapy, and exercise therapy. Databases searched were: PubMed, EBSCOhost, Medline, CINAL, Proquest, Health Source, Sport Discus, Science Direct, Springer Link, Google Scholar and Summons. The articles were screened according to inclusion and exclusion criteria, after which a secondary hand and reference searches were performed. Thereafter, the articles were reviewed by four independent reviewers and the researcher. The PEDro Scale was used to determine methodological rigor of the included studies. The results were then analysed and ranked. Results: Following the screening process during data collection for this study, a total of 25 studies were identified and included. The review and ranking of these studies revealed a moderate level of evidence present for the effectiveness of Topical Agents. A limited level of evidence was noted for TENS, Ischemic Compression, Ultrasound, Laser and Other Modalities. Approximately 25% of the reviewed studies involved combination therapies; hence their outcomes cannot be applied to the effectiveness of individual modalities. Conclusion: Upon comparison of the quality of evidence available for the various types of modalities present for the treatment of MPD, it was noted that Topical Agents were supported by a stronger level of evidence than TENS, Ischeamic Compression, Ultrasound, Laser and Other Modalities. However, due to a lack of strong overall evidence for any of these modalities it has been concluded that more research is required to establish which modality is in fact the most effective.

Aim of the study is to explore the role caring practices within the nurse-patient relationship, in facilitating effective chronic pain management in the primary health care context. Objectives are to analyse the current caring practices within the nurse-patient relationship during the management of patients with chronic pain within primary health care services; explore the challenges experienced by nurses in primary health care services when managing patients with chronic pain; observe the caring practices within the nurse patient interaction for the patients suffering from chronic pain within the Primary health care setting and explain the nurses‟ caring practices when managing their chronic pain in the primary health care setting. Method The research design for this study is sequential, explanatory and mixed method, which is more appropriate due to the complexity of the phenomenon under study. Findings: Although the survey measured the caring practices subjectively which other studies had done consistently, generally nurses associated caring as their core function within the health profession. Nurses do not actively involve the patients in the development of a treatment plan and as a result the caring behaviours that are intended to benefit the patients are not realised and, thus patients report nurses as not being caring. The results indicated that lack of an inclusive treatment plan, which can only be discovered through the development of the therapeutic NPR, is not given priority in the management of patients with chronic pain Conclusions: Caring should not be seen as concrete execution of the set of activities towards the patient but rather as a joint venture between the nurse and the patient. The strength of the model developed in this study is the identification of the nurses‟ internal readiness to create a caring environment by experiencing the love, faith and hope before engaging with the patient. / Health Studies