Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T15:39:06Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DelioHDO_DISSERT.pdf: 712638 bytes, checksum: 38070559aaed2c51fdabb003e5bbef83 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-03-20 / Psychology uses listening as a work resource. When it comes to psychotherapy, listening establishes communication and makes psychologist-client dialogue easier. This qualitative research aims to discuss the clinic listening in phenomenological attitude in existential-phenomenological psychotherapy with deaf people. This perspective is based on the thinking of German philosopher Martin Heidegger, who considers humane a being-with and being-in-the-world, always unveiling meanings. Regarding the deaf people, Libras is currently the natural language of Brazilian deaf people. In this new language configuration, communication occurs in a visual-spatial modality. Thus, listening and speech gain new dimensions, demanding different ways of understanding in the field of psychotherapy. To the development of this research, we present excerpts from therapeutic sessions narratives with a deaf client, interpreted in the light of Heidegger s hermeneutics. We consider that it is possible for the psychotherapist to listen to deaf people in phenomenological attitude. Such position, which does not naturalize and limit the humane, helps so that the clients do not feel responsible for their existence and can hermeneutically converse in their language. In this context, the psychologist must be qualified to conduct the treatment in Libras. We hope that this research can, somehow, fill the existing gap of the scientific production about such theme in the field of Psychology and, mainly, instigate discussion in the context of Psychology courses on the importance and need to qualify psychologists for the management of clinical practice with deaf people / A psicologia faz uso da escuta como um dos recursos do seu trabalho. Em se tratando da psicoterapia, a escuta estabelece a comunica??o e facilita o di?logo entre psic?logocliente. A presente pesquisa, de car?ter qualitativo, tem por objetivo discutir a escuta cl?nica na atitude fenomenol?gica na psicoterapia fenomenol?gico-existencial com pessoas surdas. Essa perspectiva est? embasada no pensamento do fil?sofo alem?o Martin Heidegger, que considera o humano um ser-no-mundo-com-os-outros, sempre desvelando sentidos. Com rela??o ?s pessoas surdas, atualmente, a Libras ? a l?ngua natural das pessoas surdas brasileiras. Nessa nova configura??o de l?ngua, a comunica??o ocorre na modalidade espa?o-visual. Assim, escuta e fala ganham novas dimens?es que demandam diferentes formas de compreens?o no campo da psicoterapia. Para o desenvolvimento desta pesquisa, apresentamos recortes das narrativas de sess?es psicoterap?uticas com um cliente surdo, interpretadas ? luz da hermen?utica heideggeriana. Consideramos ser poss?vel para o psicoterapeuta escutar pessoas surdas em atitude fenomenol?gica, com postura que n?o naturaliza e n?o limita o humano, auxiliando para que o cliente se responsabilize por seu existir e que possa dialogar hermeneuticamente em sua l?ngua, cabendo, nesse contexto, ao psic?logo, estar habilitado em Libras para realizar o atendimento. Esperamos que esta pesquisa possa, de alguma forma, preencher a lacuna existente no que se refere ? produ??o cient?fica sobre tal tem?tica, no campo da psicologia, e, principalmente, fomentar a discuss?o no contexto dos cursos de psicologia acerca da import?ncia e necessidade de capacitar o psic?logo para o exerc?cio da pr?tica cl?nica com pessoas surdas

Au cœur de la phénoménologie gît une thèse métaphysique selon laquelle le flux phénoménal du vécu (Erlebnisstrom) puise son sens et son être en lui-même, plutôt que d’une quelque réalité extérieure ou sous-jacente. En outre, cette thèse de l’autonomie existentielle du flux phénoménal, ou de l’équivalence de l’être et du paraître, ne s’atteste que moyennant une transformation complète de notre rapport au monde, où l’on s’efforce de se mettre à l’écoute des choses, et du mystère qui les enveloppe, plutôt que de les maîtriser. Pris ensemble, cette thèse métaphysique et cette attitude du laisser-être (Seinlassen) constituent les deux piliers de la phénoménologie comme manière de vivre dont la présente thèse se propose de tracer les grandes lignes. Pour ce faire, nous centrons nos recherches sur l’œuvre du fondateur de la phénoménologie, Edmund Husserl, que nous soumettons toutefois à une critique immanente; c’est Husserl qui à la fois dégage l’idée d’une phénoménologie comme manière de vivre et lui pose le plus sérieux obstacle. Cette tension au sein de la pensée husserlienne s’aperçoit à même les deux exigences qui la définissent : celle du « retour aux choses mêmes », d’une part, et celle de la description eidétique, de l’autre. À l’aide de différents interlocuteurs – qui nous permettent d’interroger Husserl rétrospectivement (Pyrrhon), contemporainement (James, Bergson) et prospectivement (Heidegger) –, nous montrons que ces deux exigences sont en fait incompatibles, et proposons afin de résoudre cette contradiction d’éliminer un de ses termes, soit l’exigence de description eidétique. Se fait alors jour la possibilité d’une phénoménologie qui assume pleinement sa vocation existentielle. Enfin, en parallèle à cette critique immanente de Husserl, et afin de l’étayer, nous développons une explication génétique de l’ἐποχή transcendantale, où celle-ci est caractérisée en tant que conversion de l’attitude naturelle à une forme de conscience postréflexive, c’est-à-dire mystique. / At the heart of phenomenology lies a metaphysical claim according to which the phenomenal stream of lived experience (Erlebnisstrom) derives its meaning and its being from itself, rather than from some external or underlying reality. Moreover, this claim of the existential autonomy of the phenomenal stream, or of the equivalence of being and appearing, can only be verified through a complete transformation of our relationship to the world, where we seek to become mindful of things, and of the mystery in which they are steeped, rather than seeking to master them. Taken together, this metaphysical claim and this attitude of letting-be (Seinlassen) constitute the two pillars of phenomenology as a way of life, which the present thesis proposes to describe in broad outline. To do so, we focus our research on the work of the founder of phenomenology, Edmund Husserl, which we submit however to an internal critique; it is Husserl who both allows us to contemplate the idea of phenomenology as a way of life and at the same time poses the greatest obstacle to it. This tension within Husserlian thought can be seen in the two imperatives that define it: that of the “return to the things themselves”, on the one hand, and that of eidetic description, on the other. With the help of various interlocutors – who allow us to interrogate Husserl retrospectively (Pyrrho), contemporaneously (James, Bergson) and prospectively (Heidegger) – we show that these two imperatives are in fact incompatible, and propose in order to lift this contradiction to eliminate one of its terms, namely the imperative of eidetic description. Thus a path is cleared for a phenomenology that fully commits itself to its existential vocation. Finally, in parallel to this internal critique of Husserl, and to better support it, we develop a genetic explanation of the transcendental ἐποχή, where it is characterized as a conversion from the natural attitude to a post-reflective, that is mystical, form of consciousness.