En kamera fångar ögonblick av det ljus som människan kan uppfatta, eller verkligheten som det ibland kallas. Dessa ögonblick i form av fotografier, arbetar de elever och den lärare med, som Ola Lindholm har följt på gymnasiet. Läsaren kan följa hur eleverna interagerar, hur det sociala samspelet organiseras under lektioner och redovisningar, vad som görs viktigt samt hur bildteoretiska- och yrkesmässiga kunskaper framträder i interaktionen. I studien framträder ett arbetssätt som ger eleverna ansvar och möjlighet att visa vad de kan i interaktionerna och vid redovisningarna av deras fotografier. Resultatet visar hur läraren försöker få eleverna att se skillnader i fotografiets uttryck, skärpedjup, bildbeskärning etcetera. Ibland gör eleverna motstånd och förhandlar med läraren där eleverna hävdar sin kunskap och sina åsikter om sina bilder. I bildanalysen av ett elevfotografi framträder två olika intentioner med de förslag som läraren och eleven förhandlar om. Studien visar att bildteorier, bildspråket och vad bilden kan berätta, inte är lika framträdande i interaktionen som frågor om teknik och process. Ola Lindholm, är bild- och medielärare på Sundstagymnasiet i Karlstad. Licentiatavhandlingen har skrivits inom Forskarskolan i yrkesämnenas didaktik. / A camera captures the moment of light that humans can perceive, or the reality as it is sometimes called. The work and the interaction in the classroom with these frozen moments in the form of photographs can be followed in this study at a media program in high school. The aim of the study is to research how students interact, how the social interaction is organized in lectures and presentations, what becomes important and how the pictorial theory and professional knowledge emerges from the interaction.The study reveals a didactical way of working that gives students the responsibility and opportunity to communicate and show what they can, both in interactions with the teacher during their work with the photographic picture and in the presentations of their photographs. The results show how the teacher tries to get students to see the differences in the photographic expression, depth of field, cropping and so on. Sometimes the students make resistance and negotiate with the teacher, showing knowledge and arguing for their opinions about their pictures. One picture analysis of student photography reveals different intentions with the proposals that the teacher and student negotiates about. The study shows that pictorial theories, picture language, and the communicative intention, are not as prominent in the interaction as issues about technique and process.

In revolving around the construction of history, this study rethinks the historical narrative of Tuija Lindström’s professorship at Fotohögskolan in the 1990s. Through this, the aim is to widen the understanding of the role of both the school and the professor’s position within the Swedish photographic field in the postmodern era. The main material consists of archival documents from Fotohögskolan, such as syllabuses, schedules, and staff records. Other important sources include interviews with people connected to the school and articles from newspapers and photographic journals. In order to examine power structures, the theoretical framework is built upon Pierre Bourdieu’s concept of the cultural field. To further understand this, critical discourse analysis is also used both as a method and theory. The study shows that the development of Fotohögskolan grew out of many events and endeavours traceable to broader structural struggles within the Swedish field of photography in the 1990s. The changes are shown to be connected to postmodern tendencies which influenced the whole field in a certain direction, and how the school became an important institution to manifest this. Further, the study shows that the professorship played an important role as a central figure for Swedish photography.