Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universiẗat, Magisterarbeit, 2008.

余子恆. / 複印本. / Thesis (M.A.)--香港中文大學, 1988. / Fu yin ben. / Includes bibliographical references: leaves 176-190. / Yu Ziheng. / Thesis (M.A.)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue, 1988.

Thesis (M.A.)--香港中文大學. / Ms. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 191-195). / Thesis (M.A.)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue. / 序言 --- p.1-6 / 導言 --- p.7-12 / Chapter 第一章 --- 分界問題及歸納法問題之歷史淵源 --- p.13-42 / 前言 --- p.13-14 / Chapter （一） --- 康德三分界問題 --- p.15-27 / Chapter （二） --- 休謨之歸納法問題　 --- p.28-42 / Chapter 第二章 --- 分界問題及歸納法問題之解決 --- p.43-94 / 前言 --- p.43 / Chapter （一） --- 哲學是什麼及哲學家的責任　 --- p.44-47 / Chapter （二） --- 知識論的概念 --- p.48-53 / Chapter (i) --- 知識論是什麼 --- p.48-50 / Chapter (ii) --- 心理主義之消除 --- p.50-53 / Chapter （三） --- 分界問題 --- p.54-78 / Chapter (i) --- 波柏爾的分界標準 --- p.54-64 / Chapter (ii) --- 分界標準所引起的困難 --- p.64-68 / Chapter (iii) --- 邏輯實証論的分界標準 --- p.68-71 / Chapter (iv) --- 波柏爾對於邏輯實徵論的分界標準之批判 --- p.71-78 / Chapter （A） --- 可否証性與可檢証性 --- p.71-75 / Chapter (B) --- 意義問題 --- p.75-78 / Chapter （四） --- 归納法問題　 --- p.79-94 / Chapter 第三章 --- 客观知識論之原素　 --- p.95-156 / 前言 --- p.95 / Chapter （一） --- 形而上實在論 --- p.96-104 / Chapter （二） --- 科學的目的 --- p.105-115 / Chapter （三） --- 真理論 --- p.116-126 / Chapter （四） --- 三個世界´ؤ´ؤ沒有認知主體的知識論 --- p.127-147 / Chapter （五） --- 批判主觀知識論 --- p.149-156 / Chapter 第四章 --- 關於客觀知識論的討論 --- p.157-190 / 前言 --- p.157 / Chapter （一） --- 關於知識概念的討論　 --- p.160-170 / Chapter （二） --- 關於分界標準可否証性的討論 --- p.171-180 / Chapter （三） --- 關於歸納法問題的討論 --- p.181-183 / Chapter （四） --- 關於三個世界問題的討論 --- p.184-190 / 参攷書籍 --- p.191-195

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston University / This dissertation confronts contemporary physical cosmology with Karl Popper's standards of scientific method and theory construction. To the degree to which there are differences, an attempt is made to criticize the major cosmological models in the light of Popper's analysis and, in turn, to explore revisions necessitated in this analysis by the unique problems of cosmology. As background, the major facets of Popper's work are presented in detail: his falsifiability criterion for demarcating scientific theories from metaphysics, his hypothetico-deductive method, and his rejection of induction. Then the origins of general relativity and its competitors are analyzed both as explanatory background to modern cosmology and so as to reveal the history of certain problems pertinent to Popper's scheme: for instance, the use of arguments from simplicity, the ideas of the utility of analogy and models, and the relation of theory to reality. Finally, the great variety of evolutionary, fundamentalistic, and steady-state models available for study is explored in detail as to presupposition and methodology so that their distinctives are revealed and a basis for comparison with Popper's suggestions provided. [TRUNCATED]

Orientador : Luis Alberto Peluso / Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciencias Humanas / Made available in DSpace on 2018-07-14T02:09:54Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Rufatto_CarlosAlberto_M.pdf: 20295971 bytes, checksum: d99f127ab8da80c4463c0363c609aeaf (MD5) Previous issue date: 1991 / Resumo: De acordo com Popper, no âmbito da Ciência haveria a possibilidade para uma discussão e escolha racional entre teorias concorrentes. Esta tese procura investigar se um processo semelhante seria possível no âmbito da concepção popperiana de política. A partir de uma análise da concepção de Popper sobre a Ciência se procurará determinar quais as condições que tornariam possível a discussão e a escolha racional de teorias nesta esfera. De posse desses dados se investigará quais as condições que possibilitariam um processo semelhante a este no âmbito da concepção popperiana de política. Um dos resultados da investigação é a constatação de que Popper, apesar da importância que confere para a racionalidade na política, não se aprofundou na análise das condições que poderiam viabilizar tal projeto. O objetivo principal da tese é fazer avançar o debate a respeito desta questão. Se argumentará no sentido de mostrar que as condições que garantem a discussão e a escolha racional de teorias, tanto na Ciência como na política, são bastante semelhantes; e que algumas condições, que não foram abordadas em profundidade por Popper, podem ser elaboradas segundo uma interpretação que estabelece relações com sua concepção de Ciência e que se mostram em sintonia com a tradição liberal da qual ele é tributário / Abstract: Not informed. / Mestrado / Filosofia Politica / Mestre em Filosofia Politica

Orientador: Michel Ghins / Dissertação (mestrado)-Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciencias Humanas / Made available in DSpace on 2018-07-13T21:34:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Caponi_GustavoAndres_M.pdf: 32204747 bytes, checksum: 2f0387568c015dcda6275d34398fc05b (MD5) Previous issue date: 1989 / Resumo: Não informado / Abstract: Not informed. / Mestrado / Mestre em Lógica e Filosofia da Ciência

Thesis (Ph.D.)--Boston University / PLEASE NOTE: Boston University Libraries did not receive an Authorization To Manage form for this thesis or dissertation. It is therefore not openly accessible, though it may be available by request. If you are the author or principal advisor of this work and would like to request open access for it, please contact us at open-help@bu.edu. Thank you. / The central aim of this dissertation is to inquire whether there is any one concern or end that Karl Popper regards as primary and therefore binding for all areas of human endeavor. Attention centers upon his conjecture and refutation methodology for theoretical empirical science (Chapter I), his methodologies for theoretical and technological social science (Chapter II), and his social philosophy (Chapter III). The thesis of the dissertation is that Popper does subscribe to an ultimate concern, namely, the preservation and furthering of rationalism. Furthermore, that the means Popper stipulates for the realization of this end would inhibit, or prohibit, use of his methodology for theoretical science by certain sciences. [TRUNCATED] / 2031-01-01

Orientador: Octavio Ianni / Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciencias Humanas / Made available in DSpace on 2018-07-20T15:15:26Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Paiva_LuizHenriquedaSilvade_M.pdf: 2056577 bytes, checksum: b15662d79199e801ca7163d05a351561 (MD5) Previous issue date: 1995 / Resumo: Não informado / Abstract: Not informed / Mestrado / Mestre em Ciências Sociais

Orientador : Michael Wrigley / Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciencias Humanas / Made available in DSpace on 2018-07-17T08:20:04Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Caponi_GustavoAndres_D.pdf: 16497294 bytes, checksum: 676421e07ab16dd82bb2249aead86ebc (MD5) Previous issue date: 1992 / Resumo: Não informado / Abstract: Not informed. / Doutorado / Doutor em Lógica e Filosofia da Ciência

Submitted by Filipe dos Santos (fsantos@pucsp.br) on 2017-12-12T11:31:08Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Pedro Augusto Ciola de Almeida.pdf: 1437913 bytes, checksum: 6113d6dd4c49a1225406ed98f85729a5 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2017-12-12T11:31:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Pedro Augusto Ciola de Almeida.pdf: 1437913 bytes, checksum: 6113d6dd4c49a1225406ed98f85729a5 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-11-28 / The philosophers are insightful in capturing the great changes in mainly of human activities such as economy, policy, science, religion and ethic. It doesn't only change the world we live but also man comprehension about themselves and the place ourselves occupy in universe. It doesn't mean the philosopher will make a well-succeeded reflection about the problems which cross his way. In fact, it happens the opposite: we commit more mistakes than right perceptions. Because of this according to Popper we must be criticals including about ourselves. In addition, Popper realized the scientifical revolution that would be with the coming of Einstein's science and he produced a new pattern of limit between science and non-science with the falsificacionism as well as he reinterpreted the value of scientifical and philosofical knowledge from a non-optimistic epistemology. On political philosophy, Popper inspired himself on Scandinavian counries and United Kingdom to build what he called openned society which means a tolerable society, not ready and over but under reformation on gradually and full time. Identifying the gradual and slow reformations of the open society is the thesis of this dissertation / Os filósofos são perspicazes em captar mudanças nas principais atividades humanas: economia, política, ciência, religião e a ética que não apenas mudam o mundo em que vivemos, mas também a própria compreensão de homem e o espaço que ocupa no universo. Isso não significa que o filósofo elaborará uma reflexão bem sucedida aos problemas que os interpela, na verdade ocorre o contrário: nós mais erramos do que acertamos, por essa razão segundo Popper devemos ser críticos e autocríticos. Com efeito, Popper percebeu a revolução cientifica que viria com o advento da ciência de Einstein e elaborou um novo critério de demarcação de ciência e não ciência com o falsificacionismo, bem como reinterpretou o valor do conhecimento cientifico e da filosofia a partir de uma epistemologia não otimista. Na filosofia política, Popper inspirou-se nos países escandinavos e no Reino Unido para construir o que chamou de sociedade aberta, isto é, uma sociedade tolerante, que não está pronta e acabada, mas que constantemente e gradualmente se reforma. Identificar as reformas graduais e lentas da sociedade aberta é a tese desta dissertação