Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 2002. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 313-325). Also available on the Internet.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Wisconsin--Madison, 2002. / eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (p. 313-325).

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Texas at Austin, 1999. / Vita. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 300-324). Available also in a digital version from Dissertation Abstracts.

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Agra. / Bibliography: p. [203]-235.

Originally presented as the author's Thesis (doctoral)--Universität, Kiel, 2001. / Genealogical table in pocket. Includes bibliographical references (p. 308-332).

Originally presented as the author's Thesis (doctoral)--Universität, Kiel, 2001. / Genealogical table in pocket. Includes bibliographical references (p. 308-332).

Thesis (Ph. D.)--UCLA, 2009. / Vita. Illustrations not reproduced. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 694-708).

Originally presented as the author's thesis, University of Bombay, 1964. / Running title: Relations of Bikaner with central powers. Includes bibliographical references (p. 405-412).

Envisioned as a contribution to South Asian studies in general, and the fields of historical and political anthropology in particular, this dissertation develops around a set of relationships centered on the concept of sovereignty. In addressing the question of what the expenditure on Brahmins and the colonial, missionary, and Nair critiques against it meant for the evolving notion of sovereignty for the princely state of Travancore in the nineteenth century, I argue that the colonial, missionary and Nair critiques were not just based on the economic logic of productivity and the governmental logic of welfare, but also on the recognition of the Brahmin Problem as the fundamental crisis of sovereignty. Brahmin is the name of a problem that concerns the practice of expenditure, the relationship of property, and the construction of religion in the nineteenth-century Travancore. Travancore, located in the southwest of today's South India, was a native princely state under the indirect rule of the British East India Company in the first half of the nineteenth century and under the British crown in the second half. The problem was articulated in the colonial critique of spending money on Brahmins, their ceremonies, and their feeding. In trying to construct an archive of the crisis out of this problem embedded in the colonial and later missionary and Nair critiques of the state's expenditure in the nineteenth century, I focus on three key sites of contestation. The first one is the relationship of property, the second is the practice of feeding, and the third is expenditure on ceremonials. The postulation of the problem in these three sites is marked by colonial policies such as the integration of temples, or Brahmin properties, to the state treasury in the early nineteenth century and the activation of expenditure as a category of critique owing to the colonial pressure on the native state of Travancore to ensure the surplus of two lakhs rupees per year for the tributary payment for the British and the emergence of what I call public critique in nineteenth century. In my effort to build this problem, I particularly pay attention to its relationship with the evolving notion of sovereignty in the nineteenth century. This relationship is not a stable or steady text for analysis, but rather contingent on how the state variously negotiated this problem, leading to the emergence of the concepts of charity, trust, and religion. I characterize this negotiation of the state as translation, transposition, and adaptation within the colonial grammar of power. The archive of this negotiation, characterized by translation, transposition, and adaptation, provided me with the first material to think about charity, trust, and religion and see how they were connected to the evolving sovereignty of the state. By drawing on primary sources collected from various archives in Kerala, I map how sovereignty constituted a problem space in Travancore for a genealogical rumination. Following David Scott, Quentin Skinner, Ludwig Wittgenstein, Talal Asad, and Michel Foucault, I employ genealogy as a method to understand sovereignty as a relationship of power rather than an absolute type of power. This relationship of power is characterized by the crisis of the Brahmin Problem, giving rise to what I call, following Scott, the problem space of sovereignty. My primary sources consist of Travancore administrative records, temple records, written exchanges between the Dewan of Travancore and the British Resident, royal orders, colonial policy records, records of the policy discussion for temple reform, newspapers, and magazines. The dissertation concludes with a reflection on the scholarly stakes in studying sovereignty as a relationship of power in the context of caste, religion, and state in the contemporary context. / Doctor of Philosophy / The dissertation proposes a genealogical approach to the study of sovereignty in the nineteenth-century Travancore princely state by constructing what it calls the Brahmin Problem. I conceptualize the Brahmin problem as a form of expenditure that remained unexplained to the colonial officials in the Madras Presidency. Following the nineteenth-century debates around expenditure, charity, and trust, the dissertation traces varying expressions of sovereignty across time and argues that the princely state of Travancore showcased an archive of crisis cataloged by the excessive presence of the Brahmin problem. What this archive of crisis entailed was a necessity for the state to refine its policies of expenditure that include translation, transposition, and adaptation within the colonial grammar of power. Following the method of historical anthropology, the dissertation tells the story of princely sovereignty in the context of caste and expenditure in nineteenth-century Travancore.

Cette thèse de doctorat étudie les liens entretenus entre les sociétés politiques de Dijon et de Lille et le pouvoir princier sous les deux derniers ducs de Bourgogne (1419-1477), en interrogeant la manière dont les bourgeois l’ont apprécié en termes d’opportunité, se sont associés au fonctionnement de l’État princier et investis au service du prince. Toutes deux capitales d’un ensemble multipolaire de principautés dont elles sont deux des principales villes francophones, Dijon et Lille appartiennent à deux espaces géopolitiques diversement intégrés (le premier, marginal ; l’autre, central) et rarement observés ensemble. L’analyse, portée à partir des milieux dirigeants, souligne l’originalité avec laquelle ces liens s’établissent. Les dijonnais sont étroitement associés à l’exercice du pouvoir princier, là où les Lillois séparent strictement implication municipale et service du prince, mais sont étroitement liés à l’entourage ducal. La sociologie du pouvoir municipal comme des éléments de contexte régional expliquent les différences remarquées. Au-delà de ces différences, l’investissement bourgeois, qui s’articule à un ensemble d’activités parmi lesquelles l’exercice du pouvoir municipal reste toujours décisif, participe à l’évolution des sociétés urbaines, et, amorçant leur intégration à une société politique d’ordre territorial, et induit une adaptation pragmatique des pratiques politiques des Villes. La disparition de Charles le Téméraire confirme cette capacité d’adaptation des sociétés bourgeoises, qui réorientent à leur profit vers de nouveaux pouvoirs les liens élaborés auprès des ducs de Bourgogne. / This PhD thesis is about the relationship between political societies of Dijon and Lille and princely power under the last two dukes of Burgundy (1419-1477) studying the manner the citizens felt it in terms of appropriateness and how they associated to the princely state and got involved in serving it. Both capitals of a multipolar body of principalities of which they are two of the main French-speaking towns, Dijon and Lille belong to two geopolitical, diversely integrated areas (the former marginal, the latter central) and seldom observed together. The analysis seen from the ruling circles emphasizes the originality with which their links work out. The inhabitants of Dijon are closely associated with the prince’s exercising of power whereas the inhabitants of Lille strictly separate town implication from prince service though both closely related to the ducal entourage. The municipal power sociology together with regional context elements can explain those observed differences. Beyond them, the citizens investment, which is articulated to a set of activities among which the town exercise of power always remains decisive, takes part in urban societies development and initiating their integration in a political territorial society, induces a pragmatic adaptation of town practical politics. The death of Charles the Bold confirms this ability of bourgeois societies to adapt themselves and redirect the ties built with the dukes of Burgundy towards new powers for their benefit.