Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / Excessive formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and disruption of glutamate uptake have been hypothesized as key mechanisms contributing to quinolinic acid (QA)- induced toxicity. Thus, here we investigate if the use of diphenyl diselenide (PhSe)2, guanosine (GUO) and MK-801, alone or in combination, could protect rat brain slices from QA-induced toxicity. QA (1 mM) increased ROS formation, thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) and decreased cell viability after 2 h of exposure. (PhSe)2 (1 μM) protected against this ROS formation in the cortex and the striatum and also prevented decreases in cell viability induced by QA. (PhSe)2 (5 μM) prevented ROS formation in the hippocampus. GUO (10 and 100 μM) blocked the increase in ROS formation caused by QA and MK-801 (20 and 100 μM) abolished the pro-oxidant effect of QA. When the non effective concentrations were used in combination produced a decrease in ROS formation, mainly (PhSe)2 + GUO and (PhSe)2 + GUO + MK-801. These results demonstrate that this combination could be effective to avoid toxic effects caused by high concentrations of QA. Furthermore, the data obtained in the ROS formation and cellular viability assays suggest different pathways in amelioration of QA toxicity present in the neurodegenerative process. / A formação excessiva de espécies reativas de oxigênio (ROS) e alterações na captação de glutamato têm sido associadas como mecanismos chave que contribuem para toxicidade induzida pelo ácido quinolínico (AQ). Assim, nós investigamos se a utilização do disseleneto de difenila (PhSe)2, guanosina (GUO) e MK-801, isoladamente ou em combinação, podem proteger as fatias de regiões cerebrais de ratos da toxicidade induzida por AQ. AQ (1 mM) aumentou a formação de ROS, substâncias reativas ao ácido tiobarbitúrico (TBARS) e diminuiu a viabilidade celular após 2h de exposição. (PhSe)2 (1 μM) protegeu contra esta formação de ROS no córtex e no estriado e além disso preveniu a diminuição da viabilidade celular induzida pelo AQ. (PhSe)2 (5 μM) preveniu a formação de ROS no hipocampo. GUO (10 e 100 μM) bloqueou o aumento na formação de ROS causada pelo AQ e MK-801 (20 e 100 μM) aboliu o efeito pró-oxidante do AQ. Quando as concentrações não-efetivas foram usadas em combinação produziram uma diminuição na formação de ROS, principalmente (PhSe)2 + GUO e (PhSe)2 + GUO + MK-801. Estes resultados demonstram que esta combinação pode ser eficaz para evitar os efeitos tóxicos provocados por concentrações elevadas do AQ. Além disso, os dados obtidos nos ensaios de formação de ROS e viabilidade celular sugerem diferentes vias de atuação na melhora da toxicidade induzida pelo AQ presente no processo neurodegenerativo.

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / Recent data from the literature have suggested that some Krebs cycle intermediates could act as potent antioxidant agents, both in vitro and in vivo, against a variety of pro-oxidant agents. However, the mechanism(s) involved in the antioxidant effect of Krebs cycle intermediates are not fully understood. Additionally, there are scarce data in the literature taking into account the in vitro effect of Krebs cycle intermediates during oxidative stress conditions. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of some Krebs cycle intermediates on lipid peroxidation induced in vitro by different pro-oxidant agents, and the mechanism(s) by which they act. Firstly, we investigated the effect and the mechanism(s) by which malonate and quinolinic acid modulate the thiobarbituric acid- reactive species (TBARS) production in vitro, using rat brain S1 preparations (Article 1). The present results showed that the malonate-induced TBARS production was not changed by potassium cyanide or MK-801. However, the pro-oxidant effect of quinolinic acid was significantly prevented by MK-801. In addition we found that malonate was able to form complexes with iron ions (Fe2+), but these complexes were not able to interfere with in vitro deoxyribose degradation assays. Based on the results presented, we conclude that malonate pro-oxidant activity in vitro seems to be independent of the NMDA receptors activity. Additionally, we suggest that the malonate effect, in these conditions, is due to its ability to form complexes with iron ions, thus modulating an adequate ratio Fe2+/Fe3+ that could cause an increase in free radicals generation. In contrast, the quinolinic acid effect seems to be dependent of the NMDA receptors activation. However, we can not rule out the involvement of iron ions in quinolinic acid toxicity under our assay conditions. An other objective of this study was to investigate the effect of some Krebs cycle intermediates on quinolinic acid- or iron (Fe2+)-induced TBARS production in the rat brain S1 preparations, and the mechanism(s) by which they act (Article 2). The results showed that oxaloacetate, citrate, succinate, and malate were able to significantly prevent both basal and quinolinic acid- or iron-induced TBARS production. However, α-ketoglutarate induced per se a significant increase in basal TBARS production. The addition of potassium cyanide or the heat-treatment of S1 at 100ºC during 10 min completely abolished the antioxidant succinate activity, without change the effect of other Krebs cycle intermediates studied. Except for succinate, all intermediates used in this study were able to form complexes with iron (Fe2+) ions, however only oxaloacetate and α-ketoglutarate significantly prevented deoxyribose degradation induced by hydrogen peroxide. Based on the results presented, we concluded that oxaloacetate, malate, succinate, and citrate could act as antioxidants under basal, and under quinolinic acid- or iron- induced TBARS production, whereas α-ketoglutarate act as a pro-oxidant agent per se. The mechanism(s) by which citrate, malate, and oxaloacetate acts seems to be related to their ability to form complexes with iron (Fe2+) ions, thus modulating the iron redox cycle. In contrast, the succinate antioxidant effect seems to be dependent of the succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) activity. / Dados recentes na literatura têm relatado que alguns intermediários do ciclo de Krebs podem agir como potentes antioxidantes, tanto in vitro, quanto in vivo, em diversos sistemas pró-oxidantes. Porém, o(s) mecanismo(s) através dos qual(is) os intermediários do ciclo de Krebs exercem suas atividades antioxidantes não são completamente entendidas. Considerando a escassez de dados in vitro na literatura a respeito do efeito desses intermediários durante situações de estresse oxidativo, o presente trabalho tem como objetivo determinar o efeito de intermediários do ciclo de Krebs sob a peroxidação lipídica induzida por diferentes agentes pró-oxidantes in vitro, bem como investigar o(s) mecanismo(s) de ação dos mesmos. Primeiramente investigamos o efeito e o(s) mecanismo(s) pelo(s) qual(is) o malonato e o ácido quinolínico modulam a produção de espécies reativas ao ácido tiobarbitúrico (TBARS) em S1 de cérebro de ratos, in vitro (artigo 1). Os resultados obtidos mostraram um aumento na produção de TBARS induzido pelo malonato, o qual não foi modificado pela adição de cianeto de potássio, nem pelo MK-801. Por outro lado, o efeito pró-oxidante do ácido quinolínico foi significativamente prevenido pelo MK-801. Observamos ainda que o malonato foi capaz de formar complexos com íons ferrosos e que esses complexos não foram capazes de interferir nos ensaios da degradação da desoxirribose in vitro. Portanto, com base nos resultados encontrados, concluímos que o efeito pró-oxidante do malonato in vitro parece ser independente da atividade dos receptores NMDA. Os resultados sugerem que o efeito do malonato nessas condições deve-se principalmente a sua capacidade de interagir com íons ferro, modulando uma razão Fe2+/Fe3+ que favorece a geração de radicais livres. Por outro lado, o efeito do ácido quinolínico parece ser devido à ativação dos receptores NMDA. Porém, não podemos excluir a participação dos íons ferro para a toxicidade do mesmo nessas condições. Outro foco deste estudo foi investigar o efeito de alguns intermediários do ciclo de Krebs na produção de TBARS induzida por ácido quinolínico ou ferro em S1 de cérebro de ratos in vitro, bem como investigar o(s) mecanismo(s) de ação dos mesmos (artigo 2). Os resultados mostraram que o oxaloacetato, o citrato, o sucinato e o malato foram capazes de reduzir significativamente a produção de TBARS basal, bem como a induzida por ácido quinolínico ou ferro. Por outro lado, o α-cetoglutarato foi capaz de induzir per se um significativo aumento na produção de TBARS. A adição de cianeto de potássio, bem como o pré-tratamento do S1 por 10 min a 100ºC aboliram completamente o efeito antioxidante do sucinato, sem interferir significativamente no efeito dos demais intermediários estudados. Todos os intermediários estudados, exceto o sucinato, foram capazes de quelar íons ferro, porém somente o oxaloacetato e o α-cetoglutarato foram capazes de prevenir a degradação da desoxirribose induzida por peróxido de hidrogênio. Com base nos resultados obtidos, podemos concluir que o oxaloacetato, o malato o sucinato e o citrato agem como antioxidantes sob condições basais ou em presença do ácido quinolínico ou ferro, enquanto que o α-cetoglutarato age como um agente pró-oxidante per se. O mecanismo pelo qual o citrato, o malato e o oxaloacetato exercem seus efeitos antioxidantes parece ser devido à capacidade desses em interagir com íons ferro modulando o ciclo redox desse. Por outro lado, o efeito do sucinato parece ser devido à atividade da enzima succinato desidrogenase (SDH).

Spermine (SPM) is an aliphatic amine which contains four nucleophilic centers and is found in all eukaryotic cells, including nervous cells. It belongs to the group of polyamines, which are molecules associated with both neuroprotection and neurotoxicity. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of spermine on some parameters of toxicity induced by striatal administration of quinolinic acid (QA), an experimental model of Huntington s disease in adult and male Wistar rats. The intrastriatal administration of QA (180 nmol/site) induced contralateral rotations and increase the number of contralateral body swings. The previous striatal administration of SPM caused mixed effects: at the dose of 0.1 nmol/site increased the number of contralateral rotations; but at 10 nmol/site it reduced both the number of rotations and the contralateral body swings induced by QA. The mechanism by which SPM decreases these motor alterations is probably through its interaction with the NMDA receptor, since the co-administration with arcaine (antagonist of polyamine binding sites on this receptor) reversed its protective effect. The increase of protein carbonyl content induced by QA (180 nmol/site) in striatum of rats was prevented by the administration of 10 nmol/site of SPM. Besides, the bilateral striatal injection of QA (180 nmol/site) impaired the performance in the recognition memory task. The post-training striatal administration of SPM (0.1 and 1 nmol/site) reversed the QA-induced cognitive deficit. It was also evaluated whether spermine prevented QA-induced neuromorphological alterations. QA caused striatal neuronal degeneration and reactive astrogliosis. SPM, at the dose that improved the cognitive performance (0.1 nmol/site), had no effect on striatal neuronal degeneration but reversed the intense astrocytic reaction induced by QA. These results suggest that SPM has neuroprotective properties, presenting a dose dependent pattern of polyamine, in this experimental model of Huntington disease. / A espermina (SPM) é uma amina alifática, contendo quatro centros nucleofílicos e é encontrada em todas as células eucarióticas, incluindo células nervosas. Ela pertence ao grupo das poliaminas, moléculas responsáveis tanto por efeitos neuroprotetores quanto neurotóxicos. O objetivo do presente trabalho foi investigar os efeitos da SPM sobre alguns parâmetros de toxicidade induzidos pela administração estriatal de ácido quinolínico (AQ), um modelo experimental da doença de Huntington em ratos Wistar machos adultos. A administração intraestriatal unilateral de AQ (180 nmol/sítio) induziu o aparecimento de rotações contralaterais e aumento do percentual de balanços corporais contralaterais. A prévia administração estriatal de SPM mostrou efeitos diversos: na dose de 0,1 nmol/sítio aumentou o número de rotações; porém na dose de 10 nmol/sítio ela diminuiu tanto o número de rotações quanto o percentual de balanços corporais contralaterais induzidos pelo AQ. O mecanismo pelo qual a SPM diminui estas alterações motoras é, provavelmente, devido à sua interação com o receptor NMDA, uma vez que sua co-administração com a arcaína (antagonista do sítio das poliaminas neste receptor) reverteu o efeito protetor da mesma. A administração de 10 nmol/sítio de SPM preveniu o aumento do conteúdo de proteína carbonil induzida pela injeção de AQ (180 nmol/sítio) no estriado de ratos. Além disso, foi observado prejuízo cognitivo na tarefa de reconhecimento de objetos após a injeção estriatal bilateral de AQ (180 nmol/sítio). A administração estriatal póstreino de SPM (0,1 e 1 nmol/sítio) reverteu este déficit cognitivo induzido pelo AQ. Para avaliação das alterações neuromorfológicas neste modelo foram observadas degeneração neuronal e reação astrocitária. O AQ aumentou significativamente a degeneração de neurônios estriatais e a astrogliose reativa. A SPM, na menor dose que melhorou o desempenho cognitivo (0,1 nmol/sítio), não teve efeito sobre a degeneração neuronal estriatal; no entanto, ela foi capaz de reverter a intensa reação astrocitária induzida pela injeção de AQ. Estes resultados sugerem que a SPM tem propriedades neuroprotetoras, que apresentam um padrão dependente da dose da poliamina, neste modelo experimental da doença de Huntington.

Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior / Previous data from the literature have shown that some Krebs cycle intermediates could act as antioxidant in several models, both in vitro and in vivo. However, the mechanism(s) involved in the antioxidant effect of Krebs cycle intermediates are not fully understood. Additionally, there are scarce data in the literature taking into account the in vitro effect of Krebs cycle intermediates during oxidative stress conditions. Thus, the aim of this study was to determine the effect of some Krebs cycle intermediates on lipid peroxidation induced in vitro by different pro-oxidant agents, and the mechanism(s) by which they act. Furthermore, it was necessary elucidate the mechanisms by which the different pro-oxidants acts under in vitro conditions. The present results showed that the malonate-induced TBARS production was not changed by potassium cyanide or MK-801. However, the pro-oxidant effect of quinolinic acid was significantly prevented by MK-801. In addition we found that both malonate and oxalate were able to form complexes with iron ions (Fe2+). Based on the presented results, we conclude that malonate pro-oxidant activity in vitro seems to be independent of the secondary excitotoxicity via indirect NMDA receptors activation. Additionally, we suggest that both the malonate and oxalate effect, in these experimental conditions, is due to its ability to form complexes with iron ions, thus modulating an adequate ratio Fe2+/Fe3+ that could cause an increase in free radicals generation. In contrast, the quinolinic acid effect seems to be dependent of the NMDA receptors activation. However, we can not rule out the involvement of iron ions in quinolinic acid toxicity under our assay conditions. Another objective of this study was to investigate the effect of some Krebs cycle intermediates against either basal or induced TBARS production, using rat brain S1 preparations and the mechanism(s) by which they act. The results showed that oxaloacetate, citrate, succinate, and malate were able to significantly prevent both basal and quinolinic acid-, iron- or malonate-induced TBARS production. On the other hand, fumarate prevented only malonate-induced TBARS production, without effect under basal conditions. However, α-ketoglutarate induced per se a significant increase in basal TBARS production. The antioxidant activity of fumarate and succinate were completely abolished when S1 was submitted to heat-treatment at 100ºC during 10 min. Likewise, potassium cyanide completely abolished the antioxidant effect of succinate. The effect of other Krebs cycle intermediates studied was unchanged with respect to heat-treatment, or cyanide. Except for succinate and fumarate, all intermediates used in this study were able to form complexes with iron (Fe2+) ions, however only oxaloacetate and α-ketoglutarate significantly prevented deoxyribose degradation induced by hydrogen peroxide. Based on the results presented, we concluded that oxaloacetate, malate, succinate, fumarate and citrate could act as antioxidants under such conditions, whereas α-ketoglutarate acts as a pro-oxidant agent per se. The mechanism(s) by which citrate, malate, and oxaloacetate acts seems to be related to their ability to form complexes with iron (Fe2+) ions, thus modulating the iron redox cycle. In contrast, the succinate and fumarate antioxidant effect seems to be dependent of the some enzymatic system. / Dados prévios da literatura têm mostrado que alguns intermediários do ciclo de Krebs podem agir como antioxidantes em diversos modelos, tanto in vitro, quanto in vivo. Porém, o(s) mecanismo(s) através dos qual(is) esses intermediários exercem suas atividades antioxidantes não são completamente entendidas. Considerando a escassez de dados na literatura a respeito do efeito dos intermediários do ciclo de Krebs durante situações de estresse oxidativo, o presente trabalho teve por objetivo determinar o efeito desses sob a peroxidação lipídica induzida por diferentes agentes pró-oxidantes in vitro, bem como investigar o(s) mecanismo(s) de ação dos mesmos. Além disso, faz-se necessário caracterizar o(s) mecanismos(s) pelo(s) qual(is) os diferentes pró-oxidantes agem nos sistemas in vitro. Os resultados dessa tese mostraram que a atividade pró-oxidante in vitro do malonato não foi modificada pela adição de cianeto de potássio, nem pelo MK-801. Por outro lado, o efeito pró-oxidante do ácido quinolínico foi significativamente prevenido pelo MK-801. Observamos ainda que o malonato, e também o oxalato foram capazes de formar complexos com íons ferrosos. Portanto, com base nos resultados encontrados, concluímos que o efeito pró-oxidante do malonato in vitro parece ser independente da excitotoxicidade secundária, conseqüência da ativação indireta dos receptores NMDA. Os resultados sugerem que o efeito do malonato e do oxalato nessas condições experimentais deve-se principalmente a sua capacidade de interagir com íons ferro, modulando uma razão Fe2+/Fe3+ que favorece a geração de radicais livres. Por outro lado, o efeito do ácido quinolínico parece ser devido à ativação dos receptores NMDA. Porém, não podemos excluir a participação dos íons ferro para a toxicidade do mesmo nessas condições. Outro foco deste estudo foi investigar o efeito de alguns intermediários do ciclo de Krebs na produção de TBARS basal ou induzida por diferentes pró-oxidantes em S1 de cérebro de ratos in vitro, bem como investigar o(s) mecanismo(s) de ação dos mesmos. Os resultados mostraram que o oxaloacetato, o citrato, o sucinato e o malato foram capazes de reduzir significativamente a produção de TBARS basal, bem como a induzida por ácido quinolínico, ferro ou malonato. O fumarato, por sua vez, teve efeito antioxidante somente sobre a produção de TBARS induzida. Por outro lado, o α-cetoglutarato foi capaz de induzir per se um significativo aumento na produção de TBARS. O efeito antioxidante do fumarato e do sucinato foi completamente abolido quando o S1 foi submetido a um prétratamento por 10 min a 100ºC, enquanto que o efeito dos demais intermediários permaneceu inalterado. Da mesma forma, a adição de cianeto de potássio aboliu completamente o efeito antioxidante do sucinato sem interferir significativamente no efeito dos demais intermediários estudados. Todos os intermediários estudados, exceto o sucinato e o fumarato, foram capazes de quelar íons ferro, porém somente o oxaloacetato e o α- cetoglutarato foram capazes de prevenir a degradação da desoxirribose induzida por peróxido de hidrogênio. Com base nos resultados obtidos, podemos concluir que o oxaloacetato, o malato, o sucinato, o fumarato e o citrato agem como antioxidantes sob determinadas condições, enquanto que o α-cetoglutarato age como um agente pró-oxidante per se. O mecanismo pelo qual o citrato, o malato e o oxaloacetato exercem seus efeitos antioxidantes parece ser devido à capacidade desses em interagir com íons ferro modulando o ciclo redox desse. Por outro lado, o efeito do sucinato e do fumarato parece ser devido a alguma atividade enzimática.

The purpose of this thesis was to develop methodology by which treatments for the cognitive impairments in Huntington's disease (HD) could be tested. As such, the thesis focused mainly on evaluating rats with quinolinic acid (QA) lesions of the striatum, as this manipulation mimics some aspects of the neural damage in Huntington's disease, to try to identify cognitive deficits of HD resulting from cell loss in the striatum. In the first part (Chapters 3-5), the role of the striatum in implicit memory was investigated. Chapter 3 compared the performance of rats and humans on a reaction time task that evaluated implicit memory by presenting visual stimuli with differing probabilities which change over time. Although rats made higher percentage of incorrect responses and late errors, both groups showed a similar pattern of reaction times. Chapter 4 investigated whether implicit memory (the computation of probabilities to predict the location of a stimulus) was affected by selective blockade of dopaminergic transmission at the D1 or D2 receptors by SCH-23390 and raclopride, respectively. Reaction times were slower with SCH-23390 and raclopride, but only SCH-23390 reduced errors to the least probable target location. Chapter 5 used the same task to evaluate implicit memory in rats with QA lesions of the dorsomedial striatum (DMS). Implicit memory was not affected by lesions of the DMS, which suggested that once a task that requires implicit memory has been learned, the DMS was not involved in sustaining the performance of the task. The second part of this thesis (Chapter 6), explored the contribution of the DMS in habit formation. DMS lesioned rats did not show habitual responding, and were not impaired in learning a new goal-directed behaviour. The third part (Chapters 7 and 8), investigated the role of the dorsal striatum in reversal learning, attentional set-formation, and set-shifting. Dorsal striatum lesioned rats were not impaired in reversal learning, but had a diminished shift-cost, which suggested that dorsal striatum lesions disrupted the formation of attentional sets. These results showed that although QA lesions of the dorsal striatum mimic some aspects of the neural damage in HD, they did not result in the same cognitive deficits observed in patients with HD, at least using the tasks presented in this thesis. However, other animal models of HD could be evaluated using the different tasks presented in this thesis to continue the search of a reliable animal model of HD in which treatments for the disease could be evaluated.

The era of selective neurotoxins arose predominately in the 1960s with the discovery of the norepinephrine (NE) isomer 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA), which selectively destroyed noradrenergic sympathetic nerves in rats. A series of similarly selective neurotoxins were later discovered, having high affinity for the transporter site on nerves and thus being accumulated and able to disrupt vital intraneuronal processes, to lead to cell death. The Trojan Horse botulinum neurotoxins (BoNT) and tetanus toxin bind to glycoproteins on the neuronal plasma membrane, then these stealth neurotoxins are taken inside respective cholinergic or glycinergic nerves, producing months-long functional inactivation but without overtly destroying those nerves. The mitochondrial complex I inhibitor rotenone, while lacking total specificity, still destroys dopaminergic nerves with some selectivity; and importantly, results in the neural accumulation of synuclein-to model Parkinson’s disease (PD) in animals. Other neurotoxins target specific subtypes of glutamate receptors and produce excitotoxicity in nerves with that receptor population. The dopamine D2 receptor agonist quinpirole, termed a selective neurotoxin, produces a behavioral state replicating some of the notable features of schizophrenia, but without overtly destroying nerves. These processes, mechanisms or treatment-outcomes account for the means by which neurotoxins are classified as such, and represent some of the means by which neurotoxins as a group are able to destroy or functionally inactivate nerves; or replicate an altered neurological state. Selective neurotoxins have proven to be important in gaining insight into biochemical processes and mechanisms responsible for survival or demise of a nerve. Selective neurotoxins are useful also for animal modeling of human neural disorders such as PD, Alzheimer disease, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), Lesch-Nyhan disease, tardive dyskinesia, schizophrenia and others. The importance of neurotoxins in neuroscience will continue to be ever more important as even newer neurotoxins are discovered.

There has been an awareness of nerve poisons from ancient times. At the dawn of the twentieth century, the actions and mechanisms of these poisons were uncovered by modern physiological and biochemical experimentation. However, the era of selective neurotoxins began with the pioneering studies of R. Levi-Montalcini through her studies of the neurotrophin "nerve growth factor" (NGF), a protein promoting growth and development of sensory and sympathetic noradrenergic nerves. An antibody to NGF, namely, anti-NGF - developed in the 1950s in a collaboration with S. Cohen - was shown to produce an "immunosympathectomy" and virtual lifelong sympathetic denervation. These Nobel Laureates thus developed and characterized the first identifiable selective neurotoxin. Other selective neurotoxins were soon discovered, and the compendium of selective neurotoxins continues to grow, so that today there are numerous selective neurotoxins, with the potential to destroy or produce dysfunction of a variety of phenotypic nerves. Selective neurotoxins are of value because of their ability to selectively destroy or disable a common group of nerves possessing (1) a particular neural transporter, (2) a unique set of enzymes or vesicular transporter, (3) a specific type of receptor or (4) membranous protein, or (5) other uniqueness. The era of selective neurotoxins has developed to such an extent that the very definition of a "selective" neurotoxin has warped. For example, (1) N-methyl-D- aspartate receptor (NMDA-R) antagonists, considered to be neuroprotectants by virtue of their prevention of excitotoxicity from glutamate receptor agonists, actually lead to the demise of populations of neurons with NMDA receptors, when administered during ontogenetic development. The mere lack of natural excitation of this nerve population, consequent to NMDA-R block, sends a message that these nerves are redundant - and an apoptotic cascade is set in motion to eliminate these nerves. (2) The rodenticide rotenone, a global cytotoxin that acts mainly to inhibit complex I in the respiratory transport chain, is now used in low dose over a period of weeks to months to produce relatively selective destruction of substantia nigra dopaminergic nerves and promote alpha-synuclein deposition in brain to thus model Parkinson's disease. Similarly, (3) glial toxins, affecting oligodendrocytes or other satellite cells, can lead to the damage or dysfunction of identifiable groups of neurons. Consequently, these toxins might also be considered as "selective neurotoxins," despite the fact that the targeted cell is nonneuronal. Likewise, (4) the dopamine D2-receptor agonist quinpirole, administered daily for a week or more, leads to development of D2-receptor supersensitivity - exaggerated responses to the D2-receptor agonist, an effect persisting lifelong. Thus, neuroprotectants can become "selective" neurotoxins; nonspecific cytotoxins can become classified as "selective" neurotoxins; and receptor agonists, under defined dosing conditions, can supersensitize and thus be classified as "selective" neurotoxins. More examples will be uncovered as the area of selective neurotoxins expands. The description and characterization of selective neurotoxins, with unmasking of their mechanisms of action, have led to a level of understanding of neuronal activity and reactivity that could not be understood by conventional physiological observations. This chapter will be useful as an introduction to the scope of the field of selective neurotoxins and provide insight for in-depth analysis in later chapters with full descriptions of selective neurotoxins.