• Refine Query
  • Source
  • Publication year
  • to
  • Language
  • 1
  • 1
  • Tagged with
  • 2
  • 2
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • 1
  • About
  • The Global ETD Search service is a free service for researchers to find electronic theses and dissertations. This service is provided by the Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
    Our metadata is collected from universities around the world. If you manage a university/consortium/country archive and want to be added, details can be found on the NDLTD website.
1

La notion d'oeuvre aujourd'hui : entre bibliothèque patrimoniale et bibliothèque multimodale / The concept of a work of art today : between patrimonial library and multimodal library

Puidoyeux, Claude 12 October 2017 (has links)
Cette recherche porte sur le bouleversement épistémologique qui affecte la littérature patrimoniale, à l’ère du numérique et du multimédia. La première partie s’intéresse à la fondation de la notion de littérature patrimoniale en France. Elle propose une revue synthétique des contextes et des discours qui ont fondé cette notion à travers le temps. Les zones de fracture et de continuité entre conceptions passées et conceptions contemporaines y sont questionnées. L’analyse aboutit au constat que conceptions émergentes et traditionnelles forment une mémoire dialogique, vive et complexe, qui innerve de ses paradoxes les archétypes fondateurs : les notions d’auteur, d’œuvre et de « bibliothèque ». La deuxième partie examine la réception contemporaine de la littérature patrimoniale, pour laquelle « la bibliothèque » est une mémoire du passé mais aussi une réserve d’œuvres à venir dans le cadre du dialogue entre les arts et les modes que les techniques contemporaines favorisent. Pour le récepteur contemporain, la bibliothèque patrimoniale est intériorisée comme une triple mémoire formée de la bibliothèque collective, de sa propre bibliothèque intérieure, d’une bibliothèque virtuelle où se régénèrent le corpus patrimonial et les discours qui l’environnent. Ce récepteur connaît et pratique la bibliothèque collective, vouée à la conservation de la mémoire collective ; il est conscient aussi de posséder une bibliothèque intérieure où s’opère pour lui une double conversion : il devient sujet lecteur et l’œuvre patrimoniale texte du lecteur. Cette double conversion créative se concrétise et se réalise effectivement dans la bibliothèque virtuelle multimodale, lieu de partage et de discours sur les œuvres qui lui permet d’entrer en conversation avec d’autres sujets-lecteurs et en contact avec d’autres communautés discursives et, dans ce cadre, de produire à la fois de nouveaux discours sur les œuvres mais aussi des œuvres secondes. On pose que l’œuvre source et ses objets seconds forment alors une sémiosphère multimodale. Comme les objets seconds multimodaux émanent de communautés diverses, la notion de sémiosphère réinterroge les hiérarchies culturelles héritées. Etre cultivé aujourd’hui, ce n’est plus seulement connaître les œuvres de la bibliothèque collective mais investir la sémiosphère. Le sujet lecteur est amené à devenir sujet récepteur multi-compétent, capable de naviguer d’une communauté de discours et de pratiques à une autre. Il se nourrit de la diversité, assure la communication productive entre les objets et les communautés dans la sémiosphère et favorise, par sa seule navigation experte, le développement de la sémiosphère, c’est-à-dire de la culture partagée. / This research is concerned with the epistemological upheavals which affect literary heritage in the digital and multimedia age. The first part of this work explores the origin of the notion of literary heritage in France. It provides a synthetic review of the contexts and discourses which have underpinned this notion through time. Present and past concepts are examined in terms of continuity and discontinuity. The analysis leads to the conclusion that both emerging and traditional understandings blend together creating a dynamic, complex and dialogical trace which through its paradoxes informs the founding archetypical notions of author, literary work and ‘library’. The second part examines the contemporary reception of literary heritage for which the ‘library’ represents not only a record of past literary works but constitutes a stock for future ones given the increasing trend by which the Arts are distributed to the public using the medium of multimedia digital technology. The contemporary receiver conceives and internalizes the literary heritage library in three ways: as a public library, as an internal library, and as a virtual library where heritage corpus and discourses about corpus are regenerated. This receiver knows and uses the public library as a place which is dedicated to the conservation of the collective memory; s/he is also conscious of possessing an internal library where a double conversion takes place: s/he becomes a « reader-subject » and the heritage literature is the reader’s text. This double creative conversion takes a concrete form in the virtual multimodal library where literature can be shared and discussed. This enables the receiver to start up a conversation with other readers and be connected with other discourse communities. Within this framework, new discourses are generated concerning mainstream literary works and their offshoots. We consider then that the original literary work and its offshoots constitute a multimodal semiosphere. As the derived multimodal objects come from different communities, the notion of semiosphere re-interrogates the cultural inherited hierarchies. Nowadays, being cultured does not consist in knowing the contents of the public library but instead involves being invested in the semiosphere. The reader is encouraged to become a multi-skilled receiver navigating from one discourse community and/or community of practice to another. S/he feeds on diversity, ensures prolific communication within the semiosphere between objects and communities and, thanks to expertise in multimedia browsing skills, s/he enhances the development of the semiosphere, i.e. the shared culture.
2

Uma leitura discursiva sobre os modos de funcionamento do sil?ncio no livro did?tico de L?ngua Portuguesa

Lima, Fl?gila Marinho da Silva 17 May 2015 (has links)
Submitted by Ricardo Cedraz Duque Moliterno (ricardo.moliterno@uefs.br) on 2016-09-05T20:42:47Z No. of bitstreams: 1 UMA LEITURA DISCURSIVA SOBRE OS MODOS DE FUNCIONAMENTO DO SIL?NCIO NO LIVRO DID?TICO DE L?NGUA PORTUGUESA.pdf: 12035455 bytes, checksum: e8cadd87174989ac56bc13440d970fb0 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2016-09-05T20:42:47Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 UMA LEITURA DISCURSIVA SOBRE OS MODOS DE FUNCIONAMENTO DO SIL?NCIO NO LIVRO DID?TICO DE L?NGUA PORTUGUESA.pdf: 12035455 bytes, checksum: e8cadd87174989ac56bc13440d970fb0 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2015-05-17 / This present work aims to reflect about silence in the process of reading proposed by the Schoolbook, it is based on the analysis of activities and modules in a Portuguese Language Schoolbook. It is grounded on the postulates of Pech?ux?s Discourse Analysis and aims to discuss how the silence constitutes senses alternating from interdiction and also stimulation to polysemy of discourse in the Schoolbook. Its corpus was constituted of two Portuguese Language Schoolbooks, Elementary II, from the ?Cole??o Di?logo? of FTD editor. In order to do the analysis, textual interpretation activities were analyzed aiming to verify the silence functioning based on the interdiction of the imaginary reader-subject and the control of the sense. We also analyzed two modules of the school book in order to observe the silencing in them. Our initial hypotheses is that he silence guides the constitution of the senses in these manuals, since it interdicts the access of the subject to different senses, guiding it to the interpretation and reducing it to a mere copy causing the imaginary reader-subject has no opening for interpretation gestures. Thus, these manuals understand sense as something already done and completed and the silence works by signalizer ideological positions of the Schoolbook. The results show that he activities related to reading, in the school books, are on the level of paraphrase without instigating, in the most part of the questions analyzed, a passage towards the polysemy, blocking the student?s perception of plurality of senses which might be linked to the text. On this position, the book is inserted in a discursive formation of unique senses, shaped subjects and, consequently, in an ideology which understands language as transparent. It is also possible notice that the constitutive silence is the source of discursive and ideological affiliations about the black, white and Indian representation since they are inserted in a dominant ideology which understands the indian as ?good salvage?, the black people are folkloric are the white one is always related to work. / O presente trabalho busca refletir sobre o funcionamento do sil?ncio no processo de leitura proposto pelo Livro Did?tico, a partir da an?lise de atividades e m?dulos em um Livro Did?tico de L?ngua Portuguesa. Embasado nos postulados da An?lise de Discurso Pecheutiana, procuramos discutir o modo como o sil?ncio constitui os sentidos a partir, ora da interdi??o e ora do fomento ? polissemia do discurso no livro did?tico. O corpus, deste trabalho, constitui-se de 2 livros did?ticos de L?ngua Portuguesa, ensino fundamental II, da cole??o Di?logo da editora FTD. Para tanto, foi realizada a an?lise das atividades de interpreta??o de textos com o objetivo de verificar o funcionamento do sil?ncio a partir da interdi??o da voz do sujeito-leitor imagin?rio e, a partir do controle do sentido. Foram analisados tamb?m dois m?dulos constitutivos do livro a fim de observar o silenciamento nos mesmos. Nossa hip?tese inicial ? de que o sil?ncio guia a constitui??o dos sentidos nesses manuais, uma vez que interdita o acesso do sujeito aos diversos sentidos, conduzindo ? interpreta??o e reduzindo-a a uma mera c?pia, fazendo com que o sujeito-leitor imagin?rio n?o tenha espa?o para gestos de interpreta??o. Assim, esses manuais concebem o sentido como algo pronto e acabado; e o sil?ncio funciona como sinalizador de posturas ideol?gicas por parte do LD. Os resultados apontam que as atividades relacionadas ? leitura, nos livros, ficam no n?vel da par?frase sem instigar, na maioria das quest?es analisadas, uma passagem para a polissemia, impedindo o aluno de perceber a pluralidade de sentidos que pode ser atrelada ao texto. Com essa postura, o livro se inscreve numa forma??o discursiva de sentidos ?nicos, sujeitos moldados e, consequentemente, numa ideologia que concebe a l?ngua como transparente. Tamb?m ? poss?vel notar que o sil?ncio constitutivo ? fonte de filia??es discursivas e ideol?gicas no que concerne ? representa??o do negro, do branco e do ?ndio, sendo estes, discursivizados numa ideologia dominante de que o ?ndio ? o ?bom selvagem?; o negro ? folclorizado; e o branco sempre ligado ao trabalho.

Page generated in 0.0319 seconds