Maintaining replication fork integrity is vital to preserve genomic stability and avoid cancer. Physical DNA damage and altered nucleotide or protein pools represent replication obstacles, generating replicative stress. Numerous cellular responses have evolved to ensure faithful DNA replication despite such challenges. Understanding those responses is essential to understand and prevent or treat replication-associated diseases, such as cancer. Re-priming is a mechanism to allow resumption of DNA synthesis past a fork-stalling lesion. This was recently suggested in yeast and explains the formation of gaps during DNA replication on damaged DNA. Using a combination of assays, we indicate the existence of re-priming also in human cells following UV irradiation. The gap left behind a re-primed fork must be stabilised to avoid replication-associated collapse. Our results show that the checkpoint signalling protein CHK1 is dispensable for stabilisation of replication forks after UV irradiation, despite its role in replication fork progression on UV-damaged DNA. It is not known what proteins are necessary for collapse of an unsealed gap or a stalled fork. We exclude one, previously suggested, endonuclease from this mechanism in UV-irradiated human fibroblasts. We also show that focus formation of repair protein RAD51 is not necessarily associated with cellular sensitivity to agents inducing replicative stress, in rad51d CHO mutant cells. Multiple factors are required for replication fork stability, also under unperturbed conditions. We identify the histone methyltransferase SET8 as an important player in the maintenance of replication fork stability. SET8 is required for replication fork progression, and depletion of SET8 led to the formation of replication-associated DNA damage. In summary, our results increase the knowledge about mechanisms and signalling at replication forks in unperturbed cells and after induction of replicative stress. / At the time of the doctoral defense, the following papers were unpublished and had a status as follows: Paper 1: Submitted. Paper 2: Submitted. Paper 3: Manuscript. Paper 5: Submitted.

Successful replication of the genome during each cell cycle requires that every replication fork merge with its opposing fork. However, lesions in the template DNA or protein-DNA barriers often impede replication forks and threaten the timely completion of genome duplication. If a fork encounters a replication fork barrier (RFB), it can be subject to a variety of fates. In some cases the replisome is maintained in a manner such that it can resume DNA synthesis when the barrier is removed. Alternatively the stalled fork is simply held in a competent state to merge with the opposing fork when it arrives. However, fork stalling can also precipitate dissociation of the replisome (fork collapse) or even fork breakage. If this happens the recombination machinery can intervene to restore DNA integrity and restart replication, albeit with a risk of causing deleterious genetic change if ectopic homologous sequences are recombined. I have exploited a site-specific RFB in fission yeast termed RTS1 to investigate the consequences of perturbing a single replication fork. RTS1 is a polar RFB (i.e. it blocks fork progression in a unidirectional fashion), enabling replication to be completed by the opposing fork. Despite this, fork blockage at RTS1 triggers a strong recombinational response that is able to restart DNA synthesis, which at least initially is highly error prone. Here, I present my work in establishing a live cell imaging approach to visualizing the recombinational response at the RTS1 RFB, demonstrating that the majority of cells initiate recombination-dependent replication (RDR). RDR begins within a few minutes of fork blockage and is only curtailed by the arrival of the opposing fork. It depends on the Rad52 protein, which remains associated with the restarted fork and whose presence correlates with its infidelity. I also illustrate the significance of various genetic factors, including Rad51, the Rad51 mediators, Fml1 helicase, Rad54 translocase, Pfh1 sweepase, and Cds1 checkpoint kinase, in modulating Rad52 localization and block-induced recombination at the RTS1 RFB.

No description available.

DNA is susceptible to various types of damage as a result of normal cellular metabolism or from environmental sources. In order to maintain genome stability a number of different, partially overlapping DNA repair pathways have evolved to tackle specific lesions or distortions in the DNA. Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is highly conserved throughout eukarya, bacteria and archaea and predominantly targets lesions that result from exposure to UV light, for example cyclobutane pyrimidine dimers and 6-4 photoproducts. The majority of archaea possess homologous of the eukaryotic repair genes and this thesis describes the isolation and the characterization of two XPB homologues identified in the crenarchaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus, SsoXPB1 and SsoXPB2. Human XPB is one of 10 proteins that make up the TFIIH transcription complex. The activity of XPB is tightly controlled by protein interactions, in particular with p52, which stimulates the ATPase activity of XPB. Rather than a conventional helicase, human XPB is thought to act as an ATP dependent conformational switch. Consistent with human XPB, however, the S. solfataricus proteins were unable to catalyse strand separation and the identification of an archaeal protein partner, Bax1, for SsoXPB2 was one of the focuses of this project. In order to maintain genome stability, the DNA must be replicated accurately with each cell cycle. When the advancing replication fork stalls at a lesion or a DNA break, it is crucial that the fork is reset and that replication continues to completion. The helicase Hel308 is thought to clear the lagging strand template of a stalled replication fork in order for replication restart to proceed via homologous recombination (HR). Although the specific function of Hel308 is not well understood, the possibilities are described in this thesis. Strand exchange proceeds to form a D-loop, followed by branch migration to increase regions of heterology during the synapsis stage of HR. No motors for branch migration have previously been recognised in archaea, although the identification of a possible candidate was investigated during this project.

Timely completion of DNA replication in each cell cycle is crucial for maintaining genomic integrity. This is often challenged by the presence of various replication fork barriers (RFBs). On collision with a RFB, the fate of the replication fork remains uncertain. In some cases, the integrity of the fork is maintained until the barrier is removed or the fork is rescued by merging with the incoming fork. However, fork stalling can cause dissociation of all of the associated replication proteins (fork collapse). If this occurs, the cell's recombination machinery can intervene to help restart replication in a process called recombination-dependent replication (RDR). Programmed protein-DNA barriers like the Replication Terminator Sequence-1 (RTS1) have been used to demonstrate that replication fork blockage can induce recombination. However, it remains unclear how efficiently this recombination gives rise to replication restart and whether the restarted replication fork exhibits the same fidelity as an origin-derived fork. It is also unknown whether accidental replication barriers induce recombination in the same manner as programmed barriers. In this study, I introduce recombination reporters at various sites downstream of RTS1 to obtain information on both the fidelity and efficiency of replication restart. I find that unlike break induced replication (BIR), the restarted fork gives rise to hyper-recombination at least 75 kb downstream of the barrier. Surprisingly, fork convergence, rather than inducing recombination, acts to prevent or curtail genetic instability associated with RDR. I also investigate a number of genetic factors that have a role in either preventing or promoting genome instability associated with the progression of the restarted fork. To compare RTS1 with an accidental protein-DNA barrier, a novel site-specific barrier system (called MarBl) was established based on the human mariner transposase, Hsmar1, binding to its transposon end. Replication fork blockage at MarBl strongly induces recombination, more so than at RTS1. This appears to be a general feature of accidental barriers as introduction of the E. coli TusB-TerB site-specific barrier in S. pombe gives rise to a similar effect. Here, I compare and contrast accidental barriers with programmed barriers. I observe that there is very little replication restart, if any, at MarBl measured by direct repeat recombination downstream. This points to the fact that accidental barriers do not trigger fork collapse in the same way as programmed RFBs and that the increased recombination that they cause may be a consequence of the inability of replication forks to terminate correctly, owing to the bi-directional nature of the barrier. Several genetic factors are assessed for their impact on MarBl-induced recombination, which further highlights both similarities and differences with RTS1-induced recombination.

A trinucleotide repeat (TNR) is a 3 base pair (bp) DNA sequence tandemly repeated in an array. In humans, TNR sequences have been found to be associated with at least 14 severe neurological diseases including Huntington disease, myotonic dystrophy and several of the spinocerebellar ataxias. Such diseases are caused by an expansion of the repeat sequence beyond a threshold length and are characterized by non-Mendelian patterns of inheritance which lead to genetic anticipation. Although the mechanism of the genetic instability in these arrays is not yet fully understood, various models have been suggested based on the in vitro observation that TNR sequences can form secondary structures such as pseudo-hairpins. In order to investigate the mechanisms responsible for instability of TNR sequences, a study was carried out on Escherichia coli cells in which TNR arrays had been integrated into the chromosomal lacZ gene. This genetic assay was used to identify proteins and pathways involved in deletion and/or expansion instability. Deletion instability was clearly dependent on orientation of the TNR sequence relative to the origin of replication. Interestingly, it was found that expansion instability is not dependent on the orientation of the repeat array relative to the origin of replication. The replication fork reversal pathway and the RecFOR mediated gap repair pathway were found to have no statistically significant influence on the instability of TNR arrays. However, the protein UvrD was found to affect the deletion instability of TNR sequences. The roles of key helicase genes were investigated for their effects on instability of chromosomal CTG•CAG repeats. Mutation of the rep gene increased deletion in the CTG leading-strand orientation of the repeat array, and expansion in both orientations - destabilizing the TNR array. RecQ helicase was found to have a significant effect on TNR instability in the orientation in which CAG repeats were present on the leading-strand relative to the origin of replication. Mutation of the recQ gene severely limited the number of expansion events in this orientation, whilst having no effect on deletions. This dependence of expansions on RecQ was lost in a rep mutant strain. In a rep mutant expansions were shown to be partially dependent on the DinG helicase. All together, these results suggest a model of TNR instability in which expansions are due to events occurring at either the leading or lagging strand of an arrested replication fork, facilitated by helicase action. The identity of the helicase implicated is determined by the nature of the arrest.

DNA damage or replication stress during S-phase can activate the S-phase checkpoint which executes a variety of responses, such as the inhibition of origin firing and replication fork stabilisation. Deregulation of the S-phase checkpoint leads to genomic instability, which has been implicated in diseases such as cancer. In this thesis, I aimed to address whether the S-phase checkpoint is regulated outside of S-phase, and how the S-phase checkpoint targets its substrates in budding yeast. Although this checkpoint has thus far been associated exclusively with S-phase, it remains unknown whether its responses such as inhibition of origin firing can also occur in other phases of the cell cycle. To investigate this, the targets of the S-phase checkpoint for the inhibition of origin firing were analysed outside of S-phase upon DNA damage. Interestingly, I showed that the S-phase checkpoint effector kinase Rad53 phosphorylates its targets to inhibit origin firing outside of S-phase upon DNA damage when there is no replication. I then set out to test whether inhibition of origin firing by Rad53 outside of S-phase might be important for faithful DNA replication. Having shown that the checkpoint response is not specific for any cell cycle phases, I then tested how the specificity of Rad53 for its substrates might be determined. After demonstrating that the essential replication protein Cdc45 is required for Rad53 to phosphorylate the initiation factor Sld3, the key residues of Cdc45 necessary for Rad53 interaction were identified. A Cdc45 allele was produced by mutating the identified residues. This allele of Cdc45 is a separation-of-function mutant which prevents Sld3 phosphorylation upon DNA damage, but retains its function in DNA replication. Because Cdc45 travels with the replication fork, it is possible that Cdc45 also targets Rad53 to the replication fork to stabilise it upon replication stress. Overall, this thesis provides evidence that the S-phase checkpoint can function throughout the cell cycle and that Cdc45 targets Rad53 to some of its substrates, and possibly plays a role in replication fork stabilisation.

In order to monitor the T7 replisome fate upon encountering abasic lesion, I optimized a single molecule flow stretching assay where the replisome encounters either abasic site or undamaged site inserted at 3.5 kilobases from the replication fork. The obtained events were categorized into three groups; bypass, restart and permanent stop. The results showed 52% bypass, 39% pause and 9% stop upon encountering the abasic lesion. The pause duration in the restart events was found to be ten times longer than the undamaged one. Moreover, an ensemble experiment was performed, and the results were slightly consistent with regard to the bypass percentage (70%) but the stoppage percentage was significantly higher in the ensemble replication reaction (30%). Further investigations were made and it was found that the rate of the T7 replisome increases after bypassing the abasic lesion. To inquire more about this rate switch and the difference between the single molecule and ensemble results, another unwinding experiment was performed where only gp4 (helicase) was used from the replisome. Interestingly, the rate of DNA unwinding by gp4 was similar to the rate observed after the replisome bypasses the lesion. We hypothesize that the polymerase is stalled at the abasic site and its interaction with the helicase is lost. Consequently, the helicase and the polymerase will uncouple where the helicase continues unwinding the DNA to result in a higher observed rate after bypassing the abasic site. Additional studies will be performed in the future to directly observe the helicase and polymerase uncoupling upon encountering the lesion.

The cell division cycles of differentiating cells are coordinated so as to generate sufficient numbers of mature cells. The cell cycle may also regulate the process of differentiation, in ways that are not well understood. We previously discovered that during erythropoiesis, the cell cycle is synchronized with a specific developmental switch, where erythroid progenitors known as colony-forming-unit-erythroid (CFU-e) transition from a self-renewal state to a state of erythroid terminal differentiation (ETD). This switch takes place during a single cell cycle S phase and is dependent on S-phase progression. My work shows that this S phase is unusual, in that it is shorter than S phase in preceding cycles, as a result of a global increase in replication fork speed. I found that the CDK inhibitor, p57KIP2, negatively regulates replication fork speed in self-renewing CFU-e, and its down-regulation at the switch to ETD results in S-phase shortening. p57KIP2-mediated inhibition of CDK2 is essential for CFU-e self-renewal. It exerts this effect by reducing replication stress and also reducing the probability of transition from CFU-e to ETD, promoting CFU-e self-renewal instead. CDK2 inhibiting drugs that mimic the action of p57KIP2 stimulate erythropoiesis both in vitro and in vivo, through expansion of the CFU-e pool. In addition to p57KIP2, E2f4 also regulates S-phase shortening and the efficiency of the CFU-e to ETD transition. Overall, my work shows that S-phase speed regulates a key erythroid cell fate decision, and suggests a possible translational application of CDK2 inhibiting drugs in the stimulation of erythropoiesis.

Genomic DNA is constantly exposed to assaults, which if not dealt with, can lead to genomic instability and carcinogenesis. In response to stress including either Ionising Radiation (IR) or replication stress, ATM and ATR promote the activation of cell cycle checkpoints and initiate repair of DNA damage. Recent studies have revealed that ATM signalling can activate LATS1 via a cascade through RASSF1A and MST2. LATS1 is a tumour suppressor, which forms a barrier to carcinogenesis restricting cell proliferation and promoting apoptosis by stabilising a YAP/p73 transcriptional complex, hence upregulating p73 responsive genes. LATS1 is inactivated through promoter hypermethylation in a number of cancer types including breast cancer and soft tissue sarcoma. This research project seeks to define the mechanism through which LATS1 is involved in IR-induced DNA damage signalling. The data presented in this thesis shows that LATS1 controls CDK2 and regulates phosphorylation of S3291 on BRCA2. Cells lacking LATS1 exhibited enhanced accumulation of damage-induced Rad51 foci leading to cell cycle arrest at the G₂/M checkpoint. Furthermore, the data presented here suggests that LATS1 may not be required for homologous recombination. This work supports the hypothesis that LATS1 inhibits CDK2-dependent phosphorylation of BRCA2 at S3291, hence protecting stalled replication forks from nucleolytic degradation.