Spelling suggestions: "subject:"d'evolution off 1905"" "subject:"d'evolution oof 1905""
1 |
The agrarian problem in Russia as a background for the revolutionKask, Marie Katherine January 1932 (has links)
No abstract included. / Arts, Faculty of / History, Department of / Graduate
|
2 |
A recepção alemã à revolução russa de 1905 / The German reception towards the Russian revolution of 1905Luiz Enrique Vieira de Souza 27 November 2012 (has links)
Os argumentos que apresentaremos ao longo das páginas seguintes terão como fio condutor as reações de uma parcela da intelligentsia alemã à revolução russa de 1905. Mesmo antes de se tornar palco de eventos revolucionários de importância central para os destinos políticos do continente, a Rússia já exercia algum magnetismo sobre as camadas cultas da Alemanha em virtude de suas realizações no plano cultural. No entanto, a partir dos conflitos subsequentes ao domingo sangrento, os alemães vieram também a nutrir interesse pelos eventuais reflexos desse processo revolucionário no contexto político em que estavam inseridos. Essa afirmação será corroborada mediante a análise crítica de escritos que algumas das personalidades intelectuais mais fecundas em atividade na Alemanha Guilhermina dedicaram às disputas em curso no império do czar. Mais especificamente, confrontaremos os artigos de Max Weber embasados numa combinação peculiar entre nacionalismo germânico e a tradição liberal e as avaliações produzidas pelas diferentes vertentes do pensamento socialdemocrata que disputavam entre si o conteúdo das diretrizes daquele que figurava então como o maior e mais respeitado partido marxista da II Internacional. Nesse último caso, trata-se de desvendar como as polêmicas travadas entre Eduard Bernstein, Karl Kautsky e Rosa Luxemburg acerca da viabilidade da greve de massas na Alemanha estiveram impregnadas de leituras particulares a respeito da distância entre as condições da luta de classes no Kaiserreich e as peculiaridades daquele tecido societário onde o proletariado despontava, pela primeira vez, como força protagonista e hegemônica de transformações com alcance revolucionário. Em resumo, demonstraremos que os juízos emitidos por esses autores sobre a revolução russa estiveram imbuídos por reflexões subjacentes que, explicita ou implicitamente, diziam respeito aos tensionamento políticos e sociais que acompanharam o processo de modernização da Alemanha. Em sentido metafórico, defenderemos a ideia de que a Rússia apresentou-se-lhes como um espelho convexo, no qual a imagem da Alemanha teria sido refletida, ainda que, obviamente, de maneira distorcida. / The statements presented in the following pages will focus the reaction of some representative members of the German intelligentsia towards the Russian revolution of 1905. Due to its achievements in the cultural field, Russia already exercised a sort of magnectical attraction upon the German cultural stratum, even before it became the scenery of revolutionary events of central importance for the political destiny of the European continent. Neverthless, those conflicts that ensued the bloody Sunday also roused concerns about the possible reflexes of this revolutionary proccess in their own political context. This assertion will be corroborated by the critical analysis of the writings that some among the most prominent intellectual personalities in Wilhelminian Germany devoted to the disputes in the empire of the tsar. More specifically, I intend to consider Max Weber\'s articles which were based on a peculiar combination of German nacionalism and the liberal tradition in relation to the judgments of the different social democratic tendencies envolved in the debate over the course of the major party within the Second International. Thus, I will make an attempt to shed some light on how the controversies between Eduard Bernstein, Karl Kautsky and Rosa Luxemburg over the feasibility of the political mass strike methods in Germany were infused with particular interpretations concerning the distance between the class struggle conditions in the Kaiserreich and the peculiarities which characterized that social tissue where the proletariat emerged for the first time as protagonist and hegemonical force of revolutionary transformations. In short, it will be shown that these authors\' formulations about the Russian revolution were pervaded by underlying reflections that implicitly or explicitly referred to the social and political tensions that accompanied the modernization proccess in Germany. Metaphorically, I will support the proposition that Russia appeared to them as a convex mirror, where the image of Germany would have been reflected, even though in a distorted manner.
|
3 |
A recepção alemã à revolução russa de 1905 / The German reception towards the Russian revolution of 1905Souza, Luiz Enrique Vieira de 27 November 2012 (has links)
Os argumentos que apresentaremos ao longo das páginas seguintes terão como fio condutor as reações de uma parcela da intelligentsia alemã à revolução russa de 1905. Mesmo antes de se tornar palco de eventos revolucionários de importância central para os destinos políticos do continente, a Rússia já exercia algum magnetismo sobre as camadas cultas da Alemanha em virtude de suas realizações no plano cultural. No entanto, a partir dos conflitos subsequentes ao domingo sangrento, os alemães vieram também a nutrir interesse pelos eventuais reflexos desse processo revolucionário no contexto político em que estavam inseridos. Essa afirmação será corroborada mediante a análise crítica de escritos que algumas das personalidades intelectuais mais fecundas em atividade na Alemanha Guilhermina dedicaram às disputas em curso no império do czar. Mais especificamente, confrontaremos os artigos de Max Weber embasados numa combinação peculiar entre nacionalismo germânico e a tradição liberal e as avaliações produzidas pelas diferentes vertentes do pensamento socialdemocrata que disputavam entre si o conteúdo das diretrizes daquele que figurava então como o maior e mais respeitado partido marxista da II Internacional. Nesse último caso, trata-se de desvendar como as polêmicas travadas entre Eduard Bernstein, Karl Kautsky e Rosa Luxemburg acerca da viabilidade da greve de massas na Alemanha estiveram impregnadas de leituras particulares a respeito da distância entre as condições da luta de classes no Kaiserreich e as peculiaridades daquele tecido societário onde o proletariado despontava, pela primeira vez, como força protagonista e hegemônica de transformações com alcance revolucionário. Em resumo, demonstraremos que os juízos emitidos por esses autores sobre a revolução russa estiveram imbuídos por reflexões subjacentes que, explicita ou implicitamente, diziam respeito aos tensionamento políticos e sociais que acompanharam o processo de modernização da Alemanha. Em sentido metafórico, defenderemos a ideia de que a Rússia apresentou-se-lhes como um espelho convexo, no qual a imagem da Alemanha teria sido refletida, ainda que, obviamente, de maneira distorcida. / The statements presented in the following pages will focus the reaction of some representative members of the German intelligentsia towards the Russian revolution of 1905. Due to its achievements in the cultural field, Russia already exercised a sort of magnectical attraction upon the German cultural stratum, even before it became the scenery of revolutionary events of central importance for the political destiny of the European continent. Neverthless, those conflicts that ensued the bloody Sunday also roused concerns about the possible reflexes of this revolutionary proccess in their own political context. This assertion will be corroborated by the critical analysis of the writings that some among the most prominent intellectual personalities in Wilhelminian Germany devoted to the disputes in the empire of the tsar. More specifically, I intend to consider Max Weber\'s articles which were based on a peculiar combination of German nacionalism and the liberal tradition in relation to the judgments of the different social democratic tendencies envolved in the debate over the course of the major party within the Second International. Thus, I will make an attempt to shed some light on how the controversies between Eduard Bernstein, Karl Kautsky and Rosa Luxemburg over the feasibility of the political mass strike methods in Germany were infused with particular interpretations concerning the distance between the class struggle conditions in the Kaiserreich and the peculiarities which characterized that social tissue where the proletariat emerged for the first time as protagonist and hegemonical force of revolutionary transformations. In short, it will be shown that these authors\' formulations about the Russian revolution were pervaded by underlying reflections that implicitly or explicitly referred to the social and political tensions that accompanied the modernization proccess in Germany. Metaphorically, I will support the proposition that Russia appeared to them as a convex mirror, where the image of Germany would have been reflected, even though in a distorted manner.
|
4 |
Drohgebärden. Repräsentationen von Herrschaft im WandelGumb, Christoph 06 December 2013 (has links)
Im Russischen Zarenreich waren Drohungen ein zentrales Instrument der Machtausübung. Die Androhung von Gewalt erlaubte es dem Staat, seine Untertanen in Schach zu halten, ohne Gewalt tatsächlich anwenden zu müssen. Als während der Gewaltexzesse der Revolution von 1905 die Drohkulisse des Zarenreiches in sich zusammenfiel, geriet das System in eine elementare Krise. In dieser Arbeit wird anhand einer Fallstudie untersucht, wie die imperiale russische Armee als zentraler politischer Akteur neue Praktiken entwickelte, die das Überleben des Zarenreichs sicherten. In Zusammenarbeit von Militäreinheiten vor Ort und dem Ministerium in St. Petersburg wurden Regelungen ausgearbeitet, mit denen die symbolische Androhung von Gewalt durch den tatsächlichen, realisierten Gewaltakt ersetzt werden sollte. Hierzu wollten die Militärs zunächst, dass die Differenz zwischen Soldaten und Zivilisten wieder sichtbar gemacht werden sollte. Soldaten sollten sich nur noch in Extremsituationen auf den Strassen blicken lassen um dann „schnell und entschieden“, wie eine der zentralen Forderungen jener Zeit lauerte, zur Waffe zu greifen. Diese Taktiken hatten kurzfristig Erfolg. Langfristig führten sie jedoch zur Erosion des russischen Zarenreichs: Die Revolution von 1905 hatte die Grenzen der Drohpotentiale des Zaren aufgezeigt. / In Tsarist Russia, the threat was an important instrument of rule. Threats of violence enabled the state to subdue its subjects without the need to resort to the actual use of violence. But when the Tsar’s threats lost their effectiveness during the excessive violence of the revolution of 1905, Russia endured a fundamental crisis. My work uses Warsaw as a case study to examine how the Imperial Russian Army secured the survival of Tsarist Russia by developing new practices of threat. Units on the ground and the military bureaucracy in St. Petersburg developed new regulations that aimed at replacing the symbolic threat of violence with its actual and finely regulated application. As a precondition for this, the military command wanted to reestablish the symbolic boundaries between soldiers and civilians. Soldiers were allowed to leave their barracks only in situations when this was absolutely necessary. However, they then had to use violence “quickly and decisively,” as a popular phrase described it. In the short term, these tactics proved successful. In the longer run, however, they led to the erosion of the Tsarist regime during its next fundamental moment of crisis. The revolution of 1905 had shown to the people the limitations of the Tsar’s threat potential.
|
Page generated in 0.0553 seconds