No description available.

Steerable catheters are routinely deployed in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. During invasive electrophysiology studies, the catheter handle is manipulated by an interventionalist to guide the catheter's distal section toward endocardium for pacing and ablation. Catheter manipulation requires dexterity and experience, and exposes the interventionalist to ionizing radiation. Through the course of this research, a platform was developed to assist and enhance the navigation of the catheter inside the cardiac chambers. This robotic platform replaces the interventionalist's hand in catheter manipulation and provides the option to force the catheter tip in arbitrary directions using a 3D input device or to automatically navigate the catheter to desired positions within a cardiac chamber by commanding the software to do so. To accomplish catheter navigation, the catheter was modeled as a continuum manipulator, and utilizing robot kinematics, catheter tip position control was designed and implemented. An electromagnetic tracking system was utilized to measure the position and orientation of two key points in catheter model, for position feedback to the control system. A software platform was developed to implement the navigation and control strategies and to interface with the robot, the 3D input device and the tracking system. The catheter modeling was validated through in-vitro experiments with a static phantom, and in-vivo experiments on three live swines. The feasibility of automatic navigation was also veri ed by navigating to three landmarks in the beating heart of swine subjects, and comparing their performance with that of an experienced interventionalist using quasi biplane fluoroscopy. The platform realizes automatic, assisted, and motorized navigation under the interventionalist's control, thus reducing the dependence of successful navigation on the dexterity and manipulation skills of the interventionalist, and providing a means to reduce the exposure to X-ray radiation. Upon further development, the platform could be adopted for human deployment.

Steerable catheters are routinely deployed in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. During invasive electrophysiology studies, the catheter handle is manipulated by an interventionalist to guide the catheter's distal section toward endocardium for pacing and ablation. Catheter manipulation requires dexterity and experience, and exposes the interventionalist to ionizing radiation. Through the course of this research, a platform was developed to assist and enhance the navigation of the catheter inside the cardiac chambers. This robotic platform replaces the interventionalist's hand in catheter manipulation and provides the option to force the catheter tip in arbitrary directions using a 3D input device or to automatically navigate the catheter to desired positions within a cardiac chamber by commanding the software to do so. To accomplish catheter navigation, the catheter was modeled as a continuum manipulator, and utilizing robot kinematics, catheter tip position control was designed and implemented. An electromagnetic tracking system was utilized to measure the position and orientation of two key points in catheter model, for position feedback to the control system. A software platform was developed to implement the navigation and control strategies and to interface with the robot, the 3D input device and the tracking system. The catheter modeling was validated through in-vitro experiments with a static phantom, and in-vivo experiments on three live swines. The feasibility of automatic navigation was also veri ed by navigating to three landmarks in the beating heart of swine subjects, and comparing their performance with that of an experienced interventionalist using quasi biplane fluoroscopy. The platform realizes automatic, assisted, and motorized navigation under the interventionalist's control, thus reducing the dependence of successful navigation on the dexterity and manipulation skills of the interventionalist, and providing a means to reduce the exposure to X-ray radiation. Upon further development, the platform could be adopted for human deployment.

Yes / To capture stakeholders’ theories concerning how and in what contexts robot-assisted surgery becomes integrated into routine practice. A literature review provided tentative theories that were revised through a realist interview study. Literature-based theories were presented to the interviewees, who were asked to describe to what extent and in what ways those theories reflected their experience. Analysis focused on identifying mechanisms through which robot-assisted surgery becomes integrated into practice and contexts in which those mechanisms are triggered. Nine hospitals in England where robot-assisted surgery is used for colorectal operations. Forty-four theatre staff with experience of robot-assisted colorectal surgery, including surgeons, surgical trainees, theatre nurses, operating department practitioners and anaesthetists. Interviewees emphasised the importance of support from hospital management, team leaders and surgical colleagues. Training together as a team was seen as beneficial, increasing trust in each other’s knowledge and supporting team bonding, in turn leading to improved teamwork. When first introducing robot-assisted surgery, it is beneficial to have a handpicked dedicated robotic team who are able to quickly gain experience and confidence. A suitably sized operating theatre can reduce operation duration and the risk of de-sterilisation. Motivation among team members to persist with robot-assisted surgery can be achieved without involvement in the initial decision to purchase a robot, but training that enables team members to feel confident as they take on the new tasks is essential. We captured accounts of how robot-assisted surgery has been introduced into a range of hospitals. Using a realist approach, we were also able to capture perceptions of the factors that support and constrain the integration of robot-assisted surgery into routine practice. We have translated these into recommendations that can inform future implementations of robot-assisted surgery.

Yes / Background: The implementation of robot-assisted surgery (RAS) can be challenging, with reports of surgical robots being underused. This raises questions about differences compared with open and laparoscopic surgery and how best to integrate RAS into practice. Objectives: To (1) contribute to reporting of the ROLARR (RObotic versus LAparoscopic Resection for Rectal cancer) trial, by investigating how variations in the implementation of RAS and the context impact outcomes; (2) produce guidance on factors likely to facilitate successful implementation; (3) produce guidance on how to ensure effective teamwork; and (4) provide data to inform the development of tools for RAS. Design: Realist process evaluation alongside ROLARR. Phase 1 – a literature review identified theories concerning how RAS becomes embedded into practice and impacts on teamwork and decision-making. These were refined through interviews across nine NHS trusts with theatre teams. Phase 2 – a multisite case study was conducted across four trusts to test the theories. Data were collected using observation, video recording, interviews and questionnaires. Phase 3 – interviews were conducted in other surgical disciplines to assess the generalisability of the findings. Findings: The introduction of RAS is surgeon led but dependent on support at multiple levels. There is significant variation in the training provided to theatre teams. Contextual factors supporting the integration of RAS include the provision of whole-team training, the presence of handpicked dedicated teams and the availability of suitably sized operating theatres. RAS introduces challenges for teamwork that can impact operation duration, but, over time, teams develop strategies to overcome these challenges. Working with an experienced assistant supports teamwork, but experience of the procedure is insufficient for competence in RAS and experienced scrub practitioners are important in supporting inexperienced assistants. RAS can result in reduced distraction and increased concentration for the surgeon when he or she is supported by an experienced assistant or scrub practitioner. Conclusions: Our research suggests a need to pay greater attention to the training and skill mix of the team. To support effective teamwork, our research suggests that it is beneficial for surgeons to (1) encourage the team to communicate actions and concerns; (2) alert the attention of the assistant before issuing a request; and (3) acknowledge the scrub practitioner’s role in supporting inexperienced assistants. It is beneficial for the team to provide oral responses to the surgeon’s requests. Limitations: This study started after the trial, limiting impact on analysis of the trial. The small number of operations observed may mean that less frequent impacts of RAS were missed. Future work: Future research should include (1) exploring the transferability of guidance for effective teamwork to other surgical domains in which technology leads to the physical or perceptual separation of surgeon and team; (2) exploring the benefits and challenges of including realist methods in feasibility and pilot studies; (3) assessing the feasibility of using routine data to understand the impact of RAS on rare end points associated with patient safety; (4) developing and evaluating methods for whole-team training; and (5) evaluating the impact of different physical configurations of the robotic console and team members on teamwork. / National Inst for Health Research (NIHR)

La robotique a fait progresser les interventions chirurgicales, avec des interventions moins invasives, une manipulation d’instruments plus précise et une meilleure dextérité. Néanmoins, le manque de retour haptique sur les plates-formes chirurgicales existantes aujourd’hui rend délicat l’accomplissement des gestes chirurgicaux et par conséquent augmente le risque de ces procédures. Avec l’introduction d’un retour haptique, les robots chirurgicaux sont conçus avec une approche de télé-opération bilatérale. Le retard, inhérent à cette approche, est crucial car même un petit retard pourrait déstabiliser le système. En pratique, le retard est inévitable, notamment pour les robots miniaturisés avec communication sans fils. Pour résoudre les problèmes liés à l’instabilité induite par le retard et rendre passif le canal de communication, l’approche de wave variable transformation (WVT) a été proposée. Néanmoins, les performances de suivi sont compromises à cause de la conservation de la condition de passivité. Dans cette thèse, une nouvelle approche de compensation basée sur la structure de wave variable, et considérant moins de condition de conservation est proposée afin d’améliorer les performances de suivi en position, en vitesse et en force. Pour garantir la passivité du système global, une approche énergétique (energy reservoir based regulators) est développée pour ajuster les termes de WVT avec une analyse rigoureuse. La méthode proposée permet d’améliorer les performances de suivi avec uniquement un retard de transmission dans un seul sens. Pour faciliter davantage les procédures chirurgicales, notamment les microchirurgies, deux facteurs d’échelle ont été rajoutés à l’approche de compensation. Une analyse de passivité a été par ailleurs menée en considérant la transparence du système. Les performances de suivi peuvent être obtenues si et seulement si les conditions de passivité et de transparence sont satisfaites. Les approches de compensation, avec et sans mise à l’échelle, ont été vérifiées à travers des simulations et des évaluations expérimentales. / Robotic technology has advanced the surgical procedures in terms of reduced trauma, more accurate manipulation and enhanced dexterity. However, the lack of haptic feedback on existing surgical robotic platforms makes it impossible for the surgeon to feel the operative site,and thus increases the risks of surgical procedures. With the introduction of haptic feedback, the surgical robots are design in bilateral teleoperation way. Time delay in bilateral teleoperation is crucial because even small time delay may destabilize the system. In practice, time delay is unavoidable, e.g. wireless communication miniaturized surgical robots, internet based robotic-assisted telesurgery and transmission of big amount of information, etc. In order to solve the instability caused by time delay in bilateral teleoperation, wave variable transformation (WVT) method has been proposed to passivate the delayed communication channel. However, the tracking performances are compromised due to the conservative passivity condition. In this thesis, a new wave variable compensation (WVC) structure with less conservative condition is proposed to enhance the velocity/position and force tracking performances. In order to guarantee the passivity of the whole system, energy reservoir based regulators are designed to adjust the WVC terms in the proposed structure with rigorous analysis. The WVC is able to achieve tracking performance with only single trip time delay. To better facilitate the surgical procedures, e.g. the microsurgeries, a scaled WVC structure is also developed by adding two scaling factors to the WVC structure. Passivity analysis on the scaled WVC is conducted with consideration of system transparency. Scaled tracking performance can be obtained as long as the two obtained passivity and transparency conditions are satisfied. The proposed WVC and scaled WVC have been verified through simulation and experimental studies.

京都大学 / 新制・課程博士 / 博士(工学) / 甲第24608号 / 工博第5114号 / 新制||工||1978(附属図書館) / 京都大学大学院工学研究科機械理工学専攻 / (主査)教授 松野 文俊, 教授 小森 雅晴, 教授 森本 淳 / 学位規則第4条第1項該当 / Doctor of Philosophy (Engineering) / Kyoto University / DGAM

Introduction: In recent years, robot-assisted surgery has taken over as a first option in rectal cancer treatment. The overall perception is that robot-assisted surgery is a method with good surgical outcomes. Many current studies have focused on comparing robot-assisted surgery to conventional laparoscopy. To our knowledge, few studies have been conducted to compare surgical outcomes in rectal cancer over time in robot-assisted surgery as training and knowledge increases in the field. Aim: To examine the two most commonly used robot-assisted surgical procedures in rectal cancer, to compare surgical outcomes of each procedure over a ten-year period. Method: A retrospective comparative study design was used. The national Swedish Colorectal Cancer Registry (SCRCR) was used to identify patients who underwent robot-assisted rectal cancer surgery at Örebro University Hospital between 2013 and 2022. Two surgical procedures were assessed: anterior resection and abdomino-perineal resection. Studied outcomes included: console-time, operation time, blood loss, hospital stay and conversion rate. Group comparisons were performed. Results: In total 202 patients were included and grouped into two periods (2013-2017; 2018-2022). A statistically significant reduction was observed in both procedures regarding blood loss in the later period. No other statistically significant differences were identified. Patients operated with APR in the later period were less fit. Conclusion: The surgical procedures showed comparable clinical outcomes in both periods. Our study showed that more complex cases in the group operated with APR were selected in the second period, which could imply that a higher degree of surgical proficiency was obtained over time.

Yes / Safe and successful surgery depends on effective teamwork between professional groups, each playing their part in a complex division of labour. This article reports the first empirical examination of how introduction of robot-assisted surgery changes the division of labour within surgical teams and impacts teamwork and patient safety. Data collection and analysis was informed by realist principles. Interviews were conducted with surgical teams across nine UK hospitals and, in a multi-site case study across four hospitals, data were collected using a range of methods, including ethnographic observation, video recording and semi-structured interviews. Our findings reveal that as the robot enables the surgeon to do more, the surgical assistant's role becomes less clearly defined. Robot-assisted surgery also introduces new tasks for the surgical assistant and scrub practitioner, in terms of communicating information to the surgeon. However, the use of robot-assisted surgery does not redistribute work in a uniform way; contextual factors of individual experience and team relationships shape changes to the division of labour. For instance, in some situations, scrub practitioners take on the role of supporting inexperienced surgical assistants. These changes in the division of labour do not persist when team members return to operations that are not robot-assisted. This study contributes to wider literature on divisions of labour in healthcare and how this is impacted by the introduction of new technologies. In particular, we emphasise the need to pay attention to often neglected micro-level contextual factors. This can highlight behaviours that can be promoted to benefit patient care.

Background: The best technique of radical prostatectomy – open retropubic versus robot-assisted surgery – is a subject of controversy. Patients and Methods: Between January 1st, 2007 and December 31st, 2011, 2,177 men underwent radical prostatectomy at our department. 252 (12%) cases were laparoscopic robot-assisted, the remainder open retropubic procedures. In Germany, certified prostate cancer centers are required to collect urinary tract-related outcome data after radical prostatectomy using the International Consultation of Incontinence Questionnaire Male Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms. The questionnaire data were used to compare both surgical approaches concerning the urinary tractrelated outcome 1, 2 and 3 years postoperatively. Results: Neither the voiding score nor the incontinence score or the bother scale sum differed between the two cohorts at any of the measurement times. Conclusions: Concerning continence recovery, in this series, there were no detectable differences between robot-assisted and open radical prostatectomy.