Les mécanismes moléculaires impliqués dans la fusion membranaire ont été amplement étudiés au cours des trente dernières années. Notre compréhension actuelle de ce phénomène est principalement basée sur des résultats obtenus par (1) le développement de modèles physiques décrivant la fusion des membranes biologiques, (2) l’étude mécanistique et structurale des protéines de fusion membranaire des virus à enveloppe et (3) l’étude des évènements de fusion intracellulaire médiés par les protéines SNARES dans les cellules eucaryotes. La découverte du complexe SNARE fut l’aboutissement de travaux interdisciplinaires qui ont exigés un large éventail de techniques tel que la génétique de la levure, l’électrophysiologie, la biologie moléculaire, la biochimie cellulaire, la biophysique expérimentale et l’imagerie. Tirant parti des paradigmes et techniques biophysiques qui ont émergés de ces études, nous avons examiné les fonctions et mécanismes de régulation des domaines « coiled-coil » dans les processus de fusion intracellulaire impliquant des protéines de la famille des Longin-SNAREs ou des Mitofusines, deux machineries protéiques de fusion dont le mode d’action exact reste encore peu clair. La conception exacte des mécanismes moléculaires de la fusion membranaire requiert la reconstitution in vitro des protéines de fusion dans un large spectre d’environnement membranaire avec des propriétés biophysiques définies et facilement modulables. Idéalement, ces systèmes membranaires devraient permettre à l’expérimentateur de contrôler la composition lipidique et protéique, ainsi que la topologie membranaire, afin de rendre compte de l’importante variabilité observée entre les différents compartiments de fusion cellulaire. La reconstitution dans des liposomes offre une incroyable flexibilité avec la possibilité de faire varier la plupart des paramètres clefs et de créer un environnement minimal dans lequel les facteurs solubles et/ou membranaires peuvent être ajoutés, seuls ou en combinaison, pour dévoiler leur rôle avec clarté. Nous avons mis au point des systèmes in vitro de reconstitution de protéines dans des plateformes membranaires artificielles pour nos deux systèmes d’études (les deux protéines Longin-SNAREs TI-VAMP et Sec 22b, ainsi que les domaines « coiled-coil » des Mitofusines) et nous avons réalisé des expériences biochimiques pour caractériser le mode d’action de ces protéines. L’objectif à long-terme de ce projet est de comparer les mécanismes moléculaires des machineries de fusion associés aux protéines SNAREs et Mitofusines, et ainsi de dévoiler des similitudes structurelles et fonctionnelles entre (1) leur protéines de fusion principales et (2) leur facteurs régulateurs. / The molecular mechanisms involved in membrane fusion have been extensively studied for the past thirty years. Our current understanding of this phenomenon is mainly based on results obtained by (i) the development of physical models describing the fusion of membranes, (ii) structural and mechanistic investigations on fusion proteins of enveloped viruses and (iii) studies of SNARE protein-mediated intracellular fusion events of eukaryotic cells. Discovery of the SNARE complex was the outcome of interdisciplinary works which involved a wide range of techniques including yeast genetics, electrophysiology, molecular biology, cell-free biochemistry, adhesion/fusion biophysics and imaging. Taking advantage of the paradigms and biophysical techniques that emerged from these studies, we investigated the function and regulation of coiled-coil domains in intracellular fusion processes involving Longin-SNAREs or Mitofusins, two fusion protein machineries whose exact mode of action still remains unclear. A comprehensive understanding of the molecular mechanisms of membrane fusion requires the in vitro reconstitution of fusion proteins into a wide variety of membrane environments with defined and tunable biophysical properties. Ideally, these membrane systems should allow the experimentalists to control the lipid and protein composition as well as the membrane topology, to account for the variability observed across cellular fusing compartments. Reconstitution into liposomes offers amazing flexibility with the capacity to vary most of these relevant parameters, and to create a minimal environment in which membrane and/or soluble factors can be added, one at a time or in combination, to reveal their role with clarity. We have set up the in vitro reconstitution of proteins into various artificial membrane platforms for both systems (the Longin-SNAREs TI-VAMP and Sec22b and the coiled-coil domains of Mitofusins) and performed biochemical assays to gain insight into how these proteins execute their functions. The long-term goal of this project is to compare the molecular mechanisms of SNARE and Mitofusin fusion machineries and thus reveal structural and functional similitudes between (i) their core fusion proteins, and (ii) their regulatory factors.

Les mécanismes moléculaires impliqués dans la fusion membranaire ont été amplement étudiés au cours des trente dernières années. Notre compréhension actuelle de ce phénomène est principalement basée sur des résultats obtenus par (1) le développement de modèles physiques décrivant la fusion des membranes biologiques, (2) l’étude mécanistique et structurale des protéines de fusion membranaire des virus à enveloppe et (3) l’étude des évènements de fusion intracellulaire médiés par les protéines SNARES dans les cellules eucaryotes. La découverte du complexe SNARE fut l’aboutissement de travaux interdisciplinaires qui ont exigés un large éventail de techniques tel que la génétique de la levure, l’électrophysiologie, la biologie moléculaire, la biochimie cellulaire, la biophysique expérimentale et l’imagerie. Tirant parti des paradigmes et techniques biophysiques qui ont émergés de ces études, nous avons examiné les fonctions et mécanismes de régulation des domaines « coiled-coil » dans les processus de fusion intracellulaire impliquant des protéines de la famille des Longin-SNAREs ou des Mitofusines, deux machineries protéiques de fusion dont le mode d’action exact reste encore peu clair. La conception exacte des mécanismes moléculaires de la fusion membranaire requiert la reconstitution in vitro des protéines de fusion dans un large spectre d’environnement membranaire avec des propriétés biophysiques définies et facilement modulables. Idéalement, ces systèmes membranaires devraient permettre à l’expérimentateur de contrôler la composition lipidique et protéique, ainsi que la topologie membranaire, afin de rendre compte de l’importante variabilité observée entre les différents compartiments de fusion cellulaire. La reconstitution dans des liposomes offre une incroyable flexibilité avec la possibilité de faire varier la plupart des paramètres clefs et de créer un environnement minimal dans lequel les facteurs solubles et/ou membranaires peuvent être ajoutés, seuls ou en combinaison, pour dévoiler leur rôle avec clarté. Nous avons mis au point des systèmes in vitro de reconstitution de protéines dans des plateformes membranaires artificielles pour nos deux systèmes d’études (les deux protéines Longin-SNAREs TI-VAMP et Sec 22b, ainsi que les domaines « coiled-coil » des Mitofusines) et nous avons réalisé des expériences biochimiques pour caractériser le mode d’action de ces protéines. L’objectif à long-terme de ce projet est de comparer les mécanismes moléculaires des machineries de fusion associés aux protéines SNAREs et Mitofusines, et ainsi de dévoiler des similitudes structurelles et fonctionnelles entre (1) leur protéines de fusion principales et (2) leur facteurs régulateurs. / The molecular mechanisms involved in membrane fusion have been extensively studied for the past thirty years. Our current understanding of this phenomenon is mainly based on results obtained by (i) the development of physical models describing the fusion of membranes, (ii) structural and mechanistic investigations on fusion proteins of enveloped viruses and (iii) studies of SNARE protein-mediated intracellular fusion events of eukaryotic cells. Discovery of the SNARE complex was the outcome of interdisciplinary works which involved a wide range of techniques including yeast genetics, electrophysiology, molecular biology, cell-free biochemistry, adhesion/fusion biophysics and imaging. Taking advantage of the paradigms and biophysical techniques that emerged from these studies, we investigated the function and regulation of coiled-coil domains in intracellular fusion processes involving Longin-SNAREs or Mitofusins, two fusion protein machineries whose exact mode of action still remains unclear. A comprehensive understanding of the molecular mechanisms of membrane fusion requires the in vitro reconstitution of fusion proteins into a wide variety of membrane environments with defined and tunable biophysical properties. Ideally, these membrane systems should allow the experimentalists to control the lipid and protein composition as well as the membrane topology, to account for the variability observed across cellular fusing compartments. Reconstitution into liposomes offers amazing flexibility with the capacity to vary most of these relevant parameters, and to create a minimal environment in which membrane and/or soluble factors can be added, one at a time or in combination, to reveal their role with clarity. We have set up the in vitro reconstitution of proteins into various artificial membrane platforms for both systems (the Longin-SNAREs TI-VAMP and Sec22b and the coiled-coil domains of Mitofusins) and performed biochemical assays to gain insight into how these proteins execute their functions. The long-term goal of this project is to compare the molecular mechanisms of SNARE and Mitofusin fusion machineries and thus reveal structural and functional similitudes between (i) their core fusion proteins, and (ii) their regulatory factors.

No description available.

No description available.

Les mécanismes moléculaires impliqués dans la fusion membranaire ont été amplement étudiés au cours des trente dernières années. Notre compréhension actuelle de ce phénomène est principalement basée sur des résultats obtenus par (1) le développement de modèles physiques décrivant la fusion des membranes biologiques, (2) l’étude mécanistique et structurale des protéines de fusion membranaire des virus à enveloppe et (3) l’étude des évènements de fusion intracellulaire médiés par les protéines SNARES dans les cellules eucaryotes. La découverte du complexe SNARE fut l’aboutissement de travaux interdisciplinaires qui ont exigés un large éventail de techniques tel que la génétique de la levure, l’électrophysiologie, la biologie moléculaire, la biochimie cellulaire, la biophysique expérimentale et l’imagerie. Tirant parti des paradigmes et techniques biophysiques qui ont émergés de ces études, nous avons examiné les fonctions et mécanismes de régulation des domaines « coiled-coil » dans les processus de fusion intracellulaire impliquant des protéines de la famille des Longin-SNAREs ou des Mitofusines, deux machineries protéiques de fusion dont le mode d’action exact reste encore peu clair. La conception exacte des mécanismes moléculaires de la fusion membranaire requiert la reconstitution in vitro des protéines de fusion dans un large spectre d’environnement membranaire avec des propriétés biophysiques définies et facilement modulables. Idéalement, ces systèmes membranaires devraient permettre à l’expérimentateur de contrôler la composition lipidique et protéique, ainsi que la topologie membranaire, afin de rendre compte de l’importante variabilité observée entre les différents compartiments de fusion cellulaire. La reconstitution dans des liposomes offre une incroyable flexibilité avec la possibilité de faire varier la plupart des paramètres clefs et de créer un environnement minimal dans lequel les facteurs solubles et/ou membranaires peuvent être ajoutés, seuls ou en combinaison, pour dévoiler leur rôle avec clarté. Nous avons mis au point des systèmes in vitro de reconstitution de protéines dans des plateformes membranaires artificielles pour nos deux systèmes d’études (les deux protéines Longin-SNAREs TI-VAMP et Sec 22b, ainsi que les domaines « coiled-coil » des Mitofusines) et nous avons réalisé des expériences biochimiques pour caractériser le mode d’action de ces protéines. L’objectif à long-terme de ce projet est de comparer les mécanismes moléculaires des machineries de fusion associés aux protéines SNAREs et Mitofusines, et ainsi de dévoiler des similitudes structurelles et fonctionnelles entre (1) leur protéines de fusion principales et (2) leur facteurs régulateurs. / The molecular mechanisms involved in membrane fusion have been extensively studied for the past thirty years. Our current understanding of this phenomenon is mainly based on results obtained by (i) the development of physical models describing the fusion of membranes, (ii) structural and mechanistic investigations on fusion proteins of enveloped viruses and (iii) studies of SNARE protein-mediated intracellular fusion events of eukaryotic cells. Discovery of the SNARE complex was the outcome of interdisciplinary works which involved a wide range of techniques including yeast genetics, electrophysiology, molecular biology, cell-free biochemistry, adhesion/fusion biophysics and imaging. Taking advantage of the paradigms and biophysical techniques that emerged from these studies, we investigated the function and regulation of coiled-coil domains in intracellular fusion processes involving Longin-SNAREs or Mitofusins, two fusion protein machineries whose exact mode of action still remains unclear. A comprehensive understanding of the molecular mechanisms of membrane fusion requires the in vitro reconstitution of fusion proteins into a wide variety of membrane environments with defined and tunable biophysical properties. Ideally, these membrane systems should allow the experimentalists to control the lipid and protein composition as well as the membrane topology, to account for the variability observed across cellular fusing compartments. Reconstitution into liposomes offers amazing flexibility with the capacity to vary most of these relevant parameters, and to create a minimal environment in which membrane and/or soluble factors can be added, one at a time or in combination, to reveal their role with clarity. We have set up the in vitro reconstitution of proteins into various artificial membrane platforms for both systems (the Longin-SNAREs TI-VAMP and Sec22b and the coiled-coil domains of Mitofusins) and performed biochemical assays to gain insight into how these proteins execute their functions. The long-term goal of this project is to compare the molecular mechanisms of SNARE and Mitofusin fusion machineries and thus reveal structural and functional similitudes between (i) their core fusion proteins, and (ii) their regulatory factors.

No description available.

No description available.

Upon vascular injury, activated blood platelets fuse their granules to the plasma membrane and release cargo to regulate the vascular microenvironment, a dynamic process central to platelet function in many critical processes including hemostasis, thrombosis, immunity, wound healing, angiogenesis etc. This granule- plasma membrane fusion is mediated by a family of membrane proteins- Soluble N-ethyl maleimide Attachment Receptor Proteins(SNAREs). SNAREs that reside on vesicle (v-SNAREs) /Vesicle-Associated Membrane Proteins(VAMPs) interact with target/t-SNAREs forming a trans-bilayer complex that facilitates granule fusion. Though many components of exocytic machinery are identified, it is still not clear how it could be manipulated to prevent occlusive thrombosis without triggering bleeding. My work addresses this question by showing how the rates and extents of granule secretion could be regulated by various v-SNAREs. We also show that the granule cargo decondensation is an intermediate to secretion that also contributes to rates of cargo release. Platelets contain four major VAMP isoforms (-2, -3, -7, and -8), however, VAMP-8 and -7 play a primary role while VAMP-2 and -3 are ancillary in secretion. To exploit this heterogeneity in VAMP usage, platelet-specific V-2/3-/- and V-2/3/8-/- mouse models were generated and characterized to understand how secretion influences hemostasis. We found that each VAMP isoform differentially contributes by altering the rates and extents of cargo release. The loss of VAMP-2 and -3 had a minimal impact while the loss of VAMP-2, -3 and -8 significantly reduced the granule secretion. Platelet activation and aggregation were not affected though the spreading was reduced in V-2/3/8-/- platelets indicating the importance of secretion in spreading. Though coagulation pathways were unaltered, PS exposure was reduced in both V-2/3-/- and V-2/3/8-/- platelets suggesting diminished procoagulant activity. In vivo experiments showed that V-2/3/8-/- animals bled profusely upon tail transaction and failed to form occlusive thrombus upon arterial injury while V-2/3-/- animals did not display any hemostatic deficiency. These data suggest that about 40-50% reduction in secretion provides protection against thrombosis without compromising hemostasis and beyond 50% secretion deficiency, the animals fail to form functional thrombi and exhibit severe bleeding. Additionally, detailed structural analysis of activated platelets suggests that the post-stimulation cargo dissolution depends on an agonist concentration and stimulation duration. This process is VAMP-dependent and represents intermediate steps leading to a full exodus of cargo. Moreover, we also show that VAMP-8 is important for compound fusion events and regulates fusion pore size. This is a first comprehensive report that shows how manipulation of the exocytic machinery have an impact on secretion and ultimately on hemostasis. These animals will be instrumental in future investigations of platelet secretion in many other vascular processes.

Membrane fusion is essential for survival in eukaryotic cells. Many physiological processes such as endocytosis and exocytosis are mediated by membrane fusion, which is driven by highly specialized and conserved family of proteins. Neuronal soluble Nethylmaleimide- sensitive factor attachment protein receptors (SNAREs) mediate vesicle fusion with the plasma membrane during neurotransmitter release; however, the mechanism for SNARE-mediated membrane fusion remains to be established. In the current work, we aimed at investigating this mechanism using atomic force microscope (AFM) spectroscopy. We established an AFM lipid bilayer system, which proved effective in detecting fusion of bilayers and measuring compression forces required to generate fusion. It also revealed that SNARE-mediated membrane fusion proceeds through an intermediate hemifused state. Using this system, we revealed the energy landscape for membrane fusion using a dynamic force approach. We carried out compression force measurements at different compression rates and a significant reduction in the force was observed when SNAREs were present in the bilayers. The results also indicated that a single energy barrier governed membrane fusion in our experimental system. The energy barrier is characterized by its width and height, which determine the slope of the activation potential. With SNAREs in the opposing (trans) bilayers, the width of the barrier increased > 2 fold, which is interpreted as an increase in the compressibility of the membranes and subsequently a greater ease in their deformation and fusion under compression. Moreover, specific perturbations to the SNARE interaction interfered with the observed facilitation of membrane fusion, which indicated the involvement of SNAREs in the observed fusion facilitation and increase in the fusion rate. Furthermore, dissociation kinetics analysis of the SNARE interaction revealed a strong binding force during trans SNARE-complex formation, and a correlation between the strength of the SNARE interaction and the degree of fusion facilitation was established. In conclusion, the present findings provide support for a mechanism for SNAREmediated membrane fusion, where trans-interaction between SNAREs provides close apposition of the membranes and reduces fusion energy requirements by locally destabilizing the bilayers, in which the SNAREs are anchored, through pulling on or tilting of their transmembrane segments.

The processes localized to biological membranes are of great interest, both from a scientific and pharmaceutical point of view. Understanding aspects such as the detailed mechanism and regulation of these processes requires investigation of the structure and function of the membrane-bound proteins in which they take place. The study of these processes is often complicated by the need to create in vitro systems that mimic the environment in which these proteins are normally found in vivo. This thesis describes some of the methods available for membrane-protein studies in membrane-mimetic systems, as well as our work aimed at developing such systems. Furthermore, results from studies using these systems are described. In the first two studies, described in Papers I &amp; II, we investigated the use of silica particle-supported lipid bilayers, both for membrane-protein studies and as possible drug-delivery vehicles. Successful reconstitution of a multisubunit proton-pump, cytochrome c oxidase is described and characterized. Initial attempts to develop drug-delivery systems with two different targeting peptides are also described in the thesis. The second part of this thesis revolves around our work with membraneprotein dependent pathways. Results from studies of systems where the proton- pump bo3 oxidase and ATP synthase work in concert are described. The results show a surprising lipid-composition dependence for the coupled bo3- ATP-synthase activity (Paper III). Finally, a new system utilizing synaptic vesicle-fusion proteins for coreconstitution of membrane proteins is described, showing successful coreconstitution of a small respiratory chain, delivery of soluble proteins to preformed liposomes and reconstitution of ATP synthase in native membranes (Paper IV). / <p>At the time of the doctoral defense, the following papers were unpublished and had a status as follows: Paper 3: Manuscript. Paper 4: Manuscript.</p>