Univ., Diss.--Regensburg, 2005. / Literaturverz. S. 201 - 217.

S'appuyant sur les théories esthétiques des frères Schlegel, de Novalis et de Schelling, ce travail s'attache à analyser les discours esthétiques et scientifiques dans Les Frères de Saint-Sérapion d'E.T.A. Hoffmann et à étudier dans quelle mesure et jusqu'à quel point l'écrivain se réapproprie les réflexions de ces premiers romantiques et s'en distancie. Confronté au philistinisme, aux malveillances d'autrui et à ses démons intérieurs, l'artiste sérapiontique poursuit un idéal tant social que psychique. Rêveurs, fous, enfants ou encore sous influence magnétique, les personnages hoffmanniens sont tous en quête de reconnaissance et d'identité. Polyformes, polymorphes et hétérogènes, centrés sur l'interaction artistique, le travail de création et la réception, Les Frères de Saint-Sérapion créent une sorte d'" œuvre d'art totale " avant la lettre où se mêlent aussi bien les sciences que les arts.

Habilitation - Universität, Göttingen, 2006. / Includes bibliographical references (p. [501]-528).

Slightly revised version of her dissertation (Ph. D.), Universität-Bremen, 1999--Cf. p. (7). / Anhang presents the aphorisms chiefly discussed, those by Jean Paul, Novalis, and Friedrich Schlegel. Includes bibliographical references (p. 110-115).

Thesis (Ph. D.)--University of Texas at Austin, 2004. / Supervisor: Katherine Arens. Vita. Includes bibliographical references.

Made available in DSpace on 2014-06-11T19:25:25Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0 Previous issue date: 2007-06-29Bitstream added on 2014-06-13T20:53:14Z : No. of bitstreams: 1 divino_le_me_arafcl.pdf: 316312 bytes, checksum: b04a67d25620506838b643550182ef05 (MD5) / O seguinte trabalho consiste em uma análise de um romance, Lucinde, escrito por Friedrich Schlegel em 1799. Este romance situa-se no período literário alemão conhecido como Primeiro Romantismo, em alemão Frühromantik. Tal período encontra-se entre os anos de 1798 e 1804. Um dos principais objetivos do trabalho é estudar a construção do romance de Schlegel, e descrever a alegoria, bem como seu emprego como forma de expressão estética, a qual compete decisivamente para a criação de um romance romântico. Como se vê em Lucinde, os românticos enfatizavam o caráter ficcional da obra literária e a reflexão sobre a criação e o ato criador. Com isso, por meio da alegoria e da poética romântica, estudamos os mecanismos para a formação da poesia romântica: a Poesia Universal Progressiva. A pesquisa também descreve o grupo de Jena, isto é, os Primeiros Românticos alemães e seu programa literário. Além desse estudo, o trabalho busca uma fonte para os principais conceitos presentes no programa literário dos românticos. Assim, a pesquisa descreve acerca dos gregos antigos, e principalmente a respeito de Heráclito de Éfeso, que já ditava os pressupostos para a totalidade da natureza humana, os quais seriam depois descritos na poética dos Primeiros Românticos e no próprio romance de Schlegel, como se vê neste trabalho. / The following paperwork consists of an analysis of a novel, Lucinde, written by Friedrich Schlegel in 1799. This novel is situated in the German literary period know as the Early Romanticism, or Frühromantik in German. That period is found between the years of 1798 and 1804. One of the main goals of this work was to study the building blocks of Schlegel's novel, and to describe the allegory, as well its use as an esthetic way of expression, which was decisive for the creation of a romantic novel. As we can see in Lucinde, the romantics emphasize the fictional character of a piece of work and the reflection of the creation and the creation act. Thus, with the allegory and the romantic poetics we can make a study upon the formation of a romantic poetry: the Progressive Universal Poetry. This paper also describes the Jena group, we mean, the German Early Romanticism and their literary program. Besides this study, this research paper describes a source for the main concepts found in the romantic literary program. This way, the paper describes a little about the ancient Greeks, mainly about Heraclites of Ephesus, who has already talked about the totality of the human nature which was later described by the Early Romantics and can be also found in Schlegel's novel, as we can see in this paper.

In der Vergangenheit erfolgte die geisteswissenschaftliche Produktion klassischer Editionen meist in komplexen und kostenintensiven Langzeitprojekten. Mit den Möglichkeiten der elektronischen Datenverarbeitung und einer ubiquitären Verfügbarhaltung von fortschreitend digitalisierten Beständen aus kulturgutverwahrenden Institutionen im Internet rückt das traditionsreiche Verhältnis zwischen Edition und Bibliothek neu in den Fokus der Aufmerksamkeit. Das Interesse an einer auf bibliothekarischen Strukturen aufbauenden Weiterentwicklung der wissenschaftlichen Informationsinfrastruktur hin zu „virtuellen Forschungsumgebungen“ mit kollaborativen Werkzeugen für standortunabhängige und im Workflow standardisierte Arbeitsweisen ist ermutigend und wird derzeit in Initiativen und Projekten gefördert und erprobt. Nach einer theoretischen Annäherung an Entwicklungen und Typologien digitaler Editionen informiert die Arbeit durch eine Auswahl erfolgreicher Projekte über derzeit verfügbare Funktionalitäten. Im Zentrum der Betrachtungen steht die Etablierung eines Datenflusses zur Überführung unikaler Bestände und verifizierter bibliothekarischer Metadaten in virtuelle Forschungsräume. Anhand des kooperativen Pilotprojektes Digitale Briefedition A. W. Schlegel zwischen der SLUB Dresden, der Philipps-Universität Marburg und dem Center for Digital Humanities in Trier soll exemplarisch ein dem Open-Source-Paradigma folgender Autographenworkflow von der Digitalisierung und Formalerschließung der Handschriften, ihrer Präsentation in Digitalen Sammlungen bis zur Implementierung in eine virtuelle Forschungsumgebung für die fachwissenschaftliche Tiefenerschließung aufgezeigt werden. Der Transformationsprozess hin zu einer global vernetzten Informations- und Wissensgesellschaft kann nur in arbeitsteiliger Kooperation auf Augenhöhe gelingen und bedingt eine funktionale wie institutionelle Wiederannäherung zwischen Bibliotheken und Forschung.:Abstract i 1 Einleitung 1 2 Hauptteil 6 2.1 Digitale Editionen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.1.1 Entwicklung und Typologie Elektronischer bzw. Digitaler Editionen 6 2.1.2 Beispiele Digitaler Editionen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Die Vincent van Gogh-Briefedition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Die Carl Maria von Weber-Gesamtausgabe . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Das Christian Dietrich Grabbe-Portal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Tabellarischer Funktionalitätsvergleich der Beispieleditionen . . . 15 2.2 Workflow – Vom Autographen zur Digitalen Edition . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2.2.1 Empfehlungen, Positionspapiere und Praxisregeln zur digitalen Transformation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2.2.2 Infrastrukturelemente eines Autographenworkflows . . . . . . . . 21 Normdaten und Handschriftendatenbanken . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Digitalisierungssoftware – Digital Library Modules . . . . . . . . 24 Virtuelle Forschungsumgebungen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Schnittstellen, Austauschformate und Datenmapping . . . . . . . 30 2.3 Pilotprojekt Digitale Briefedition August Wilhelm Schlegel . . . . . . . . 32 2.3.1 Der Nachlass August Wilhelm Schlegels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 2.3.2 Kooperationspartner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 2.3.3 Inhaltliche und organisatorisch-technische Ziele . . . . . . . . . . 35 2.3.4 Vorleistungen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 2.3.5 Workflow, präsentiert anhand eines Beispielbriefes . . . . . . . . 39 Bibliothekarische Schwerpunkte des Dresdner Teils . . . . . . . . 42 Informatische Schwerpunkte des Trierer Teils . . . . . . . . . . . 53 Editorische Schwerpunkte des Marburger Teils . . . . . . . . . . 57 2.3.6 Zwischenergebnisse und Nachnutzung . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 3 Schlussbemerkung und Ausblicke für die „Digital Humanities“ 64 Abbildungsverzeichnis 69 Quellcodeverzeichnis 71 Index und Glossar 72 Literaturverzeichnis 76 / In the past, the scholarly production of classical editions took place mostly in complex and costly long-term projects. The possibilities of electronic data processing and of making progressively digitized collections of institutions that act as custodians of cultural assets available on the internet on a ubiquitous scale are moving the relationship between edition and library into the focus of attention. There is an encouraging interest in enhancing the scientific information infrastructure on the basis of library structures to provide „virtual research environments“ with collaborative tools for location-independent work with standardized workflows; and these efforts are currently being promoted and tested in initiatives and projects. After giving a theoretical outline of developments and typologies of digital scholarly editions, this thesis will provide information on currently offered functionalities at the example of selected successful projects. The focus of consideration, however, is on the establishment of a data flow for transferring unique stocks and verified (library) metadata into virtual research spaces. The collaborative pilot project Digitale Briefedition A. W. Schlegel (Digital Edition of the Letters of A. W. Schlegel) between the SLUB Dresden, the University of Marburg and the Center for Digital Humanities in Trier will serve as an example to illustrate such an autograph workflow, based on the open source paradigm, from digitization and descriptive cataloguing of the manuscripts to their presentation in the Digital Collections through to their incorporation into a virtual research environment for scientific in-depth analysis. The process of transformation into a global networked information and knowledge society relies on division of labor and cooperation on a peer-to-peer basis and requires a functional and institutional rapprochement between libraries and the research community.:Abstract i 1 Einleitung 1 2 Hauptteil 6 2.1 Digitale Editionen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6 2.1.1 Entwicklung und Typologie Elektronischer bzw. Digitaler Editionen 6 2.1.2 Beispiele Digitaler Editionen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Die Vincent van Gogh-Briefedition . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9 Die Carl Maria von Weber-Gesamtausgabe . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11 Das Christian Dietrich Grabbe-Portal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14 Tabellarischer Funktionalitätsvergleich der Beispieleditionen . . . 15 2.2 Workflow – Vom Autographen zur Digitalen Edition . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2.2.1 Empfehlungen, Positionspapiere und Praxisregeln zur digitalen Transformation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 2.2.2 Infrastrukturelemente eines Autographenworkflows . . . . . . . . 21 Normdaten und Handschriftendatenbanken . . . . . . . . . . . . 21 Digitalisierungssoftware – Digital Library Modules . . . . . . . . 24 Virtuelle Forschungsumgebungen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 Schnittstellen, Austauschformate und Datenmapping . . . . . . . 30 2.3 Pilotprojekt Digitale Briefedition August Wilhelm Schlegel . . . . . . . . 32 2.3.1 Der Nachlass August Wilhelm Schlegels . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 2.3.2 Kooperationspartner . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 2.3.3 Inhaltliche und organisatorisch-technische Ziele . . . . . . . . . . 35 2.3.4 Vorleistungen . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36 2.3.5 Workflow, präsentiert anhand eines Beispielbriefes . . . . . . . . 39 Bibliothekarische Schwerpunkte des Dresdner Teils . . . . . . . . 42 Informatische Schwerpunkte des Trierer Teils . . . . . . . . . . . 53 Editorische Schwerpunkte des Marburger Teils . . . . . . . . . . 57 2.3.6 Zwischenergebnisse und Nachnutzung . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 59 3 Schlussbemerkung und Ausblicke für die „Digital Humanities“ 64 Abbildungsverzeichnis 69 Quellcodeverzeichnis 71 Index und Glossar 72 Literaturverzeichnis 76

Roger Paulin, einer der besten Kenner der europäischen Literatur des 18. Jahrhunderts, bereitet die erste neuere Biographie zu August Wilhelm Schlegel vor. Die Grundlage dafür ist der Nachlass Schlegels, der sich im Bestand der Handschriftenabteilung der SLUB Dresden befindet.

Generally speaking, scholarship in the field of Germanistik has taken an interest in Friedrich Schlegel’s early publication, “Vom aesthetischen Werte der griechischen Komoedie” (1794), either because of its perceived influence on German Romantic Comedy [(Catholy 1982), (Kluge 1980), (Holl 1923), (Japp 1999)], or else because of its relevance as an example of Schlegel's still inchoate aesthetic philosophy [(Dierkes 1980), (Behrens 1984), (Schanze 1966), (Michel 1982), (Dannenberg 1993), (Mennemeier 1971)]. As a theory of comedy in its own right, Schlegel’s essay has garnered little attention, in part because of its supposed inapplicability to comedic praxis and at times utopian implications, in part because of its seemingly contradictory argument, and lastly in part because Schlegel himself abandoned the essay’s central premise soon after its publication. However, it is the central argument of the present study that Schlegel’s essay can be shown to be interesting and relevant precisely for the theory of comedy it contains. Through a close reading of Schlegel’s essay on Old Greek Comedy, as well as an examination of Schlegel’s early political and aesthetic beliefs, which will help render Schlegel’s theory more intelligible, it will be shown that Schlegel’s theory of comedy is novel in so far as it is one of the first aesthetic theories to claim that comedic practice is necessarily deprived of aesthetic validity unless it exists in a social atmosphere of freedom of expression, namely, such as that of the Athenians. The implication is that Schlegel here predicates an aesthetic theory upon one of society. Schlegel’s theory is also interesting for the peculiar type of comedy it advocates, namely a joyous comedy (Comedy of ‘Freude’), which stands in direct opposition to the ‘Satirische Verlachskomoedie’ of the Enlightenment and makes use of a comedic mechanism (joy) that is anathema to traditional negative comedic elements (satire, derision, mockery etc.). The conclusion discusses what the relevance and value of these implications might be for future research.

Generally speaking, scholarship in the field of Germanistik has taken an interest in Friedrich Schlegel’s early publication, “Vom aesthetischen Werte der griechischen Komoedie” (1794), either because of its perceived influence on German Romantic Comedy [(Catholy 1982), (Kluge 1980), (Holl 1923), (Japp 1999)], or else because of its relevance as an example of Schlegel's still inchoate aesthetic philosophy [(Dierkes 1980), (Behrens 1984), (Schanze 1966), (Michel 1982), (Dannenberg 1993), (Mennemeier 1971)]. As a theory of comedy in its own right, Schlegel’s essay has garnered little attention, in part because of its supposed inapplicability to comedic praxis and at times utopian implications, in part because of its seemingly contradictory argument, and lastly in part because Schlegel himself abandoned the essay’s central premise soon after its publication. However, it is the central argument of the present study that Schlegel’s essay can be shown to be interesting and relevant precisely for the theory of comedy it contains. Through a close reading of Schlegel’s essay on Old Greek Comedy, as well as an examination of Schlegel’s early political and aesthetic beliefs, which will help render Schlegel’s theory more intelligible, it will be shown that Schlegel’s theory of comedy is novel in so far as it is one of the first aesthetic theories to claim that comedic practice is necessarily deprived of aesthetic validity unless it exists in a social atmosphere of freedom of expression, namely, such as that of the Athenians. The implication is that Schlegel here predicates an aesthetic theory upon one of society. Schlegel’s theory is also interesting for the peculiar type of comedy it advocates, namely a joyous comedy (Comedy of ‘Freude’), which stands in direct opposition to the ‘Satirische Verlachskomoedie’ of the Enlightenment and makes use of a comedic mechanism (joy) that is anathema to traditional negative comedic elements (satire, derision, mockery etc.). The conclusion discusses what the relevance and value of these implications might be for future research.