The thesis describes the circumstances of founding, development and transformation of the Grammar school in Jilemnice from 1913 to 1948 in the context of the political, economic and social changes and, also, changes of the national education policy. The paper consists of two major parts: the first one describes the historical development of the grammar school as a type, and thus forms a theoretical basis for the second part focused on the history of the Grammar school in Jilemnice itself. The latter part puts forward a picture of a daily life of the institution that was established by Czech citizens to support the Czech language and the national identity in a predominantly German-speaking area. It also presents problems the school faced during the peace time as well as during the global war conflicts, including the temporary closure of the school from 1941 to 1945. The paper finishes in 1948 when the character of the Grammar school changed significantly due to Act no. 95/1948 Sb. The appendices provide personal history of selected professors and memories of several former students.

The aim of this thesis is to comprehensively describe and evaluate the linguistic work of the German grammarian and teacher Max Wilhelm Götzinger (1799–1856). Götzinger‘s work has been little considered in linguistics and historiography of linguistics apart from some articles mainly on his grammatical theory. The first editions of Anfangsgründe (1825) and Die Deutsche Sprachlehre für Schulen (1827), which up to now have been considered to be lost, could be retrieved and used for this study. Aspects of Götzinger‘s didactics and grammar can still today be re-garded as modern. In many respects his didactic ideas were opposed to the methods of teaching inspired by rationalist grammar and prevailing in the schools of his time. His own method is inductive and the aim of teach-ing was mainly to make pupils familiar with the structure of the German language. Götzinger‘s grammatical system was inspired by his experience as a teacher. The logical judgement and the subject-predicate concepts were replaced by a verb centred concept of syntax and Götzinger‘s system of word classes began with the verb instead of the noun. He did not regard correct thinking, which was the main purpose of rationalist grammar, but communication as the basic aim of the teaching of grammar. His notion of the verb as the centre of the clause has basic features in common with modern dependency theories introduced by Lucien Tesnière. Götzinger performed pioneering work in the field of dialectology and he is understood be the first to include a comprehensive description of the dialects of the German speaking countries Even if there also are good reasons to criticise many aspects of his work, e.g. indistinct terminology, inconsistency in sticking to his theory, and subjectivity in the description of the dialects, Götzinger‘s achieve-ment as to the state of the art of his time and also with regard to modern linguistics must be considered remarkable.

The project deals with development of school education in the vicinity of the town of Svitavy, Czech Republic, populated by both the Czech and German nations between 1918 and 1938. It is focused on changes in traditional schools as well as on founding new ones for ethnic.

Key topic of this diploma thesis is study of possibilities of applying constructivist approaches in teaching information and communication technologies (ICT) subject at Czech elementary school (equivalent of K-12). More specified at 1st to 4th grade of multi-year grammar school. The paper maps current situation in education of ICT skills and it consists of theoretical part and action research. Theoretical basis is focused on constructivist pedagogy and includes suggestions, general principles and specific principles for teaching of ICT - computer graphics. These suggestions are verified by action research within ICT lessons.

L’étude retrace l’histoire de la première nomenclature grammaticale officielle en France, depuis les premiers débats publics sur la nécessité d’une simplification et d’une unification terminologiques (à partir de janvier 1905) jusqu’à la promulgation des trois textes officiels que sont l’arrêté du 25 juillet 1910 (qui fixe la liste des termes grammaticaux dont la connaissance est exigible dans les examens et concours de l’enseignement primaire et de l’enseignement secondaire) ainsi que la circulaire du 28 septembre 1910 et la note du 21 mars 1911 (qui précisent la manière dont doit être mis en œuvre l’arrêté). L’étude soulève des enjeux politiques, théoriques et épistémologiques : la simplification et l’unification des nomenclatures grammaticales répond à la volonté de l’État d’améliorer la maitrise de la langue nationale et d’unifier son enseignement sur tout le territoire ; l’élaboration de la nomenclature révèle les problèmes posés par l’analyse des constructions verbales et de la phrase complexe au début du XXe siècle ; la réforme des nomenclatures met en lumière la tension entre un idéal terminologique et la réalité des pratiques. Ces enjeux croisent à tous moments des questionnements d’ordre didactique : sur la place d’un enseignement explicite de la grammaire dans l’enseignement de la langue, sur les relations que les savoirs scolaires entretiennent avec les savoirs savants ou encore sur les limitations imposées par ce qui peut être enseigné. / This study recounts the history of the first official grammatical nomenclature in France, since the first public debates on the necessity of a terminological simplification and unification (from January 1905) to the promulgation of the three official texts that are the decree of the 25th of July 1910 (that fixes the list of the grammatical terms that have to be known in the exams and examinations of both primary and secondary educations) as well as the circular of the 28th of September 1910 and the note of the 21st of March 1911 (that both explain how the decree has to be implemented). The study raises political, theoretical and epistemological issues: the simplification and unification of grammatical nomenclatures encounter the State’s will to improve the command of the national language and to unify education on the entire territory; the elaboration of the nomenclature reveals the problems caused by the analysis of verbal constructions and the complex sentence at the beginning of the 20th century; the reform of the nomenclatures highlights the tension between a terminological ideal and the reality of practices. These issues consistently intersect with didactic questions: on the place of an explicit teaching of grammar in the teaching of language, on the relations that school knowledge has with academic knowledge or furthermore on the limitations imposed by what can be taught.