No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.

<p>  </p> <p>Rapid intensification of low-level rotation in non-classic tornadic storms in southeastern United States, often at time scales shorter than the volume updates from existing opera- tional radars, calls for a deeper understanding of storm-scale processes. There is growing evidence that the highly nonlinear interactions between vertical wind shear and cold pools regulate the intensity of downdrafts, low- and mid-level updrafts, and thus tornadic poten- tial in supercells. Tornado-strength circulations are more likely associated with cold pools of intermediate strength. The microphysical pathway leading to storm electrification also plays a major role in the regulation of cold pool intensity. Storm electrification and subsequent lightning initiation are a by-product of charging of ice hydrometeors in the mixed-phase updrafts. Lightning flashes frequently initiate along the periphery of turbulent updrafts and total flash rate is controlled by the updraft speed and volume.</p> <p><br></p> <p>In the first part of this work, polarimetric fingerprints like ZDR and KDP columns (proxies for mixed-phase updraft strength) are objectively identified to track rapid fluctuations in updraft intensity. We quantify the volume of ZDR and KDP columns to evaluate their utility in predicting temporal variability in lightning flash characteristics and the onset of severe weather. Using observational data from KTLX radar and Oklahoma Lightning Mapping Array, we had previously found evidence of temporal covariance between ZDR column volume and the total lightning flash rate in a tornadic supercell in Oklahoma. </p> <p><br></p> <p> Here, we extend our analysis to three high-shear low-CAPE (HSLC) cases observed during the 2016-17 VORTEX-SE field campaign in Northern Alabama. In all three scenarios (one tornadic and one nontornadic supercell, and a quasi-linear convective system), the KDP column volume had a stronger correlation with total flash rates than the ZDR column volume. We also found that all three storms maintained a normal tripole charge structure, with majority of the cloud-to-ground (CG) strikes lowering negative charge to the ground. The tornadic storm’s CG polarity changed from negative to positive at the same time it entered a region with higher surface equivalent potential temperature. In contrast to the Oklahoma storm, lightning flash initiations in HSLC storms occurred primarily outside the footprint of ZDR and KDP column objects.</p> <p><br></p> <p>Storm dynamics coupled with microphysical processes such as diabatic heating/cooling and advection/sedimentation of hydrometeors also plays a significant role in electrification of thunderstorms. Simulation of deep convection, therefore, needs to account for the feedback of microphysics to storm dynamics. In the second part of this work, the NSSL microphysics scheme is used to simulate ice mass fluxes, cold pool intensity, and noninductive charging rates. The scheme is run in its triple-moment configuration in order to provide a more realis- tic size-sorting process that avoids pathologies that arise in double-moment representations.</p> <p><br></p> <p>We examine the possible tertiary linkage between noninductive charging rates and cold pool through their dependence on mixed-phase microphysical processes. The Advanced Re- gional Prediction System (ARPS) model is used to simulate the same three HSLC cases from VORTEX-SE 2016-17 IOPs. WSR-88D radar reflectivity and Doppler velocity observations are assimilated in a 40-member ensemble using an ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF) filter.</p> <p><br></p> <p>In all three cases, the simulated charge separation is consistent with the observed normal tripole. Greater updraft mass flux, supercooled liquid water concentration, and nonprecip- itation mass flux explain the nontornadic supercell’s higher total flash rate compared to the tornadic supercell. Positive and negative graupel charging rates were found to have the greatest linear correlation with updraft mass flux, followed by precipitation mass flux in all three cases. At zero time lag, horizontal buoyancy gradients associated with a surface cold pool were not found to be correlated with either the charging rates or the updraft and precipitation mass flux. Total flash rate based on empirical relationships between simulated ice mass fluxes was lower than the observed values.</p>