Spelling suggestions: "subject:"shakespeare, william , 156461616"" "subject:"shakespeare, william , 156411616""
71 |
Aspects of music in Shakespearean drama.January 2004 (has links)
Wong Ka-ki, Katrine Wong. / Thesis (M.Phil.)--Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2004. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 123-132). / Abstracts in English and Chinese. / Acknowledgements --- p.vi / Chapter Chapter One --- Introduction --- p.2 / Chapter Chapter Two --- Medical Aspects in Shakespearean Drama --- p.11 / Chapter Chapter Three --- """If music be the food of love ´ؤ´ح:: Music as an Indicator of a Person's Attitude toward and Position in Love" --- p.47 / Chapter Chapter Four --- "Music: ""The patroness of heavenly harmony´ح" --- p.81 / Chapter Chapter Five --- Conclusion --- p.112 / Works Cited --- p.123
|
72 |
Language in Romeo and JulietBoswell, N. Kathleen January 2010 (has links)
Typescript (photocopy). / Digitized by Kansas Correctional Industries
|
73 |
"The curiosity of nations" : King Lear and the incest prohibitionHendricks, Shellee. January 1999 (has links)
No description available.
|
74 |
True light, true method : science, Newtonianism, and the editing of Shakespeare in eighteenth-century EnglandBar-On, Gefen. January 2006 (has links)
No description available.
|
75 |
The necessity of affections : Shakespeare and the politics of the passionsKehler, Torsten. January 2001 (has links)
No description available.
|
76 |
Davenant's Shakespeare, 1660-1668Bachorik, Lawrence Lee. January 1977 (has links)
No description available.
|
77 |
The theatrical and dramatic form of the swordfight in the chronicle plays of ShakespeareEdelman, Charles. January 1988 (has links) (PDF)
Typescript. Errata slip inserted. Bibliography: leaves 360-385.
|
78 |
A feminist love story : the cinematic possibilities of Shakespeare's JulietFaherty, Dionna E. 20 November 2000 (has links)
Literary and feminist theory have recently begun to recognize William Shakespeare's character of Juliet as a possible feminist heroine, but communicating this interpretation on film will be complicated. Not only will the film need to deal with the issues of adaptation that come with moving any play onto film, but the finished product will also need to avoid the objectification of the female form. An investigation of literary theory, adaptation theory, and feminist film theory reveals that, although this is a formidable task, the original text offers enough power to overcome any obstacle of communication.
Once the earlier literary criticism of A. C. Bradley gives way to feminist literary theory which offers a more empowering interpretation of the character of Juliet, it seems clear that this character could be a powerful cinematic heroine. At this point, it becomes relevant to acknowledge the problems involved in the transfer of text to cinema and the adaptation theories of Andre Bazin, Susan Sontag, and others become applicable. Adding further dimension to the film discussion is Laura Mulvey's theory of "the masculine gaze" as well as Tania Modleski's theories on feminism as it applies to mass culture and audience interpretation.
The theoretical discussion suggests a unique combination of theories with which to investigate the three best-known Romeo and Juliet adaptations (George Cukor, 1936; Franco Zeffirelli, 1968; Baz Luhrmann, 1996) Each of these films uses the medium of cinema to communicate a specific interpretation of the original text. Although none emphasize a strong, decisive heroine, they each present different options for portraying the character of Juliet and offer valuable insight in their moments of oppression as well as empowerment.
Applying this blend of theories to the specific films leads to the idea that future filmmakers could take all the theories into consideration and learn from these previous works to produce a main-stream adaptation of Romeo and Juliet which emphasizes the strength and agency of the main female character. The power of Shakespeare's Juliet is a prolific area of the text which, when explored on screen, has the ability to utilize film as an ally to unite feminist theory with popular culture. / Graduation date: 2001
|
79 |
The social dimension of Shakespeare's art : a Midsummer Night's DreamSchaefer, Mimi 05 May 1994 (has links)
The study of the social dimensions of Shakespeare's art is represented by the work of Mikhail Bakhtin, C.L. Barber, Robert Weimann, Edward Berry, and Michael Bristol. Their work analyzes the background in Elizabethan social practices and popular dramatic traditions that contribute to the form, structure, and meaning of Shakespeare's comedies. The purpose of this study is to review the work of these authors, apply their insights into three productions of A Midsummer Niqht's Dream, and suggest further implications of their work.
A review of these authors' major premises provides the context for analysis of three productions of A Midsummer Niqht's Dream: those of Max Reinhardt, Peter Hall, and, Joseph Papp. This study suggests that the popular festive tradition created a dialogic mode in Shakespeare's art and accounts for important features of our aesthetic experience of the plays. / Graduation date: 1994
|
80 |
Shakespeare on the verge : rhetoric, tragedy, and the paradox of placeEskew, Douglas Wayne, 1976- 11 October 2012 (has links)
"Shakespeare on the Verge: Rhetoric, Tragedy, and the Paradox of Place" describes the ideological geographies of Renaissance England and reads the ways "place" was rhetorically constructed in two of Shakespeare's late tragedies. By ideological geographies I mean the way in which Renaissance men and women understood spatially the constitution of their world--their spatialized "habits of thought." These habits were then undergoing a change from seeing the world as a vertical hierarchy of interrelated and dependent places to seeing it as a horizontal array of discrete places related to one another in a linear manner. Working from the theories of Agamben, Burke, Foucault, and Ong, I argue that Shakespeare constructs a paradox of place in which hierarchically elevated places subsume inferior ones and thereby double them. The paradigmatic example of this phenomenon is the king's mobile court, known at the time as the "Verge," which subsumed the places, the actual palaces and castles, of the king's subjects as it progressed across the kingdom. This phenomenon is paradoxical because, although the king's superior place subsumed those below it, it was always dependent on those inferior places, both logically (there can be no king without his subjects) and materially (as the king traveled, his household relied on the provisions supplied by subjects along the way). This paradox leads Shakespeare to double certain dramatic characters and their environments. It also leads him to set up oppositions between places constructed through violent means and places constructed through the "violence" of rhetoric. In my chapter on King Lear (1605), I argue that Edmund should be read as Lear's double, a doubling made manifest especially in the characters' stage movements as they effectively change places with one another. In Coriolanus (1608), I argue that its hero rejects his double, the Plebeian class of Rome, but that he eventually attempts to reconcile with them in large measure by changing his use of rhetoric. In my reading of these plays, as in my description of Renaissance ideological geographies, I aim to revise the way people look at place on the Shakespearean stage and at the complex interplay in them between physical violence and rhetorical action. / text
|
Page generated in 0.0579 seconds