Spelling suggestions: "subject:"5ource rule"" "subject:"eource rule""
1 |
A regra matriz de incidência do Imposto sobre a Propriedade de Veículos Automotores - IPVABernini, Cassiano Inserra 26 October 2010 (has links)
Made available in DSpace on 2016-04-26T20:19:39Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
Cassiano Inserra Bernini.pdf: 720433 bytes, checksum: d298dd79462719292c50326ec106424b (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2010-10-26 / This work constructs the source rule for the Tax on Property of Automotive Vehicles
(IPVA) levy. The competence to establish and collect this tax was given to the States and the
Federal District by article 155, item III, of the 1988 Federal Constitution of Brazil. The
methodology conceived by the Logical and Semantic Constructivism was used to study the
theme. According to said methodology, the Law is taken as a cultural object expressed in
language and based on the categories of the Philosophy of Language. Initially, the object is
submitted to an analytical analysis and following it is reconstructed with emphasis on the
syntactic, semantic and pragmatic aspects of the terms. The work starts with some brief
considerations on the legal rule and the source rule for the tax levy. Following, the work
focuses on the historical aspects involving the IPVA and the possible requirement for the
prior enactment of a nationwide supplementary law providing for the elements of the source
rule for this tax levy enabling the competent political entities to establish it. This work also
addresses the constitutional principles applicable to the IPVA. Finally, the source rule for the
IPVA levy is constructed through a detailed analysis of all its constituent criteria / O trabalho constrói a regra matriz de incidência do Imposto sobre a Propriedade de
Veículos Automotores IPVA , cuja competência para instituição e cobrança foi outorgada
aos Estados e ao Distrito Federal pelo artigo 155, inciso III, da Constituição Federal do Brasil
de 1988. Para o estudo do tema foi utilizada a metodologia idealizada pelo Construtivismo
Lógico-Semântico, que toma o Direito positivo como objeto cultural expresso em linguagem
e que parte de categorias da Filosofia da Linguagem para, inicialmente, realizar uma análise
analítica do objeto, para em seguida reconstruí-lo, dando-se ênfase aos aspectos sintático,
semântico e pragmático dos termos. O trabalho inicia-se com breves considerações a respeito
da norma jurídica e da regra matriz de incidência tributária. Em seguida, foram examinados os
aspectos históricos envolvendo o IPVA e a eventual necessidade da prévia edição de lei
complementar nacional dispondo sobre elementos da regra matriz de incidência deste imposto
para que as pessoas políticas competentes possam instituí-lo. Foram estudados, também, os
princípios constitucionais aplicáveis ao IPVA. Por fim, é construída a regra matriz de
incidência do IPVA, com o desenvolvimento de todos os seus critérios constitutivos
|
2 |
Eléments d'une théorie de la frontière appliqués au droit fiscal / Elements of a theory on borders applied to tax lawRobert, Eric 08 September 2011 (has links)
Alors que sa disparition semble se profiler à l’horizon, du moins à l’intérieur de l’espace Européen, la notion juridique de frontière qui dessine les limites du territoire de l’Etat reste l’objet d’une imprécision surprenante. Aucune définition générale et intelligible ne semble encore lui avoir été consacrée, nonobstant la place centrale qui lui est attribuée par nombre d’analyses savantes sur les institutions de la modernité politique (Etat, souveraineté, territoire). Une tentative de définition (ou de théorisation) de la frontière est donc nécessaire. Théoriser la frontière n’implique pas de s’éloigner de la réalité : ce sont au contraire des données empiriques, sélectionnées à l’intérieur d’une foison d’informations disponibles sur le sujet, qui doivent guider un travail de systématisation. Au sein de celles-ci, la place privilégiée du droit fiscal (interne, communautaire et internationale) s’explique par les affinités personnelles de l’auteur. Ce dernier n’a toutefois pas omis de balayer d’autres disciplines, à l’instar du droit international public ou du droit international privé, aux fins de caractériser une substance irréductible et invariable de la frontière. Deux fonctions distinctes, bien que complémentaires, s’imposeront très rapidement comme les éléments constitutifs de la notion de frontière : la ligne réputée impénétrable en droit international qui sépare les territoires des Etats, d’un côté (ou « frontière internationale »), le filtre perméable qui régule les circulations entre les territoires des Etats (ou « frontière-obstacle »), de l’autre. Le temps et l’espace imposeront de limiter l’analyse au premier élément, à savoir la frontière internationale. À raison de ses fonctions pour commencer : quel est son rôle ? Mais aussi à raison de son objet : à quoi, ou à qui, s’applique-t-elle ? L’analyse des fonctions permettra d’abord de vérifier que la frontière internationale, en tant que cause et conséquence du principe de l’exclusivité territoriale, est étroitement liée à la notion d’Etat moderne. La naissance de la notion moderne de souveraineté, dans la mesure où elle est largement tributaire de la conquête du monopole de la violence légitime au profit des autorités centralisatrices de l’Etat, n’aurait pas été envisageable sans la constitution de frontières impénétrables aux limites du royaume. Plus largement, bien des notions fondamentales associées au droit étatique moderne (intégrité territoriale, centralisation de la contrainte, dualisme juridique,…) peuvent être reconsidérées à la lumière de la notion de frontière. L’analyse de l’objet de la frontière internationale permettra, ensuite, de surmonter bien des incertitudes. Celle qui touche, en particulier, au rapport entre la frontière impénétrable et le principe de territorialité des lois (ou des impôts) : la territorialité normative, sous toutes ses formes, ne peut-être assimilée à une manifestation (ou à une composante) de la frontière internationale. Celle qui touche, aussi, à la nature et à la portée de l’assistance administrative internationale entre les Etats dans le domaine fiscal. Le développement récent de celle-ci, sous toutes ses variantes (assiette et recouvrement), ne se traduit qu’exceptionnellement par des entorses à l’impénétrabilité des frontières. Toutes les activités de l’Etat n’ont pas, en effet, vocation à s’arrêter aux limites du territoire en application du droit international public. Seul l’imperium de l’Etat entendu stricto sensu, c’est-à-dire le pouvoir coercitif proprement dit, semble être soumis au respect de cette imperméabilité. En somme, à défaut de parvenir à dresser une théorie générale de la frontière en droit, certaines de ses caractéristiques majeures seront en l’espèce esquissées dans l’espoir de fournir au juriste une grille de lecture supplémentaire, et si possible originale, du droit positif. / Even though its disappearance seems to be predictable, at least within the European Union, the legal notion of “Border” remains subject to a high degree of uncertainty. No general definition which combines clarity and precision, has been formulated on this matter yet. Therefore, time has come to provide a rigorous “definition” of this limit which separates the territories of the states. In other words, an attempt to theorize the notion of “Border” will be carried out in this book. The choice of a theoretical approach does not necessarily imply, however, to undertake a study remote from reality. To the contrary, an appropriate definition must be based on empirical data: selected matters among the huge amount of information available will be, as a result, the main source of this work. Among them, tax law (domestic, European and international) will play a key role due to the personal background of the author. The latter, however, did not forget to cover other disciplines. A wide-ranging scope is necessary where the objective is to reach the irreducible gist of a legal notion: International Public Law, Private International Law, Political Science as well as Sociology will be dealt with in this book. Two distinct functions (meanwhile complementary) will immediately be identified as the main components of the notion of “Border”: the dividing line, seen as impenetrable under International Public Law, that separates the territories of the States on one hand (so-called "international border"), and the permeable filter which regulates by way of discriminatory rules the movements (e.g. goods, persons, rights, values) between the states on the other hand (so-called “obstacle-border"). Due to limited time and space, however, this book will only focus on the first component, namely the international border. A study of its functions (i.e. what is the purpose for the impenetrability of the border?), will be followed by a study of its object (what is the scope of the impenetrability of the border?). The study of the functions will demonstrate that the international border, as a cause and a consequence of the principle of territorial exclusivity (i.e. monopoly of violence within the territorial borders), has strong ties with the concept of “Modern State”. Moreover, many fundamental notions generally attached to modern statute law (e.g. coercion, sovereignty, legal dualism) will be reconsidered in the light of this principle of impenetrability. Further, the analysis of the object of the international border will enable the author to eliminate certain jeopardizing uncertainties. Among others, the issue concerning the existence (or not) of a kinship between the “Border” and the territoriality of the law (including Power to Tax) will eventually be resolved: the territoriality principle, irrespective of its forms, is not an appearance (neither a component) of the international border. All activities undertaken by a state (i.e. legislative and executive powers), therefore, are not forced by law to be circumscribed to the territorial limits of that state. Only the core of the Imperium of a Modern State, that is to say the coercive power itself, seems to be subject to the impenetrability of the Border. In short, this book does not provide for (and is not aimed at) a general and all-comprehensive theory on “Borders”. Some of the major features of the latter are, however, clearly characterized herewith in order to provide the reader with another tool to scrutinize positive law.
|
3 |
The nature, assessment and quantification of medical expenses as a head of delictual damage(s)Monyamane, Phillip Lesetja 07 1900 (has links)
Medical expenses refer to all medical and related expenditure reasonably incurred in respect of bodily injuries sustained. This then constitutes the primary loss in incidences of bodily injuries. However, it is accepted that bodily injuries infringe in the main the non-patrimonial aspects of the individual’s bodily integrity which is a personality right. Notwithstanding this trite provision of our law, the dissertation contends that medical expenses as a head of damages is inherently patrimonial. In essence, the true nature of medical expenses as a loss that ultimately affects both the patrimonial and non-patrimonial interests of the individual, is considered.
Furthermore, the dissertation analyses the assessment and quantification mechanisms in our law, and makes a comparative study with the corresponding positions in England and Australia. The intended outcome of this dissertation is to provide clear guidelines for the award of damages, particularly where future loss is involved. / Private Law / LLM
|
4 |
The nature, assessment and quantification of medical expenses as a head of delictual damage(s)Monyamane, Phillip Lesetja 07 1900 (has links)
Medical expenses refer to all medical and related expenditure reasonably incurred in respect of bodily injuries sustained. This then constitutes the primary loss in incidences of bodily injuries. However, it is accepted that bodily injuries infringe in the main the non-patrimonial aspects of the individual’s bodily integrity which is a personality right. Notwithstanding this trite provision of our law, the dissertation contends that medical expenses as a head of damages is inherently patrimonial. In essence, the true nature of medical expenses as a loss that ultimately affects both the patrimonial and non-patrimonial interests of the individual, is considered.
Furthermore, the dissertation analyses the assessment and quantification mechanisms in our law, and makes a comparative study with the corresponding positions in England and Australia. The intended outcome of this dissertation is to provide clear guidelines for the award of damages, particularly where future loss is involved. / Private Law / LLM
|
Page generated in 0.0505 seconds