Die bestuursverantwoordelikhede van die skoolhoo ten opsigte van skoolsport is vanuit 'n juridies-opvoedkundige perspektief ondersoek. Sport is eerstens in 'n opvoed­ kundige perspektief geplaas en daar is onder andere gewys op die plek van sport binne die onderwysstelsel en die waarde van sport vir die kind as opvoedeling. Daarna is vanuit 'n bestuursperspektiebesin oar aangeleenthede wat verband hou met skoolsport, met besondere verwysing na die bestuurstake van die skoolhoof. Die navorsing behels oak 'n bespreking van relevante juridiese aspekte en die implikasies daarvan vir skoolbestuur. In die lig van die navorsing is riglyne neergelen aanbevelings gemaak wat grater doeltreffendheid vir die bestuur van skoolsport tot gevolg sal h . / The managerial responsibilities of the headmaster with regard to sport in schools have been examined from a juridical educational point-of-view. Firstly sport is viewed from an inter alia, its educational perspective in order to show, place and value to the child within the educational system. Secondly sport is considered from a managerial perspective in order to consider managerial responsibilities regarding school sports with special reference to the headmaster as manager of the shcool. Thirdly this research contains a discourse of relevant juridical aspects, and their implications regarding school management vis-a-vis the headmaster. In consequence, this research has led to guidelines and recommendations which should enable a headmaster to effect a more efficient system of management with regard to school sports. / Educational Leadership and Management / M. Ed. (Onderwysbestuur)

The care of the athlete has come into much discussion and has been the object of much research, but all this has come about in recent years. The athlete's health is paramount to a successful team and a conscientious coach; more so is his health important in contact sports with intercollegiate football in the foreground. The interest in football injuries has increased with the increased emphasis of the sport, for the coach is finding it more and more important to have all his players in the best possible condition to withstand the physical and mental strain under which they must compete. The coach, therefore, relies heavily on the team trainer. Are there enough trained and qualified athletic trainers in our colleges and universities to meet this challenge? Are these same institutions properly equipped to care for the athlete? What methods, materials, and equipment are being used? What improvements can be made in the field of training? These questions came to the authors attention only after experience as trainer for four different organizations. In truth, the field of athletic training seemed no more than an embryo with a great need for an accumulation of fata which would bring out various methods, uses of equipment and of materials, and comparison of the existing training departments of more schools than just the one where the young athlete and future coach gets his training. Thus, the inspiration for this investigation was born. The problem undertaken was to report the existing training departments of a selected group of colleges and universities, and to present an ideal training department for both the large university and the smaller college. The State of California has twenty-two four year colleges and universities within its boundaries. They range from the largest university in the world to a college with a male enrollment of 475. Of these twenty-two institutions all sponsoring intercollegiate football, nineteen have training departments, and reports from sixteen of these schools form the basis of this thesis. The data was gathered over a two year period from visits and questionnaires from the schools involved. The information is by no means conclusive, but it does help to show the position training occupies at the present time in California universities and colleges. Unless otherwise stated, all statements represent the consensus of opinion by the trainers involved.

The recent breakthroughs in the research of brain trauma as it relates to athletics has revealed never before seen damage linked with football participation. Known as chronic traumatic encephalopathy (CTE), it is caused by activities inherent to the sport of football. School sponsored football has been granted immunity through case law and legislation in Texas. Recent research however indicates a different type of injury than those that school districts have been protected of liability from. This will provide a challenge to the immunity school districts have enjoyed regarding football. One route to abrogation of immunity is the state created danger provision established by the Supreme Court. The Fifth Circuit Court whose jurisdiction includes Texas has yet to officially adopt the state created danger theory. This research examined legal precedent to determine the challenge CTE may present the various layers of immunity surrounding school sponsored football in Texas.