Uppsatsen skrivs inom det tvärvetenskapliga forskningsfältet kulturarvsstudier. Med utgångspunkt i ett herrgårdsmuseum i Sverige utforskar uppsatsen, genom den verksamhet som bedrivs där idag, kulturarv som bestående av flera processer i samverkan. När en plats doneras till staten, blir kulturarv och marknadsförs som ett historiskt besöksmål blir den både en del av en ökande kulturarvsturism och en del av en institutionaliserad kulturarvsförvaltning. Olika tiders subjektiva och personliga minnen som materialiserats på platsen bevaras, vårdas och införlivas i ett kollektivt och nationellt minnes- och kulturarvsskapande. Platsen skapas som kulturarv och besöksmål av olika aktörer och det testamenterade minnet medieras och fiktionaliseras på olika sätt beroende på aktör och vilket mål aktören har. Studien synliggör att målet att bevara och vårda samvekar med målet att återskapa något av det förflutna liv som levts på platsen. Detta påverkas av ägare och förvaltare, men också av utomstående aktörer som exempelvis besökare, Tv-producenter och romanförfattare. Kulturarv är inte något statiskt som bevaras helt oförändrat till kommande generationer utan en process som kontinuerligt (om)förhandlas och (om)tolkas beroende på samtidens ideal, behov, kunskapssyn och föväntningar.

Background: Historical buildings in Sweden with the highest value of cultural heritage are administrated by the state and are protected by the directive SFS 2013:588. Also there are laws which demands that all public buildings which are administrated by the government should be accessible for everyone, with or without disabilities. This law also demands that in case of fire all visitors should be able to evacuate safely, including people with disabilities. This may be problematic to achieve without damaging the cultural value. Aim: The aim of this work is therefore to investigate a safe way for people with disabilities to evacuate in case of fire in buildings with high cultural value in Sweden, which are administrated by the state, with focus on the technical solutions. The aim is also to investigate improvement measures for the studied buildings and the laws in Sweden regarding the subject. Method: This work in bases on a literature study and a case study. The purpose of the literature study was to identify the previous studies and background information which was needed to find solutions to the problem. The case study were constructed to see how technical solutions are incorporated in actual buildings, but also to see how the evacuation can improve. Results: The work shows that all buildings in the case study has a sufficient evacuation plan for people with disabilities, but could be improved especially for people with visual disabilities without destroying the cultural heritage. Conclusion: One conclusion is that the focus often lies on technical solutions to make it possible for people with mobility impairments to evacuate, but the needs of people with visual disabilities are often overlooked. Therefore the laws regarding the subject should clarified that all people with disabilities also should have the same possibility to evacuate safety. Another conclusion is that it is possible to implement technical solutions in historical buildings without significantly destroying the cultural value. However, more research is required to develop new and improved solutions for these type of buildings.