The purpose of this quantitative, non-experimental study was to explore a possible relationship between the number of students in grades 9-12 classified as chronically absent and the inclusion of the Chronically Out of School indicator in Tennessee’s accountability model for schools and school districts. Using publicly available data from the Tennessee Department of Education, the research study examined 6 years of data from the 2014-2015 to 2019-2020 school years. Data were divided into 3 years before and 3 years after implementation. Results of the study indicated that the mean number of chronically absent students in grades 9-12 were significantly lower during the 3 years after implementation of the Chronically Out of School indicator. Data was further disaggregated and analyzed based on the following subgroups: Black/Hispanic/Native American, Economically Disadvantaged, and Students with Disabilities. Results indicated a significant difference in the number of chronically absent Black/Hispanic/Native American subgroup after implementation, but there were no significant differences found in the Economically Disadvantaged and Students with Disabilities subgroups. In addition to a summary of the research findings, implications, and recommendations for future research and current practice are discussed.

Let R be a domain, V a left R-module, and L a composition series of direct summands of V. Our main results show that if U is a stabilizer group of L containing the McLain-group associated with L , then U determines the chain (L,⊆) uniquely up to isomorphism or anti-isomorphism.

The McKay-Alperin-Dade Conjecture, which has not been finally verified, predicts the number of complex irreducible characters in various p-blocks of a finite group G as an alternating sum of the numbers of characters in related p-blocks of certain subgroups of G. The sub-groups involved are the normalizers of representatives of conjugacy classes of radical p-chains of G. For this reason, it is of interest to study radical p-chains. In this thesis, we examine the group L3(2) and determine representatives of the conjugacy classes of radical p-subgroups and radical p-chains for the primes p = 2, 3, and 7. We then determine the structure of the normalizers of these subgroups and chains.

The purpose of this study was to determine whether children with specific language impairment (SLI) are more or less variable than children with typically developing language. In addition, the within child variability for children with SLI was analyzed to consider how heterogeneity influenced identification of areas of linguistic strengths and weaknesses in this population. Fifty seven children with SLI, 7:0–11:0, and fifty seven of their peers with typically developing language were assessed using five subtests and a composite language score from the Comprehensive Assessment of Spoken Language (CASL) (Carrow-Woolfolk, 1999). The children with typically developing language were significantly more variable as a group than the children with SLI. The heterogeneity of the children with SLI did not allow for the creation of subgroups based on language strengths and weaknesses.

The aggregate of a sport team’s fans may be viewed as a consumption community that surrounds the team and its brand (Devasagayam & Buff, 2008; Hickman & Ward, 2007). Beneath this larger consumption umbrella, smaller groups of consumers may exist (Dholakia, Bagozzi, & Pearo, 2004), such as specific supporter groups for a team. Individuals thus may identify with multiple layers of the consumption group simultaneously (Brodsky & Marx, 2001; Hornsey & Hogg, 2000). Although past researchers have studied supporter groups (Giulianotti, 1996, 1999a; Parry & Malcolm, 2004) and consumption communities (Kozinets, 2001; Muñiz & O’Guinn, 2001; McAlexander, Schouten, & Koenig, 2002), there has been limited research on the interaction among subgroups within the superordinate group. The current study examines the American Outlaws (AO), a supporter group for the United States men’s national soccer team (USMNT). AO members belong to local AO chapters (subgroups) as well the national (superordinate) group. This structure creates multiple levels of identification and is conducive to studying the phenomenon in question. Through employing a grounded theory methodology, data were collected via participant observation and ethnographic interviews over a two year period. The current study identifies six prominent foci of identification among AO members: the USMNT, the United States of America (national identity), the sport of soccer, AO National, AO Local, and one’s small social group. These identities are found to be mutually reinforcing and shape members’ interactions with the team, the supporter group, and social groups therein. Specifically, the regional subgroups (AO Local chapters) create opportunities for social interaction, which fosters members’ sense of community and group identification. In turn, this strengthens group cohesion at the subgroup and superordinate group levels. Further, supporter group members alter their team consumption experiences by creating places of prolonged identity salience at live games and when watching games on television. These events increase identification with the supporter group and its related identities. For practitioners, implications of this study include the understanding of supporter groups’ impact on members’ frequency and duration of brand-related consumption.

No description available.

Let Ω be the Fraïssé limit of a class of relational structures. We seek to answer the following semigroup theoretic question about Ω. What are the group H-classes, i.e. the maximal subgroups, of End(Ω)? Fraïssé limits for which we answer this question include the random graph R, the random directed graph D, the random tournament T, the random bipartite graph B, Henson's graphs G[subscript n] (for n greater or equal to 3) and the total order Q. The maximal subgroups of End(Ω) are closely connected to the automorphism groups of the relational structures induced by the images of idempotents from End(Ω). It has been shown that the relational structure induced by the image of an idempotent from End(Ω) is algebraically closed. Accordingly, we investigate which groups can be realised as the automorphism group of an algebraically closed relational structure in order to determine the maximal subgroups of End(Ω) in each case. In particular, we show that if Γ is a countable graph and Ω = R,D,B, then there exist 2[superscript aleph-naught] maximal subgroups of End(Ω) which are isomorphic to Aut(Γ). Additionally, we provide a complete description of the subsets of Q which are the image of an idempotent from End(Q). We call these subsets retracts of Q and show that if Ω is a total order and f is an embedding of Ω into Q such that im f is a retract of Q, then there exist 2[superscript aleph-naught] maximal subgroups of End(Q) isomorphic to Aut(Ω). We also show that any countable maximal subgroup of End(Q) must be isomorphic to Zⁿ for some natural number n. As a consequence of the methods developed, we are also able to show that when Ω = R,D,B,Q there exist 2[superscript aleph-naught] regular D-classes of End(Ω) and when Ω = R,D,B there exist 2[superscript aleph-naught] J-classes of End(Ω). Additionally we show that if Ω = R,D then all regular D-classes contain 2[superscript aleph-naught] group H-classes. On the other hand, we show that when Ω = B,Q there exist regular D-classes which contain countably many group H-classes.

La construction d'un quotient, en topologie, est relativement simple; si $G$ est un groupe topologique agissant sur un espace topologique $X$, on peut considérer l'application naturelle de $X$ dans $X/G$, l'espace d'orbites muni de la topologie quotient. En géométrie algébrique, malheureusement, il n'est généralement pas possible de munir l'espace d'orbites d'une structure de variété. Dans le cas de l'action d'un groupe linéairement réductif $G$ sur une variété projective $X$, la théorie géométrique des invariants nous permet toutefois de construire un morphisme de variété d'un ouvert $U$ de $X$ vers une variété projective $X//U$, se rapprochant autant que possible d'une application quotient, au sens topologique du terme. Considérons par exemple $X\subseteq P^{n}$, une $k$-variété projective sur laquelle agit un groupe linéairement réductif $G$ et supposons que cette action soit induite par une action linéaire de $G$ sur $A^{n+1}$. Soit $\widehat{X}\subseteq A^{n+1}$, le cône affine au dessus de $\X$. Par un théorème de la théorie classique des invariants, il existe alors des invariants homogènes $f_{1},...,f_{r}\in C[\widehat{X}]^{G}$ tels que $$C[\widehat{X}]^{G}= C[f_{1},...,f_{r}].$$ On appellera le nilcone, que l'on notera $N$, la sous-variété de $\X$ définie par le locus des invariants $f_{1},...,f_{r}$. Soit $Proj(C[\widehat{X}]^{G})$, le spectre projectif de l'anneau des invariants. L'application rationnelle $$\pi:X\dashrightarrow Proj(C[f_{1},...,f_{r}])$$ induite par l'inclusion de $C[\widehat{X}]^{G}$ dans $C[\widehat{X}]$ est alors surjective, constante sur les orbites et sépare les orbites autant qu'il est possible de le faire; plus précisément, chaque fibre contient exactement une orbite fermée. Pour obtenir une application régulière satisfaisant les mêmes propriétés, il est nécessaire de jeter les points du nilcone. On obtient alors l'application quotient $$\pi:X\backslash N\rightarrow Proj(C[f_{1},...,f_{r}]).$$ Le critère de Hilbert-Mumford, dû à Hilbert et repris par Mumford près d'un demi-siècle plus tard, permet de décrire $N$ sans connaître les $f_{1},...,f_{r}$. Ce critère est d'autant plus utile que les générateurs de l'anneau des invariants ne sont connus que dans certains cas particuliers. Malgré les applications concrètes de ce théorème en géométrie algébrique classique, les démonstrations que l'on en trouve dans la littérature sont généralement données dans le cadre peu accessible des schémas. L'objectif de ce mémoire sera, entre autres, de donner une démonstration de ce critère en utilisant autant que possible les outils de la géométrie algébrique classique et de l'algèbre commutative. La version que nous démontrerons est un peu plus générale que la version originale de Hilbert \cite{hilbert} et se retrouve, par exemple, dans \cite{kempf}. Notre preuve est valide sur $C$ mais pourrait être généralisée à un corps $k$ de caractéristique nulle, pas nécessairement algébriquement clos. Dans la seconde partie de ce mémoire, nous étudierons la relation entre la construction précédente et celle obtenue en incluant les covariants en plus des invariants. Nous démontrerons dans ce cas un critère analogue au critère de Hilbert-Mumford (Théorème 6.3.2). C'est un théorème de Brion pour lequel nous donnerons une version un peu plus générale. Cette version, de même qu'une preuve simplifiée d'un théorème de Grosshans (Théorème 6.1.7), sont les éléments de ce mémoire que l'on ne retrouve pas dans la littérature. / The topological notion of a quotient is fairly simple. Given a topological group $G$ acting on a topological space $X$, one gets the natural application from $X$ to the quotient space $X/G$. In algebraic geometry, unfortunately, it is generally not possible to give the orbit space the structure of an algebraic variety. In the special case of a linearly reductive group acting on a projective variety $X$, the geometric invariant theory allows us to get a morphism of variety from an open $U$ of $X$ to a projective variety $X//G$, which is as close as possible to a quotient map, from a topological point of view. As an example, let $ X\subseteq P^{n}$ be a $k$-projective variety on which acts a linearly reductive group $G$. Suppose further that this action is induced by a linear action of $G$ on $A^{n+1}$ and let $\widehat{X}\subseteq A^{n +1}$ be the affine cone over $X$. By an important theorem of the classical invariants theory, there exist homogeneous invariants $f_{1},..., f_{r}\in C[\widehat{X}]^{G}$ such as $$\C[\widehat{X}]^{G}=\C[f_{1},...,f_{r}].$$ The locus in $X$ of $f_{1},...,f_{r}$ is called the nullcone, noted $N$. Let $Proj(C[\widehat{X}]^{G})$ be the projective spectrum of the invariants ring. The rational map $$\pi:X\dashrightarrow Proj(C[f_{1},...,f_{r}])$$ induced by the inclusion of $C[\widehat{X}]^{G}$ in $C[\widehat{X}] $ is then surjective, constant on the orbits and separates orbits as much as possible, that is, the fibres contains exactly one closed orbit. A regular map is obtained by removing the nullcone; we then get a regular map $$\pi:X \backslash N\rightarrow Proj(C[f_{1},...,f_{r}])$$ which still satisfy the preceding properties. The Hilbert-Mumford criterion, due to Hilbert and revisited by Mumford nearly half-century later, can be used to describe $N$ without knowing the generators of the invariants ring. Since those are rarely known, this criterion had proved to be quite useful. Despite the important applications of this criterion in classical algebraic geometry, the demonstrations found in the literature are usually given trough the difficult theory of schemes. The aim of this master thesis is therefore, among others, to provide a demonstration of this criterion using classical algebraic geometry and of commutative algebra. The version that we demonstrate is somewhat wider than the original version of Hilbert \cite{hilbert}; a schematic proof of this general version is given in \cite{kempf}. Finally, the proof given here is valid for $C$ but could be generalised to a field $k$ of characteristic zero, not necessarily algebraically closed. In the second part of this thesis, we study the relationship between the preceding constructions and those obtained by including covariants in addition to the invariants. We give a Hilbert-Mumford criterion for covariants (Theorem 6.3.2) which is a theorem from Brion for which we prove a slightly more general version. This theorem, together with a simplified proof of a theorem of Grosshans (Theorem 6.1.7), are the elements of this thesis that can't be found in the literature.

La construction d'un quotient, en topologie, est relativement simple; si $G$ est un groupe topologique agissant sur un espace topologique $X$, on peut considérer l'application naturelle de $X$ dans $X/G$, l'espace d'orbites muni de la topologie quotient. En géométrie algébrique, malheureusement, il n'est généralement pas possible de munir l'espace d'orbites d'une structure de variété. Dans le cas de l'action d'un groupe linéairement réductif $G$ sur une variété projective $X$, la théorie géométrique des invariants nous permet toutefois de construire un morphisme de variété d'un ouvert $U$ de $X$ vers une variété projective $X//U$, se rapprochant autant que possible d'une application quotient, au sens topologique du terme. Considérons par exemple $X\subseteq P^{n}$, une $k$-variété projective sur laquelle agit un groupe linéairement réductif $G$ et supposons que cette action soit induite par une action linéaire de $G$ sur $A^{n+1}$. Soit $\widehat{X}\subseteq A^{n+1}$, le cône affine au dessus de $\X$. Par un théorème de la théorie classique des invariants, il existe alors des invariants homogènes $f_{1},...,f_{r}\in C[\widehat{X}]^{G}$ tels que $$C[\widehat{X}]^{G}= C[f_{1},...,f_{r}].$$ On appellera le nilcone, que l'on notera $N$, la sous-variété de $\X$ définie par le locus des invariants $f_{1},...,f_{r}$. Soit $Proj(C[\widehat{X}]^{G})$, le spectre projectif de l'anneau des invariants. L'application rationnelle $$\pi:X\dashrightarrow Proj(C[f_{1},...,f_{r}])$$ induite par l'inclusion de $C[\widehat{X}]^{G}$ dans $C[\widehat{X}]$ est alors surjective, constante sur les orbites et sépare les orbites autant qu'il est possible de le faire; plus précisément, chaque fibre contient exactement une orbite fermée. Pour obtenir une application régulière satisfaisant les mêmes propriétés, il est nécessaire de jeter les points du nilcone. On obtient alors l'application quotient $$\pi:X\backslash N\rightarrow Proj(C[f_{1},...,f_{r}]).$$ Le critère de Hilbert-Mumford, dû à Hilbert et repris par Mumford près d'un demi-siècle plus tard, permet de décrire $N$ sans connaître les $f_{1},...,f_{r}$. Ce critère est d'autant plus utile que les générateurs de l'anneau des invariants ne sont connus que dans certains cas particuliers. Malgré les applications concrètes de ce théorème en géométrie algébrique classique, les démonstrations que l'on en trouve dans la littérature sont généralement données dans le cadre peu accessible des schémas. L'objectif de ce mémoire sera, entre autres, de donner une démonstration de ce critère en utilisant autant que possible les outils de la géométrie algébrique classique et de l'algèbre commutative. La version que nous démontrerons est un peu plus générale que la version originale de Hilbert \cite{hilbert} et se retrouve, par exemple, dans \cite{kempf}. Notre preuve est valide sur $C$ mais pourrait être généralisée à un corps $k$ de caractéristique nulle, pas nécessairement algébriquement clos. Dans la seconde partie de ce mémoire, nous étudierons la relation entre la construction précédente et celle obtenue en incluant les covariants en plus des invariants. Nous démontrerons dans ce cas un critère analogue au critère de Hilbert-Mumford (Théorème 6.3.2). C'est un théorème de Brion pour lequel nous donnerons une version un peu plus générale. Cette version, de même qu'une preuve simplifiée d'un théorème de Grosshans (Théorème 6.1.7), sont les éléments de ce mémoire que l'on ne retrouve pas dans la littérature. / The topological notion of a quotient is fairly simple. Given a topological group $G$ acting on a topological space $X$, one gets the natural application from $X$ to the quotient space $X/G$. In algebraic geometry, unfortunately, it is generally not possible to give the orbit space the structure of an algebraic variety. In the special case of a linearly reductive group acting on a projective variety $X$, the geometric invariant theory allows us to get a morphism of variety from an open $U$ of $X$ to a projective variety $X//G$, which is as close as possible to a quotient map, from a topological point of view. As an example, let $ X\subseteq P^{n}$ be a $k$-projective variety on which acts a linearly reductive group $G$. Suppose further that this action is induced by a linear action of $G$ on $A^{n+1}$ and let $\widehat{X}\subseteq A^{n +1}$ be the affine cone over $X$. By an important theorem of the classical invariants theory, there exist homogeneous invariants $f_{1},..., f_{r}\in C[\widehat{X}]^{G}$ such as $$\C[\widehat{X}]^{G}=\C[f_{1},...,f_{r}].$$ The locus in $X$ of $f_{1},...,f_{r}$ is called the nullcone, noted $N$. Let $Proj(C[\widehat{X}]^{G})$ be the projective spectrum of the invariants ring. The rational map $$\pi:X\dashrightarrow Proj(C[f_{1},...,f_{r}])$$ induced by the inclusion of $C[\widehat{X}]^{G}$ in $C[\widehat{X}] $ is then surjective, constant on the orbits and separates orbits as much as possible, that is, the fibres contains exactly one closed orbit. A regular map is obtained by removing the nullcone; we then get a regular map $$\pi:X \backslash N\rightarrow Proj(C[f_{1},...,f_{r}])$$ which still satisfy the preceding properties. The Hilbert-Mumford criterion, due to Hilbert and revisited by Mumford nearly half-century later, can be used to describe $N$ without knowing the generators of the invariants ring. Since those are rarely known, this criterion had proved to be quite useful. Despite the important applications of this criterion in classical algebraic geometry, the demonstrations found in the literature are usually given trough the difficult theory of schemes. The aim of this master thesis is therefore, among others, to provide a demonstration of this criterion using classical algebraic geometry and of commutative algebra. The version that we demonstrate is somewhat wider than the original version of Hilbert \cite{hilbert}; a schematic proof of this general version is given in \cite{kempf}. Finally, the proof given here is valid for $C$ but could be generalised to a field $k$ of characteristic zero, not necessarily algebraically closed. In the second part of this thesis, we study the relationship between the preceding constructions and those obtained by including covariants in addition to the invariants. We give a Hilbert-Mumford criterion for covariants (Theorem 6.3.2) which is a theorem from Brion for which we prove a slightly more general version. This theorem, together with a simplified proof of a theorem of Grosshans (Theorem 6.1.7), are the elements of this thesis that can't be found in the literature.

It can be deduced from the Burnside Basis Theorem that if G is a finite p-group with d(G)=r then given any generating set A for G there exists a subset of A of size r that generates G. We have denoted this property B. A group is said to have the basis property if all subgroups have property B. This thesis is a study into the nature of these two properties. Note all groups are finite unless stated otherwise. We begin this thesis by providing examples of groups with and without property B and several results on the structure of groups with property B, showing that under certain conditions property B is inherited by quotients. This culminates with a result which shows that groups with property B that can be expressed as direct products are exactly those arising from the Burnside Basis Theorem. We also seek to create a class of groups which have property B. We provide a method for constructing groups with property B and trivial Frattini subgroup using finite fields. We then classify all groups G where the quotient of G by the Frattini subgroup is isomorphic to this construction. We finally note that groups arising from this construction do not in general have the basis property. Finally we look at groups with the basis property. We prove that groups with the basis property are soluble and consist only of elements of prime-power order. We then exploit the classification of all such groups by Higman to provide a complete classification of groups with the basis property.