We consider a number of temporal logics, some interval-based and some instant-based, and the choices that have to be made if we need to construct a computational framework for such a logic. We consider the axiomatisation of the accessibility relations of the underlying temporal structures when we are using a modal language as well as the formulation of axioms for distinguishing concepts like actions, events, processes and so on for systems using first-order languages. Finally, we briefly discuss the fields of application of temporal logics and list a number of fields that looks promising for further research. / Computer Science and Information Systems / M.Sc.(Computer Science)

Orientador: Walter Alexandre Carnielli / Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciencias Humanas / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-12T22:46:52Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Freire_RodrigodeAlvarenga_D.pdf: 761227 bytes, checksum: 3b1a0de92aa93b50f2bfc602bf6173bc (MD5) Previous issue date: 2009 / Resumo: Esta Tese tem como objetivo elucidar, ao menos parcialmente, a questão do significado da Teoria de Modelos para uma reflexão sobre o conhecimento matemático no século XX. Para isso, vamos buscar, primeiramente, alcançar uma compreensão da própria reflexão sobre o conhecimento matemático, que será denominada de Fundamentos do Pensamento Matemático no século XX, e da própria relevância fundacional. Em seguida, analisaremos, dentro do contexto fundacional estabelecido, o papel da Teoria de Modelos e da sua interação com a Álgebra, em geral, e, finalmente, empreenderemos um estudo de caso específico. Nesse estudo de caso mostraremos que a Teoria de Galois pode ser vista como um conteúdo lógico, e buscaremos compreender o significado fundacional desse enquadramento modelo-teórico para uma parte da Álgebra clássica. / Abstract: The aim of the present Thesis is to bring some light to the question about the status and relevance of Model Theory to a reflection about the mathematical knowledge in the twentieth century. To pursue this target, we will, first of all, try to reach a comprehension of the reflection about the mathematical knowledge, itself, what will be designated as Foundations of Mathematical Thought in the twentieth century, and of the foundational relevance, itself. In the sequel, we will provide an analysis, of the role of Model Theory and its interaction with Algebra, in general, within the established foundational setting and, finally, we will discuss a specific study case. In this study case we will show that Galois Theory can be seen as a logical content, and we will try to understand the foundational meaning of this model-theoretic framework for some part of classical Algebra. / Doutorado / Logica / Doutor em Filosofia

Orientador: Marcelo Esteban Coniglio / Dissertação (mestrado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Instituto de Filosofia e Ciencias Humanas / Made available in DSpace on 2018-08-11T21:55:18Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Reis_TeofilodeSouza_M.pdf: 733611 bytes, checksum: 0e64d330d9e71079eddd94de91f141c2 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2008 / Resumo: Neste trabalho apresentamos um novo formalismo de decomposição de Lógicas, as Coberturas por Traduções Possíveis, ou simplesmente CTPs. As CTPs constituem uma versão formal das Semânticas de Traduções Possíveis, introduzidas por W. Carnielli em 1990. Mostramos como a adoção de um conceito mais geral de morfismo de assinaturas proposicionais (usando multifunções no lugar de funções) nos permite definir uma categoria Sig?, na qual os conectivos, ao serem traduzidos de uma assinatura para outra, gozam de grande flexibilidade. A partir de Sig?, contruímos a categoria Log? de lógicas tarskianas e morfismos (os quais são funções obtidas a partir de um morfismo de assinaturas, isto é, de uma multifunção). Estudamos algumas características de Sig? e Log?, afim de verificar que estas categorias podem de fato acomodar as construções que pretendemos apresentar. Mostramos como definir em Log? o conjunto de traduções possíveis de uma fórmula, e a partir disto definimos a noção de CTP para uma lógica L. Por fim, exibimos um exemplo concreto de utilização desta nova ferramenta, e discutimos brevemente as possíveis abordagens para uma continuação deste trabalho. / Abstract: We present a general study of a new formalism of decomposition of logics, the Possible- Translations Coverings (in short PTC 's) which constitute a formal version of Possible-Translations Semantics, introduced by W. Carnielli in 1990. We show how the adoption of a more general notion of propositional signatures morphism allows us to define a category Sig?, in which the connectives, when translated from a signature to another one, enjoy of great flexibility. Essentially, Sig? -morphisms will be multifunctions instead of functions. From Sig? we construct the category Log? of tarskian logics and morphisms between them (these .are functions obtained from signature morphisms, that is, from multifunctions) . We show how to define in Log? the set of possible translations of a given formula, and we define the notion of a PTC for a logic L. We analyze some properties of PTC 's and give concrete examples of the above mentioned constructions. We conclude with a discussion of the approaches to be used in a possible continuation of these investigations. / Mestrado / Mestre em Filosofia

Mechanisation of Mathematics refers to use of computers to generate or check proofs in Mathematics. It involves translation of relevant mathematical theories from one system of logic to another, to render these theories implementable in a computer. This process is termed formalisation of mathematics. Two among the many ways of mechanising are: 1 Generating results using automated theorem provers. 2 Interactive theorem proving in a proof assistant which involves a combination of user intervention and automation. In the first part of this thesis, we reformulate the question of equivalence of two Links in first order logic using braid groups. This is achieved by developing a set of axioms whose canonical model is the braid group on infinite strands B∞. This renders the problem of distinguishing knots and links, amenable to implementation in first order logic based automated theorem provers. We further state and prove results pertaining to models of braid axioms. The second part of the thesis deals with formalising knot Theory in Higher Order Logic using the interactive proof assistant -Isabelle. We formulate equivalence of links in higher order logic. We obtain a construction of Kauffman bracket in the interactive proof assistant called Isabelle proof assistant. We further obtain a machine checked proof of invariance of Kauffman bracket.

A topological approach to nonlinear analysis allows for strikingly beautiful proofs and simplified calculations. This topological approach employs many of the ideas of continuous topology, including convergence, compactness, metrization, complete metric spaces, uniform spaces and function spaces. This thesis illustrates using the topological approach in proving the Cauchy-Peano Existence theorem. The topological proof utilizes the ideas of complete metric spaces, Ascoli-Arzela theorem, topological properties in Euclidean n-space and normed linear spaces, and the extension of Brouwer's fixed point theorem to Schauder's fixed point theorem, and Picard's theorem.

In classical propositional logic (CPL) logical reasoning is formalised as logical entailment and can be computed by means of tableau and resolution proof procedures. Unfortunately CPL is not expressive enough and using first order logic (FOL) does not solve the problem either since proof procedures for these logics are not decidable. Modal propositional logics (MPL) on the other hand are both decidable and more expressive than CPL. It therefore seems reasonable to apply tableau and resolution proof systems to MPL in order to compute logical entailment in MPL. Although some of the principles in CPL are present in MPL, there are complexities in MPL that are not present in CPL. Tableau and resolution proof systems which address these issues and others will be surveyed here. In particular the work of Abadi & Manna (1986), Chan (1987), del Cerro & Herzig (1988), Fitting (1983, 1990) and Gore (1995) will be reviewed. / Computing / M. Sc. (Computer Science)

The study constituted an investigation for concept images and mathematical reasoning of Grade 11 learners on the concepts of reflection, translation and stretch of functions. The aim was to gain awareness of any conceptions that learners have about these transformations. The researcher’s experience in high school and university mathematics teaching had laid a basis to establish the research problem. The subjects of the study were 96 Grade 11 mathematics learners from three conveniently sampled South African high schools. The non-return of consent forms by some learners and absenteeism during the days of writing by other learners, resulted in the subsequent reduction of the amount of respondents below the anticipated 100. The preliminary investigation, which had 30 learners, was successful in validating instruments and projecting how the main results would be like. A mixed method exploratory design was employed for the study, for it was to give in-depth results after combining two data collection methods; a written diagnostic test and recorded follow-up interviews. All the 96 participants wrote the test and 14 of them were interviewed. It was found that learners’ reasoning was more based on their concept images than on formal definitions. The most interesting were verbal concept images, some of which were very accurate, others incomplete and yet others exhibited misconceptions. There were a lot of inconsistencies in the students’ constructed definitions and incompetency in using graphical and symbolical representations of reflection, translation and stretch of functions. For example, some learners were misled by negative sign on a horizontal translation to the right to think that it was a horizontal translation to the left. Others mistook stretch for enlargement both verbally and contextually. The research recommends that teachers should use more than one method when teaching transformations of functions, e.g., practically-oriented and process-oriented instructions, with practical examples, to improve the images of the concepts that learners develop. Within their methodologies, teachers should make concerted effort to be aware of the diversity of ways in which their learners think of the actions and processes of reflecting, translating and stretching, the terms they use to describe them, and how they compare the original objects to images after transformations. They should build upon incomplete definitions, misconceptions and other inconsistencies to facilitate development of accurate conceptions more schematically connected to the empirical world. There is also a need for accurate assessments of successes and shortcomings that learners display in the quest to define and master mathematical concepts but taking cognisance of their limitations of language proficiency in English, which is not their first language. Teachers need to draw a clear line between the properties of stretch and enlargement, and emphasize the need to include the invariant line in the definition of stretch. To remove confusion around the effect of “–” sign, more practice and spiral testing of this knowledge could be done to constantly remind learners of that property. Lastly, teachers should find out how to use smartphones, i-phones, i-pods, tablets and other technological devices for teaching and learning, and utilize them fully to their own and the learners’ advantage in learning these and other concepts and skills / Mathematics Education / D.Phil. (Mathematics, Science and Technology Education)

In classical propositional logic (CPL) logical reasoning is formalised as logical entailment and can be computed by means of tableau and resolution proof procedures. Unfortunately CPL is not expressive enough and using first order logic (FOL) does not solve the problem either since proof procedures for these logics are not decidable. Modal propositional logics (MPL) on the other hand are both decidable and more expressive than CPL. It therefore seems reasonable to apply tableau and resolution proof systems to MPL in order to compute logical entailment in MPL. Although some of the principles in CPL are present in MPL, there are complexities in MPL that are not present in CPL. Tableau and resolution proof systems which address these issues and others will be surveyed here. In particular the work of Abadi & Manna (1986), Chan (1987), del Cerro & Herzig (1988), Fitting (1983, 1990) and Gore (1995) will be reviewed. / Computing / M. Sc. (Computer Science)

The study constituted an investigation for concept images and mathematical reasoning of Grade 11 learners on the concepts of reflection, translation and stretch of functions. The aim was to gain awareness of any conceptions that learners have about these transformations. The researcher’s experience in high school and university mathematics teaching had laid a basis to establish the research problem. The subjects of the study were 96 Grade 11 mathematics learners from three conveniently sampled South African high schools. The non-return of consent forms by some learners and absenteeism during the days of writing by other learners, resulted in the subsequent reduction of the amount of respondents below the anticipated 100. The preliminary investigation, which had 30 learners, was successful in validating instruments and projecting how the main results would be like. A mixed method exploratory design was employed for the study, for it was to give in-depth results after combining two data collection methods; a written diagnostic test and recorded follow-up interviews. All the 96 participants wrote the test and 14 of them were interviewed. It was found that learners’ reasoning was more based on their concept images than on formal definitions. The most interesting were verbal concept images, some of which were very accurate, others incomplete and yet others exhibited misconceptions. There were a lot of inconsistencies in the students’ constructed definitions and incompetency in using graphical and symbolical representations of reflection, translation and stretch of functions. For example, some learners were misled by negative sign on a horizontal translation to the right to think that it was a horizontal translation to the left. Others mistook stretch for enlargement both verbally and contextually. The research recommends that teachers should use more than one method when teaching transformations of functions, e.g., practically-oriented and process-oriented instructions, with practical examples, to improve the images of the concepts that learners develop. Within their methodologies, teachers should make concerted effort to be aware of the diversity of ways in which their learners think of the actions and processes of reflecting, translating and stretching, the terms they use to describe them, and how they compare the original objects to images after transformations. They should build upon incomplete definitions, misconceptions and other inconsistencies to facilitate development of accurate conceptions more schematically connected to the empirical world. There is also a need for accurate assessments of successes and shortcomings that learners display in the quest to define and master mathematical concepts but taking cognisance of their limitations of language proficiency in English, which is not their first language. Teachers need to draw a clear line between the properties of stretch and enlargement, and emphasize the need to include the invariant line in the definition of stretch. To remove confusion around the effect of “–” sign, more practice and spiral testing of this knowledge could be done to constantly remind learners of that property. Lastly, teachers should find out how to use smartphones, i-phones, i-pods, tablets and other technological devices for teaching and learning, and utilize them fully to their own and the learners’ advantage in learning these and other concepts and skills / Mathematics Education / D.Phil. (Mathematics, Science and Technology Education)

Text in English with abstracts in English, Afrikaans and isiZulu / The formalisation of first-order logic and axiomatic set theory in the first half of the 20th century—along with the advent of the digital computer—paved the way for the development of automated theorem proving. In the 1950s, the automation of proof developed from proving elementary geometric problems and finding direct proofs for problems in Principia Mathematica by means of simple, human-oriented rules of inference. A major advance in the field of automated theorem proving occurred in 1965, with the formulation of the resolution inference mechanism. Today, powerful Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) provers combine SAT solvers with sophisticated knowledge from various problem domains to prove increasingly complex theorems. The combinatorial explosion of the search space is viewed as one of the major challenges to progress in the field of automated theorem proving. Pioneers from the 1950s and 1960s have already identified the need for heuristics to guide the proof search effort. Despite theoretical advances in automated reasoning and technological advances in computing, the size of the search space remains problematic when increasingly complex proofs are attempted. Today, heuristics are still useful and necessary to discharge complex proof obligations. In 2000, a number of heuristics was developed to aid the resolution-based prover OTTER in finding proofs for set-theoretic problems. The applicability of these heuristics to next-generation theorem provers were evaluated in 2009. The provers Vampire and Gandalf required respectively 90% and 80% of the applicable OTTER heuristics. This dissertation investigates the applicability of the OTTER heuristics to theorem proving in the hybrid theorem proving environment Rodin—a system modelling tool suite for the Event-B formal method. We show that only 2 of the 10 applicable OTTER heuristics were useful when discharging proof obligations in Rodin. Even though we argue that the OTTER heuristics were largely ineffective when applied to Rodin proofs, heuristics were still needed when proof obligations could not be discharged automatically. Therefore, we propose a number of our own heuristics targeted at theorem proving in the Rodin tool suite. / Die formalisering van eerste-orde-logika en aksiomatiese versamelingsteorie in die eerste helfte van die 20ste eeu, tesame met die koms van die digitale rekenaar, het die weg vir die ontwikkeling van geoutomatiseerde bewysvoering gebaan. Die outomatisering van bewysvoering het in die 1950’s ontwikkel vanuit die bewys van elementêre meetkundige probleme en die opspoor van direkte bewyse vir probleme in Principia Mathematica deur middel van eenvoudige, mensgerigte inferensiereëls. Vooruitgang is in 1965 op die gebied van geoutomatiseerde bewysvoering gemaak toe die resolusie-inferensie-meganisme geformuleer is. Deesdae kombineer kragtige Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) bewysvoerders SAT-oplossers met gesofistikeerde kennis vanuit verskeie probleemdomeine om steeds meer komplekse stellings te bewys. Die kombinatoriese ontploffing van die soekruimte kan beskou word as een van die grootste uitdagings vir verdere vooruitgang in die veld van geoutomatiseerde bewysvoering. Baanbrekers uit die 1950’s en 1960’s het reeds bepaal dat daar ’n behoefte is aan heuristieke om die soektog na bewyse te rig. Ten spyte van die teoretiese vooruitgang in outomatiese bewysvoering en die tegnologiese vooruitgang in die rekenaarbedryf, is die grootte van die soekruimte steeds problematies wanneer toenemend komplekse bewyse aangepak word. Teenswoordig is heuristieke steeds nuttig en noodsaaklik om komplekse bewysverpligtinge uit te voer. In 2000 is ’n aantal heuristieke ontwikkel om die resolusie-gebaseerde bewysvoerder OTTER te help om bewyse vir versamelingsteoretiese probleme te vind. Die toepaslikheid van hierdie heuristieke vir die volgende generasie bewysvoerders is in 2009 geëvalueer. Die bewysvoerders Vampire en Gandalf het onderskeidelik 90% en 80% van die toepaslike OTTER-heuristieke nodig gehad. Hierdie verhandeling ondersoek die toepaslikheid van die OTTER-heuristieke op bewysvoering in die hibriede bewysvoeringsomgewing Rodin—’n stelselmodelleringsuite vir die formele Event-B-metode. Ons toon dat slegs 2 van die 10 toepaslike OTTER-heuristieke van nut was vir die uitvoering van bewysverpligtinge in Rodin. Ons voer aan dat die OTTER-heuristieke grotendeels ondoeltreffend was toe dit op Rodin-bewyse toegepas is. Desnieteenstaande is heuristieke steeds nodig as bewysverpligtinge nie outomaties uitgevoer kon word nie. Daarom stel ons ’n aantal van ons eie heuristieke voor wat in die Rodin-suite aangewend kan word. / Ukwenziwa semthethweni kwe-first-order logic kanye ne-axiomatic set theory ngesigamu sokuqala sekhulunyaka lama-20—kanye nokufika kwekhompyutha esebenza ngobuxhakaxhaka bedijithali—kwavula indlela ebheke ekuthuthukisweni kwenqubo-kusebenza yokufakazela amathiyoremu ngekhomyutha. Ngeminyaka yawo-1950, ukuqinisekiswa kobufakazi kwasuselwa ekufakazelweni kwezinkinga zejiyomethri eziyisisekelo kanye nasekutholakaleni kobufakazi-ngqo bezinkinga eziphathelene ne-Principia Mathematica ngokuthi kusetshenziswe imithetho yokuqagula-sakucabangela elula, egxile kubantu. Impumelelo enkulu emkhakheni wokufakazela amathiyoremu ngekhompyutha yenzeka ngowe-1965, ngokwenziwa semthethweni kwe-resolution inference mechanism. Namuhla, abafakazeli abanohlonze bamathiyori abizwa nge-Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT) bahlanganisa ama-SAT solvers nolwazi lobungcweti oluvela kwizizinda zezinkinga ezihlukahlukene ukuze bakwazi ukufakazela amathiyoremu okungelula neze ukuwafakazela. Ukukhula ngesivinini kobunzima nobunkimbinkimbi benkinga esizindeni esithile kubonwa njengenye yezinselelo ezinkulu okudingeka ukuthi zixazululwe ukuze kube nenqubekela phambili ekufakazelweni kwamathiyoremu ngekhompyutha. Amavulandlela eminyaka yawo-1950 nawo-1960 asesihlonzile kakade isidingo sokuthi amahuristikhi (heuristics) kube yiwona ahola umzamo wokuthola ubufakazi. Nakuba ikhona impumelelo esiyenziwe kumathiyori ezokucabangela okujulile kusetshenziswa amakhompyutha kanye nempumelelo yobuchwepheshe bamakhompyutha, usayizi wesizinda usalokhu uyinkinga uma kwenziwa imizamo yokuthola ubufakazi obuyinkimbinkimbi futhi obunobunzima obukhudlwana. Namuhla imbala, amahuristikhi asewuziso futhi ayadingeka ekufezekiseni izibopho zobufakazi obuyinkimbinkimbi. Ngowezi-2000, kwathuthukiswa amahuristikhi amaningana impela ukuze kulekelelwe uhlelo-kusebenza olungumfakazeli osekelwe phezu kwesixazululo, olubizwa nge-OTTER, ekutholeni ubufakazi bama-set-theoretic problems. Ukusebenziseka kwalawa mahuristikhi kwizinhlelo-kusebenza ezingabafakazeli bamathiyoremu besimanjemanje kwahlolwa ngowezi-2009. Uhlelo-kusebenza olungumfakazeli, olubizwa nge-Vampire kanye nalolo olubizwa nge-Gandalf zadinga ama-90% kanye nama-80%, ngokulandelana kwazo, maqondana nama-OTTER heuristics afanelekile. Lolu cwaningo luphenya futhi lucubungule ukusebenziseka kwama-OTTER heuristics ekufakazelweni kwamathiyoremu esimweni esiyinhlanganisela sokufakazela amathiyoremu esibizwa nge-Rodin—okuyi-system modelling tool suite eqondene ne-Event-B formal method. Kulolu cwaningo siyabonisa ukuthi mabili kuphela kwayi-10 ama-OTTER heuristics aba wusizo ngenkathi kufezekiswa isibopho sobufakazi ku-Rodin. Nakuba sibeka umbono wokuthi esikhathini esiningi ama-OTTER heuristics awazange abe wusizo uma esetshenziswa kuma-Rodin proofs, amahuristikhi asadingeka ezimweni lapho izibopho zobufakazi zingazenzekelanga ngokwazo ngokulawulwa yizinhlelo-kusebenza zekhompyutha. Ngakho-ke, siphakamisa amahuristikhi ethu amaningana angasetshenziswa ekufakazeleni amathiyoremu ku-Rodin tool suite. / School of Computing / M. Sc. (Computer Science)