[pt] A presente dissertação é um estudo teórico-experimental sobre linguagem na esquizofrenia, com foco no uso de pronomes em textos escritos por nativos do inglês, disponíveis na plataforma Reddit, com análise adicional da complexidade sintática no nível sentencial. A esquizofrenia é um distúrbio mental que se apresenta como uma heterogeneidade de disfunções neuropsicológicas, sendo uma de suas principais características disfunções linguísticas, em especial no uso e compreensão de expressões nominais e na redução da complexidade sintática. Foram coletados, analisados e comparados um total de 78 textos (39 de usuários com autodeclaração de esquizofrenia e 39 de controles pareados). Os textos coletados foram anotados sintaticamente e tratados estatisticamente considerando fatores relativos à complexidade sintática no nível sentencial e pronominal. Comparações intergrupais revelaram diferenças significativas no domínio sentencial e pronominal, com o grupo esquizofrenia apresentando menor volume de truncamento sentencial não-anômalo e maior volume de anomalias no emprego de pronomes plenos de terceira pessoa com leitura referencial. Estes resultados estão de acordo com as conclusões de estudos anteriores. Partindo do entendimento de que a Gramática é um mecanismo computacional cognitivo, as observações obtidas indicam que a esquizofrenia leva a uma redução na complexidade sintática de processos gramaticais responsáveis pela construção do significado. / [en] The present dissertation is a theoretical-experimental study on language in schizophrenia, focusing on the usage of pronouns in written texts produced by native speakers of English and published on Reddit, considering in addition syntactic complexity at the sentential level. Schizophrenia is a mental disorder characterized by a set of heterogeneous dysfunctions, with language-malfunctioning being one of its main characteristics. In particular, misuse and misinterpretation of nominal expressions and syntactic-complexity reduction are linguistic hallmarks of schizophrenia. 78 texts (39 from Reddit users with self-declaration of schizophrenia and 39 from paired controls) were automatically collected, manually tagged and statistically compared. The tagging process was based on syntactic complexity at the sentential and nominal level. Between-group statistical comparisons showed significant differences, with the schizophrenic group exhibiting less non-anomalous sentential truncations (ellipsis) and more anomalous 3Person referential pronouns. This is in accordance with previous independent studies. Assuming human Grammar to be a computational apparatus of the cognitive system, we interpret the obtained results as suggesting that schizophrenia leads to reductions on meaning-building derivational grammatical processes.

This dissertation deals with the developing and development of EFL learners' communicative competence in writing in a blended learning course. The dissertation addresses issues related to the conceptualization of developing communicative competence and measuring learners' progress as well as using ICT in foreign language teaching. The underlying research question was whether learners' communicative competence changed after using a series of online discussion tasks, and if so, in what manner. The empirical research was conducted as a case study in which 18 learners in an EFL course at the CEFR A2 level participated in three discussion tasks conducted online, using asynchronous discussion forum. The discussions were built on social constructivist learning theories. Methods of data collection and analysis included pre- and post-tests, learner corpus compiled from the texts written by the students in two online discussions and its analysis, and a questionnaire survey. The results showed that learners' overall level of communicative competence in writing improved. Specifically, the syntactic complexity of learners' language produced at the beginning and at the end of the course increased and learners' perceived fluency in writing improved. These findings support the claim that learners' active participation in...

Un nombre réduit, mais croissant de recherches étudie le développement de la complexité syntaxique pour l’anglais et le français européen, mais à notre connaissance aucune ne s’est intéressée au français québécois. Ce projet a donc pour ambition d’analyser la production de constructions complexes chez des enfants franco-québécois âgés de 3 à 6 ans, à partir d’un corpus composé de 30 échantillons de langage spontané répartis en trois groupes d’âge de 3-4 ans, 4-5 ans et 5-6 ans. Les échantillons ont été recueillis pendant que chaque enfant s’amusait avec des jouets standards. Des enregistrements audio-visuels ont été effectués pendant l’activité et ensuite transcrits sous forme de corpus écrits. Enfin, le logiciel SALT a été utilisé pour coder les transcriptions. La présente étude se veut développementale, dans le sens qu’elle cherche à généraliser le processus de développement des complexités syntaxique en fonction de l’âge. Les constructions complexes considérées s’appuient sur la liste revisitée des introducteurs de complexité de Lentin (1998). À des fins d’analyse, elles ont été réparties en quatre catégories syntaxiques : les complétives, les coordonnées, les circonstancielles, et les relatives. Une analyse descriptive des constructions complexes basée sur des pourcentages a d’abord été effectuée suivie d’analyses statistiques pour vérifier la significativité des évolutions observées. Les principales conclusions de cette étude se résument comme suit. La proportion de constructions complexes est invariante entre 3 et 6 ans, laissant croire que le développement de la complexité syntaxique s’effectue au-delà de l’âge de 6 ans. Néanmoins, comme pour l’anglais, les complétives sont les constructions les plus fréquentes dans le langage de l’enfant et ce, pour chaque groupe d’âge. Viennent ensuite les coordonnées, les circonstancielles et enfin les relatives. L’ordre de développement suit ainsi l’ordre d’émergence des constructions complexes. À l’intérieur des quatre catégories syntaxiques, certains sous-types de constructions apparaissent plus fréquemment que d’autres. Dans les complétives, ce sont les infinitives prépositionnelles et les complétives introduites par la conjonction « que ». Dans les circonstancielles, ce sont les propositions introduites par « parce que » qui sont les plus utilisés, dans les coordonnées, ce sont les juxtapositions de propositions et enfin dans les relatives, les relatives sujet en « qui ». Une analyse plus détaillée du développement des sous-types de constructions complexes révèle une augmentation significative des circonstancielles exprimant la conséquence à partir de 4 ans et du discours indirect à partir de 5 ans. Toutefois, une diminution significative de l’interrogative indirecte a été relevée à partir de 5 ans. Des différences individuelles substantielles ont été observées entre les enfants d’un même groupe d’âge, en particulier dans le groupe de 4-5 ans. Les résultats obtenus mériteraient d’être vérifiés sur un corpus plus large et plus homogène afin de dégager des généralisations sur le processus de développement de la complexité syntaxique. Autre que l’âge, d’autres facteurs, tel que les facteurs cognitifs (comme la capacité de l’enfant à traiter l’information, la mémoire de travail) et les facteurs environnementaux (comme le type de discours, le langage adressé à l’enfant) seraient à considérer dans des travaux futurs. / A small but growing of research studies the development of syntactic complexity for English and European French, but to our knowledge none has focused on Quebec French. This project aims to analyze the production of complex constructions in Franco-Quebecer children aged 3 to 6, from a corpus composed of 30 samples of spontaneous language divided into three age groups of 3-4 years, 4-5 years and 5-6 years. The samples were collected while each child was playing with standard toys. Audio-visual recordings were made during the activity and then transcribed into a written corpus. Finally, SALT software was used to code the transcripts. The present study is developmental, in the sense that it seeks to generalize the process of production of syntactic complexities according to age. The complex constructions considered are based on Lentin's revisited list of complexity introducer, and for analysis purposes, they have been divided into four syntactic categories: complements, coordinates, circumstantials, and relatives. A descriptive analysis of the complex constructions based on percentages was first carried out, followed by statistical analyzes to test the significance of the changes observed. The main conclusions of this work can be summarized as follows. The proportion of complex constructions is invariant between 3 and 6 years, suggesting the development of syntactic complexity takes place beyond the age of 6 years. Nevertheless, as for English, complements are the most frequent constructions in child language, and this for each age group. This is followed respectively by coordinates, circumstantials and relatives. The order of development thus follows the order of emergence of complex constructions. Within these four syntactic categories, certain subtypes of constructions appear more frequently than others. In the category of complements, these are prepositional infinitives and the conjunction “que”. In circumstantials, "because" structures are the most used, and in coordinates, it is juxtapositions, and finally in relatives, the relative subject "qui” (who/which). A more detailed analysis of the development of complex construction subtypes reveals a significant increase in circumstantials expressing consequence from age 4, and indirect speech from age 5. However, a significant decrease in indirect questions was noted from the age of 5 years. Substantial individual differences were observed between children within the same age group, particularly in the 4-5 year one. Results obtained should be verified on a larger and more homogeneous corpus in order to draw generalizations on the process of syntactic complexity development. Other than age, other factors, such as cognitive factors (such as the child's ability to process information and working memory) and environmental factors (such as type of speech, language addressed to the child) should be considered in future work.