The reason for my research is to provide an analysis of German administrative jurisdiction. The thesis is composed of seven chapters, each of them dealing with different aspects of analysed matter. Chapter one is introductory and defines basic elements of the thesis, which are the public system of judiciary and administrative jurisdiction. The chapter is subdivided into three parts. Part one describes horizontal model of public judiciary organisation. Part two deals with vertical model of public judiciary organisation and part three with diagonal model, as mixture of elements of the previous two models. Chapter two examines historical background and relevant constitutional legislation. The chapter consists of two corresponding parts. Chapter three is subdivided into two parts and provides an outline of institutional organisation of administrative courts. Part one illustrates the court organisation. Part two looks closer at the personal component of - in part one - described courts. Chapter four concentrates on access to the administrative courts. Part one describes the condition of access to administrative courts. Part two analyses the legal actions in particular and part three the scale of judicial review. Chapter five is analysing the procedural aspect of protecting the public laws. It is...

Ce mémoire a comme objectif d’analyser le vécu des justiciables placés en détention avant jugement. Plus précisément, cette étude se veut préciser ce vécu sur les volets judiciaire et carcéral impliqués dans une mise en détention provisoire. Nous voulons de plus dégager les sentiments issus d’un tel placement. Enfin, nous souhaitions réfléchir sur le recours à la détention avant jugement à travers la perspective d’un modèle de justice basé sur la gestion des risques et sur une logique d’efficience, d’efficacité et de responsabilisation. Pour ce faire, nous avons utilisé l’approche qualitative pour mener vingt-trois entrevues auprès d’hommes et de femmes incarcérés en attente de leur jugement dans quatre établissements de détention du Québec. De ces entretiens, deux thèmes centraux sont ressortis, soit le Vécus carcéral et judiciaire du prévenu, marqué par l’incertitude, l’incompréhension, l’impuissance, la dépendance, les conditions difficiles de détention, les pertes ainsi que l’attente et les Sentiments issus d’une mise en détention provisoire, marqué par la souffrance, l’injustice et l’urgence de sortir de cette situation provisoire. Il ressort de nos analyses que la façon dont est administré le système de justice, l’opinion du public ainsi que les politiques en vigueur ont un impact sur la façon de gérer le recours à la détention provisoire en favorisant tout le contraire de sa mission initiale. Ainsi, la mesure s’en trouve conduite au détriment de l’acteur principal : le prévenu. / This thesis aim to understand and analyze the experiences of individuals placed in pretrial detention. More specifically, this study aims to clarify that lived on the judicial and prison components involved in a remand. We want more free from the felling of such an investment. Finally, we wanted to reflect on the use of pretrial detention from the perspective of justice based on risk management and on the logic of efficiency, effectiveness and accountability. To do this, we used a qualitative approach to conduct our twenty-three interviews with men and women incarcerated awaiting trial in four detention facilities in Quebec. From these interviews, two main themes emerged, namely The judicial and prison experiences of the accused, marked by uncertainty, incomprehension, helplessness, dependency, difficult conditions of detention, losses and expectation and Sentiments from a remand, marked by suffering, injustice and the urgency out of this temporary situation. It is clear from our analysis that the way the system is administered justice, public opinion and the policies in effect have an impact on how to manage the use of remand in promoting the opposite of its original. Thus, the measurement is to be conducted at the expense of the main actor: the accused.

Os Juizados Especiais Cíveis são atualmente no Brasil a principal experiência para a efetivação do acesso à justiça, constituindo-se em uma via judiciária estatal de baixo custo e fácil acesso aos cidadãos para a solução de seus conflitos e garantia de seus direitos. Pesquisas e levantamentos sobre o desempenho desse modelo indicam que, ao invés de conflitos cotidianos, é cada vez maior a presença de demandas de consumidores contra prestadores de serviço público. A presente dissertação analisa os tipos de autores, reclamados e ações interpostas em três Juizados Especiais Cíveis localizados em regiões de diferentes perfis sócio-econômicos do Município de São Paulo com o objetivo de verificar a presença deste tipo de litígio e a hipótese se esses Juizados tornaram-se de fato um \"balcão de reclamações\" contra a prestação de serviços públicos. / Currently, in Brazil, the Small Claims Courts are the main experience of effectiveness in access to justice. They are state judiciary institutions that offer low costs and easy access to the citizens for the solution of their conflicts and guarantee of their rights. Researches and surveys on this model\'s performance indicate that there is an increasing presence of demands from consumers against private agents that render public services, instead of other daily conflicts. The present study analyzes the types of plaintiffs, defendants and judicial actions in three Small Claims Courts located in regions of different social-economic profiles in São Paulo City. The aim is to verify the presence of this type of litigation and the hypothesis whether these Courts had become in fact a \" claims counter\" against private agents that render public services.

Ce mémoire a comme objectif d’analyser le vécu des justiciables placés en détention avant jugement. Plus précisément, cette étude se veut préciser ce vécu sur les volets judiciaire et carcéral impliqués dans une mise en détention provisoire. Nous voulons de plus dégager les sentiments issus d’un tel placement. Enfin, nous souhaitions réfléchir sur le recours à la détention avant jugement à travers la perspective d’un modèle de justice basé sur la gestion des risques et sur une logique d’efficience, d’efficacité et de responsabilisation. Pour ce faire, nous avons utilisé l’approche qualitative pour mener vingt-trois entrevues auprès d’hommes et de femmes incarcérés en attente de leur jugement dans quatre établissements de détention du Québec. De ces entretiens, deux thèmes centraux sont ressortis, soit le Vécus carcéral et judiciaire du prévenu, marqué par l’incertitude, l’incompréhension, l’impuissance, la dépendance, les conditions difficiles de détention, les pertes ainsi que l’attente et les Sentiments issus d’une mise en détention provisoire, marqué par la souffrance, l’injustice et l’urgence de sortir de cette situation provisoire. Il ressort de nos analyses que la façon dont est administré le système de justice, l’opinion du public ainsi que les politiques en vigueur ont un impact sur la façon de gérer le recours à la détention provisoire en favorisant tout le contraire de sa mission initiale. Ainsi, la mesure s’en trouve conduite au détriment de l’acteur principal : le prévenu. / This thesis aim to understand and analyze the experiences of individuals placed in pretrial detention. More specifically, this study aims to clarify that lived on the judicial and prison components involved in a remand. We want more free from the felling of such an investment. Finally, we wanted to reflect on the use of pretrial detention from the perspective of justice based on risk management and on the logic of efficiency, effectiveness and accountability. To do this, we used a qualitative approach to conduct our twenty-three interviews with men and women incarcerated awaiting trial in four detention facilities in Quebec. From these interviews, two main themes emerged, namely The judicial and prison experiences of the accused, marked by uncertainty, incomprehension, helplessness, dependency, difficult conditions of detention, losses and expectation and Sentiments from a remand, marked by suffering, injustice and the urgency out of this temporary situation. It is clear from our analysis that the way the system is administered justice, public opinion and the policies in effect have an impact on how to manage the use of remand in promoting the opposite of its original. Thus, the measurement is to be conducted at the expense of the main actor: the accused.

Made available in DSpace on 2016-08-18T12:54:31Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 DISSERTACAO_JOAO CARLOS DA CUNHA MOURA.pdf: 1109786 bytes, checksum: 985ee035312e2cedb16808da35d15f83 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2014-04-07 / The following dissertation seeks understand about the modern concepts of subjectivity and juridical thought, as well their institutional reflect. Investigate the relationship between I and other as driven and universalized conducts. After this theoretical definition, based upon the dialectical study on Jürgen Habermas e Michel Foucault, the work searches differentiate public and political in the democratic and constitutional context, exploring the institutional formation of State as enterprise of Law and whose interests are elevated in the construction of the later. From the logical of separation of powers, analyses the space of political domain. Finally, it intends to question about delegations of responsibilities to the Public Power: a society that inserted itself in an age of delegations of responsibilities of private matters which charges to the scope of Public Power taking actions about responsibilities and decisions of individual imprint, whose direction is given by devices (laws, sentences etc.) that creates a legitimate discourse about the theme which wants to debate, setting, at the end of a chain of relations of power, socials and normative, the Judiciary. / A dissertação que segue é a procura do entendimento sobre as noções modernas de subjetividade e pensamento jurídico, bem como o reflexo institucional que isso acarreta. Investiga a relação entre eu e outro enquanto condutas dirigidas e universalizadas. Após essa definição teórica, baseada principalmente no estudo dialético de textos de Jürgen Habermas e Michel Foucault, busca diferenciar público e político no contexto democrático e constitucional, explorando a formação institucional do Estado como criador do Direito e quais interesses são elevados na construção deste último. A partir da lógica da separação dos poderes, analisa o espaço de domínio político. Finalmente, pretende perquirir sobre a delegação de responsabilidades aos âmbitos do Poder Público: uma sociedade que se inseriu em uma era de delegação das responsabilidades de assuntos privados a qual encarrega aos âmbitos do Poder Público a tomada de providências sobre responsabilidades e decisões de cunho individual, cuja direção passa a ser dada por expedientes (leis, decisões judiciais etc.) criadores de um discurso legitimador acerca do tema que se quer debater, acionando, ao final de uma cadeia de relações de poder, sociais e normativas, o Poder Judiciário

Os Juizados Especiais Cíveis são atualmente no Brasil a principal experiência para a efetivação do acesso à justiça, constituindo-se em uma via judiciária estatal de baixo custo e fácil acesso aos cidadãos para a solução de seus conflitos e garantia de seus direitos. Pesquisas e levantamentos sobre o desempenho desse modelo indicam que, ao invés de conflitos cotidianos, é cada vez maior a presença de demandas de consumidores contra prestadores de serviço público. A presente dissertação analisa os tipos de autores, reclamados e ações interpostas em três Juizados Especiais Cíveis localizados em regiões de diferentes perfis sócio-econômicos do Município de São Paulo com o objetivo de verificar a presença deste tipo de litígio e a hipótese se esses Juizados tornaram-se de fato um \"balcão de reclamações\" contra a prestação de serviços públicos. / Currently, in Brazil, the Small Claims Courts are the main experience of effectiveness in access to justice. They are state judiciary institutions that offer low costs and easy access to the citizens for the solution of their conflicts and guarantee of their rights. Researches and surveys on this model\'s performance indicate that there is an increasing presence of demands from consumers against private agents that render public services, instead of other daily conflicts. The present study analyzes the types of plaintiffs, defendants and judicial actions in three Small Claims Courts located in regions of different social-economic profiles in São Paulo City. The aim is to verify the presence of this type of litigation and the hypothesis whether these Courts had become in fact a \" claims counter\" against private agents that render public services.

No description available.