On Mothodological Approach to Philosophical System of Sunology Abstract A Study on the Methodology of the Philosophical System of Sunology The focus of this doctoral dissertation is primarily predicated upon my attempt to explore the philosophical system of Sunology or Dr. Sun Yat-sen¡¦s works and the related mode and value of the methodology. As a consequence of this effort, this author suggests a common foundation of research and dialogue as a model for human epistemology. With this foundation in mind, the main dimensions of Sunology has been explored: (1) Regarding the philosophical system, the method of content analysis in social sciences has been applied, yielding its peculiar characteristics and mode; (2) Regarding its logical structure, the axiomatic method has been employed so as to testify that Dr. Sun¡¦s logical structure is well integrated; (3) Regarding Dr. Sun¡¦s operational dimension, the mode of interdisciplinary integration has been used, so as to clarify his operational conversion; and (4) Regarding Sunology¡¦s consistency in its logic, an attempt has been made to explore its methodology, so as to find out its form and value and, at the same time, the kind of method and approach to materialize an ideal. From the study, one should realize that mankind ought to seriously weigh the value of any given theoretical and philosophical systems in the past and fully appreciate its latent significance and validity. As a next step, one should try to put it into practice. Subsequently, an attainable framework should be constructed, so as to fulfill the projected undertaking. However, we should understand that the approach and method should not be just limited to this. At the same time, it should be noted that our framework argues that knowledge has a holistic structure which can be mutually continuous. Philosophical systems are interrelated. When analyzing any change in the relationship and its development, it is necessary to clarify the structure and operation aspects of the two. Only having done that, can we enhance the clarification and systematization of thinking. And only then, can we handle humankind and nature¡¦s mutual movement. Unless this is done, it is not possible for us to have an original look at human thinking and knowledge construction. In this connection, it should be noted that each discipline has its background and knowledge. Based on this, can we develop pervasive and automatic mode of knowledge. After that, can we have the ability to be creative. As a result, human knowledge and culture can continue its integrative process and be progressive.

我國以公開的考試方式作為考選任用政府文官的思想及制度可說具有悠久的歷史傳統 及深厚的社會基礎，並已成為我國政治結構的特色之一，而有關我國文官考試的思想 及制度，長久以來也成為中外政治社會學家及歷史學者關注、思考及研究的主題，本 文乃承繼此一傳統，然著力的重心及焦點，乃在於以巨觀（Macri View）的政治視野 ，觀察分析文官考選制度對我國政治體系斤產生的功能及意涵。 全文分五章論述，首章緒論部分係就本文研究的背景及分析的架構予以闡明，並界定 釐清指涉研究主題的相關概念；次章則析述我國文官考選制度在傳統政治及社會格局 中所突顯的政治本質及意義，並分析 國父孫中山先生在其三民主義的思想體系中對 上一制度之倡導所冀達成的政治目標；第二章係就目前我國憲政制度對文官考選制度 的規範以及目前此一制度的基本結構在我國政治系絡中運作的特色予以析論；第四章 則以目前文官考選制度中較具政治特色的考試種類為分析的焦點以析論此一制度對政 治體系所蘊含的政治功能；末章則分別從功績制原制的挑戰以及民主與效率本質上的 爭論觀點，對我國文官考選制度所蘊含的政治功能予以反省，並思考其對目前之制度 的啟示，以作為本文結論。

第一章導論。說明本文寫作之動機、研究範圍、研究方法及其限制。以及對於「主義 」的體認。 第二章趙素昂先生與 孫中山牛生二人生平及其主要政治思想之比較研究。 第三章三均主義與三民主義的時代背景及其思想浦源之比較研究。 第四章三均主義與三民主義的哲學基礎及思想體系之比較研究。 第五章三均主義與三民主義的實錢方案之比較研究。 第六章結論。以三均主義與三民主義之精神義及比較研究之結果（包含兩主義之思想 形態及評價），做為本論文之總結。

本論文凡七章，共二十三節，約十萬言，其要旨如后： 第一章「緒論」，先就題目界說，次述研究動機、目的、方法及架構，再就胡氏生平 、背景作一交代。 第二章「對於民族主義之闡揚」，探討其排滿民族思想、廢約主張、民族復興運動及 民族國際之提倡等。 第三章「對於民權主義之闡揚」，論究其母女平等思想，地方自治與分權主張，而訓 政時期的黨治理論及三民主義之立法尤為其一生思想之特色，本文特為著眼。 第四章「對於民生主義之闡揚」，由其對經濟建設、平均地權與土改方面分析，次論 及教育與民生之關係。 第五章「對於三民主義總體思想之闡揚」，以生之革命哲學為基點，論述民生史觀及 三民主義之連環性。 第六章「其他有關三民主義之重要主張」，諸如革命理論之詮釋，革命工作之進行及 其對共黨理論的批判等是。 第七章「結論」，指出胡氏在主義闡揚方面之特色及貢獻，並就其成就得失加以評析 。