本研究旨在瞭解臺北縣市高中教師知覺校長轉型領導與教師組織承諾的現況，並分析教師人口變項、學校環境變項在校長轉型領導以及教師組織承諾的差異情形，最後探討校長轉型領導與教師組織承諾之關係。 本研究以問卷調查法為主，訪談為輔，所稱「高中」校長，僅包括公立（含國立與縣市立）高級中學，不含私立高中與綜合高中。問卷調查法以自編「高中校長轉型領導與教師組織承諾調查問卷」（內含基本資料、校長轉型領導量表與教師組織承諾量表）為工具，對臺北縣市公立高中進行問卷調查。問卷以高中教師為調查對象，計調查41所學校，發出問卷668份、回收534份、有效問卷513份，可用率76.8%。調查所得資料分別以描述性統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析、Pearson積差相關、多元逐步迴歸分析等統計方法實施資料分析，據以進行研究結果的分析與討論。 研究結論如下： 一、目前高中校長轉型領導與教師組織承諾現況表現均屬中上程度。 二、在教師人口變項中，不同年齡、職務的教師在所知覺的校長轉型領導上具有顯著差異。其中以年齡較大教師以及兼任主任教師知覺的校長轉型領導程度較高。 三、在教師人口變項中，不同年齡、學歷、年資與職務的教師在教師組織承諾上具有顯著差異。其中以年齡較大教師、四十學分班結業、年資較久以及兼任主任之教師組織承諾較高。 四、在教師人口變項中，不同性別、學歷與年資教師在所知覺的校長轉型領導上沒有顯著差異。不同性別教師在教師組織承諾上沒有顯著差異。 五、在學校環境變項中，不同學校歷史與學校規模的教師在所知覺的校長轉型領導上具有顯著差異存在。其中以學校歷史為11-20年及學校規模為13-24班的教師知覺的校長轉型領導程度較高。 六、在學校環境變項中，不同學校性質、歷史與規模的教師在教師組織承諾上具有顯著差異。以學校歷史較久、班級數較多的一般高中教師組織承諾較高。 七、在學校環境變項中，不同學校性質、學校位置的教師在所知覺的校長轉型領導上沒有顯著差異。不同學校位置的教師在教師組織承諾上沒有顯著差異。 八、在不同性別校長與校長在本校年資變項中，教師所知覺的校長轉型領導有顯著差異，在教師組織承諾上沒有顯著差異。教師知覺男性校長與第一年在本校服務的校長轉型領導程度較高。 九、整體而言，高中校長轉型領導與教師組織承諾具有正相關。 十、校長轉型領導對於教師組織承諾具有預測力。 最後依據研究結果與結論，提出具體建議，以作為教育行政機關、學校校長以及未來研究的參考。 / This study aims to investigate the current situations of principals’ transformational leadership and teachers’ organizational commitment in senior high schools and to analyze the differences in teachers’ personal variables and school environmental variables concerning principals’ transformational leadership and teachers’ organizational commitment. Finally, it explores the relationship between principals’ transformational leadership and teachers’ organizational commitment. This study employs the research method of questionnaire surveys and interviews. There were two survey tools used in the study, including Principals’ Transformational Leadership Questionnaire, and Teachers’ Organizational Commitment Questionnaire. Six hundred and sixty eight subjects are randomly selected from forty-one public senior high schools in Taipei city and county. The number of effective samples is 513. The data are analyzed using the methods of description statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, and multiple stepwise regressions. The findings of this study are as follows: 1. The current situations of principals’ transformational leadership and the teachers’ organizational commitment in senior high schools are both above average. 2. Among teachers’ personal variables, there is significant difference in principals’ transformational leadership based on the two variables, teachers’ age and teachers' positions. Senior teachers and teachers with administrative affairs get higher scores. 3. Among teachers’ personal variables, there is significant difference in teachers’ organizational commitment based on the variables of teachers’ age, educational degrees, seniority and positions. Older and senior teachers, teachers who completed forty-credits in-service training courses and teachers with administrative affairs get higher scores. 4. Among teachers’ background variables, there is no significant difference in principal’s transformational leadership based on the variables of the teachers’ sex, educational degrees and seniority; and there is no significant difference in teachers’ organizational commitment between male and female teachers. 5. Among the school environmental variables, there is significant difference in principal’s transformational leadership based on the variables of the school’s history and scale. Teachers in schools older than ten years but less than twenty years and teachers in schools with the number of classes more than 13 but less than 24 get higher scores. 6. Among the school environmental variables, there is significant difference in teachers’ organizational commitment based on the variables of school type, history and scale. Teachers in older and bigger schools get higher scores. 7. Among the school environmental variables, there is no significant difference in principals’ transformational leadership based on the variables of school type and location .And there is no significant difference in teachers’ organizational commitment for teachers who serve in different school locations. 8. Based on the variables of principals’ sex and serving years in the school, there is significant difference in principal’s transformational leadership, but there is no significant difference in teachers’ organizational commitment. Male principals and the principal serving for the first year in the school get higher scores. 9. In general ,there is positive correlation between principals’ transformational leadership and teachers’ organizational commitment. 10. Principals’ transformational leadership can serve to predict teachers’ organizational commitment. In the end, based on the findings and conclusions of this research, some suggestions are given to our educational administration authorities, senior high principals and future studies for reference.

本研究旨在探討國民小學校長競值領導行為與教師組織承諾之關係。研究採用調查研究法，以臺灣北部區域之公立國民小學教師為對象，總共發出1043份問卷，問卷回收率為85.91%，有效問卷回收率則為81.30%。正式問卷回收之後，分別以百分等級、t考驗、單因子變異數分析、卡方考驗、皮爾森積差相關分析、迴歸分析等統計方式對回收資料進行分析。 本研究獲得以下十項結論： 一、國民小學校長競值領導行為較著重「競爭行為」層面，且以「均衡領導型」比例最高。 二、國民小學教師組織承諾以「努力意願」層面表現最佳。 三、男校長在校長競值領導行為之合作行為層面有較佳表現，年輕校長在校長競值領導行為各層面有較佳表現。 四、小型規模、偏遠地區的校長在校長競值領導行為各層面均有較佳表現。 五、年齡大的校長在均衡領導型的比例較低且在平庸領導型的比例較高。 六、小型規模、偏遠地區的校長在均衡領導型的比例較高且在平庸領導型的比例較低。 七、年齡大、資深及教師兼主任的教師組織承諾較高，小型規模及偏遠地區學校的教師組織承諾亦較高。 八、校長競值領導行為以「均衡領導型」在教師組織承諾的表現最佳，「不均衡領導型」次之，「平庸領導型」最不理想。 九、校長領導競值行為與教師組織承諾具有正向關連，校長競值領導行為表現愈好，則教師組織承諾愈高。 十、國小校長採行競值領導行為有助於教師組織承諾之提升，其中僅「合作行為」與「競爭行為」兩個領導行為層面具有顯著預測力，競值領導理論之「均衡觀點」宜適度修正。 根據研究結論提出下列建議： 一、對教育行政機關之建議 （一）校長職前與在職訓練，宜融入競值領導相關課程。 （二）適度控制學校經濟規模，以利於教師組織承諾之維持。 二、對國小校長之建議 （一）校長應加強領導行為之複雜性，以增進領導效能。 （二）校長要不斷吸取新知與積極進修，以強化專業智能與教育熱忱。 （三）校長宜多關懷年輕、資淺及未兼行政職務之教師，以協助其生涯發展。 （四）校長須展現兼容並蓄的領導作風，同時採取競爭行為與合作行為，以提升教師組織承諾。 三、對未來研究之建議 （一）研究對象可擴大至國中、高中等不同層級學校，乃至私立學校。 （二）研究變項可加入其他可能影響教師組織承諾的變項。 （三）研究方法可酌加使用質化方式之訪談，並在橫斷性研究的基礎上，兼採縱貫性研究，蒐集相關資料。 （四）競值領導理論架構需要國內更多實證研究去驗證其在本國教育環境的適用性與可行性。 / The purpose of the study was to investigate the relationship between principals’ competing values leadership behavior and teachers’ organizational commitment in elementary schools. The reasearch method this study adopted is survey reasearch. Data were collected from 1043 teachers of elementary schools in northern parts of Taiwan. The response rates were 85.91%; the usable rates were 81.30%. The collected data were analyzed by using the statistical methods of percentile rank, t-test, one-way ANOVA, χ2 test, Pearson product-moment correlation and regression analysis. The conclusions of this study are: 1.Among all of the dimensions of principals’ competing values leadership behavior, “Compete” is the dominant in the elementary schools. And “Balanced Style” ranks the highest. 2.Among all of the dimensions of teachers’ organizational commitment, “Effort Intention” is the dominant in the elementary schools. 3.Male principals have better performances in “Collaborate”. Young principals have better performances among all of the dimensions of principals’ competing values leadership behavior. 4.Principals in small-sized schools and in remote area schools have better performances among all of the dimensions of principals’ competing values leadership behavior. 5.Among competing values leadership behavior of elder principals, “Balanced Style” ranks lower and “Mediocre Style”ranks higher. 6.Among competing values leadership behavior of principals in small-sized schools and in remote area schools, “Balanced Style” ranks higer and “Mediocre Style”ranks lower. 7.Elder, senior teachers and directors in schools have higher organizational commitment; teachers in small-sized schools and in remote area schools also have higher organizational commitment. 8.Underneath principals’ competing values leadership behavior , Teachers have the best organizational commitment toward “Balanced Style”, the next-best organizational commitment toward “Unbalanced Style” and the worst organizational commitment toward “Mediocre Style”. 9.There is a positive relationship between principals’ competing values leadership behavior and teachers’ organizational commitment. Principals with better leadership performances tend to enhance teachers’ organizational commitment. 10.Principals ’ competing values leadership behavior promote teachers’ organizational commitment. Among all of the dimensions of principals’ competing values leadership behavior, “Collaborate” and “Compete” have significant predictabilty, “Balanced Perspective” could be modified. Based on the findings, the study offers suggestions for the education authorities, the principals of elementary schools, and the future researchers, hoping to shed light on the development of elementary school education in the future.

本研究主要目的在分析國小校長分布式領導、教師效能感與教師組織承諾之間的關係。採用問卷調查法，以臺北市地區之公立國小教師為研究對象，有效樣本為445份。問卷調查結果採用描述性統計、t考驗、變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關、逐步多元迴歸及結構方程模式等統計方式加以分析。 本研究得到下列結論： 一、目前臺北市國小教師對校長分布式領導的知覺情況屬中上程度。 二、目前臺北市國小教師對教師效能感的知覺情況屬中上程度。 三、目前臺北市國小教師對教師組織承諾的知覺情況屬中上程度。 四、教師因背景變項中「現任職務」的不同，在知覺校長分布式領導、教師效能感與教師組織承諾上有差異。 五、國小校長分布式領導、教師效能感與教師組織承諾兩兩之間具有正向的關聯。 六、國小校長分布式領導、教師效能感的分層構面，對教師組織承諾有正向的預測作用。 七、校長分布式領導可透過教師效能感，增強對教師組織承諾的正向預測力。 最後，根據研究結果提出建議，以供教育行政機關、學校及後續研究之參考。 / The intent of this study was to explore the relationship among principal’s distributed leadership, teacher efficacy and teachers’ organizational commitment in elementary schools. The questionnaire investigation method was employed, and there were 445 valid questionnaires collected from public elementary schools in Taipei City. The data was analyzed by descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson's product-moment correlation, stepwise multiple regression analysis and Structural Equation Modeling. The results were as follows: 1. The perceptions from the elementary school teachers about principal’s distributed leadership were quite well. 2. The perceptions from the elementary school teachers about teacher efficacy were quite well. 3. The perceptions from the elementary school teachers about teachers’ organizational commitment were quite well. 4. Incumbent duty had significant influences the perceptions of teachers about on principal’s distributed leadership, teacher efficacy and teachers’ organizational commitment. 5. There were significant correlations between principal’s distributed leadership and teacher efficacy as well as between teachers’ organizational commitment. 6. The sub-level of the distributed leadership and teacher efficacy could apparently predict the teachers’ organizational commitment. 7. Teacher efficacy had mediate effect on distributed leadership and influence positively teachers’ organizational commitment. According to the above conclusion, the research proposed relevant suggestions to be referenced by education administrative organizations, elementary schools , and future research.

本研究旨在瞭解臺北市國民中學校長正向領導、教師幸福感與教師組織承諾關係之現況，分析不同背景變項之教師在知覺校長正向領導、教師幸福感與教師組織承諾關係之差異情形，並探討三者之間的關係及影響，最後藉由校長正向領導與教師幸福感對教師組織承諾進行預測。 本研究採調查研究法，研究對象為臺北市國民中學教師，共計發出611份問卷，回收487份有效問卷，問卷有效率達80.0%。資料處理分別以描述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、皮爾遜積差相關及多元逐步迴歸分析等統計方式進行統計分析。 本研究獲致以下之結論： 一、臺北市國民中學教師對校長正向領導、教師幸福感與教師組織承諾的知覺程度皆屬於中高程度。 二、以校長正向領導、教師幸福感與教師組織承諾三變項而言，年齡與擔任職務皆是重要影響因素，皆已51歲以上與擔任主任或組長職務之教師知覺程度較高。 三、臺北市國民中學校長正向領導、教師幸福感與教師組織承諾的整體及各分層面，彼此之間具有正相關的關係。 四、臺北市國民中學校長正向領導與教師幸福感對教師組織承諾具有預測作用，以「校長正向領導」的預測力最佳。 最後依據研究結果與結論，提出具體建議，以供教育行政機關、學校校長與教師以及未來研究參考。 / The purpose of this study was to investigate the current development of principal’s positive leadership, teachers’ well-being and teachers’ organizational commitment in junior high schools in Taipei City, and to analyze the difference between teachers of different background variables, and to explore the relationship among the three variables. This study has aimed to predict teachers’ organizational commitment through principal’s positive leadership and teachers’ well-being. Through the use of questionnaire survey method, data were collected teacher from junior high schools in Taipei City, distributing 611 questionnaires in total. Valid questionnaires of 487 were collected, with a usable rate of 80.0%. All data were analyzed by the methods of descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression. The conclusions of this study are as follows: 1. Junior high school teachers’ perception of principal’s positive leadership, teachers’ well-being, teachers’ organizational commitment is above average 2. There are significant differences in the junior high school teachers’ perception of principal’s positive leadership, , teachers’ well-being, teachers’ organizational commitment in terms of age, and position. 3. There is a positive correlation among the principal’s positive leadership, teachers’ well-being, and teachers’ organizational commitment. 4. Principal’s positive leadership and teachers’ well-being have a predictive effect on teachers’ organizational commitment.

本研究旨在瞭解新北市國民中學校長正向領導、教師情緒勞務與教師組織承諾之現況，分析不同背景變項之教師對於校長正向領導、教師情緒勞務與教師組織承諾之知覺差異情形，並研究三者之間的關係，最後分析新北市國民中學校長正向領導與教師情緒勞務對教師組織承諾之預測力。 本研究採問卷調查法，共計抽樣37所國民中學，發出555份問卷，收回414份，回收率達75%，其中有效問卷共有371份，可用率達90%。問卷調查結果以描述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、皮爾森積差相關及多元逐步迴歸分析等統計方法進行統計分析。 根據資料分析與討論的結果，本研究之研究結果如下： 一、新北市國民中學教師知覺校長正向領導、教師情緒勞務與教師組織承諾皆屬於中高程度。 二、新北市國民中學教師因其背景變項不同，對校長正向領導的知覺程度不同，以男性、41歲以上、服務年資21年以上、兼任主任以及學校規模61班以上之教師有較高的知覺程度。 三、新北市國民中學教師因其背景變項不同，對教師情緒勞務的知覺程度不同，以41歲至50歲、服務年資21年以上以及兼任主任教師有較高的知覺程度。 四、新北市國民中學教師因其背景變項不同，對教師組織承諾的知覺程度不同，以男性、41歲以上、碩、博士學歷、服務年資21年以上以及兼任主任之教師有較高的知覺程度。 五、新北市國民中學校長正向領導、教師情緒勞務與教師組織承諾整體及各分層面間具有正相關。 六、新北市國民中學校長正向領導與教師情緒勞務對教師組織承諾具有預測力，以賦予正向意義的預測力最佳。 本研究依據校長正向領導、教師情緒勞務與教師組織承諾之相關結論，提供教育行政機關、學校教育人員建議，以做為未來教育行政以及後續研究之參考。

Clientelism is a form of informal relations between political parties and other agents, based on the exchange of benefits and favors in return for political support and loyalty. It is a legacy from the socialist era that has been shaping Serbian economic and political life for decades. These clientelistic practices could have a harmful impact on organizations if it affects employees’ organizational commitment negatively. Teachers are especially important for the economy of a country since the quality of teaching has an impact on future generations of individuals who will work, live, and contribute to the local communities and the society. The aim of this study is therefore to find out if and how teachers in the public sector perceive clientelism and how this affects their organizational commitment. A case study was made on one prominent school in Serbia, where interviews were held with eight teachers. The findings suggest that clientelism affects teachers’ organizational commitment negatively in some cases, indicating that the impact of clientelism on teachers’ organizational commitment is person specific. Clientelism does not have a direct impact on teachers’ organizational commitment but impacts commitment through proxies, i.e. antecedents to organizational commitment.

本研究旨在探究國民中學教師所知覺的校長變革領導、教師組織承諾與學校創新經營效能之關係，根據研究結果提出建議，以做為教育行政機關、國民中學校長，以及未來相關研究之參考。 本研究以臺北市立國民中學之教師為對象，採問卷調查法，以「國民中學校長變革領導、教師組織承諾與學校創新經營效能問卷」進行抽樣調查，抽取541位教師為樣本，回收415份，回收率為76.7%，以描述統計、t考驗、單因子變異數分析、積差相關分析、多元逐步迴歸等統計方法加以分析。獲得以下結論： ㄧ、臺北市國民中學整體校長變革領導現況屬良好程度，各層面以「提升危機意識」最好，以「組織變革團隊」最後。 二、不同學歷及擔任職務背景變項之教師對於校長變革領導的知覺具有顯著差異；不同教師性別、教師年齡及教師服務年資等變項無顯著差異。 三、不同學校規模、學校歷史、校長年齡、校長在該校服務年資、擔任校長總年資及校長學歷等學校背景變項之教師對於校長變革領導的知覺具有顯著差異；不同校長性別變項無顯著差異。 四、臺北市國民中學整體教師組織承諾現況屬良好程度，各層面以「努力意願」最好，以「留職傾向」最後。 五、不同教師年齡、教師最高學歷、教師服務年資及教師擔任職務等背景變項教師對於教師組織承諾的知覺具有顯著差異；不同教師性別變項無顯著差異。 六、不同學校規模及校長最高學歷背景變項之教師對於教師組織承諾的知覺具有 顯著差異；不同學校歷史、校長性別、校長年齡、校長在該校服務年資、擔任校長總年資等背景變項無顯著差異。 七、臺北市國民中學整體學校創新經營效能現況屬良好程度，各層面以「學生活動創新效能」最好，以「課程教學創新效能」層面程度最後。 八、不同教師擔任職務背景變項之教師對於學校創新經營效能的知覺具有顯著差異；不同教師性別、教師年齡、教師最高學歷及教師服務年資等變項無顯著差異。 九、不同學校歷史及校長年齡背景變項之教師對於學校創新經營效能的知覺具有顯著差異；不同學校規模、校長性別、校長在該校服務年資、擔任校長總年資，以及校長最高學歷等背景變項無顯著差異。 十、校長變革領導與學校創新經營效能之間具有正相關；教師組織承諾與學校創新經營效能之間具有正相關。 十ㄧ、校長變革領導各層面以「形塑學校文化」及「營造變革環境」對學校創新經營效能具有預測力，總解釋變異量為42.3%。 十二、教師組織承諾「留職傾向」、「努力意願」及「組織認同」三層面對學校創新經營效能均具有預測力，總解釋變異量為36.2%。 十三、校長變革領導與教師組織承諾對學校創新經營效能之聯合預測，共有「形塑學校文化」、「努力意願」、「留職傾向」、「營造變革環境」及「組織認同」五個層面對整體學校創新經營效能具有預測力，總解釋變異量為50.1％。 最後，根據研究結果提出下列幾點建議： ㄧ、對教育行政機關的建議 (一)規劃變革領導相關課程及訓練，提昇新任校長變革領導能力。 (二)多挹注相關資源給小型及老舊學校，以強化學校競爭力。 (三)鼓勵資深且治校有方之校長至亟須大力整頓之小校或老校服務，以救亡圖存，提升學校創新經營效能。 二、對國中校長的建議 (ㄧ)洞悉學校發展需求，掌握時機節奏進行變革領導。 (二)拔擢人才充分溝通，將組織發展目標與個人發展目標相結合。 (三)鼓勵教師在職進修與時俱進，與學校之各項變革相契合。 (四)發揮教師社群力量，授權學歷高有意願教師帶動學校課程與教學創新。 (五)落實教學輔導照顧資淺教師，發揮老幹新枝經驗傳承的力量，並強化組織承諾與留職傾向。 (六)設立各項教師獎勵措施，激勵教師內外在成就動機，增強對學校向心力。 (七)積極爭取經費與各項資源，改善硬體設備，打造嶄新優質的學校環境。 (八)建構各項創新變革方案回饋循環模式，營造創意的學校文化。 / The main objective of this study is to investigate the relationship among principals’ change leadership, teachers’ organizational commitment, and school innovative management effectiveness which teachers perceive, and to propose suggestions based on the results, for the reference of educational administration authorities, junior high school principals, and relevant future studies. In this study, faculty of junior high schools in Taipei City is picked as subjects and questionnaire survey is adopted. The researcher formulates “junior high school principals’ change leadership, teachers’ organizational commitment, and school innovative management effectiveness questionnaire,” and randomly selects 541 teachers as samples. In a rate of 76.7%, 415 replies are returned and then analyzed in methods of descriptive statistics, t-test, one-way ANOVA, product-moment correlation analysis and stepwise multiple regression. The following conclusions are obtained: 1. The present situation of principals’ change leadership is up to fine level. Among all the aspects, “raising the sense of danger” ranks to the top, while “organizing teams for change” ranks otherwise. 2. Teachers bearing different education backgrounds and duties perceive principals’ change leadership significantly differently; while teachers of other variables such as gender, age, and service seniority show no significant difference. 3. Teachers of different demographic variables such as school size and history; principals’ age, local seniority, total seniority, and education background perceive principals’ change leadership significantly differently; while the variable, principals’ gender, shows no significant difference. 4. The present situation of teachers’ organizational commitment is up to fine level. Among all the aspects, “desire for putting efforts” ranks to the top, while “tendency to retain the job” ranks otherwise. 5. Teachers of different demographic variables such as age, education level, service seniority, and duties perceive teachers’ organizational commitment significantly differently; while the variable of gender shows no significant difference. 6. Teachers of different demographic variables such as school size and principals’ education level perceive teachers’ organizational commitment significantly differently; while some other variables such as school history; principals’ gender, age, local seniority, and total seniority show no significant difference. 7. The present situation of school innovative management effectiveness is up to fine level. Among all the aspects, “innovative effectiveness of pupil activity” ranks to the top, while “innovative effectiveness of course and instruction” ranks otherwise. 8. Teachers bearing different duties perceive school innovative management effectiveness significantly differently; while teachers of other variables such as gender, age, education level, and seniority show no significant difference. 9. Teachers of some demographic variables such as school history and principals’ age perceive school innovative management effectiveness significantly differently; while some other variables such as school size; principals’ gender, local seniority, total seniority, and education level show no significant difference. 10. Principals’ change leadership is positively related to school innovative management effectiveness; teachers’ organizational commitment is also positively related to school innovative management effectiveness. 11. School innovative management effectiveness is most predictable for “to shape school culture” and “to establish change environment” among all the aspects of principals’ change leadership, accounting for 42.3% of total variance. 12. Teachers’ organizational commitment is predictable for each aspect, including “tendency to retain the job,” “desire for putting efforts,” and “approval of organization,” accounting for 36.2% of total variance. 13. When combining principals’ change leadership and teachers’ organizational commitment, school innovative management effectiveness is predictable for five aspects, including “to shape school culture,” “desire for putting efforts,” “tendency to retain the job,” “to establish change environment,” and “approval of organization,” accounting for 50.1% of total variance. Finally, based on the results, the following suggestions are proposed: 1. Suggestions for educational administration authorities (1)Arrange related courses and trainings of change leadership to improve newly nominated principals’ ability to lead changes. (2)Invest more relevant resources to small or old schools to make them more competitive. (3)Encourage senior principals who are good at management to aid small or old schools in need, for saving and improving their innovative management effectiveness. 2. Suggestions for principals in junior high schools (1)Understand what is required for school development thoroughly, and seize the timing for processing change leadership. (2)Select talented people, communicate sufficiently, and combine organizational and personal goals of development. (3)Encourage teachers to take in-service education to catch up the pace of the times, and to better cooperate with changes applied at school. (4)Fulfill the power of teachers’ community through authorizing highly educated and willing ones to promote innovation of courses and instructions. (5)Perform instructive guidance and assistance to help less senior teachers, pass on experiences, and strengthen organizational commitment and tendency to retain the job. (6)Establish reward system to inspire teachers’ both inner and outer motivation, and enhance the centripetal force to their school. (7)Actively endeavor to obtain money and resources and improve hardware to build quality environment. (8)Establish circulating feedback pattern of innovative change blueprints to produce creative atmosphere of school.