本研究旨在瞭解臺北市國民中學校長正向領導、教師幸福感與教師組織承諾關係之現況，分析不同背景變項之教師在知覺校長正向領導、教師幸福感與教師組織承諾關係之差異情形，並探討三者之間的關係及影響，最後藉由校長正向領導與教師幸福感對教師組織承諾進行預測。 本研究採調查研究法，研究對象為臺北市國民中學教師，共計發出611份問卷，回收487份有效問卷，問卷有效率達80.0%。資料處理分別以描述性統計、獨立樣本t檢定、單因子變異數分析、皮爾遜積差相關及多元逐步迴歸分析等統計方式進行統計分析。 本研究獲致以下之結論： 一、臺北市國民中學教師對校長正向領導、教師幸福感與教師組織承諾的知覺程度皆屬於中高程度。 二、以校長正向領導、教師幸福感與教師組織承諾三變項而言，年齡與擔任職務皆是重要影響因素，皆已51歲以上與擔任主任或組長職務之教師知覺程度較高。 三、臺北市國民中學校長正向領導、教師幸福感與教師組織承諾的整體及各分層面，彼此之間具有正相關的關係。 四、臺北市國民中學校長正向領導與教師幸福感對教師組織承諾具有預測作用，以「校長正向領導」的預測力最佳。 最後依據研究結果與結論，提出具體建議，以供教育行政機關、學校校長與教師以及未來研究參考。 / The purpose of this study was to investigate the current development of principal’s positive leadership, teachers’ well-being and teachers’ organizational commitment in junior high schools in Taipei City, and to analyze the difference between teachers of different background variables, and to explore the relationship among the three variables. This study has aimed to predict teachers’ organizational commitment through principal’s positive leadership and teachers’ well-being. Through the use of questionnaire survey method, data were collected teacher from junior high schools in Taipei City, distributing 611 questionnaires in total. Valid questionnaires of 487 were collected, with a usable rate of 80.0%. All data were analyzed by the methods of descriptive statistics, independent t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation, and multiple regression. The conclusions of this study are as follows: 1. Junior high school teachers’ perception of principal’s positive leadership, teachers’ well-being, teachers’ organizational commitment is above average 2. There are significant differences in the junior high school teachers’ perception of principal’s positive leadership, , teachers’ well-being, teachers’ organizational commitment in terms of age, and position. 3. There is a positive correlation among the principal’s positive leadership, teachers’ well-being, and teachers’ organizational commitment. 4. Principal’s positive leadership and teachers’ well-being have a predictive effect on teachers’ organizational commitment.

本研究係以「後設分析」為研究方法，共採納國內二十四篇「人格特質與教師幸福感」與「社會支持與教師幸福感」的相關研究，以探究我國當前人格特質、社會支持與教師幸福感的現況，並探討不同調節變項對「人格特質與教師幸福感」或「社會支持與教師幸福感」的相關性之影響情形，其分析結果如下： 整體人格特質與教師幸福感在隨機效果模式下，其平均效應值為0.4330，表示教師的人格特質對其幸福感具有中高程度(.10<0.4330<.50)的正向影響。然整體人格特質與教師幸福感間卻存在高異質性(Q=65.22；p<.001)，經研究結果發現，具有顯著差異的調節變項有：教師性別、婚姻狀況、教育程度以及任教階段共四項。 此外，人格特質的細部構面（神經質、外向性、開放性、友善性、嚴謹性）與教師幸福感在隨機效果模式下，除神經質對教師幸福感具有中程度(.10<|-0.3952|<.50)的負向影響外；其他人格特質，如外向性、開放性、友善性、嚴謹性等都對教師幸福感具有中至高程度的正向影響。然人格特質的細部構面（神經質、外向性、開放性、友善性、嚴謹性）與教師幸福感間卻都存在高異質性(p<.001)，經研究結果發現，具有顯著差異的調節變項有：教師性別、年齡、婚姻狀況、教育程度、任教階段以及任教地區共六項。 而社會支持與教師幸福感在隨機效果模式下，其平均效應值為0.5564，表示教師若獲得社會支持的程度愈高，其幸福感也會愈高，兩者間具有高程度(0.5564＞.50)的正向影響。然儘管社會支持與教師幸福感間存在高異質性(Q=326.45；p<.001)，經研究後，受限於所納入的資料，未能發現具有顯著差異的調節變項。 最後，根據研究發現提出具體建議，以供教師、學校、相關教育行政單位及未來研究者參考。 / The present research employs meta-analysis as methodology based on the findings of 24 researches related to both the relationships between personality trait and teacher’s well-being, and the relationships between social support and teacher’s well-being. The purpose of this study is to understand the current status of the relationships between personality trait, social support and teacher’s well-being in Taiwan. The main findings of this study were summarized as follows: Under the random-effects mode, the average effect value suggests that the mean effect size of personality trait and teacher’s well-being is 0.4330. There is a high heterogeneity between the overall personality traits and teacher’s well-being(Q=65.22；p<.001). For the relationships between personality trait and teacher’s well-being,4 moderators（i.e., teacher gender, marital status, educational level and teaching stage）have a statistically significant impacts on the mean effect size for outcomes. Under the random-effects mode, the average effect results between the detail of personality traits and teacher’s well-being suggests that in personality traits, only neuroticism on teacher’s well-being with moderate (.10 <| -0.3952 | <.50) negative impact; other personality traits, such as extroversion, openness, agreeableness, conscientiousness, etc. have a sense of teacher’s well-being moderate to high degree of positive impact. There is a high heterogeneity between the details of the personality traits and teacher’s well-being(p<.001). For the relationships between The detail of the personality traits and teacher’s well-being, 6 moderators（i.e., teacher gender, age, marital status, educational level, teaching stage and teaching area）have a statistically significant impacts on the mean effect size for outcomes. Under the random-effects mode, the average effect value suggest that the mean ESs of social support and teacher’s well-being is 0.5564. Although there is a high heterogeneity between social support and teacher well-being (Q = 326.45; p <.001). Due to limitations of the study, there shows no significant difference on moderator variables The findings not only provide helpful information to teachers, schools, education authorities, but also generate practical suggestions for future studies.