Thesis (Ed.D.)--Boston University / PLEASE NOTE: Boston University Libraries did not receive an Authorization To Manage form for this thesis or dissertation. It is therefore not openly accessible, though it may be available by request. If you are the author or principal advisor of this work and would like to request open access for it, please contact us at open-help@bu.edu. Thank you. / In a review of the literature, no studies were found on the achievement of school-age English-Speaking Caribbean students. This study was initiated to remedy this lack by examining the characteristics of twenty-one 12-18 year old high achieving and low achieving English-speaking Caribbean students and the influence of twenty-one parents' and seventeen teachers' attitudes on the students. Support was found for Bandura's theory that role models influence people's self-efficacy which in turn influences their choice, effort and persistence. The study further supports the resiliency theory which suggests that people can be successful, despite environmental challenges. This study also found that the unidentified bilingual status of English-speaking Caribbean 12-18 year old students and their new environment with unfamiliar teaching styles, regulations and procedures were additional challenges not commonly identified in the literature. In order to support self-efficacy and promote resiliency, 1) better assessment of English-speaking Caribbean students' ability to use Standard English and 2) greater planning and collaboration among parents, teachers and students are recommended. The following are questions to be addressed in future research: 1) What are the similarities and differences among students, parents and teachers regarding expectations of ESC students' school performance? 2) What are ESC students' reading and writing proficiency levels in Standard English? 3) How can schools support self-efficacy and resiliency characteristics in all students? / 2031-01-01

Sir William Macpherson's conclusion - following his public inquiry into the racist murder of the black teenager Stephen Lawrence in 1993 - that the Metropolitan Police was 'institutionally racist', was a seminal moment for policing in Britain. The publication of the Macpherson report in 1999 has been rightly regarded as a victory for the Stephen Lawrence Family Campaign (SLFC), whose activities had been crucial in building pressure on the newly-elected Labour Government to hold a public inquiry into the Metropolitan Police's murder investigation. However, to focus solely on the Lawrence case, and the SLFC, is to obscure the existence of a longer struggle waged by black Londoners to expose the racism that had affected their experience of policing since the Second World War. This thesis explores the development of grassroots political activism within London's Afro-Caribbean community around the issue of policing from 1945 to 1993. Using material from local community archives, this thesis represents the first attempt at documenting the history of race and policing in London from the perspective of the capital's Afro-Caribbean population. Moreover, by taking the end of the Second World War as its starting point, it also breaks new ground in charting the way Afro-Caribbean people in London organised politically in opposition to racist policing prior to the murder of Stephen Lawrence in 1993. Ever since people of Afro-Caribbean descent began to settle in London in increasing numbers in the aftermath of the Second World War, they have continually expressed concern about the way they were policed. While opposition to policing initially emerged in a highly unorganised form, this was fundamentally altered by the arrival of the British black power movement in the late 1960s. Despite its short existence, black power's emphasis upon independent black grassroots political activism outlived the movement and became a feature of the way black Londoners' challenged racist policing during the 1970s and 1980s. Therefore, this thesis contends that the grassroots political campaign that developed around the case of Stephen Lawrence cannot be viewed in isolation from the historical efforts of black people in London to expose racism within the Metropolitan Police.

Racial inequalities in health are well documented in the literature, specifically with respect to Blacks and Whites in the United States (U.S.) These stark racial differences in health may be explained by the weathering hypothesis, whereby Blacks experience earlier deterioration of health resulting from cumulative stress from living in a race-conscious society. Despite the abundance of research on the weathering hypothesis to account for racial disparities, few research studies have attempted to empirically test this theory as it relates to cardio-metabolic disease disparities. Using nationally representative data from the National Survey of American Life (NSAL) and the National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R), the weathering hypothesis was examined in the context of cardio-metabolic disease disparities among a U.S. sample of Whites, African-Americans and Caribbean Blacks. This dissertation was organized into three main papers: The first paper (“Application of the Weathering Hypothesis: A Systematic Review of the Research”) is a systematic review of the existing literature that empirically tests the weathering hypothesis, which informed the methods in papers 2 and 3 of this dissertation. The second paper (“Cardio-Metabolic Disease Disparities: Comparisons between Caribbean Blacks, African-Americans and Whites to Test the Weathering Hypothesis”) tests the weathering hypothesis as an explanation for health disparities compared with other potential explanations (e.g. minority stress, socioeconomic status, health behaviors and genetics). The third paper (“Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Cardio-metabolic Disease: The Role of Racial Group Identification and Discrimination-Specific Coping”) assesses whether and to what extent racial socialization factors (racial identity and coping strategies) affect racial disparities in cardio-metabolic disease, as well as influence the effect of racial discrimination on cardio-metabolic disease. The systematic review informs future studies of the weathering hypothesis as a comprehensive framework for understanding racial disparities in health outcomes, but highlights the need for additional studies examining the impact of weathering on health outcomes other than birth outcomes. In paper 2, the results showed some support for the weathering hypothesis, but the patterns were not fully consistent with the predictions of this hypothesis. The results in paper 3 revealed racial differences in racial socialization factors (racial identity and coping strategies), but these factors did not explain racial/ethnic disparities in cardio-metabolic disease. Future studies should examine the effect of structural racism on racial disparities in cardio-metabolic disease as another test of the weathering hypothesis.

This essay investigates Jamaica Kincaid´s the book Annie John (1985) and its protagonist Annie John´s search for a coherent self-and/or a de-colonized identity through a subject transformation. Using postcolonial feminism, including theorists such as Homi K. Bhabha and Stuart Hall, I suggest that the protagonist Annie John does not perform a subject transformation as she is unable to embrace the state of hybridity needed to perform such a transformation. Annie John is a colonial subject drawn to the two worlds in which she resided, the East and West- and cannot create herself in the presence of them both. I conclude that Annie John´s mother, under the influence of colonialism and patriarchy, is part reason as to why Annie John is unable to perform this transformation. With the help of postcolonial feminism, I find that as Annie John cannot recover her mother from this double oppression of colonialism and patriarchy. The conclusion of this essay proposes that the protagonist Annie John does not manage to create a subject formation as she is not able to reside in a state of hybridity between her own culture and that of her colonizer.

As fronteiras são linhas imaginárias, foram desenhadas como resultado de vários processos sociais de índole política, econômica ou cultural. Geralmente são reconhecidas como áreas dinâmicas e de tensão, especialmente em territórios com herança colonial. Entre Colômbia e Nicarágua há uma tensão histórica da fronteira que envolve a solicitação do exercício de soberania tanto em uma área marinha quanto no arquipélago de San Andrés, Providencia e Santa Catarina, no Mar do Caribe. Tal impasse acabou resolvendo-se por uma delimitação feita através de uma sentença do Tribunal Internacional de Justiça de Haia, em 2012, como resultado de um processo de pouco mais de uma década, e que redefiniu a área suscetível de usufruto no mar em ambos os países. A bacia do Caribe ocidental, no âmbito de tensão da fronteira, posiciona-se como uma área de interesse do mercado global dado o progresso de ambos os países para abrir espaços para a concessão à exploração de hidrocarbonetos no mar a empresas não nacionais; vale lembrar que dentro da região encontra-se o Canal de Panamá, uma das vias de transporte de matérias-primas e mercadorias mais importantes do mundo, e um futuro segundo canal transoceânico que irá atravessar a parte sul da Nicarágua. A posição do petróleo no cenário global de energia, bem como em vários processos industriais, faz com que ocupe um lugar de destaque no sistema econômico contemporâneo e represente ainda um dos motores do modo de vida de uma grande parte da sociedade; a iminente diminuição das reservas resultou no desenvolvimento de técnicas de exploração para extração nas áreas mais profundas, incluindo o fundo do mar, tais explorações fora da costa são chamadas de offshore, e se apresentam como uma alternativa à crise do petróleo. A constante procura de recursos naturais, especialmente de petróleo em várias regiões do planeta tem se traduzido em diversas crises, com ênfase naquelas que geram grandes impactos socioambientais, tais como as mudanças climáticas e a devastação de ecossistemas locais que merecem uma abordagem geopolítica ambiental. O resultado desta pesquisa é dividida em duas partes, cada uma delas com dois capítulos, onde são abordadas as questões de soberania, fronteira, mercado global de petróleo e as posições da Colômbia e da Nicarágua ante a possibilidade de extrair petróleo na zona fronteiriça do mar. / Las fronteras son líneas imaginarias trazadas a partir del resultado de diferentes procesos sociales de índole político, económico o cultural. Generalmente son reconocidas como áreas dinâmicas de tensión, especialmente en territorios con herencias coloniales. Entre Colombia y Nicaragua há existido una histórica tensión fronteriza que incluye el interés por el ejercicio de soberanía en el archipiélago de San Andrés, Providencia y Santa Catalina, y en el área marítima subyacente, en el mar Caribe; dicha frontera fue delimitada por la Corte Internacional de Justicia de La Haya em 2012, como resultado de un proceso de un poco más de una década; lo que redefinió el área susceptible de usufructo en el mar, de ambos países. La cuenca del Caribe occidental, en este marco de tensión fronteriza se posiciona como área de interés del mercado global dado el avance de ambos países en abrir espacios a empresas no nacionales para la concesión de exploración/explotación de hidrocarburos en el mar; es importante considerar que en la región se localiza el canal de Panamá, una de las vías de transporte de mercancías y materias primas más importante del mundo, a la vez que se está gestando la construcción de un segundo canal transoceánico que atravesaría la zona sur de Nicaragua, ambos puntos de importancia geoestratégica del comercio global. El lugar del petróleo en el panorama energético global, hace que ocupe un lugar destacado en el sistema económico contemporáneo. La inminente disminución de las reservas de combustibles fósiles ha permitido el desarrollo de técnicas de exploración en áreas de mayor profundidad, que incluyen los lechos marinos, denominadas offshore, las cuales se presentan como alternativa a la crisis petrolera. En relación a lo anterior y dada la exhaustiva búsqueda de recursos naturales a lo largo de la historia, especialmente de petróleo, en áreas del planeta diversas, ha desencadenado diferentes crisis, entre ellos impactos socio-ambientales complejos, como el Cambio Climático y la devastación de ecosistemas locales, los cuales merecen un abordaje geopolítico ambiental. Esta investigación evidencia como el petróleo continua siendo un recurso estratégico a pesar de las recientes crisis de precio y disponibilidad, a su vez que demuestra que el interés binacional, tanto de Colombia como de Nicaragua, de entrar en el mercado offshore de producción de petróleo, de forma que el área de tensión binacional cobra importancia global. Los resultados de la investigación se presentan en dos partes en las cuales son tratados los asuntos de soberanía, frontera, mercado global y las posiciones de ambos países frente al mercado global de petróleo

No description available.

During the 17th and 18th century a number of Jews settled on the English island of Barbados and the Dutch island of St. Eustatius. The Jews on both islands erected synagogues and a number of key structures essential for a practicing religious community. Although they had strong connections that spanned across geo-political boundaries, the synagogue compounds on each island became key places for the creation and maintenance of a Jewish community. I argue that these synagogue compounds represented diasporic places that must be understood through a tri-partite model that explores the relationships between the Jewish community and its hostland, other dispersed Jewish communities, and the homeland. Furthermore, during the early modern period, these compounds were "heterotopias" within the colonial landscape. Heterotopias, as places of alternative ordering, speak to the constructions of social and cultural difference. For the Jews, the synagogue compounds provided them a chance to create a place founded on their cultural values and ideals within the Christian controlled spaces of both islands. Alternatively, for the Christian communities on the islands, the synagogue compounds highlighted how the Jewish community had different loyalties and values than they did. In exploring the ways that these places served as heterotopias, and for how long they were sites of alternative ordering, this dissertation demonstrates the fundamental role that places play in the formation and maintenance of diasporic communities and the dynamic relationship between spaces, places, and identities in the early modern period.

No description available.

No description available.

No description available.