戴淑茵. / "2003年3月". / 附歌譜. / 論文(哲學碩士)--香港中文大學, 2003. / 參考文獻 (leaves 172-178). / 附中英文摘要. / "2003 nian 3 yue". / Fu ge pu. / Dai Shuyin. / Lun wen (zhe xue shuo shi)--Xianggang Zhong wen da xue, 2003. / Can kao wen xian (leaves 172-178). / Fu Zhong Ying wen zhai yao. / Chapter 第一章 --- 緒論 --- p.1 / Chapter 1.1 --- 研究目的與架構 --- p.1 / Chapter 1.2 --- 研究概況 --- p.3 / Chapter 1.3 --- 研究方法與資料 --- p.6 / Chapter 第二章 --- 創作背景 --- p.11 / Chapter 2.1 --- 香港的歷史與文化 --- p.11 / Chapter 2.2 --- 香港的粤劇音樂 --- p.15 / Chapter 2.3 --- 仙鳳鳴劇團的組織 --- p.16 / Chapter 2.4 --- 《再世紅梅記》的寫作背景與内容 --- p.18 / Chapter 2.5 --- 小結 --- p.22 / Chapter 第三章 --- 音樂的創意 --- p.24 / Chapter 3.1 --- 整體的結構 --- p.24 / Chapter 3.2 --- 「中」、「西」結合的器樂組合 --- p.32 / Chapter 3.3 --- 新作小曲的特色 --- p.49 / Chapter 3.4 --- 唱詞的特點 --- p.57 / Chapter 3.5 --- 小結 --- p.70 / Chapter 第四章 --- 創作過程中的創意 --- p.71 / Chapter 4.1 --- 改編的原創性 --- p.72 / Chapter 4.2 --- 創作的分工 --- p.84 / Chapter 4.3 --- 創作手法的改變一由「依曲填詞」到「依詞譜曲」 --- p.97 / Chapter 4.4 --- 創作流程的變遷 --- p.102 / Chapter 4.5 --- 小結 --- p.109 / Chapter 第五章 --- 結論 --- p.110 / Chapter 5.1 --- 創意與傳統的交融 --- p.110 / Chapter 5.2 --- 多元文化的結合 --- p.113 / Chapter 5.3 --- 文化演變的結果 --- p.115 / 附錄 --- p.119 / 參考資料 --- p.172

No description available.

Abstract not available

This dissertation examines the early modern representation of the Ottoman sultan as merciless murderer of his own family in dramas depicting Islam that are also revenge tragedies or history plays set in empires. This representation arose in part from historical events: the civil wars that erupted periodically from the reign of Sultan Murad I (1362-1389) to that of Sultan Mehmed III (1595-1603) in which the sultan killed family members who were rivals to the throne. Drawing on these events, theological and historical texts by John Foxe, Samuel Purchas, and Richard Knolles offered a distorted image of the Ottoman sultan as devoid of pity for anyone, but most importantly family, an image which seeped into early modern drama. Early modern English playwrights repeatedly staged scenes in the dramas that depict Islam in which one member of a family implores another for pity and to remain alive. However, family killing became diffuse and was not the sole province of the Ottoman sultan or other Muslim character: the Spanish, Romans, and the Scythians also kill their kin. Additionally, they kill members of their own religious, ethnic, and national groups as family killing expands to encompass a more general self destruction, self sacrifice, and self consumption. The presence of the Muslim character, Turk or Moor, serves to underscore the political and religious significance of other characters' family killing. Part of the interest of English playwrights in the Ottoman history of family killing is that England had suffered its own share of family killing or the specter of it during the Wars of the Roses, the Babington Plot against Queen Elizabeth's life, and the martyrdom of many English during the Protestant Reformation. Through an analysis of such plays as Thomas Kyd's The Spanish Tragedy , William Shakespeare's Titus Andronicus , and Christopher Marlowe's Tamburlaine I and II , among others, I argue that English playwrights represented family killing to contend with England's past of civil war, its Protestant Reformation present, and its political future. The dramas that depict Islam portray rulers who elevate empire building above kinship bonds and who feel no pity for those in their own kinship, national, or religious groups. The plays illustrate that the emotion, pity, leads a ruler to the just action of extending mercy and that the converse, lack of pity, leads a kingdom or empire to injustice and destruction. The plays ultimately declare empire building unjust because it is pitiless, creating an argument against empire for English audiences.

Dès la fin du XVIIe siècle, Corneille, Racine et Molière se voient attribuer une supériorité indiscutable sur l’ensemble des autres dramaturges contemporains. Cette hiérarchie dont l’histoire littéraire actuelle a hérité continue à nous faire admettre comme une évidence la précellence accordée à ce trio de « classiques » et les études consacrées aux auteurs dits « mineurs » interrogent rarement le statut d’auteur « majeur ». Nous avons souhaité étudier le processus d’élaboration du statut de grand dramaturge. Cette thèse met ainsi en lumière les différents aspects et manifestations de cette construction, dont elle retrace les étapes du vivant des auteurs — des années 1640 à 1680 —, tout en identifiant les facteurs permettant de comprendre pourquoi ces trois dramaturges bénéficièrent d’un tel statut, au détriment de leurs confrères et concurrents. Ce travail observe ensuite l’immédiate postérité de nos auteurs — des années 1670 à 1720 —, afin de montrer comment la hiérarchisation et la classification à l’œuvre dans le double processus de majoration et de minoration desdramaturges posent les bases de l’histoire du théâtre français. Pour comprendre la constitution du panthéon des grands dramaturges, nous analysons les mécanismes d’écriture de l’histoire du théâtre dit « classique » et faisons émerger le processus de mythification qui préside à l’apparition de la « triade sacrée » Corneille- Racine-Molière. Nous expliquons alors comment l’histoire du théâtre français s’écrit à la gloire de ces auteurs, à partir et autour de leurs trois figures, classicisées et transformées en symboles du « siècle de Louis XIV ». / From the late 17th century, Corneille, Racine and Molière are given an undeniable superiority over all other contemporary playwrights. This hierarchy, from which current literary history has inherited, continues to make us consider the pre-eminence granted to this “classical” trio as obvious and the studies devoted to the so-called “minor” authors rarely question the “major” author status. Our goal has been to study the elaboration process of the great playwright status. Thus, this PhD thesis highlights the different aspects and manifestations of this construction, retracing its stages during the authors’ lifetime — from the 1640s to the 1680s — while identifiying the factors allowing to understand why these three playwrights were given such a status, at the detriment of their colleagues and competitors. Moreover, this work studies our authors’ immediate posterity — from the 1670s to the 1720s — in order to show how the hierarchy and classification at work in the “majoration” and “minoration” process lay the foundation of French theater history. To understand how the great playwrights’ pantheon was built, we analyze the writing mechanisms of “classical” theater history and bring out the process of mythification that leads to the birth of the “sacred triad” Corneille-Racine-Molière. We then explain how the French theater history is written in praise of these authors, from and around their three figures, classicized and converted into symbols of “the age of Louis XIV”.

vii, 157 p. / In the second half of the nineteenth century, the Aesthetic Movement in England coalesced literary and visual arts in unprecedented ways. While the writers associated with the Aesthetic Movement reflected on visual art through the exercise of criticism, their encounters with painting, portraiture, and sculpture also led to the articulation of a problem. That problem centers on the fascination with the attentive look, or the physical act of seeing in a specialized way for an extended period of time that can result in a transformation in the mind of the observer. In this dissertation, I consider how Dante Gabriel Rossetti, Henry James, and Oscar Wilde utilize the attentive look in their poetry, fiction, and drama, respectively. As I argue in this dissertation, the writers associated with the Aesthetic Movement approach and treat attention as a new tool for self-creation and self-development. As these writers generally attempt to transcend both the dullness and repetitiveness associated with modern forms of industrialized labor as well as to create an antidote for the endless distractions affiliated with the modern urban environment, they also develop or interrogate systems for training and regulating the senses. What these writers present as a seemingly spontaneous attentive engagement with art and beauty they also sell to the public as a specialized form of perception and experience that can only be achieved through training or, more specifically, through an attentive reading of their works. While these writers attempt to subvert institutional authority, whether in the form of the Royal Academy or the Oxford University system, they also generate new forms of authority and knowledge. Even though the Aesthetic Movement is not a homogeneous set of texts and art works, the Aesthetic Movement can be characterized in terms of its utilization of attentiveness as a way to both understand and create modern subjectivity. / Committee in charge: Dr. Forest Pyle， Chair； Dr. Sangita Gopal， Member； Dr. Linda Kintz， Member； Dr. Kenneth Calhoon， Outside Member

Submitted by Rodrigo Morais Leite (leitemorais@ig.com.br) on 2018-06-26T13:55:39Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Tese (Versão Final).pdf: 3414715 bytes, checksum: a15097db7716a2205fbc956ec6188a85 (MD5) / Rejected by Laura Mariane de Andrade null (laura.andrade@ia.unesp.br), reason: Solicitamos que realize correções na submissão seguindo as orientações abaixo: - o item "resumo" deve ser apresentado em folha única. As mesmas regras servem para o item "abstract". Caso seja necessário, consulte o modelo em: http://www.ia.unesp.br/Home/Biblioteca/orientacoes-para-a-normalizacao-de-trabalhos-academicos_iaunesp_26_03.pdf Caso haja dúvidas, consulte a biblioteca. Agradecemos a compreensão. on 2018-06-27T00:23:40Z (GMT) / Submitted by Rodrigo Morais Leite (leitemorais@ig.com.br) on 2018-06-27T01:50:53Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Tese (Versão Final).pdf: 3414715 bytes, checksum: a15097db7716a2205fbc956ec6188a85 (MD5) / Rejected by Laura Mariane de Andrade null (laura.andrade@ia.unesp.br), reason: Solicitamos que realize correções na submissão seguindo as orientações abaixo: - o item "resumo" deve ser apresentado em folha única. As mesmas regras servem para o item "abstract". Ou seja, o “resumo” deve constar em uma página e o “abstract” na próxima. Caso seja necessário, consulte o modelo em: http://www.ia.unesp.br/Home/Biblioteca/orientacoes-para-a-normalizacao-de-trabalhos-academicos_iaunesp_26_03.pdf Caso haja dúvidas, consulte a biblioteca. Agradecemos a compreensão. on 2018-07-05T12:59:42Z (GMT) / Submitted by Rodrigo Morais Leite (leitemorais@ig.com.br) on 2018-07-05T13:40:01Z No. of bitstreams: 1 Tese (Versão Final).pdf: 3414715 bytes, checksum: a15097db7716a2205fbc956ec6188a85 (MD5) / Approved for entry into archive by Laura Mariane de Andrade null (laura.andrade@ia.unesp.br) on 2018-07-11T12:44:11Z (GMT) No. of bitstreams: 1 leite_rm_dr_ia.pdf: 3190092 bytes, checksum: 12769717101f026f9ce6e10cd98aee06 (MD5) / Made available in DSpace on 2018-07-11T12:44:11Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 leite_rm_dr_ia.pdf: 3190092 bytes, checksum: 12769717101f026f9ce6e10cd98aee06 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2018-05-18 / A pesquisa apresenta uma reflexão sobre a historiografia teatral de Décio de Almeida Prado, importante crítico e historiador do teatro brasileiro. Intelectual ligado à terceira fase do movimento modernista, que alguns autores designam como a “Geração de 1945”, seu pensamento estético e historiográfico possui laços estreitos com uma certa concepção de mundo moderna, donde se explica o título conferido ao trabalho. A tese defendida objetiva demonstrar os diferentes imbricamentos existentes entre os ensaios de Prado sobre o passado cênico nacional e semelhante cosmovisão, procurando deslindá-los à luz de certos parâmetros como, por exemplo, a filosofia da história e algumas noções estético-teatrais que conformariam essa vertente de sua obra. Em que pese, contudo, o foco mais concentrado nos ensaios historiográficos, informe-se que suas críticas de espetáculos, produzidas ao longo de anos, não foram ignoradas, na medida em que fazem parte do escopo deste estudo, cujo projeto, dentro de suas possibilidades, é analisar o pensamento de Prado como um todo. Tendo isso em vista, para uma melhor compreensão do assunto, empreendeu-se uma comparação, que atravessa a pesquisa do início ao fim, entre o ensaísmo teatral de Prado e o ensaísmo literário de Antonio Candido, lembrando que ambos começaram suas carreiras juntos ao fundarem, em parceria com outros nomes, como Paulo Emílio Salles Gomes e Ruy Coelho, a revista Clima (1941-1944). Pelo fato de suas respectivas historiografias apresentarem muitos vínculos entre si, a ponto de ser possível afirmar que elas pertenceriam a um mesmo projeto intelectual, tal cotejo acabou se mostrando fundamental para as pretensões embutidas na tese, fazendo com que este trabalho se tornasse, à sua maneira, uma obra de historiografia comparada. / This research presents a reflection on the theatrical historiography of Décio de Almeida Prado, an important critic and historian of Brazilian theater. As an intellectual associated with the third phase of the modernist movement, which some authors call the “Generation of 1945”, his aesthetic and historiographical thinking has close ties with a certain conception of the modern world, which explains the title given to this paper. The thesis defended here aims to demonstrate the different overlaps existing between Prado’s essays on the country’s theatrical past and similar worldviews, aiming to address them in the light of certain parameters, such as the philosophy of history and some aesthetic and theatrical notions that shape this aspect of his writings. However, despite the more concentrated focus on his historiographical essays, the reviews of performances he penned over the years have not been ignored, to the extent that they are included within the scope of this paper, which is intended, as far as this is possible, to analyze Prado’s overall thinking. That said, in order to provide a better understanding of the topic, a comparison has been made, throughout the research from start to finish, between Prado’s theatrical essays and the literary essays of Antonio Candido, recalling that they both started their careers together when they founded, in partnership with other names such as Paulo Emílio Salles Gomes and Ruy Coelho, the magazine Clima (1941-1944). Given that their respective historiographies are related in many ways, to the point that it is possible to say that they belong to the same intellectual tradition, this comparison proved to be instrumental for the aspirations of this thesis, turning this paper, in its own way, into a comparative historiography.

This mini-thesis investigates the concepts of refusal and rupture as a postdramatic revolt and how these terms can be applied and read within the context of analysing contemporary devised performance in South Africa. The argument focuses on the efficacy of Hans-Thies Lehmann’s postdramatic terminology and the potential of its use in an appreciation of contemporary performance analysis. I investigate the potential in South African contemporary devised performance practice to challenge prevailing modes of traditional dramatic expectation in order to restore the experience of discovery and questioning in the spectator. This research is approached through a qualitative process which entails a reading and application of selected critical texts to the analysis with an application of Lehmann’s terminology. This reading/application is engaged in a dialogue with the interpretative and experiential aspects of selected South African devised performances with particular focus on four cross-disciplinary works selected for analysis. Chapter One functions as an introduction to the concept of postdramatic theatre and the application of the terms refusal and rupture as deconstructive keywords in the process of a devised performance. Chapter Two is an analysis of several South African contemporary performances with particular focus on Body of Evidence (2009) by Siwela Sonke Dance Company, Wreckage (2011) a collaboration by Ubom! Eastern Cape Drama Company and First Physical Theatre Company, Discharge (2012) by First Physical Theatre Company, and Drifting (2013) by The Rhodes University Drama Department. This mini-thesis concludes with the idea that with an understanding of refusal and rupture in a postdramatic revolt, contemporary devised performance achieves an awakening in its spectators by deconstructing the expectation of understanding and the need for resolve; the assumption and need for traditional dramatic structures and rules are challenged. Instead, it awakes an experience of discovery and questioning.

The following is a historical analysis on the Moscow Art Theatre’s (MAT) tours to the United States in 1923 and 1924, and the developments and changes that occurred in Russian and American theatre cultures as a result of those visits. Konstantin Stanislavsky, the MAT’s co-founder and director, developed the System as a new tool used to help train actors—it provided techniques employed to develop their craft and get into character. This would drastically change modern acting in Russia, the United States and throughout the world. The MAT’s first (January 2, 1923 – June 7, 1923) and second (November 23, 1923 – May 24, 1924) tours provided a vehicle for the transmission of the System. In addition, the tour itself impacted the culture of the countries involved. Thus far, the implications of the 1923 and 1924 tours have been ignored by the historians, and have mostly been briefly discussed by the theatre professionals. This thesis fills the gap in historical knowledge.

No description available.