Spelling suggestions: "subject:"athermal therapy"" "subject:"ephermal therapy""
11 |
The effect of a three dimensional growth environment on cell death and stress protein expressionSong, Alfred Seunghoon 02 July 2012 (has links)
Understanding the cellular response thermal stress is important for improving thermoablative treatments of cancer. Cells generally respond to thermal stress by expressing heat shock proteins, or undergoing cell death by apoptosis or necrosis. Most of our detailed knowledge regarding these cellular phenomena has been gathered in vitro in two dimensional (2D) environments. Yet, little is known about how prostate cancer cells respond to thermal stress in a more physiologically relevant three dimensional (3D) environment. Several approaches were used to investigate this question, all of which focused on controlled heating of cells in both two dimensional (2D) and 3D culture. Tools and assays were developed to investigate cellular response to thermal stress in 2D and 3D environments. A computer-controlled heating apparatus was constructed to heat cell cultures to precise temperatures and durations. Three dimensional growth environments were produced using Matrigel, a commercially available extracellular matrix (ecm) mixture. Transcriptional expression of heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) was measured using a green fluorescent protein (GFP) reporter gene under the control of an HSP promoter. Apoptosis, necrosis and HSP70 transcription was measured using flow cytometry analysis. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) and microscopy revealed that transmembrane targets may be involved in the mechanism of the effect which 3D culture has on the cellular response to heat shock. The results herein demonstrate that the 3D growth environment, may be protective to the cell in that the percentage of cells that undergo apoptosis or necrosis when exposed to heat shock are reduced. Furthermore, HSP70 expression is enhanced in 3D culture at a specific thermal dose and integrins and heat shock proteins may be part of the mechanism by which the ecm exerts its protective effect against thermal stress. / text
|
12 |
Vasodilatação induzida pelo calor através de dispositivo portátil no leito na insuficiência cardíaca descompensada / Thermal vasodilation using a portable infrared thermal blanket in decompensated heart failureMarcelo Villaça Lima 24 March 2014 (has links)
Fundamento: medidas adjuvantes têm sido propostas para o tratamento de pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca, algumas não farmacológicas, como o uso do calor. Apesar dos resultados positivos para pacientes clinicamente estáveis, não existem trabalhos relacionados ao tratamento com calor na fase descompensada da insuficiência cardíaca em pacientes em uso de drogas vasoativas. Objetivos: avaliar os efeitos hemodinâmicos agudos do calor aplicado através da manta térmica em pacientes com insuficiência cardíaca descompensada (ICD) refratária. Para isso foi estabelecido como desfechos o aumento do índice cardíaco e a redução da resistência vascular sistêmica no primeiro dia de seguimento. Como objetivo secundário, avaliar se sessões repetidas de calor por cinco dias consecutivos promoveria ou sustentaria os efeitos hemodinâmicos obtidos agudamente e, se reduziria os níveis de BNP ao longo do seguimento. Métodos: ensaio clínico randomizado aberto, prospectivo, com grupo controle em pacientes portadores de ICD. O estudo foi dividido em duas fases. Na primeira fase foram estudados pacientes em um único dia e foi avaliado o efeito agudo do calor antes e após a intervenção. Na segunda fase o calor foi avaliado através de sessões diárias por cinco dias consecutivos. Foi utilizada a manta térmica por radiação infravermelha para o aquecimento dos pacientes. As medidas hemodinâmicas foram avaliadas por método invasivo através do cateter de Swan-Ganz e de maneira não invasiva pelo método de modelflow. Os pacientes estavam em uso de inotrópico endovenoso contínuo, no perfil hemodinâmico C segundo a classificação clínico-hemodinâmica de Stevenson e foram considerados refratários após tentativa de retirada da droga vasoativa sem sucesso. A população do estudo foi dividida em 2 grupos: grupo T (termoterapia) e grupo C (controle). O grupo T foi submetido à vasodilatação térmica através da manta térmica na temperatura de 50°C por 40 minutos adicionalmente ao tratamento medicamentoso. Os pacientes do grupo C mantiveram o tratamento medicamentoso e a manta térmica foi posicionada da mesma maneira por 40 minutos, porém desligada. Análise estatística: as variáveis foram analisadas pelo teste exato de Fisher ou razão de verossimilhança. A normalidade foi avaliada com o teste de Komogorov-Smirnov. As variáveis quantitativas foram apresentadas por média e desvio padrão. As médias foram avaliadas com análise de variância para medidas repetidas (ANOVA). Quando significante, utilizou-se contrastes para discriminar as diferenças entre os momentos. As medidas avaliadas em um único momento foram comparadas com teste t-Student. Foi utilizado o coeficiente de correlação de Pearson para a análise da correlação entre as medidas. Foram considerados estatisticamente significantes os valores de p < 0,05. Resultados: entre outubro de 2007 e abril de 2013, 165 pacientes foram avaliados para possível elegibilidade. Destes, 12 pacientes recusaram participar do estudo e 105 foram excluídos pelos critérios de exclusão. Foram incluídos 48 pacientes, entretanto, 10 pacientes foram excluídos prérandomização. Foram avaliados inicialmente 8 pacientes que foram submetidos a sessões de calor para segurança e validação do método e 30 pacientes foram randomizados até o término do estudo. No total, 38 pacientes foram estudados. Não houve diferença nas características basais entre os grupos estudados. Na primeira fase foram avaliados 38 pacientes, pré e pós-intervenção. A vasodilatação térmica foi capaz de aumentar o índice cardíaco em 24,1% e de reduzir a resistência vascular sistêmica em 16%. Na segunda fase os pacientes foram seguidos por 5 dias consecutivos conforme randomização e apresentaram melhora hemodinâmica significativa somente nos primeiros dois dias. O maior aumento do índice cardíaco foi de 23,3% e a maior redução da resistência vascular sistêmica foi de 19,3% no grupo tratado com calor. A partir do terceiro dia não houve mais benefício da termoterapia. Da mesma forma, não verificamos diferença entre os níveis de BNP dosados entre o primeiro e quinto dias de seguimento entre os grupos. Conclusões: o calor como vasodilatador foi capaz de aumentar o índice cardíaco e diminuir a resistência vascular sistêmica nos primeiros dias de tratamento na ICD. Entretanto, não houve benefício adicional em sessões repetidas por cinco dias consecutivos ou melhora dos níveis de BNP. Os dados sugerem que a termoterapia pode vir a representar uma abordagem terapêutica adjuvante para o tratamento dos pacientes com ICD. No entanto, um ensaio clínico randomizado com número maior de pacientes é necessário para explorar sua potencial efetividade clínica / Background: adjuvant measures have been proposed for the treatment of heart failure patients, some non-pharmacological, such as the use of heat. Despite the positive results for clinically stable patients, there are no studies related to use thermal therapy in patients with decompensated heart failure (DHF) and in use of vasoactive drugs. Objectives: To evaluate the acute hemodynamic effects of heat applied through the thermal blanket in patients with refractory decompensated heart failure. It was established as outcomes the increase of cardiac index and decrease of systemic vascular resistance on the first day of follow-up. Secondary objective was to evaluate whether repeated sessions of heat for five consecutive days would promote or sustain the hemodynamic effects obtained acutely, and if it would reduce BNP levels during the follow-up. Methods: open label randomized clinical trial, with control group, in patients with DHF. The study was divided into two phases. In the first phase, patients were studied in a single day and the acute effects of heat were evaluated before and after intervention. In the second phase, the effects of heat were evaluated by daily sessions for five consecutive days. An infrared thermal blanket was used to heating the patients. Hemodynamic measurements were assessed through invasive Swan-Ganz catheter and noninvasively by the method of modelflow. The patients were receiving continuous intravenous inotropic therapy and were classified in the profile C according to Stevenson´s clinical and hemodynamic classification and were considered refractory after failure in the attempted of withdraw the vasoactive drugs. The study population was divided into 2 groups: group T (thermal therapy) and group C (control). Group T was submitted to vasodilation through the thermal blanket at 50 °C for 40 minutes in addition to drug treatment. Patients in group C maintained the drug treatment and the thermal blanket was positioned in the same way for 40 minutes, but turned off. Statistical analysis: The variables were analyzed by Fisher\'s exact test or likelihood ratio. Normality was assessed with Komogorov-Smirnov test. Quantitative variables were presented as mean and standard deviation. Means were evaluated using analysis of variance for repeated measures (ANOVA). When significant, contrasts were used to discriminate the differences between times. Measurements evaluated at a single time were compared with Student\'s t test. We used the Pearson correlation coefficient to analyze the correlation between the measurements. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: Between October 2007 and April 2013, 165 patients were evaluated for possible eligibility. Of these, 12 patients refused to participate in the study and 105 were excluded by the exclusion criteria. There were included 48 patients, however, 10 patients were excluded in the pre-randomization. Eight patients were initially evaluated and were submitted to heart sessions for security and validation of the method and 30 patients were randomized until the end of the study. In total, 38 patients were studied. There were no differences in the baseline characteristics between the study groups. In the first phase, 38 patients were analyzed pre and post-intervention. The thermal vasodilation was able to increase the cardiac index by 24.1% and to reduce the systemic vascular resistance by 16%. In the second phase, patients were followed up for 5 consecutive days according to randomization and showed significant hemodynamic improvement only in the first two days. The largest increase in cardiac index was 23.3 % and the greatest reduction in systemic vascular resistance was 19.3 % in the group treated with heat. From the third day there was no benefit of thermal therapy. Likewise, there was no difference in the levels of BNP measured in the first and fifth day of follow-up between groups. Conclusions: heat as a vasodilator was able to increase the cardiac index and lower the systemic vascular resistance in the first days of treatment in the DHF. However, there was no additional benefit in repeated sessions for five consecutive days or improvement in the BNP levels. The data suggest that thermal therapy may come to represent a therapeutic approach for the adjuvant treatment of patients with DHF. Nonetheless, a randomized clinical trial with a larger number of patients is needed to explore its potential clinical effectiveness
|
Page generated in 0.0745 seconds