University, Diss., 2004--Frankfurt (Main). / Zsfassung in engl. und dt. Sprache.

Laboratory bioassay was used to determine the pathogenicity of nine isolates of fungi of the genera Metarhizium, Beauveria and Clonostachys to the parasitic mite, Varroa destructor. All nine isolates were pathogenic to V. destructor with Metarhizuim anisopliae UAMH 9198, Clonostachys rosea UAMH 9161 and Beauveria bassiana GHA being the most pathogenic within their respective species. Metarhizium anisopliae UAMH 9198 was more lethal to V. destructor than B. bassiana GHA and C. rosea UAMH 9161 with LC50 values of 1.6 x 10(5), 9.6 x 10(6) and 5.4 x 10(6) conidia/mL, respectively. Metarhizium anisopliae and B. bassiana significantly affected brood and adult honey bee survivorship and their immune responses. They were lethal to the bees with LC50s of 3.70 x 10(6) and 2.62 x 10()5 conidia/mL, respectively. The effect of temperature and thymol on conidia germination, production and colony growth of the fungal isolates was determined. Temperature significantly affected conidia germination, production and colony growth (P < 0.05) but thymol did not. Efficacy of the two most promising isolates (M. anisopliae UAMH 9198 and B. bassiana GHA) as potential bio-control agents against V. destructor in hives was evaluated. Fungal inocula were applied as dry formulation, with corn flour as carrier, using dispenser tray and dusting applications. Treatments were either applied alone or in combination with thymol to determine any synergistic effects. All treatments significantly increased mite mortality (P < 0.05), however, the mite control efficacy varied between fungal treatments and application methods. Combined treatments of fungi and thymol caused significantly higher mite mortality than single fungal treatments, which showed control levels of ≤61%. Significant differences in mite mortality were found between the two delivery methods with the differences depending on the fungal isolate. The results suggest that M. anisopliae UAMH 9198 would be a more effective bio-control agent for the management of V. destructor in honey bee colonies than the other isolates tested when dispensed continuously in hives using delivery methods such as a dispenser tray. However, future research is needed to improve delivery methods and investigate the effect of carriers used in the formulation on the efficacy of such entomopathogenic fungi. / Ontario Ministry of Agriculture and Food (OMAF), University of Guelph

The number of drones and genetic diversity among drones are essential components to a well mated queen. Varroa destructor preferentially parasitizes drone brood, and is thought to be responsible for the loss of feral populations that once provided additional drones for honey bee mating areas. It is necessary to use miticides (e.g. coumaphos) in managed colonies to control V. destructor. Little is known about the sublethal effects of these compounds, which are directly introduced into the hive. In response to growing concerns about the successful mating of honey bee queens, drone honey bees were exposed to coumaphos, during drone development. Sperm and seminal vesicles were sampled among drones that were exposed to coumaphos and drones that were not exposed to coumaphos, but were parasitized by Varroa destructor. There were no significant differences found between the two treatments in terms of seminal vesicle size and sperm numbers. These results indicate that drones parasitized by V. destructor have similar sperm quantities as drones exposed to coumaphos. / Graduation date: 2004

The European honey bee, Apis mellifera, is a primarily beneficial insect for mankind. It has been utilized by humans for thousands of years for the products and services it provides. Crop pollination and honey production are two of the most economically beneficial activities of the honey bee. Though they have been important for many centuries and immeasurable amounts of effort have been expended investigating the methods and means to harness their natural abilities, a far lesser amount of attention has been directed towards exploring their molecular makeup. These experiments involve identifying modification of gene transcription as a result of exposure to a pheromone or a parasite. This data will provide information on the general types of transcripts involved in the biochemical response of the honey bee to the two stimuli and will also provide specific candidates for further investigation of their potential role in downstream behavioral events.

The European honey bee, Apis mellifera, is a primarily beneficial insect for mankind. It has been utilized by humans for thousands of years for the products and services it provides. Crop pollination and honey production are two of the most economically beneficial activities of the honey bee. Though they have been important for many centuries and immeasurable amounts of effort have been expended investigating the methods and means to harness their natural abilities, a far lesser amount of attention has been directed towards exploring their molecular makeup. These experiments involve identifying modification of gene transcription as a result of exposure to a pheromone or a parasite. This data will provide information on the general types of transcripts involved in the biochemical response of the honey bee to the two stimuli and will also provide specific candidates for further investigation of their potential role in downstream behavioral events.

The honey bee is one of the most familiar insects in the world, and plays an important role in the global economy providing essential pollination services to crops, fruit trees and vegetables. However, honey bee health is severely threatened by the ectoparasitic mite Varroa destructor, which feeds on the hemolymph of pupal and adult bees, resulting in loss of nutrients and circulatory fluids, decreased overall body weight and eventually the death of the bees. To investigate the molecular defense mechanisms of the honey bee against varroa mite infestation, we employed DNA microarray analysis to compare gene expression of two contrasting honey bee colony phenotypes selected from the Saskatraz breeding program. One designated as G4 is susceptible to the varroa mite, while the other designated as S88 is highly tolerant to the varroa. Total RNAs were isolated from bees at two different stages, dark-eyed pupa and adult worker, infected or non-infected with varroa mites, and used for DNA microarray analysis. The results showed that distinct sets of genes were differentially regulated in the varroa-tolerant and varroa-susceptible honey bee phenotypes, with and without varroa infestation. In both phenotypes, there were more differentially-expressed genes identified at the pupal stage than at the adult stage, indicating that at the pupal stage honey bees are more responsive to the varroa infestation than adult bees. In the phenotype comparisons, substantially more differentially-expressed genes were found in the tolerant than susceptible line, indicating that the tolerant phenotype has an increased capacity to mobilize the expression of the genes in response to varroa mite infestation. Based on function, the differentially-expressed genes could be classified into groups that are involved in olfactory signal transduction, detoxification, metabolism and exoskeleton formation, implying several possible mechanisms for the host-parasite interaction and resistance. Quantitative RT-PCR was used to confirm the data obtained from the DNA microarray hybridization. Eleven out of twelve genes selected based on the microarray data showed consistent expression patterns measured by both methods. Overall, comprehensive evaluation of the gene expression of honey bees in response to the mite infestation by DNA microarray has revealed several possible molecular mechanisms for the host defense against the pest. Identification of highly differentially expressed genes between the two phenotypes provides potential biomarkers that can be used for breeding honey bees resistant to the varroa mite.

Universiẗat-Gesamthochsch., Diss.--Kassel, 2000.

Thesis (M.Sc.)--Acadia University, 1999. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 46-48). Also available on the Internet via the World Wide Web.

Thesis (M.Sc.)--Acadia University, 1999. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 46-48). Also available on the Internet via the World Wide Web.

The discovery of the honeybee-specific ectoparasitic mite Varroa destructor in South Africa in October 1997 raised the spectre of massive honeybee colony losses as has occurred in most parts of the world where the varroa mite has been found. This was particularly concerning in Africa because of the importance of honeybees in the pollination of indigenous and commercial crops, and because of the numbers of small-scale beekeepers in Africa. The mite has now spread throughout South Africa and is found in almost all honeybee populations, both commercial and wild, and is also now present in most neighbouring countries. Varroa has not left a trail of destruction in South Africa as had been expected and no large scale collapse of the honeybee population occurred, despite the majority of beekeepers deciding not to protect their hives with chemical varroacides. Some colony losses did occur at the front of the varroa spread, and all colonies were found to be deleteriously affected by the mite which developed populations of 50 000 and more in some colonies. Infected colonies were also not as efficient as pollinators as uninfected colonies. Colonies exhibited all the same varroa effects witnessed in other parts of the world, with the exception that the majority of colonies did not die as a result of the infestation. The relative tolerance of African bees to the varroa mite has been confirmed by the long-term monitoring of both wild honeybee populations and commercial stock, and by population dynamic studies of the mites. In both wild and managed honeybee populations varroa appears to have been reduced to the status of an incidental pest. The development of mite tolerance took 3-5 years in the Cape honeybee (Apis mellifera capensis) and 6-7 years in the Savanna honeybee (Apis mellifera scutellata). The rapid development of mite tolerance in the Cape bee is thought to be due to the well developed removal of varroa-infested brood and the short post-capping period of worker brood. Together these resulted in a very rapid increase in infertile mites in the colony, the collapse of the mite population, and varroa tolerance. Tolerance does not develop as rapidly in Savanna honeybees as the post-capping period in these bees is similar to that of European bees and does not result in as many infertile mites. Nonetheless, varroa tolerance in Savanna bees develops more rapidly than would be the case in European bees because of more effective hygienic removal of varroa-infested brood. In both Cape and Savanna bees, the absence of varroacide applications and a “live-and-let-die” approach to the wild and commercial honeybee populations was crucial to the developed of population-wide varroa tolerance, in contrast to the selective breeding and pesticide treadmill practised in most parts of the world in an effort to get rid of the varroa mite. Varroa destructor is concluded not to be a serious threat to honeybees and beekeeping in Africa, and efforts should be made to prevent the use of pesticides and techniques that could hinder the development of natural mite tolerance in Africa. / Dissertation (MSc (Entomology))--University of Pretoria, 2007. / Zoology and Entomology / unrestricted