This paper deals with the importance of music lessons in Bavarian special needs schools. It is based on three hypotheses and develops various possible reasons regarding the above-mentioned concern in relation to the focus on schools working with students' challenging be-haviour. For this purpose, literature and an expert interview are used to derive special conditions of these schools. Moreover, this paper examines the circumstances of musical education and possible ways of dealing with them at schools. The aim of this paper is to derive general possibilities for teaching. The concept of 'music ed-ucation units' (Musikvermittlungseinheiten) is used as a basis for suggesting a concrete way of integrating music education into everyday school life. These are short, approximately 10-minute units in which music is used and taught as part of structuring and rhythmising phases. Chances and limits of these music education units as well as recommendations for action and exemplary suggestions for their design are elaborated at the end of the paper. / This paper deals with the importance of music lessons in Bavarian special needs schools. It is based on three hypotheses and develops various possible reasons regarding the above-mentioned concern in relation to the focus on schools working with students' challenging behaviour. For this purpose, literature and an expert interview are used to derive special conditions of these schools. Moreover, this paper examines the circumstances of musical education and possible ways of dealing with them at schools. The aim of this paper is to derive general possibilities for teaching. The concept of 'music education units' (Musikvermittlungseinheiten) is used as a basis for suggesting a concrete way of integrating music education into everyday school life. These are short, approximately 10-minute units in which music is used and taught as part of structuring and rhythmising phases. Chances and limits of these music education units as well as recommendations for action and exemplary suggestions for their design are elaborated at the end of the paper.

Bereits vorangegangene Studien haben zeigen können, dass eine verstärke Generali- sierung von Furcht sowohl bei Erwachsenen, bei denen beispielsweise eine Angststörung oder eine PTSB diagnostiziert wurde, aber auch bei gesunden Kindern eine Rolle spielt. In unserer Studie untersuchten wir eine Gruppe Kinder und Jugendliche (n = 31, m = 25, w = 6; Alter = 13.35 ± 2.03), die eine Störung des Sozialverhaltens aufwiesen, auf die Konditionierbarkeit von Furcht und eine mögliche Furchtgeneralisierung. Diese Gruppe verglichen wir mit einer gesunden Kontrollgruppe (n = 29, m = 11, w = 18; Alter = 14.28 ± 2.43). Als Generalisierungsstimuli verwendeten wir ein Furchtgeneralisierungsparadigma mit zwei Frauengesichtern, die in vier Schritten aneinander angeglichen wurden. Zusätzlich führten wir mit beiden Probandengruppen ein Dot-Probe-Paradigma zur Objektivierung von Aufmerksamkeitsprozessen im Sinne eines Attentional Bias oder Attentional Avoidance mit emotionalen Gesichtern durch. Wir konnten eine erfolgreiche Furchtkonditionierung für beide Gruppen erreichen. Im Vergleich mit der gesunden Kontrollgruppe zeigte die externalisierende Probandengruppe eine verstärke Furchtgeneralisierung. Hinsichtlich der subjektiven Valenz- und Kontingenzratings wurden die Unterschiede besonders deutlich. Eine verstärkte Generalisierungsneigung bei erhöhter Trait-Angst konnten wir nicht finden. Die externalisierende Gruppe zeigte im Vergleich mit neutralen Gesichtern bei den emotionalen Gesichtern insgesamt einen Attentional Bias. Am deutlichsten war dabei eine verstärkte Aufmerksamkeitslenkung hin zu glücklichen Gesichtern festzustellen. Für die gesunde Kontrollgruppe konnten wir keine Besonderheiten bezüglich der Aufmerksamkeitsrichtung finden. Weiterführende Studien sollten mit größ- eren Probandengruppen und nach Geschlecht und Alter gepaarten Probanden durch- geführt werden. Mit externalisierenden Probanden sollte ein Furchtgeneralisierungs- paradigma mit neutralen Stimuli (z.B. Ringe) gewählt werden, um eine subjektive Wertung emotionaler Gesichter bei den Ratings als Störfaktor auszuschließen. Für externalisierende Probanden sollte außerdem die Ausprägung von CU-Traits erfasst und die Dauer der Testung verkürzt oder auf zwei Termine aufgeteilt werden, um eine ausreichende Konzentrationsfähigkeit zu ermöglichen. / Previous studies have already been able to show that increased generalization of fear plays a role both in adults diagnosed with anxiety disorder or PTSD, but also in healthy children. In our study we examined a group of children and adolescents (n = 31, m = 25, f = 6; age = 13.35 ± 2.03) with conduct disorder for possible fear conditioning and overgeneralization of fear. We compared this group with a healthy control group (n = 29, m = 11, f = 18; age = 14.28 ± 2.43). As generalization stimuli we used a fear generalization paradigm with two female faces that were matched in four steps. In addition both groups performed a dot-probe task to objectify attentional processes in terms of attentional bias or attentional avoidance with emotional faces. We were able to achieve successful fear conditioning for both groups. Compared with the healthy control group the externalizing subject group showed increased fear generalization. Regarding the subjective valence and contingency ratings the differences were particularly evident. We could not find an increased generalization tendency for subjects with increased trait anxiety. The externalizing group showed an attentional bias towards emotional faces compared to neutral faces. Most clearly there was an increased attentional bias towards happy faces. For the healthy control group we could not find any particularities regarding attentional bias or avoidance. Further studies should be conducted with larger subject groups and subjects paired by gender and age. With externalizing subjects a fear-generalization paradigm with neutral stimuli (e.g., rings) should be chosen to exclude subjective scoring of emotional faces in the ratings as a confounding factor. For externalizing subjects, the expression of CU traits should also be recorded and the duration of testing should be shortened or divided into two sessions to enable sufficient concentration.

The diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease (PD) follows the UK Brain Bank Criteria, which demands bradykinesia and one additional symptom, i.e. rigidity, resting tremor or postural instability. The latter is not a useful sign for the early diagnosis of PD, because it does not appear before Hoehn and Yahr stage 3. Early symptoms of PD which precede the onset of motor symptoms are hyposmia, REM sleep behavioral disorder, constipation, and depression. In addition, an increasing number of patients whose PD is related to a genetic defect are being described. Thus, genetic testing may eventually develop into a tool to identify at-risk patients. The clinical diagnosis of PD can be supported by levodopa or apomorphine tests. Imaging studies such as cranial CT or MRI are helpful to distinguish idiopathic PD from atypical or secondary PD. SPECT and PET methods are valuable to distinguish PD tremor from essential tremor if this is clinically not possible. Using all of these methods, we may soon be able to make a premotor diagnosis of PD, which will raise the question whether early treatment is possible and ethically and clinically advisable. / Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.

The diagnosis of Parkinson’s disease (PD) follows the UK Brain Bank Criteria, which demands bradykinesia and one additional symptom, i.e. rigidity, resting tremor or postural instability. The latter is not a useful sign for the early diagnosis of PD, because it does not appear before Hoehn and Yahr stage 3. Early symptoms of PD which precede the onset of motor symptoms are hyposmia, REM sleep behavioral disorder, constipation, and depression. In addition, an increasing number of patients whose PD is related to a genetic defect are being described. Thus, genetic testing may eventually develop into a tool to identify at-risk patients. The clinical diagnosis of PD can be supported by levodopa or apomorphine tests. Imaging studies such as cranial CT or MRI are helpful to distinguish idiopathic PD from atypical or secondary PD. SPECT and PET methods are valuable to distinguish PD tremor from essential tremor if this is clinically not possible. Using all of these methods, we may soon be able to make a premotor diagnosis of PD, which will raise the question whether early treatment is possible and ethically and clinically advisable. / Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.

No description available.