Made available in DSpace on 2014-12-17T15:07:05Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 EduardoJPSL.pdf: 687770 bytes, checksum: ea9efa61b72d97e3eb90288327c79c87 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2006-12-19 / The present dissertation analyses the philosophy of Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) and the short story written by Jo?o Guimar?es Rosa (1908-1967), A hora e vez de Augusto Matraga (1946) seeking to point out the possibility of the philosophic application of some Nietzschean ideas to enlarge the aesthetic value of the short story. It has been especially aimed at applying the concept of the noble superior being described by Nietzsche, the ubermensch, to the hero s ontological nature, Augusto Matraga. Nietzsche s postulates of the will to power, the elements suggested of the trial between Dionysus and Apollo and the ascetic ideal, will be especially relevant to this work, which intends to establish until what point the hero can be conceived as a good ascetic person, in so far as his noble ontological nature trespass the Christian morality, bringing him closer to the man who, according to Nietzsche, is beyond good and evil. Some Heideggerian concepts will also be relevant in order to reinforce the idea that the judgment created about Matraga is just an appearance that does not contemplate his essential Being, contributing to veil his real tragic-ontological valour, what implies that the aesthetic power of the short has been under valued / O presente trabalho tem como objetivo comparar a filosofia de Friedrich Nietzsche (1844-1900) e o conto de Jo?o Guimar?es Rosa (1908-1967), A hora e vez de Augusto Matraga (1946), no intuito de revelar a possibilidade da aplica??o da filosofia nieztscheana para expandir o valor est?tico do conto e possibilitar a compreens?o do protagonista, Augusto Matraga, como o prot?tipo do ser superior nobre descrito por Nietzsche, o ubermensch. Considerando os conceitos do fil?sofo sobre a vontade de pot?ncia, os elementos dionis?aco e apol?neo, bem como o ideal asc?tico, pretende-se estabelecer at? que ponto o protagonista pode ser concebido como um bom asceta, na medida em que, devido a sua natureza ontol?gica nobre, transgride a moral crist? e se aproxima do conceito do homem que est? al?m do bem e do mal. Al?m da filosofia de Nietzsche, usar-se-? alguns postulados filos?ficos de Martin Heidegger (1889-1976) para refor?ar a id?ia de que o ju?zo criado sobre Matraga ? apenas uma apar?ncia que n?o contempla a ess?ncia do seu Ser, contribuindo para camuflar seu car?ter tr?gico-ontol?gico, o que implica na diminui??o da for?a est?tica do conto

Made available in DSpace on 2017-07-10T18:26:12Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Cleber Baessa Mestriner.pdf: 391701 bytes, checksum: 2c3ce6ecae93348a0d4fb88a1c0cab00 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2007-06-14 / This dissertation analyses the psychology concept on Nietzsche?s philosophy and its relation to the typology and hierarchy. First of all, it was verified that the meaning of the Nietzsche psychological research is based on the concept of power will which is considered by the German philosopher as an interpretation of the world and not a description. The power will has as mean characteristic to affirm the effectiveness as a come of strengths in fight for more power and depose of truth the metaphysics oppositions. These strengths, or impulses, are understood as power quanta that differ each other and they relate with all of other quanta in order to intensify. Therefore, the power intensity is what differ the strengths. This way, we understand the fight of the strengths as a domination process, which produce impulses complex or hierarchies. The development of these hierarchical configurations of strengths comes from the dynamic establishment of commander and commanded, that is, from dominion relations that are expressed in ways of life, human types. Types, however, are not understood as essential manifestations of a being, but as strength relation?s symptoms and their hierarchical configurations. These symptoms are the object of the psychology proposed by Nietzsche, and not the human soul or conscience. The human types are analyzed by the German philosopher through two great and focused perspectives, one of ascendancy (powerful and heavily hierarchizated impulses) and another of life?s decadence (weak and anarchic impulses). From this general aspect of Nietzsche typology, is verified the importance of the types, considering that for the appearance of a type is necessary the existence of its differentiated, because there is a relation of domination between them. Thus, the job of the nietzschean psychologist is, with grounding in the interpretation of the world as power will, to evaluate the various ways of life and make them hierarchical. Therefore, Nietzsche psychological evaluation corresponds to differ and make hierarchical the humans types, understood as symptoms of strength relations, in affirmation, growth, strength and overcome ways of life and negation, decline, weakness and conservation ways of life. This way, it is concluded that Nietzsche psychology is an evaluation exercise of various human kinds, understood as morphology and theory of the power will improvement / Esta disserta??o analisa o conceito de psicologia na filosofia de Nietzsche e sua rela??o com a tipologia e a hierarquia. Inicialmente, verificamos que o sentido da pesquisa psicol?gica de Nietzsche ? alicer?ado sobre o conceito de vontade de pot?ncia, que ? considerado pelo fil?sofo alem?o uma interpreta??o e n?o uma descri??o do mundo. A vontade de pot?ncia tem como caracter?stica principal afirmar a efetividade enquanto um devir de for?as em luta por mais pot?ncia e destituir de verdade as oposi??es metaf?sicas. Estas for?as, ou impulsos, s?o compreendidas enquanto quanta de pot?ncia que se diferenciam e se relacionam com todos os outros quanta de forma a se intensificar. O que diferencia as for?as, portanto, ? a intensidade de pot?ncia. Assim, entendemos a luta das for?as enquanto um processo de domina??o, o que produz conjuntos de impulsos ou hierarquias. O desenvolvimento destas configura??es hier?rquicas de for?as se d? pelo estabelecimento din?mico de mandantes e mandados, ou seja, por rela??es de dom?nio, que se expressam em modos de vida, tipos humanos. Os tipos, entretanto, n?o s?o entendidos enquanto manifesta??es essenciais de um ser, mas sim enquanto sintomas das rela??es das for?as e suas conseq?entes configura??es hier?rquicas. Esses sintomas s?o o objeto da psicologia proposta por Nietzsche, e n?o a alma ou a consci?ncia humana. Os tipos humanos s?o analisados pelo fil?sofo alem?o mediante duas grandes e centrais perspectivas, uma de ascend?ncia (impulsos potentes e fortemente hierarquizados) e outra de decad?ncia da vida (impulsos fracos e an?rquicos). A partir deste aspecto geral da tipologia de Nietzsche, verificamos a imprescindibilidade dos tipos, sendo que para o surgimento de um tipo ? necess?ria a exist?ncia do seu diferenciado, pois h? rela??o de domina??o entre eles. Assim, a fun??o do psic?logo nietzschiano ?, com base na interpreta??o do mundo enquanto vontade de pot?ncia, avaliar os diversos modos de vida e hierarquiz?-los. A avalia??o psicol?gica de Nietzsche, portanto, corresponde a diferenciar e hierarquizar os tipos humanos, compreendidos enquanto sintomas das rela??es de for?as, em modos de vida de afirma??o, crescimento, for?a, supera??o, e em modos de vida de nega??o, de decl?nio, fraqueza e conserva??o. Conclu?mos, desse modo, que a psicologia de Nietzsche ? um exerc?cio de avalia??o dos diversos tipos humanos, entendida enquanto morfologia e teoria do desenvolvimento da vontade de pot?ncia