Spelling suggestions: "subject:"world grade multiorganisation (WTO"" "subject:"world grade partiorganisation (WTO""
11 |
Anticipating pressing issues in trade and climate change policies: a critical analysis of border carbon adjustment measures with WTO lawAdedeji Adedayo Samuel January 2011 (has links)
No description available.
|
12 |
The implementation of countervailing measures in Tanzania: challenges and constraintsNumbi, Theresia Charles January 2013 (has links)
No description available.
|
13 |
Agricultural trade under the multilateral trade system in sub-Saharan Africa: a South African perspective with lessons from BrazilRunick, Alah Fru January 2011 (has links)
No description available.
|
14 |
The implementation of countervailing measures in Tanzania: challenges and constraintsNumbi, Theresia Charles January 2013 (has links)
No description available.
|
15 |
Agricultural trade under the multilateral trade system in Sub-saharan Africa: a South African perspective with lessons from BrazilFru, Runick Alah January 2010 (has links)
Magister Legum - LLM
|
16 |
The implementation of countervailing measures in Tanzania: challenges and constraintsNumbi, Theresia Charles January 2013 (has links)
Magister Legum - LLM
|
17 |
Agricultural trade under the multilateral trade system in sub-Saharan Africa: a South African perspective with lessons from BrazilRunick, Alah Fru January 2011 (has links)
Magister Legum - LLM / South Africa
|
18 |
Anticipating pressing issues in trade and climate change Policies: a Critical analysis of border carbon adjustment measures with WTO LawAdedeji, Adedayo Samuel January 2011 (has links)
Magister Legum - LLM
|
19 |
Anticipating pressing issues in trade and climate change policies: a critical analysis of border carbon adjustment measures with WTO lawAdedeji Adedayo Samuel January 2011 (has links)
Magister Legum - LLM
|
20 |
Deconstructing ‘Emerging Powers’ and ‘Emerging Markets’: India and the United States in Global GovernanceMahrenbach, Laura Carsten 30 September 2019 (has links)
Academic literature and the media offer a variety of monikers for emerging states like Brazil, India and China, most prominently, ‘emerging powers’ and ‘emerging markets’. This article argues the terms used to describe these states create assumptions about their behaviour in global governance (GG). In order to accurately assess the impact of emerging states on international institutions, it is necessary to more systematically examine their current participation in GG. Does the use of power and economic interests in GG negotiations distinguish emerging states from traditional powers, as the ‘emerging’ part of these terms suggests? And can the content of GG negotiations predict the dominance of each factor, as implied by the ‘power/market’ part? This article tackles these questions by comparing the behaviour of one emerging state (India) and one traditional power (the United States) in negotiations at the World Trade Organisation and the United Nations Security Council. The results demonstrate that, while there is clearly something distinctive about at least India’s participation in GG, focussing on power or economic interests alone is insufficient to explain that distinctiveness or its implications for relations between rising and traditional powers in GG.
|
Page generated in 0.1131 seconds