Thesis (Ph. D.)--Brigham Young University. Dept. of Psychology, 2008. / Includes bibliographical references (p. 31-36).

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Michigan, 2002. / eContent provider-neutral record in process. Description based on print version record. Includes bibliographical references (leaves 51-61).

Thesis (M.S.)--University of Michigan, 2002. / Includes bibliographical references (leaves 51-61).

Thesis (Ph. D.)--West Virginia University, 1999. / Title from document title page. Document formatted into pages; contains x, 118 p. : ill. Vita. Includes abstract. Includes bibliographical references (p. 95-108).

Thesis--Lund University, 1992. / Added t.p. with thesis statval Includes bibliographical references.

Thesis--Lund University, 1992. / Added t.p. with thesis statval. Includes bibliographical references.

Research shows Mexican Americans typically have better cardiovascular health than European Americans, despite being relatively economically disadvantaged. Given research indicating the importance of relationship quality on one's health, the present study examined whether certain relationship orientations (e.g. communal or exchange) were more prevalent in different ethnic groups and if these orientations could help explain this Hispanic Paradox. 582 adults were recruited from the community. Participants were primarily European American (40%) and foreign-born Mexican Americans (55%). A cross-sectional designed was used where participants wore 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) monitors and completed self-report measures of relationship satisfaction and relationship orientation. Results indicated that, contrary to predictions, European Americans tended to have more of a communal relationship orientation compared to foreign-born Mexican Americans. As expected however, communal orientation was predictive of higher relationship satisfaction, β = .29, SE = .07, p < .001, 95% CI [.15, .43], and while higher relationship satisfaction predicted lower systolic blood pressure, R2 = .02, β = -.16, SE = .07, p < .05, 95% CI [-.31, -.01], when ethnicity was added into the model this relationship was eliminated and foreign-born Mexican Americans had higher ABP compared to European Americans, β = 4.72, SE = 2.25, p < .05, 95% CI [.29, 9.14]. While there were these important differences, communal and exchange orientations had minimal direct or indirect effects on ABP. Even though communal and exchange relationship orientation don't seem to give us any more information to unravel the Hispanic Paradox, there are important ethnic differences in how we engage in marriage relationships and future research may consider other approaches to examine the health effects of these differences.

Background: In patients with diabetes, high blood pressure is an established risk factor for cardiovascular disease. The aim of this thesis was to explore the associations between blood pressure levels measured with different techniques and during different circumstances, and the degree of cardiovascular organ damage and subsequent prognosis in patients with diabetes. Methods: We analysed baseline data from patients with type 2 diabetes who participated in the observational cohort study CARDIPP (Cardiovascular Risk factors in Patients with Diabetes – a Prospective study in Primary care), and longitudinal data from patients registered in the Swedish national quality registry RIKS-HIA (Register of Information and Knowledge about Swedish Heart Intensive care Admissions). Patients in CARDIPP underwent nurse-recorded, 24-hour ambulatory and non-invasive central blood pressure measurements. Patients in RIKS-HIA had their systolic blood pressure measured upon hospitalisation for acute chest pain. Results: In CARDIPP, nearly one in three patients with office normotension (&lt;130/80 mmHg) were hypertensive during the night (≥120/70 mmHg). This phenomenon, masked nocturnal hypertension, was significantly associated with increased arterial stiffness and increased central blood pressure. Furthermore, nearly one in five CARDIPP patients with office normotension had high central pulse pressure (≥50 mmHg), and there was a significant association between high central pulse pressure and increased carotid intima-media thickness and increased arterial stiffness. Among CARDIPP patients who used at least one antihypertensive drug, those who used beta blockers had significantly higher central pulse pressure than those who used other antihypertensive drugs, but there were no significant between-group differences concerning office or ambulatory pulse pressures. In CARDIPP patients with or without antihypertensive treatment, ambulatory systolic blood pressure levels were significantly associated with left ventricular mass, independently of central systolic blood pressure levels. When RIKS-HIA patients, admitted to hospital for chest pain, were stratified in quartiles according to admission systolic blood pressure levels, the risk for all-cause one-year mortality was significantly lower in patients with admission systolic blood pressure in the highest quartile (≥163 mmHg) than in patients with admission systolic blood pressure in the reference quartile (128-144 mmHg). This finding remained unaltered when the analysis was restricted to include only patients with previously known diabetes. Conclusions: In patients with type 2 diabetes, ambulatory or central blood pressure measurements identified patients with residual risk factors despite excellent office blood pressure control or despite ongoing antihypertensive treatment. Ambulatory systolic blood pressure predicted left ventricular mass independently of central systolic blood pressure. In patients with previously known diabetes who were hospitalised for acute chest pain, there was an inverse relationship between systolic blood pressure measured at admission and the risk for one-year all-cause mortality.

A taxa de controle da hipertensão arterial permanece subótima apesar dos amplos e intensos programas institucionais e o número das novas medicações. A combinação de drogas de diferentes mecanismos de ação vem se tornando uma alternativa para aumentar a redução na pressão arterial (PA) e aumentar seu controle, aumentar aderência ao tratamento e reduzir os eventos adversos. Um estudo fatorial 4X4 foi desenhado para determinar a eficácia e a segurança de telmisartana (T) mais anlodipino (A) em pacientes hipertensos estágios I e II. Pacientes hipertensos adultos (N=1461) estágios I e II (pressão arterial basal 153,212,1 &#8260;101,74,3 mm Hg) foram randomizados para 1 de 16 grupos de tratamento com T 0, 20, 40, 80 mg e A 0, 2.5, 5, 10 mg por oito semanas. A maior redução na média das pressões sistólica e diastólica foram observadas com T 80 mg mais A10 mg (- 26,4 &#8260;20,1 mm Hg; p<0,05 comparados com as monoterapias). A taxa de controle da PA foi também maior no grupo T 80mg mais A 10mg (76,5% [controle total] e 85,3% [controle da PA diastólica ]), e taxa de controle da PA >90% com esta combinação. O edema periférico maleolar foi o evento adverso mais frequente e ocorreu no grupo A 10mg (17,8%), porém, esta taxa foi marcadamente menor quando A foi usada associada com T: 11,4% (T20+A10), 6,2% (T40+ A10), e 11,3% (T80+A10). Um subestudo utilizando a monitorização ambulatorial da pressão arterial (MAPA) foi realizado na fase basal e após oito semanas de tratamento. A maior redução média das pressões nas 24 horas a partir do período basal foi registrada para a combinação de telmisartana 80 mg e anlodipino 10 mg e encontrou-se queda de 22,4/14,6 mmHg, de 11,9/6,9 mmHg para anlodipino 10 mg monoterapia e de 11,0/6,9 mmHg para telmisartana 80 mg (p< 0,001). Além disso, resultados relevantes foram também constatados numa análise post hoc de subgrupos incluindo idosos, obesos, diabéticos tipo 2 e hipertensão sistólica. A resposta anti-hipertensiva da combinação foi semelhante, independente de qualquer característica de cada subgrupo. Estes dados demonstram que telmisartana e anlodipino em combinação oferecem substancial redução e controle nas 24 horas superior às respectivas monoterapias em hipertensos estágios I e II. / The rate of control of hypertension remains suboptimal despite widespread educational programs and the increasing number of novel medications. The combination of drugs with different mechanism of action has become an alternative to improve blood pressure reduction and control, enhance adherence to the treatment and reduce adverse events. This randomized 4X4 factorial study determined the efficacy and safety of telmisartan (T) plus amlodipine (A) in hypertensive patients. Adults (N=1461) with stage 1 or 2 hypertension (baseline blood pressure (BP) 153.212.1 &#8260;101.74.3 mm Hg) were randomized to 1 of 16 treatment groups with T 0, 20, 40, 80 mg and A 0, 2.5, 5, 10 mg for 8 weeks. The greatest leastsquare mean systolic &#8260; diastolic BP reductions were observed with T80 mg plus A10 mg (- 26.4 &#8260;20.1 mm Hg; P<.05 compared with both monotherapies). BP control was also greater in the T80-mg plus A10-mg group (76.5% [overall control] and 85.3% [diastolic BP control]), and BP response rates >90% with this combination. Peripheral edema was most common in the A10-mg group (17.8%); however, this rate was notably lower when A was used in combination with T: 11.4% (T20 &#8260; A10), 6.2% (T40 &#8260; A10), and 11.3% (T80 &#8260; A10). Ambulatory BP monitoring (ABPM) was performed, at baseline and after 8 weeks of treatment; the endpoints of interest were the changes from baseline in 24-hour systolic and diastolic BP. Mean reductions from baseline in 24-hour BP for the combination of the highest doses of telmisartan 80 mg and amlodipine 10 mg were -22.4/-14.6 mmHg versus -11.9/-6.9 mmHg for amlodipine 10 mg and -11.0/-6.9 mmHg for telmisartan 80 mg (p< 0.001 for each comparison. This study also presents most of the relevant results in hypertensive patients and a post hoc analysis of subgroups including elderly, diabetics type 2, systolic hypertension and obese patients. These findings demonstrate that telmisartan and amlodipine in combination provide substantial 24 hour BP efficacy that is superior to either monotherapy in patients with stages 1 and 2 hypertension.

<p>This study examined relationships between 24-hour ambulatory BP and components of the insulin resistance syndrome, and investigated the prognostic significance of 24-hour BP for cardiovascular morbidity in a longitudinal population-based study of 70-year-old men. The findings indicated, that a reduced nocturnal BP fall, nondipping, was a marker of increased risk primarily in subjects with diabetes. A low body mass index and a more favourable serum fatty acid composition at age 50 predicted the development of white-coat as opposed to sustained hypertension over 20 years. Furthermore, cross-sectionally determined hypertensive organ damage at age 70 was detected in sustained hypertensive but not in white-coat hypertensive subjects. In a prospective analysis, 24-hour ambulatory pulse pressure and systolic BP variability at age 70 were strong predictors of subsequent cardiovascular morbidity, independently of office BP and other established risk factors. Isolated ambulatory hypertension, defined as having a normal office BP but increased daytime ambulatory BP, was associated with a significantly increased incidence of cardiovascular events during follow-up. </p><p>Hypertension constitutes part of the insulin resistance syndrome, and is a common and powerful risk factor for cardiovascular disease in elderly. Blood pressure (BP) measured with 24-hour ambulatory monitoring gives however more detailed information and may be a better estimate of the true BP than conventional office BP. </p><p>In summary, these data provide further knowledge of 24-hour ambulatory BP and associated metabolic risk profile, and suggest that the prognostic value of 24-hour ambulatory BP is superior to conventional BP in an elderly population.</p>