The Public Attitude towards Preventive Oncology Examinations The object of this paper is to find out how laic and health professional public uses the potential of preventive oncology examinations and to uncover the barriers in use of these programs from the point of view of the laic and professional public. The public attitude towards preventive oncology examinations is more important these days as the incidence of oncology diseases is growing. Prevention is considered the principal in modern medicine, also from an economic point of view. The attitude of society towards its health is one of problematic public health areas, the attitude of self-responsibility and the underestimated meaning of primary prevention. Moreover, there is a psychological problem related to oncological diseases: the fear of positive findings and the fear of the disease itself which is traditionally connected with incurability, cruel pain and inevitable death. This notion is no longer true. A dictatorial doctor{\crq}s approach to patients in the past has been replaced with cooperative and more equal relation, where the patient takes part in decision making. However, doctors are too busy to find the proper way and proper extent of informing the patient or these doctors often underestimate the importance of a good way of giving this kind of information. This thesis presents current preventive care offered in the Czech Republic and it shows the negative bias towards cancer which is a stumbling block to a more successful fight against oncology diseases. This research was undertaken amongst laic and health public. Quantitative data collection was used in the form of questionnaires. The research file is made up of men and women over 18 years, with or without health occupation. The hypothesis was not proven that laic public use preventive oncology examinations more than health public. The laics use these programs less mostly due to lack of awareness about them. One of the most common obstacles in using preventive programs is the misunderstanding of prevention itself, when people contact a doctor only when they have problems. The results have also shown that laics are not satisfied with the activity of doctors in informing them and that laic public search for information is done less actively. This thesis can be used as a foundation for further discussion about problems of informing the public about preventive programs and for future education of health personnel within oncology matters.

I takt med den teknologi som har expanderat i samhället har organisationer, b.la rekryterings- och bemanningsföretag, med glädje valt att implementera artificiell intelligens (AI) för att underlätta sina arbetsuppgifter på ett kostnadseffektivt sätt. I samband med detta har fördomar och diskriminering varit en stor fråga i relation till AI-drivna rekryteringsprocesser. Arbetet syftar till att undersöka vilka åtgärder organisationer kan ta för att hantera fördomar i AI-drivna rekryteringsprocesser utifrån svenska aktörers föreställningar. Arbetet syftar även till att förstå hur svenska aktörer ställer sig i relation till de etiska överväganden och den etiska processen som bör tas hos organisationer som använder sig av AI-verktyg i rekryteringsprocessen. Vi vill forska vidare kring hur fördomar ska åtgärdas i en AI-driven rekryteringsprocess och utgå ifrån Sverige. Studien har genomförts genom en kvalitativ metod för att få en djupgående insyn och dessutom forma en god relation med respondenterna. Resultatet visar att fokuset ligger på aktörerna i organisationerna i relation till AI-verktygen. Detta är för att övervaka individernas egna fördomar. Det är främst den etiska processen och etiska överväganden som presenteras i arbetet är det som krävs för att organisationer ska kunna hantera eventuella fördomar som kan dyka upp i AI-driva rekryteringsprocesser. / As technology has expanded in society, organizations, such as recruitment and staffing companies, have been happy to implement artificial intelligence (AI) to facilitate their tasks in a cost-effective way. In this context, prejudice and discrimination has been a major issue in relation to AI-driven recruitment processes. The work aims to investigate what measures organizations can take to manage prejudice in AI-driven recruitment processes based on Swedish actors' perceptions. The work also aims to understand how Swedish actors positionthemselves in relation to the ethical considerations and the ethical process that should be taken by organizations that use AI tools in the recruitment process. We want to further research how prejudices should be addressed in an AI-driven recruitment process and start from Sweden. The study has been conducted through a qualitative method to gain an in-depth insight and also form a good relationship with the respondents. The results show that the focus is on the actors in the organizations in relation to the AI tools. This is to monitor the individuals' own biases. It is mainly the ethical process and ethical considerations presented in the work that are what is required for organizations to be able to manage any biases that may emerge in AI-driven recruitment processes.