Virtual-reality neuropsychological tests offer a novel way to assess real-life executive functioning within the context of standardized test conditions whilst maximizing ecological validity. Given the limited empirical evidence base for many of these virtual-reality tests, the current study aimed to further examine the relative ecological validity, sensitivity to brain-injury and diagnostic accuracy of the virtual-reality based Jansari assessment of Executive Functions (JEF). To do this, the test was compared to seven standard tests of executive function, in a New Zealand sample of 27 brain-injured and 28 non brain-injured participants matched for age, gender and education. The JEF’s ecological validity was supported, with JEF total percent scores exhibiting large correlations with participants’ independently reported levels of everyday functioning, as measured by the Dysexecutive Questionnaire: Independent-Rater (DEX-IR) and Patient Competency Rating Scale-Relative (PCRS-R) (both rs = 0.606, p < 0.001). Compared to the standard executive function test variables included in the current study, the JEF’s associations with the everyday functioning measures were the largest, but only significantly larger than the respective correlations of some standard executive function test variables. These results indicated that the JEF is trending towards being relatively more ecologically valid than most of the standard executive function tests included in the study. The JEF also exhibited good sensitivity to brain-injury and diagnostic accuracy for discriminating brain-injured from non brain-injured participants, which was generally consistent with most of the standard tests, but only significantly better than some. These results provide empirical support for the JEF’s clinical utility, particularly in the assessment of brain-injured persons’ functional abilities. It also suggests that both virtual-reality and standard executive function tests have a place in the routine neuropsychological test batteries used to assess brain-injured persons.

Objective: The aim of this study was to examine the impact of social identity, coping style and cognitive impairment, on quality of life and well-being in a group of people with head injury compared to patients with chronic pain. Design: A correlational design using sixty participants recruited from Devon was employed: thirty adults with acquired brain injuries (ABI) were recruited from a charity and thirty adults with chronic pain difficulties from a NHS pain management service. Results: Analysis showed that there was little difference between the two groups on the variables measured. The role of social identity was not associated with better psychosocial outcome or coping style. Maladaptive coping strategies were associated with poorer adjustment in the ABI group and support-seeking strategies were correlated with improved outcomes in the chronic pain group. Objective neuropsychological variables were not associated with coping style, however, a relationship was observed between maladaptive coping styles and self-reported executive functioning. Conclusions: The results add to the literature on social identity, coping and quality of life post-ABI including improved understanding of how cognitive impairment might influence the use of particular coping strategies. The findings are discussed in relation to improved interventions to increase the use of more adaptive coping strategies.

Traumatic brain injury (TBI), also referred to as an acquired brain injury, is caused by damage to the brain as a result of trauma to the head. The following report serves as a resource for patients and families wanting to gain information regarding community integration outcomes after participation in post-acute rehabilitation programs. The goal of the post-acute level of medical care is to increase functionality and serve as a transition for the patient from the rehabilitation facility to life within the community. A thorough examination of community integration after participation in a post-acute rehabilitative program with the use of the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) is provided. After investigation of the available literature, four articles were found to meet inclusion criteria and were included within the review. All studies included met the following criteria. Participants were ages 17 to 65 years old, had a diagnosis of moderate to severe TBI, were enrolled in post-acute rehabilitation, and were assessed with the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ). Overall, the available literature suggests that completion of a program within a post-acute facility does create positive outcomes for the individual with TBI; however, the outcomes are dependent on various factors regarding TBI severity, the administration of intervention, the type of intervention, time post-onset and age of participants at the time of onset. Future research is necessary to provide a more comprehensive view of post-acute rehabilitation and the outcomes that these patients may expect as they begin their road to recovery. / text

This report provides an overview of the adverse effects of the antiepileptic drug topiramate. Specifically, it evaluates the negative cognitive-communication effects of topiramate on individuals with epilepsy and postulates that treating these deficits is within the scope of practice of speech-language pathologists. It begins with a discussion on epilepsy, description of seizures, and the mechanism of action for antiepileptic drugs. It then provides an overview of cognitive communication deficits caused by antiepileptic drugs, including: memory problems, impairments in attention, and executive dysfunction. The final section provides an outline of potentially beneficial treatments a speech-language pathologist may provide to patients experiencing adverse effects from topiramate and how continued research can expand this area of practice. / text

Background: Traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients are often sedated, yet sedation assessment scales have not been thoroughly studied in this population. This project inquiry describes the use of the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) in assessing sedation in TBI patients. Methods: A retrospective, descriptive analysis of 38 ventilated, sedated TBI patients was performed to describe 1) the characteristics of the study TBI population, 2) the use of the RASS to guide titration of sedation medication, and 3) the nursing perspective of a sedation titration protocol that includes the use of the RASS. Results: Prescribed RASS score for the study population was -2; the actual RASS score was -2.04 +/-1.05. The days spent on mechanical ventilation were 3.46 +/- 1.95. The Injury Severity Score (ISS) correlated with sedation titration (r = -0.373; p<.05). The ICD-9 code also correlated with the RASS (r = -0.400; p<0.05). There was no correlation between RASS and sedation titration (r = -0.061; p = 0.717). The majority of nurses perceived that when using the RASS, sedation level did not affect their feeling of accuracy of neurological assessment (56%), and the patient's agitation level did not affect their feeling of accurate neurological assessment (58%). Conclusion: While the degree of injury was associated with the ability of the TBI patient to maintain the prescribed RASS level, there was no association between the RASS score and sedation titration, indicating that in this small study, the RASS did not guide sedation titration in the TBI population. However, the time spent at the prescribed RASS level and days of mechanical ventilation, which was similar to reported norms, suggest that the RASS is an adequate tool for assessing sedation in the TBI population. From the nursing perspective, the use of the RASS was not a barrier in assessing sedation titration. To our knowledge, this is the first study to describe the use of RASS for assessment of sedation in TBI patients. Additional prospective studies are necessary to fully understand the ability of the RASS to guide sedation titration.

A novel cell culture system was designed to serve as a model of neuroinflammation. Neurons, astrocytes, and microglia derived from embryonic and perinatal rat cortical tissue were combined in a three-dimensional hydrogel utilizing a method that facilitated cell maturation and viability. Chemical challenge of the cultures with a broad pro-inflammatory stimulus resulted in the production of inflammatory cytokines and other associated molecules commensurate with the response observed in vivo and in other in vitro systems. It was hypothesized that mechanical deformation of the multitypic neural cell cultures would produce a similar response and thus validate the system as an in vitro model of traumatic brain injury-induced neuroinflammation. Mechanical injury delivered using custom-manufactured culture chambers and injury devices successfully imparted a moderate level of cell death to the cultures. It was determined that a mechanically-induced inflammatory response required chemical stimulation prior to the injury. The research presented here describes the generation and characterization of a novel in vitro culture system and its implementation in experiments designed to model secondary injury mechanisms associated with injury-induced neuroinflammation. The findings of these studies, applications of the culture system, and future research avenues are discussed.

Following a mild head injury (MHI), a person may report a variety of symptoms such as headache, memory disturbance, dizziness, and concentration difficulties. For most persons the symptoms are transient, but some suffer persistent symptoms that can have a major impact on everyday life. It remains poorly understood why some but not others have full recovery after MHI. The aim of this thesis was to investigate outcomes after MHI, with particular focus on neuropsychological functioning, fatigue, and risk of dementia. A related objective was to examine the potential association of a genetic factor, Apolipoprotein (APOE), with MHI outcome. The APOE є4 allele has been associated with unfavorable outcomes after moderate or severe head injury, but little is known about its influence on outcome after MHI. In Study I and II, data from a population-based longitudinal study were used to compare neuropsychological functioning and fatigue before and after MHI. The results from Study I showed a post-injury decline in neuropsychological performance for є4-carriers, whereas the performance remained unchanged for non-carriers. Study II showed an increase in self-reported fatigue after MHI for both є4-carriers and non-carriers, with a more pronounced increase for є4-carriers. In Study III, a case-control study was conducted to examine whether a history of MHI increased the risk of developing dementia later in life. It was found that MHI alone did not increase the risk, but the combination of MHI and APOE є4 was associated with increased risk of dementia. Taken together, the studies generally indicate a positive outcome after MHI, but in combination with APOE є4 even mild head injury may lead to long-lasting negative outcomes. Consideration of pre-injury level of functioning and genetic factors seems critical for a complete understanding of the impact of MHI.

Introduction: Trauma centers (TC) are the only institutions with resources to manage patients with severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). We chose to examine potential barriers to access to TC care for TBI patients. Methods: Administrative datasets were used to evaluate access to TC among patients with severe TBI. We examined triage practices of EMS in TBI. Finally, we analyzed surveys to capture the beliefs, perceptions and knowledge of ED physicians with respect to TBI. Results: 57% of patients in Ontario had any access to a TC following TBI. Of patients who had potential access to a TC from the scene of injury as defined by pre-hospital triage guidelines, 60% of patients were undertriaged. Challenges that ED physicians faced with managing TBI, included lack of beds at TC and difficulty attaining transport resources. Conclusion: Access to TC care for patients with TBI is impeded by patient and system level factors.

The scientific problem of the study Brain concussion is the most common subtype of the post-concussion syndrome in childhood. This is a mild traumatic brain injury that accounts for 80-90℅ of all cases. Individuals who have sustained brain concussion, i.e. mild traumatic brain injury, frequently complain of various symptoms that are commonly defined as the post-concussion syndrome. Such symptoms are headache, dizziness, nausea, attention disorders, memory problems, sleep disturbances, learning problems, fatigue, emotional instability, mood changes, anxiety, fear, etc. – all of these are defined in the International Classification of Diseases. The symptoms of the post-concussion syndrome are non-specific and subjective. Some patients indicate similar symptoms even without having experienced head injury; these symptoms can occur in the presence of other health disorders, such as the fatigue syndrome, neurasthenia, hyperactivity and attention disorders, as well as in cases of anxiety, mood and emotional disorders, and depression. During the last 25 years, over 500 articles on mild traumatic brain injury have been published in psychological literature, and a similar number of publications in medical literature. The results of scientific studies are quite different, and the variety of the results is still inciting heated scientific debates. Some researchers insist that brain concussion has long-tern sequelae. On the other hand, an opinion has emerged that even if... [to full text]

This thesis examines the associations between substance use/ misuse and mental health outcomes among Canadians with a Traumatic Brain injury (TBI). Its primary aim is to explore whether or not individuals with a TBI have higher rates of substance use/misuse and poorer mental health than Canadians without a TBI, and to examine two competing hypothesis that help to explain these behaviours -- the impaired brain functioning and the general coping hypotheses. Drawing on data from the 2009-2010 Canadian Community Health Survey, a nationally representative cross-sectional survey, this research assessed substance use and mental health outcomes among those with a TBI, as well as two control groups: (1) individuals with a back or spinal injury; and (2) healthy non-injured controls. Analyses include descriptive statistics and multivariate regressions (logistic and multinomial) adjusting for a range of injury and socioeconomic variables. Those with a TBI demonstrated significantly elevated rates of binge drinking, illicit drug use, and having an anxiety disorder relative to non-injured Canadians, and provided partial support for both the impaired brain functioning and general coping hypotheses to substance use. These findings indicate that public health policy should increase awareness amongst healthcare and social workers on the necessity of continued follow-up of those who experience a TBI in order to reduce future health conditions and to reduce the likelihood of re-injury.