No description available.

Brain metastases (BM) are the most frequently diagnosed neoplasm to affect the adult central nervous system (CNS), occurring in 20-40% of all cancer patients throughout the course of the disease. The significant advancements to the treatment and control of primary cancers have unfortunately resulted in an increased incidence of BM, however, this complication of cancer progression continues to be met with a dismal outcome and limited therapeutic options. There remains a poor understanding of the several cellular hallmarks of BM, encompassing various molecular, genetic and epigenetic changes that underlay the stages of metastasis, which requires the development of clinically relevant models of metastasis. Our group has previously established the existence of a cancer stem cell/tumor initiating population with patient samples of BM, which established the foundation of this thesis. Thus, I postulate that there exists a subpopulation of cancer stem-like cells, termed brain metastasis initiating cells (BMICs), that is responsible for the initiation of BM and is identifiable by an exclusive subset of genes that regulate self-renewal and metastasis. To support this hypothesis, I established novel experimental models of BM by inoculation of BMICs derived from patient samples of lung-to-brain metastases into intracranial (ICr), intracardiac (ICa), and intrathoracic (IT) routes into NOD/SCID mice. ICr injections validated the presence of a tumor initiating cell (TIC) capacity of BMICs in the secondary environment (brain). From ICa injections I was able to recapitulate macro-metastatic growth, whereas with IT injections I was able to capture the complete metastatic process, from primary lung tumor formation to micro-metastasis growth. Utilizing these models, I determined that the STAT3 pathway and genes SPOCK1 and TWIST2 all contribute to the regulation of BM development, where SPOCK1 may pose as a potential BMIC marker. Further interrogation of the metastatic process utilizing the IT model of BM led to the characterization of “pre-metastasis”, a stage where BMIC cells have crossed the blood-brain barrier and employ mechanisms to invade and seed the neural environment, while simultaneously repressing mechanisms of proliferation and cell growth that would indicate tissue colonization. In summation, I propose a shift in the cancer research paradigm to target the metastatic process itself, to prevent the dissemination of primary tumor cells to the brain. I present models of clinically relevant models of human BM that have proved to be reliable as platforms to interrogate the process of BM, providing insight into the stage of pre-metastasis as a novel therapeutic window into BM prevention and possible extension of patient survival. / Thesis / Doctor of Philosophy (PhD)

No description available.

No description available.

Background: Advancement in diagnosis and treatment of various cancer entities led to an increasing incidence of brain metastases in the last decades. Surgical excision of single and multiple brain metastases is one of the central treatment options beside radiotherapy, radiosurgery and chemotherapy. To evaluate the benefit of surgery with/without whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) in single brain metastases and the influence of image guidance for brain metastases resection, 104 patients were retrospectively evaluated for post-operative outcome. Patients and Methods: Between January 1994 and December 1999 150 patients were surgically treated for brain metastases at the Department of Neurosurgery at the Technical University of Dresden. Outcome could be evaluated in 104 patients with respect to special treatment strategies and survival time (69 patients with single and 35 patients with multiple lesions). Results: Most metastases originated from primary lung and breast tumours. Karnofsky performance score improved on average by 10 after surgery. The extent of the extracerebral tumour burden was the main influence on survival time. Patients’ age below 70 years was combined with prolonged survival time (median survival time, MST: 4.5 months vs. 7 months). Patients with solitary cerebral metastasis had a MST of 16 months, whereas patients with singular lesions had a MST of 7 and 4 months, depending on the extent of the extracerebral tumour growth. Additional post-operative WBRT with 30 Gy was combined with an increase in MST in patients with single brain metastasis (surgery + WBRT: MST 13 months; surgery only: MST 8 months). In addition, the rate of recurrent cerebral tumour growth was distinctly higher in the non-WBRT group. Neuronavigation did not significantly improve post-operative survival time. In 80% of patients extracerebral tumour growth limited patients’ survival. Conclusion: Surgery is an initial treatment option in patients with single and multiple brain metastases especially with large tumours (> 3 cm). Post-operative WBRT seems to prolong survival time in patients with single brain metastasis by decreasing local and distant tumour recurrence. Neuronavigational devices permit a targeted approach. Multiple processes can be extirpated in one session without prolonging the hospitalisation time for the patient. However, neuronavigational devices cannot assure complete tumour resection. / Hintergrund: Fortschritte in der Diagnostik und Therapie von Krebserkrankungen haben in den letzten Jahrzehnten zu einer steigenden Inzidenz von Hirnmetastasen geführt. Die chirurgische Entfernung singulärer und multipler Hirnmetastasen stellt neben Strahlentherapie, Radiochirurgie und Chemotherapie eine zentrale Therapieoption dar. Um die Wertigkeit der chirurgischen Behandlung von singulären Hirnmetastasen mit/ohne Ganzhirnbestrahlung (WBRT) und den Einfluss der Neuronavigation zu untersuchen, wurden 104 Patienten retrospektiv bezüglich ihres postoperativen «Outcomes» untersucht. Patienten und Methoden: Zwischen Januar 1994 und Dezember 1999 wurden 150 Patienten mit Hirnmetastasen in der Klinik für Neurochirurgie der Technischen Universität Dresden operiert. Das «Outcome » von 104 Patienten konnte bezüglich der verschiedenen Behandlungsstrategien und Überlebenszeit ausgewertet werden (69 Patienten mit singulären und 35 Patienten mit multiplen Läsionen). Ergebnisse: Die meisten Metastasen stammen von Lungen- und Mammakarzinomen. Nach operativer Behandlung verbesserte sich der Karnofsky-Index um durchschnittlich 10. Das Ausmaß der extrazerebralen Tumormasse stellte die Haupteinflussgröße für die Überlebenszeit dar. Ein Lebensalter unter 70 Jahren war mit einer verlängerten Überlebenszeit verbunden (mittlere Überlebenszeit, MÜZ: 4,5 Monate vs. 7 Monate). Patienten mit solitären Metastasen hatten eine MÜZ von 16 Monaten, während Patienten mit singulären Läsionen, abhängig vom Ausmaß des extrazerebralen Tumorwachstums, eine MÜZ von 7 bzw. 4 Monaten aufweisen. Eine zusätzliche postoperative WBRT mit 30 Gy zeigte eine Verbesserung der MÜZ bei Patienten mit singulären Hirnmetastasen (OP + WBRT: MÜZ 13 Monate; OP allein: MÜZ 8 Monate). Gleichzeitig war die Rate der zerebralen Tumorrezidive in der Nicht-WBRT Gruppe deutlich höher. Die postoperative Überlebenszeit wurde durch Verwendung der Neuronavigation nicht signifikant verbessert. In 80% der Patienten limitierte das extrazerebrale Tumorwachstum die Überlebenszeit. Fazit: Bei Patienten mit singulären und multiplen Metastasen stellt die initiale chirurgische Tumorentfernung eine Therapiealternative insbesondere bei großen Tumoren (> 3 cm) dar. Eine postoperative WBRT scheint die ÜLZ der Patienten mit singulären Hirnmetastasen durch Begrenzung des Auftretens von Rezidivtumoren zu verlängern. Die Neuronavigation erlaubt eine gezielte Zugangsplanung. Multiple Prozesse können einzeitig operiert werden, ohne dass die postoperative stationäre Verweildauer verlängert wird. Hingegen wird eine radikale Tumorentfernung durch Verwendung der Neuronavigation nicht gewährleistet. / Dieser Beitrag ist mit Zustimmung des Rechteinhabers aufgrund einer (DFG-geförderten) Allianz- bzw. Nationallizenz frei zugänglich.

INTRODUCTION: Cancers of the gastrointestinal tract are the second most prevalent malignancy with 289,610 new cases last year and the second most common cause of cancer-related death with 150,000 deaths last year in the United States. Prognosis for patients with these malignancies is poor and worsens significantly once the cancer has metastasized to the brain. We evaluated the outcome of patients following Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SRS) for brain metastases (BM) in individuals with GI cancers to identify safety and effectivity of treatment and we assessed prognostic factors that affect tumor control and survival. OBJECTIVES: By the conclusion of this session, participants should be able to: 1) Identify an effective treatment for brain metastases from GI cancers in terms of increasing survival; 2) Identify which treatment provides the best local and distant control of CNS disease; 3) Discuss the effects of different prognostic factors on local control and survival. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of 58 brain metastases from 18 consecutive patients who underwent SRS treatment at BIDMC between 2006 and 2013. 11/18 patients underwent prior microsurgical resection for their metastases and 3/18 patients had undergone Whole Brain Radiation Therapy (WBRT). Overall Survival (OS), Local Control (LC), Distal control (DC), and prognostic factors such as age, number of brain metastases (BM), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), Recursive Partition Analysis (RPA) and Disease Specific Graded Prognostic Assessment (Ds-GPA) class were evaluated. RESULTS: The median overall survival (mOS) for the entire cohort was 14 months after the diagnosis of BM. The mOS for patients receiving only SRS, Surgical Resection + SRS, and WBXRT + SRS were 8 months, 18 months, and 13 months respectively. The difference in overall survival between treatment groups was not found to be statistically significant. Increasing number of BM was a factor shown to negatively influence survival. Local control was achieved in 55% of lesions after SRS, and in 75% of lesions that were surgically resected followed by SRS boost to the resection cavity. The difference in local control between SRS alone vs. Surgery + SRS was found to be statistically significant (p = 0.013). CONCLUSION: With a higher overall survival and significantly better local control rates, Surgery followed by SRS boost to the resection cavity should be considered as the treatment of choice in this specific subgroup of cancer patients as this study shows that they benefit from this more aggressive treatment option.

No description available.

Brain metastasis (BM), the most common tumor of the central nervous system, occurs in 20-36% of primary cancers. In particular, 20-40% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) develop brain metastases, with a dismal survival of approximately 4-11 weeks without treatment, and 16 months with treatment. This highlights a large unmet need to develop novel targeted therapies for the treatment of lung-to-brain metastases (LBM). Genomic interrogation of LBM using CRISPR technology can inform preventative therapies targeting genetic vulnerabilities in both primary and metastatic tumors. Loss-of-function studies present limitations in metastasis research, as knocking out genes essential for survival in the primary tumor cells can thwart the metastatic cascade prematurely. However, transcriptional overexpression of genes using CRISPR activation (CRISPRa) has the potential for overcoming dependencies of gene essentiality. In this thesis, we created and utilized an in vivo genome-wide CRISPRa screening platform to identify novel genes, that when overexpressed, drive LBM. We have developed a patient-derived orthotopic murine xenograft model of LBM using a patient-derived NSCLC cell line (termed CRUK cells) from the Swanton Lab TRACERx study. We introduced a human genome-wide CRISPRa single guide RNA (sgRNA) library into non-metastatic and pro-metastatic lung cancer CRUK cells to achieve 500X representation of each sgRNA in the activation library. We then injected the cells into the lungs of immunocompromised mice and tracked lung tumor development and BM formation. Upon sequencing primary lung tumors and subsequent BM, we will identify enriched sgRNAs which may represent novel drivers of primary lung tumor formation and LBM. To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first in vivo genome-wide CRISPR activation screen using patient-derived NSCLC cells to help elucidate drivers of LBM. This work serves to provide a framework to gain a deeper understanding of the regulators of BM formation which will hopefully lead to targeted drug discovery that will ultimately be used in clinical trials to help eradicate brain metastasis in NSCLC patients. / Thesis / Master of Science (MSc) / Brain metastasis, or the spread of a primary cancer from another organ to the brain, is the most common adult brain tumor. Brain metastases can arise after the treatment of primary tumors and are only detected in the clinic at a highly malignant stage. Current treatments for brain metastasis consist of surgical removal and palliative chemoradiotherapy, which fail to fully eliminate the brain tumor. Over 20% of cancer patients develop brain metastases, with lung, breast, and skin cancers leading as the top three sources of metastasis. In particular, 40% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer develop brain metastasis, with survival of only 4-11 weeks once diagnosed without treatment, and 16 months with treatment. As systemic therapies for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer are becoming increasingly effective at controlling primary disease, patients are ironically succumbing to their brain tumors. This highlights a large unmet need to develop novel targeted therapies for the treatment of lung-to-brain metastases (LBM). Functional genomic tools provide the opportunity to investigate the genetic underpinnings of LBM. With the advent of gene editing technologies, we are able to overexpress various genes and observe the impact genetic perturbations have on tumor initiation, growth, and metastasis. In this thesis, we devised a pre-clinical animal model of LBM that could be used to study genetic drivers of LBM using a gene overexpression tool such that one gene per tumor cell gets activated. We are then able to model the disease trajectory from a lung tumor to brain metastasis development using patient samples in our animal model and identify genes that, upon overexpression, drive LBM. This platform will lead to potential therapeutic targets to prevent the formation of LBM and prolong the survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

No description available.

No description available.