Bakgrund: Intrahospitala transporter innebär att lämna tryggheten på intensivvårdsavdelningen och möta farorna i sjukhusets korridorer. Syfte: Denna studie har syftat till att öka förståelsen för patientsäkerhetsarbete i samband med intrahospitala transporter genom att belysa effekten av en checklista i ett före-efter förhållande utifrån tre perspektiv, kommunikation mellan professionerna, patientsäkerhet och arbetsflöde. Metod: Intervjuer utfördes på en intensivvårdsavdelning på ett universitetssjukhus i Mellansverige. Intervjuerna analyserades sedan med kvalitativ innehållsanalys i enlighet med Elo och Kyngäs (2008). De nio informanterna inkluderades från samtliga professioner som använder checklistan. Resultat: Patientsäkerheten har stärkts av att checklistan förbättrar förutsättningarna till dialog mellan intensivvårdsläkare och intensivvårdssjuksköterska kring patientens tillstånd inför transport. Den har även ökat riskmedvetenheten vid intrahospitala transporter. Slutsats: Studien visar att checklistan fungerat tydliggörande i ansvars- och rollfördelning vid transporter. Brist på resurser utgör det största hindret till att efterleva checklistans höga ambitioner. / Background: The process of intrahospital transports is one of leaving the safety of the intensive care unit and venturing out into the relative danger zone of the hospital corridors. Aim: This study aims to increase the understanding of patient safety and the effects of the use of a checklist from three different perspectives; communication between professions, patient safety and workflow. Method: Interviews were conducted in an intensive care unit situated in a university hospital in the middle of Sweden. The Elo and Kyngäs (2008) method of qualitative content analysis was used to analyse the interviews. The nine participants were from three different professions of the workforce in the ward were included. Results: Patient safety increased using the checklists by improving the possibilities for communication between doctors and nurses about the patient’s condition before transportation. The checklist also increased hazard awareness during intrahospital transports. Conclusion: The study shows that the checklist improves cooperation and division of responsibility during transport. The lack of resources is the main obstacle hindering full implementation of the checklist.

Bakgrund: WHO:s checklista är avsedd för operationskliniker världen över som vill reducera komplikationer i samband med operativa ingrepp. Studier har visat att checklistan inte bara förbättrade patientsäkerheten utan också bidrog till bättre teamarbete och kommunikation mellan personal. Få studier finns om hur patienter som är vakna under operation påverkas av att man använder checklista. Syfte: Syftet med denna pilotstudie var att belysa hur ett antal operationssjuksköterskor upplevde att använda checklistan inför vaken patient. Metod: En pilotstudie med kvalitativ ansats där datainsamlingen genomfördes i form av halvstrukturerade intervjuer med tre operationssjuksköterskor. Det samlade intervjumaterialet analyserades med hjälp av kvalitativ innehållsanalys. Resultatet: Resultatet presenterades utifrån sex kategorier som beskrev hur operationssjuksköterskorna upplevde att använda checklistan inför vaken patient; Anpassning, Information, Kommunikation, Obehag, Oro och Säkerhet. Slutsats: Operationssjuksköterskorna upplevde säkerheten i arbetet kring patienten som den viktigaste aspekten med att använda checklista. Samtidigt var man dock tveksam till att använda den inför vaken patient. Detta beskrevs i form av oro för patienten och en egen obehags-känsla. Operationssjuksköterskorna funderade kring möjligheter med förändringar i en sådan situation, exempelvis genom information om checklistan preoperativt, att tala tyst eller vid sidan om patienten. Inga tydliga förslag gavs om hur checklistan skulle anpassas till vaken patient. / Background: The WHO checklist is intended for operating clinics around the world to reduce the number of complications combined with surgery. Studies have shown that the checklist not only does improve patient safety but also contributes to better teamwork and communication between staff. Little is known how the checklist affects non sedated patients undergoing surgery. Aim: The aim of this study was to illustrate how a couple of theatre nurses experience the use of checklist in presents of non sedated patient. Method: The study hade a qualitative approach and semistructured interviews were made involving three theatre nurses. The collected material was analyzed by content analysis. Result: The result was presented six categories describing how the theatre nurses experienced using the checklist in presents of non sedated patient; adjustment, information, communication, anxiety, discomfort, safety. Conclusions: The theatre nurses experienced safety as the most important issue in using the checklist. At the same time they were doubtful to use it in presents of non sedated patients. They described it as a feeling of discomfort and an unpleasant feeling that they felt. The theatre nurses suggested that more preoperative information conserning the checklist and other adjustments could make it easier to use the checklist in front of non sedated patients. However, they gave no specific suggestions how to adjust the checklist to non sedated patients.

This study focuses on agile systems development teams which work remotely during the COVID pandemic. Purpose: To identify the missing topics in informal communication and the relationship between them and team collaboration. Method: Survey is used to collect nominal data, ordinal data and qualitative data of text. 101 people participated in the survey. Analysis: An independent T-test, Spearman's rank correlation and content analysis are conducted. Result: There is a lack of discussion topics on personal information (e.g. a deeper insight into a person’s private life), social conversations (e.g. greetings and questions about weekend plans), support (e.g. giving tips and asking for help) and complaints (e.g. frustration regarding work) when they are teleworking during the COVID pandemic. Conversational topics on personal information, social conversations, support and complaints have a weak positive association with teamwork. Topics on personal information and social conversations are more strongly associated with teamwork than topics on support and complaints. The most striking results are the lack of social conversations in the age group between 30 and 39 years and those whose years of experience are between one and three years. Discussion and Conclusion: It is possible that the magnitude of topic shortages changes depending on the age and years of experience of team members, which may be a factor in how well team collaboration works. It may also become a factor determining the quality of team collaboration that causes teams to take proactive steps to increase the amount of informal communication. This study proposes to increase the amount of topics of personal information and social conversations and take serious measures to increase the amount of social conversations if the team is based on many team members whose age is between 30 and 39 years and whose years of experience are between one and three years.