<p><strong><em>Objective:</em></strong> The IFRSs are getting more popularity all over the world. IAS 39 is one of the most sophisticated standards included in the IFRS jurisdiction, which mainly addresses the recognition and measurement of financial instruments and hedge accounting. When these instruments had been <em>off-balance sheet</em> hidden, accounting scandals were the consequences. Capturing these risky instruments in the body of the financial statements, according to IAS 39, implies diverse accounting choices where the selection is tied to managers' judgment.</p><p>The Swedish GAAPs have been criticized in the literature of being less conservative than the US GAAPs. Sweden as an EU member has mandated the adoption of IFRSs in the consolidated financial statements of all listed companies, since 2005. No published research has studied the effect of IAS 39 diverse accounting practices on <em>de facto</em> harmonization and comparability in Sweden. The current study fills this gap in the literature, and goes beyond to investigate whether the selected accounting choices are associated with the industry sectors.</p><p><strong><em>Methods:</em></strong> A sample of 50 companies listed in NASDAQ, Stockholm in the financial and the industrial sectors is selected. Secondary data are obtained from the 2007 annual reports of the selected companies. Six accounting practice categories are detected under the standard. Herfindahl (H) index and Chi- square test are applied on the data.</p><p><strong><em>Results:</em></strong> The results show a relatively low harmonization and comparability in most of the accounting practices, and variation in associations between accounting practices and sectors. This infers to the risk of producing non-comparable financial statements that may distort the value of accounting numbers, the content of financial statements and negatively affect market participants.</p><p><strong><em>Conclusion:</em></strong> Much effort is still needed to enhance <em>de facto</em> harmonization and comparability of financial reporting. Further research is also motivated in order to develop a harmonization theory that support standard setters in revising the existing standard to eliminate inconsistencies in accounting choice selection and enhance comparability.</p><p> </p>

<p>National tests have an important function in ensuring reliable grades, and grades at many schools function as a sorting instrument to upper secondary school and higher education, the purpose of this essay has been to investigate if the assessment of English national tests is fair and consistent. The purpose has also been to find out if teachers consider the national test as an important basis when determining a student’s final grade.  This particular investigation showed that national tests are assessed differently by different teachers. The investigation also showed that final grades are strongly influenced by national test grades.  It is of great importance that the assessment of the national test is fair and consistent and that the result of the assessment will be the same no matter who carries it out; however the result shows that it is open to question if the national test can be considered to contribute to comparability and fairness of grades.  The assessment differences indicate otherwise.</p>

Objective: The IFRSs are getting more popularity all over the world. IAS 39 is one of the most sophisticated standards included in the IFRS jurisdiction, which mainly addresses the recognition and measurement of financial instruments and hedge accounting. When these instruments had been off-balance sheet hidden, accounting scandals were the consequences. Capturing these risky instruments in the body of the financial statements, according to IAS 39, implies diverse accounting choices where the selection is tied to managers' judgment. The Swedish GAAPs have been criticized in the literature of being less conservative than the US GAAPs. Sweden as an EU member has mandated the adoption of IFRSs in the consolidated financial statements of all listed companies, since 2005. No published research has studied the effect of IAS 39 diverse accounting practices on de facto harmonization and comparability in Sweden. The current study fills this gap in the literature, and goes beyond to investigate whether the selected accounting choices are associated with the industry sectors. Methods: A sample of 50 companies listed in NASDAQ, Stockholm in the financial and the industrial sectors is selected. Secondary data are obtained from the 2007 annual reports of the selected companies. Six accounting practice categories are detected under the standard. Herfindahl (H) index and Chi- square test are applied on the data. Results: The results show a relatively low harmonization and comparability in most of the accounting practices, and variation in associations between accounting practices and sectors. This infers to the risk of producing non-comparable financial statements that may distort the value of accounting numbers, the content of financial statements and negatively affect market participants. Conclusion: Much effort is still needed to enhance de facto harmonization and comparability of financial reporting. Further research is also motivated in order to develop a harmonization theory that support standard setters in revising the existing standard to eliminate inconsistencies in accounting choice selection and enhance comparability.

This thesis contributes to the reporting of Intellectual Capital (IC) and includes four papers on the recognition and comparability of IC. IC, often called intangibles in the financial reporting discourse, reflects resources which create value in and for organizations. These resources originate out of human knowledge and capacities, which, through their uniqueness, can provide competitive advantages for an organization. As something intangible, IC is a challenge to report as it is not only a matter of reporting value that has been or can be realized but also a matter of reporting the creative processes focusing on present and future value. This challenge is a particular reflection of how and when to recognize IC as something reportable and is intensified if IC needs to be comparable. The thesis draws on the distinction that is made between mandatory and voluntary reporting when discussing recognition and comparability. Three of the studies relate to firms’ practices of reporting through annual reports. Since these reports contain both mandatory and voluntary sections, reflecting reporting both as a requirement as well as a possibility, different aspects of reported IC is emphasized. Using a wider range of documents, the fourth study relates to the enforcement of the mandatory reporting standards which the firms are required to apply in their reporting. As the overall finding in the thesis, three categories of recognition of IC are developed which reflect differences related to whether the reporting is mandatory, voluntary or, as this thesis argues, something in between. Reflected through the categories, comparability interrelates differently with recognition. The thesis contributes with the description of IC as a foundation for reporting which makes the matter of recognition of IC in reporting complex. It further highlights that through recognition of IC reporting is continuously expanding wherefore it is not possible to identify an end of an already expanded and demarcated reporting regime. In this expansion, by settling what is mandatory reporting through requested characteristics, voluntary reporting is defined.

Sustainable actions in the footwear industry are growing in importance and sustainability communication has an important role for a changed shoe industry. The sustainability communication must be clear, credible and comparable as well as accessible in order to be communicated successfully.

National tests have an important function in ensuring reliable grades, and grades at many schools function as a sorting instrument to upper secondary school and higher education, the purpose of this essay has been to investigate if the assessment of English national tests is fair and consistent. The purpose has also been to find out if teachers consider the national test as an important basis when determining a student’s final grade.  This particular investigation showed that national tests are assessed differently by different teachers. The investigation also showed that final grades are strongly influenced by national test grades.  It is of great importance that the assessment of the national test is fair and consistent and that the result of the assessment will be the same no matter who carries it out; however the result shows that it is open to question if the national test can be considered to contribute to comparability and fairness of grades.  The assessment differences indicate otherwise.

Comparability is a desirable qualitative characteristic of financial information and critical for financial statement users' ability to identify and understand similarities and differences in financial results among reporting entities. Yet, little research explicitly considers either the determinants or benefits of comparability because of difficulty in identifying and measuring the theoretical construct of comparability. Further, the widespread global adoption of IFRS, a relatively homogenous set of accounting standards, is expected to increase comparability among companies that operate in different national jurisdictions. However, prior studies that examine the average impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on comparability find mixed results. I hypothesized that the impact of mandatory IFRS adoption on comparability varies with managers' reporting incentives and differences between countries' domestic standards and IFRS. Using listed firms from 34 countries, I documented that comparability under non-IFRS domestic standards is higher in countries that provide strong reporting incentives (i.e. countries with strict enforcement regimes or high earnings transparency). Additionally, I found an increase in comparability following IFRS adoption (relative to a control sample of non-adopters) in countries that provide strong reporting incentives or with large domestic GAAP-IFRS differences. In contrast, I found evidence of a decrease following IFRS adoption (relative to a control sample of non-adopters) in countries with weak reporting incentives or with small domestic GAAP-IFRS differences. Finally, I showed that changes in comparability surrounding adoption are positively associated with changes in the quality of firms' information environments.

Ainda existem muitas controvérsias práticas e acadêmicas sobre o modo adequado de se regular a contabilidade (Cole et al., 2012). Por um lado, autores como Sunder (2009), Schipper (2003) e d\'Arcy (2000) defendem que os padrões mais flexíveis (aqueles baseados em princípios) aumentam a variabilidade do produto final dos relatórios financeiros e como consequência diminuem a sua comparabilidade. Agoglia et al. (2011) e Collins et al. (2012), por outro lado, encontraram evidências empíricas exatamente do contrário, ou seja, os padrões baseados em princípios geraram resultados menos discrepantes, o que poderia sugerir uma maior comparabilidade dos relatórios financeiros. Nesta pesquisa, o objetivo foi avaliar diretamente o impacto de um movimento de flexibilização regulatória contábil sobre a comparabilidade dos relatórios financeiros. O país escolhido para análise foi o Brasil, pois ele foi um dos poucos países no mundo em que houve um processo radical de mudança regulatória de um padrão totalmente baseado em regras com forte vinculo com a contabilidade fiscal (Lopes, 2011) para um padrão baseado em princípios com maior necessidade de julgamento por parte dos gestores que elaboram os relatórios financeiros. Para medir a comparabilidade foi utilizado o modelo de similaridade da função contábil desenvolvido por DeFranco et al. (2011) e outras medidas alternativas para análise de sensibilidade. Para medir o impacto da flexibilização regulatória foram utilizados dois modelos. O primeiro modelo separou o período de transição por ano e comparou os resultados obtidos nos anos 2006 a 2012 individualmente com o período de referência 2004 e 2005. O segundo modelo separou o antes e o depois do impacto da adoção das normas internacionais que ocorreu em 2010. As companhias analisadas foram todas as de capital aberto que apresentaram dados completos para o período analisado e possuíam, no mínimo, uma companhia par dentro do mesmo setor de atividades econômicas. Os resultados obtidos comprovam que, na média, não houve uma diminuição significativa do nível de comparabilidade within-country durante o período de transição regulatória nem com o impacto da adoção do padrão IFRS no Brasil. Pelo contrário, houve um aumento da comparabilidade genuína com a adoção do padrão internacional no Brasil para as companhias analisadas nesta pesquisa. Para as medidas alternativas de comparabilidade, a uniformidade de movimentação do lucro (covariação) foi a única que apresentou variação negativa significativa durante o período de transição. Isto reforça o resultado da pesquisa e mostra que enquanto houve uma diminuição no nível de uniformidade dos relatórios financeiros a comparabilidade não diminuiu, contrariamente, aumentou. A principal conclusão deste trabalho é que aumentar o poder discricionário do gestor por meio da flexibilização dos padrões contábeis não diminui a comparabilidade dos relatórios financeiros. / There are still many practical and academic controversies about the proper way to regulate accounting (Cole et al., 2012). On the one hand, authors like Sunder (2009), Schipper (2003) and d\'Arcy (2000) argue that more flexibility allowed in standards (those based on principles) increases the variability of the end product of financial reporting and as a consequence their comparability is reduced. Agoglia et al. (2011) and Collins et al. (2012), on the other hand, found empirical evidences showing exactly the opposite, standards based on principles generated less variability in accounting outcomes, which could suggest a greater comparability of financial reporting. In this research, the objective was to directly assess the impact of a movement in accounting regulatory easing on the comparability of financial reporting . The country chosen for analysis was Brazil because it was one of the few countries in the world where there has been a radical process of regulatory change of a fully rule-based with a strong bond with the tax accounting (Lopes, 2011) for a standard based on principles with greatest need of judment for managers who prepare financial reports. To measure the level of comparability in financial reports this research choosed the model similarity of accounting function developed by DeFranco et al. (2011). To measure the impact of regulatory flexibility two approaches were used. The first approach separated the transition period by year and compared the results obtained in the years 2006 - 2012 with the reference period of 2004 and 2005. The second approach separated the adoption of IFRS in Brazil in two periods, before and after 2010. The companies surveyed were all public corporations with stocks traded in brazilian\'s stock market that had complete data and had at least one pair within the same company sector of economic activities. The results shows that, on average for the companies analysed in this research, there was no significant decrease in the level of within-country comparability during the regulatory transition in Brazil. They also show that impact of adopting IFRS was positive rather than negative. This fact proves that there was na increase in genuine accounting comparability with the adoption of international standard in Brazil for the companies analyzed in this research. For the alternative measures of comparability, the earnings co-movement was the only one that showed a significant negative change during the transition period. This reinforces the results of this work and shows that while there was a decrease in the level of uniformity of financial reporting, the genuine comparability has not decreased, in contrast, it rose. The main conclusion of this work is: the increase in the discretion of the manager through the flexibility of accounting standards does not reduce the comparability of financial reporting .

In this study, I examine whether the mandatory adoption of International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) in a country where local Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) is of similar quality to IFRS is associated with changes in the comparability of financial statements. I also investigate the sources of any changes in the comparability of financial statements. I use data from South Africa, where, word for word, prior to the mandatory adoption of IFRS, local GAAP was the same as IFRS, and enforcement remained unchanged. I use two different measures of comparability, one based on accounting data (accruals-cash flow measure) and the other based on both accounting data and market data (earnings-return measure). I compare South African firms with two different groups, namely other mandatory IFRS adopters and non-adopters. My data show evidence of an increase in the comparability of the financial statements of South African firms with those of both adopters (both measures) and non-adopters (the earnings-return measure) following the mandatory adoption of IFRS. In additional analysis, I found a global increase in the comparability of firms' financial statements that is consistent with market changes unrelated to IFRS adoption as one of the sources of the increase in comparability. Moreover, an incremental increase in the comparability of the financial statements of South African firms after the mandatory adoption of IFRS, relative to the increase in the comparability of the financial statements of non-adopting firms, is consistent with benefits from using the IFRS "label" and with the expanded IFRS network as sources of increased comparability. / Thesis (PhD)--University of Pretoria, 2017. / Accounting / PhD / Unrestricted

No description available.