One of the main control mechanism used by employment, school facilities or addictology services is testing for addictive substances. This tool is very important for diagnostic institutes and other organizations providing care and basic needs for entrusted children and adolescents in institutional and protective education. Main purpose of mentioned institutions is to ensure health and safety of their wards, maintain supervision of their school attendance and supervision of their compliance with internal regulations of the school and the institution. Main goal of the study is to map the versions of the standard process across all diagnostic institutes in the Czech Republic, compare these versions with legislative and afterward create recommendations and proposals, which could lead to change or make the work of employees in institutional education more effective. Study was conducted in a form of qualitative research, which was carried out through a series of interviews. The interviews were based on semi-structured type. All of the respondents gave their consent for creating a recording of their interview. For the study recordings were transcribed and edited. Furthermore, an analysis of legislation and internal regulations of diagnostic institutes was performed. The main research questions focused on...

Syftet med denna studie är att analytiskt granska och undersöka de legala aspekter som uppstått i samband med kriget mot terrorismen. Bush-administrationens juridiska argumentation kring praktikerna indefinite detentions och enhanced interrogation techniques står i fokus. Genom att använda en juridisk metod undersöks det huruvida argumentationen är förenlig med internationell rätt för att fastställa praktikernas legala status. Vidare utrönas det genom detta förfarande huruvida praktikerna kan uppnå en juridisk kodifiering internationellt och på sätt bringa ett paradigmskifte av rättfärdiga metoder inom den moderna krigsföringen. Den juridiska analysen påvisar att praktikerna ej är förenliga med internationell rätt och strider mot regleringar inom både den humanitära rätten och mänskliga rättigheter. Slutsatsen är att den amerikanska juridiska argumentationen av indefinite detentions och enhanced interrogation techniques ej kan uppnå någon juridisk kodifiering internationellt och således ej heller bringa något paradigmskifte av rättfärdiga metoder inom den moderna krigsföringen. / The purpose of this study is to analytically review and examine the legal aspects arising in connection with the war on terrorism. The Bush-administration’s legal arguments on the practices indefinite detentions and enhanced interrogation techniques are in focus. By using a legal method it will be examined whether the arguments is consistent with international law to determine the practices legal status. Furthermore, it is ascertained thru this procedure whether the practices can achieve a legal codification internationally and in that way bring a paradigmatic shift of righteous methods in modern warfare. The legal analysis demonstrates that the practices are inconsistent with international law and in conflict with regulations in both humanitarian law and human rights. The conclusion is that the American legal reasoning regarding indefinite detentions and enhanced interrogation techniques cannot achieve any legal codification internationally and thus not bring any paradigmatic shift of righteous methods in modern warfare.